-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 04/25/1999 12:10:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< The greatest threat to sustainable energy for the 21st century is the
global
 warming scare. Climate-related pressure to artificially constrain use of
 fossil fuels is likely to subside in the short run as a result of political
 constraints and lose its "scientific" urging over the longer term. Yet an
 entrenched energy intelligentsia, career bureaucrats, revenue-seeking
 politicians, and some Kyoto-aligned corporations support an interventionist
 national energy strategy based on incorrect assumptions. A "reality check"
 of the increasing sustainability of conventional energy, and a better
 appreciation of the circumscribed role of backstop technologies, can
 reestablish the market momentum in energy policy and propel energy
 entrepreneurship for the new millennium. >>

Anything the CATO Institute tells us just has to be "Right."  Prudy

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to