-Caveat Lector- Well, there is a "social movement" afoot, One should expect attempts to co-op, by the same basic chess pieces.

It is up to us, hoi polloi, to convince octopus operatives of their unwarranted actions and move history onwards to the utmost of futures.

Right now, there seems to be an operation that is looking towards the upcoming Halloween. Did ya ever notice that it changes from Daylight Savings Time to Standard Time just before Halloween. Now one might think, that gee, all those children out late at night Trick or Treating, etc., that it would be just as much of a reason to let the change happen after Halloween and help kids and parents on Halloween.

A supposition, that has occurred to me is that the cultic octopoidal elite deviants would rather have Halloween clocks be "correct," possibly for "magickal reasons.  An interesting factoid about former CIA director Bill Colby's death was his disappearance before Halloween and the finding of his body after. Bill had spilt quite a few secrets held dear to the "cultic" ones.

Like I have said, I don't know, just some speculation.

This year the "change" doesn't happen until the morning of the 31st at 2:00 am, so the "disorientation" factor will be very high.

Also, there does seem to have been some sort of HAARP, groundwave or some sort of "disturbance" that has been setting of at 1:00 am PDT or the true midnight for near a month now. It has been affecting sleep of some I know. Whether is just nothing or no, quien sabe? I am just filing it.

But with the election roiling the left, right, and center and all of our hopes and fears -- the psychic, let alone nervous energy is at a high level. The level of propaganda, acrimony and division is rife with "potential."

Their appears to be no sinister placing of this years date as the "change" happens on the last Sunday morning of October.

Here are some quotes from Wikipedia:




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time

Origin

It is sometimes asserted that DST was first proposed by
Benjamin Franklin in a letter to the editors of the Journal of Paris [1] (http://webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/franklin3.html). However, the article was humorous; Franklin was not proposing DST, but rather that people should get up and go to bed earlier.
It was first seriously proposed by
William Willett in the "Waste of Daylight" [2] (http://webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/willett.html), published in 1907, but he was unable to get the British government to adopt it despite considerable lobbying.
Canadian railroad engineer Sir Sandford Fleming invented and proposed Standard Time, which first divided the world into one-hour time zones, in 1878. It was not widely adopted by the railways until 1883, and even then it was not supported by any governmental body. However, it relieved the problem of scheduling train stops at separate stations set to their own time based on the local positioning of the sun, and it soon became widely accepted by railroads, freight clients, and passengers.
[
edit]

History

The idea of daylight saving time was first put into practice by the
German government during the First World War between April 30, 1916 and October 1, 1916. Shortly afterwards, the United Kingdom followed suit, first adopting DST between the 21st of May, 1916 and the 1st of October, 1916. Then on March 19, 1918 the United States Congress established several time zones (which were already in use by railroads since 1883) and made daylight saving time official (which went into effect on March 31) for the remainder of World War I. It was observed for seven months in 1918 and 1919. The law, however, proved so unpopular (mostly because people rose earlier and went to bed earlier than in modern times) that the law was later repealed!
Daylight saving time was reinstated in the
United States on February 9, 1942, again as a wartime measure to conserve resources, this time in order to fight World War II. This remained in effect until the war began winding down and the requirement was removed on September 30, 1945. From 1945 to 1966, there was no federal law about daylight saving time. States and localities were free to observe daylight saving time or not. The Uniform Time Act of 1966 mandated that daylight saving time begin nationwide on the last Sunday of April and end on the last Sunday of October. Any state that wanted to be exempt from daylight saving time could do so by passing a state law, provided that it exempts the entire state. The law was amended in 1972 to permit states that straddle a time zone boundary to exempt the entire area of the state lying in one time zone. In response to the 1973 energy crisis, daylight saving was begun earlier in both 1974 and 1975, commencing on the first Sunday in January in the former year and the last Sunday in February in the latter. The law was amended again in 1986 to begin daylight saving time on the first Sunday in April, to take effect the following year.
[
edit]

Criticism of DST

DST is not universally accepted; many localities do not observe it. Nevertheless, proponents claim that DST helps more than it hurts. The primary claim is that it reduces energy consumption. Opponents claim that there's not enough benefit to justify needing to adjust clocks twice per year. The disruption in sleep patterns associated with setting clocks forward, and thereby "losing" an hour, correlates with a spike in the number of severe auto accidents, as well as emotional trauma.
Some campaigners in
Britain would like the country to stay on British Summer Time (BST) all year round, or in other words, adopt Central European Time and abolish BST. Alternatively, some would like Britain to adopt Central European Time and jump forward another hour during the summer (adopting a Single/Double Summer Time from Britain's perspective). This would make winter evenings longer, thereby reducing traffic accidents and cases of seasonal affective disorder. Opponents point to the longer hours of darkness on winter mornings, especially in Scotland, which might well cause an increase in road accidents. It has even been suggested that Scotland should be placed on a different time zone from the rest of the UK, which, unlikely though it may sound, would be possible as the UK Parliament could legislate to put the UK forward an hour, and then the Scottish parliament could put Scotland back onto GMT.
DST is particularly unpopular among people working in
agriculture because the animals do not observe it, and thus the people are placed out of synchronization with the rest of the community, including school times, broadcast schedules, and the like.
DST is a long-standing controversy in
Indiana, not only as an agricultural state, but also because the meridian separating the eastern and central time zones divides the state. In the past, neighboring communities sometimes ended up one or even two hours apart. In the current compromise, the state has three kinds of time zones: 77 counties, most of the state, are on Eastern Standard Time but do not use DST; 5 counties near Chicago and 5 counties in the southwestern corner of the state are on Central Standard Time and do use DST; and 2 counties near Cincinnati, Ohio and 3 counties near Louisville, Kentucky are on Eastern Standard time but do use DST.
[
edit]

DST around the world

For fairly obvious reasons, DST is a
temperate zone practice: day lengths in the tropics do not vary enough to justify DST. Hawaii, the only U.S. state in the tropics, does not observe DST. However, Mexico has adopted DST nationwide, even in its tropical regions, because of its increasing economic ties to the U.S. The Mexican state of Sonora does not observe DST because it borders on a U.S. state that also does not observe DST (Arizona).
The amount of the time shift varies, but one hour is the most common. The dates of the beginning and ending of DST also vary, but it commonly begins in the Northern Hemisphere at 2:00 AM on either the first Sunday in April or the last Sunday in March, and ends at 2:00 AM on the last Sunday in October. In the Southern Hemisphere, the beginning and ending dates are switched (thus the time difference between e.g. the UK and Chile may be 3, 4 or 5 hours).


In a message dated 10/27/04 1:20:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


-Caveat Lector-

On Oct 27, 2004, at 2:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Virginia Deane Abernethy, Ph.D., anthropologist, author, Population
> Politics

i'm delighted to see that the racial eugenics / population reduction
movement is getting ever more promotion by the 911 truth movement!

abernethy is on the editorial advisory board of The Occidental
Quarterly, a pro-racist, pro-eugenics publication.

http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/toq-advisoryboard.html

tellingly, she was a colleague of the late garret hardin, a member of
the club of rome. (fyi, another current club of rome member on this
petition is localist econominst & former ford foundation official,
david korten, who has taken a lead in the CoR's outreach programs,
under the direction of CoR president and notable ally of ahmed chalabi,
HRH prince hassan).� one of abernethy's main theses vis a vis
population is that raising living standards and development in the
third world should be rejected as a means to slow population growth,
and that full development in the third world should be abandoned in any
case based on the claim that the world's resources are already "running
out".

TOQ's statement of principles includes the following:

> 2. Race informs culture; it is the necessary precondition for cultural
> identity and integrity. In 1950 whites represented 30 percent of the
> world's population. If current trends persist, this number will
> plummet to 8 percent by 2050. In the United States, whites are
> projected to become a minority of the national population in less than
> fifty years. The result will impoverish not only their descendants but
> the world in general and will jeopardize the civilization and free
> governments that whites have created.
>
>� 4. The European identity of the United States and its people should
> be maintained. Immigration into the United States should be restricted
> to selected people of European ancestry.
>
>� 5. The perfectibility, let alone the equality, of man is not possible
> and is not a legitimate political aspiration. Political efforts to
> achieve or enforce perfectibility and equality invariably demand an
> unacceptable degree of coercion and result in unnecessary and unjust
> pain, suffering, and social disorder.

http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/

TOQ supports the draper / pearson / manhattan institute circles of
depopulation & racial eugenics promoters who gave us 'mankind
quarterly' and 'the bell curve'... (conincidentally (?), a founding
member of MQ, charles galton darwin, seems to have become a poster boy
for some 'peak oil' pundits...)

one certainly couldn't critique this petition for failing to cover the
whole political "spectrum"...

-brian

www.ctrl.org


To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om 2">

Reply via email to