-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

Hegelian Dialectics and Conspiracy
As I speak tonight, try to relate what I say to your observation of our own 
country, and our Western (once Christian) allies. As we examine the philosophy 
behind national and international affairs, we discover it has a common purpose 
and source in every major nation, with the exception of perhaps China.

At first sight, militant national power appears to be the major force in 
history; but if there is a power which can bring nations into military 
conflict, it is a superior power. Is there such a power, and where, if 
anywhere, is it located?

There is a relationship between Finance, Centralization, and World Hegemony. 
Until the outbreak of the First World War, money appeared to be a mere 
mechanism. But the arrangements made to finance the war reveal that the money 
system was in fact the vehicle of a POLICY, and that that policy was the 
CENTRALIZATION of power leading progressively to World Government. Prior to the 
outbreak of war, Great Britain was the CENTRE (but not the BEING) of world 
financial control; with the war, financial control was transferred to New York 
and from there used to dismantle the British Empire which, by reason of British 
traditions and the Anglo-Saxon character, had been the great barrier to World 
Dominion by those operating through the world financial system. The fall of the 
British Empire was a FINANCIAL accomplishment, not a military one. But the 
terms of 'peace' imposed on 'victorious' Britain are those which might have 
been expected following military DEFEAT.

But the Power which emerged into the open in this century had its birth long 
before that. It was incubated (but not conceived) in the Secret Societies of 
Europe, appeared briefly in the French Revolution, and spread to Britain in the 
form of Fabianism, and to America in the form of various Socialist societies. 
Following the first phase of the war, it openly took over Russia, and since has 
visibly spread as International Communism until it has taken over the greater 
part of the globe.

Current history, which looks episodic, is in fact the culminating stages of a 
very long-term policy moving internationally, but visible only in the long 
perspective of time.

What we think we see is often an illusion intentionally presented, like the 
conjuror who would have you to believe he holds an orange in his right hand, 
when it is actually in his left hand. Citizens of the world, whether their 
sympathies are left-wing or right-wing, monarchist or republican, have been 
used as pawns in their game of Hegelian psychology by the hidden hand that 

In reality, the orange is in neither left nor right hand. The Hegelian 
dialectic process is the notion that conflict creates history. (See brain2.htm 

>From this axiom it follows that controlled conflict can create a predetermined 
>history. For example when the Trilateral Commission discusses 'managed 
>conflict', as it does extensively in its literature, it implies the managed 
>use of conflict for long run predetermined ends - not for the mere random 
>exercise of manipulative control to solve a problem.

The dialectic takes this Trilateral 'managed conflict' process one step 
further. In Hegelian terms, an existing force (the thesis) generates a 
counterforce (the antithesis). Conflict between the two forces results in the 
forming of a synthesis. Then the process starts all over again: Thesis vs. 
antithesis results in synthesis.

It's like two companies with undisclosed common stockholding submitting 
competitive tenders for a project on a site for which their stockholder has 
different plans altogether. Whatever the outcome, the stockholder is in 
beneficial control.

Here are some illustrations of the Hegelian Dialectic process:-
                                                   The Globalist Elite          
                                         |                       |              
                             Thesis                  Antithesis                 
                               |                             |                  
                  Marxist Russia              Nazi Germany                      
                          |        Conflict of      |                           
                     |      World War II   |               1917 Bolshevik 
Revolution           1933 Hitler's accession to power               USA 
Constructs and subsidizes    USA constructs and subsidizes               Soviet 
Union 1920 -- present       National Socialism                                  
                         |       |                                              
|               Post World War II United Nations, a step towards New World 
__________________________________________        Since World War II:-          
                                         The Globalist Elite                    
                               |                       |                        
                   Thesis                  Antithesis                           
                     |                             |                            
        Marxist Russia              Capitalist West                             
                  |                 (no longer Free Enterprise)                 
                              |       Conflict of        |                      
                         |       Cold War         |               USA 
Constructs and subsidizes      USA constructs and subsidizes               
Soviet Union
                |         Germany, Japan, Israel, Foreign                       
                                    |         Aid, Korea, Vietnam, etc.         
                                                  |       |                     
     Synthesis                                                               |  
             Detente, Glasnost, Perestroika, destruction of the Berlin Wall     
          and supposed collapse of Soviet Union. One step closer to NWO.        
                         __________________________________________        At 
the present day:-
                                                   The Globalist Elite          
                                         |                       |              
                             Thesis                  Antithesis                 
                               |                             |                  
                   Communist China      USA and/or CIS (Russia)                 
                               |      Conflict           |                      
                          |                            |               West see 
Russia as under threat from China and unite with CIS                            
                               |       |                                        
         |                                                        Synthesis     
 World Order                                 
__________________________________________        In our adversarial 'two' 
party politics:-
                                                   The Globalist Elite          
                                         |                        |             
                              Thesis                  Antithesis                
                                |                           |                   
               Aust. Liberal Party        Aust. Labor Party                     
                         or                        or                           
       (US. Republican Party)     (US. Democratic Party)                        
                        |     Conflict of       |                               
                 | general election |                                  
Multimillion dollar borrowing of campaign funds                                 
                          |       |                                             
      |               Australia becomes a Republic so that new Constitution 
permits               usurpation of States' sovereignty and National 
Sovereignty               surrendered for Asian regionalization in NWO.         
                        __________________________________________        In 
recent Sydney news:-
                                                   The Globalist Elite          
                                         |                          |           
                                Thesis                  Antithesis              
                                 |                               |              
           NSW State Government       Aborigine activists in Redfern            
Developers/financiers                                               | Conflict 
of street     |                                               | violence and 
arson |              Desire to evict and resettle            Free relocation of 
Aboriginie              Aboriginie residents outside           tenants to brand 
new homes.              Metropolitan Sydney prior to          Profit from 
redevelopment of              2000 Olympic Games. Beautify       site and 
subsequent sale of              and redevelop as commercial
 slums transformed to luxury              or inner-city apartments for          
  inner-city apartments, shopping              wealthy Chinese with a view      
    and commercial complex whilst              to huge increase in rates.       
        retaining some ownership.                                               
            |       |                                                           
 Profit                                                               |         
                                       |               A FURTHER step towards 
the destruction of Australia's once               homogeneous society with 
development of largest Asian Colony               to date in the heart of 
__________________________________________        In the religious world of 
                 Constantine and Rome                                           
      |                            |                                           
Thesis                  Antithesis                                              
   |                            |                                          
Athanasius                Arius                                                 
|     Conflict of       |                                                 |     
 theology        |                                       Trinitarianism         
  Unitarianism                                                 |                
            |                                          Conflict of human 
reasoning                                       culminating in First Nicea 
Profit                                                               |          
                                      |               Recognition of carnal 
reasoning against Christian faith and               its institutionalization 
under State patronage and control.               Eventual outlawing of 
Christian faith and the persecution of               true saints by the false 
church until today, true Christianity               is accounted heresy and 
ridiculed by most Bible students.                                 
__________________________________________        In the religious world of 
Papal Rome:-
                     The Globalist Elite                                        
           |                          |                                         
     Thesis               Antithesis                                            
  |                                  |                               Roman 
Catholicism          Protestantism                                              
|         Conflict of         |                                              |  
       theology           |                              Counter Reformation    
      Reformation                                     Great harlot          
Prostitute daughters                                       Vatican II          
World Council of Churches                                          End of 
Gentile Dispensation
 Beast unites with Image to the Beast                               Incarnation 
of Pope      Apostasy                                                           
|       |                                                            Profit     
                           |               Union of churches to stop Communism 
and rule New World Order                                 

In his novel "Conningsby", Disraeli wrote "the world is governed by very 
different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the 

Woodrow Wilson said, "Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the 
field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of 
something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, 
so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better 
not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it".

Now for our text. In Matthew 16:6, Jesus said, "Take heed and beware of the 
leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees".

This is another illustration of Hegelian dialectics or logical argument. In 
other words, the mark of the beast: wisdom against faith.

Here were two denominations each inspired by Satan, whose purpose was to 
contest the Laws and Ordinances of the Old Testament. One was the THESIS, the 
other its ANTITHESIS. Neither could agree on the Word or recognize It 
manifested before them. The SYNTHESIS through the apostasy of both parties was 
their own damnation through rejection and crucifixion of Messiah. Even their 
high priest declared, "His blood be upon us and upon our people". And It has 
been ever since.

The synthesis sought by the Establishment is called the New World Order. 
Without CONTROLLED conflict, this New World Order will not come about. RANDOM 
individual actions of persons in society would not lead to this synthesis, it 
is ARTIFICIAL, therefore it has to be created. And this is being done with the 
calculated, MANAGED, use of conflict. And all the while this synthesis is being 
sought, there is no profit in playing the involved parties against one another. 
(Hence World War I was postponed three times until the pawns were in their 
predetermined places). This also explains why the International bankers backed 
the Nazis, the Soviet Union, North Korea, North Vietnam, etc., against the 
United States. The 'conflict' built profits while pushing the world ever closer 
to One World Government.

The Establishment is ruled by elite, secret societies. Their operations must be 
seen and explained in terms of the Hegelian dialectic process. Their operations 
cannot be explained in terms of any other philosophy; therefore they cannot be 
described as "right" or "left", Marxist or Capitalist. However, one group is 
secular, and another is religious. The religious force is the Roman Catholic 
church. We are familiar with their place in history and in prophecy. Our 
teaching will consider the secular group and its objectives which is ALL of 
these and NONE of these.

In Hegelian philosophy the conflict of political 'right' and political 'left', 
or thesis and antithesis in Hegelian terms, is essential to the forward 
movement of history and historical change itself. Conflict between thesis and 
antithesis brings about a synthesis or new historical situation.

Our descriptive world history in the West and Marxist countries consists only 
of description and analysis within a political framework of 'right' or 'left'. 
For example, historical work published in the West looks at communism and 
socialism either through the eyes of financial capitalism, or Marxism. While 
historical work published in Russia looks at the West only through Marxist 
eyes. However, there is another frame of historical analysis that has never 
been utilized. This would employ a framework of Hegelian logic, to determine if 
the elites who control the State use the dialectic process to create a 
predetermined historical synthesis.

The current world situation was deliberately created by elitist power more or 
less by manipulation of 'right' and 'left' elements. Over the past 100 years or 
so they've developed both right and left elements to bring about a NWO. 
Right-left situations have been deliberately created and then placed in 
conflict mode to bring about a synthesis.

Since the rise of Kant (who stressed reason and experience) in German 
philosophy, we can identify two conflicting systems of philosophy; and 
therefore two opposing ideas of the State, society and culture.

In the U.S., the British Commonwealth and France, philosophy is based on the 
individual and the rights of the individual. Whereas in Germany from the time 
of Kant, through Fichte and Hegel up to 1945, basic philosophy has been 
universal brotherhood, rejection of individualism, and general opposition to 
Western classical liberal thought in almost all of its aspects. German idealism 
was the philosophical basis for the work of Karl Marx and the LEFT Hegelians, 
as well as Bismarck, Hitler and the RIGHT Hegelians. The paradox is that Hegel 
gave a theoretical basis not only to the most conservative of German movements, 
but also to most of the revolutionary movements of the 19th century. Both Marx 
and Hitler have their philosophical roots in Hegel.

>From the Hegelian system of political thought, alien to most of us in the 
>West, stem such absurdities as the State seen as the "March of God through 
>history", that the State is also God, and the only duty of a citizen is to 
>serve God by serving the State, that the State is Absolute Reason and citizens 
>can only find freedom by worship and utter obedience to the State. Other 
>Hegelian absurdities have thoroughly penetrated our education system. But that 
>is for another topic.

>From this system of Hegelian philosophy comes the historical dialectic, "that 
>all historical events emerge from a conflict between opposing forces." These 
>emerging events are above and different from the conflicting events. Any idea 
>or implementation of an idea may be seen as THESIS. This thesis will encourage 
>emergence of opposing forces, known as ANTITHESIS. The final outcome will be 
>NEITHER thesis nor antithesis, but a SYNTHESIS of the two forces in conflict.

In DAS KAPITAL, Marx posed capitalism as thesis and communism as antithesis. 
What has been completely ignored by historians, including Marxists, is that any 
clash between these forces cannot lead to a society which is either capitalist 
or communist but must lead to a society characterized by a SYNTHESIS of the two 
conflicting forces. The clash of opposites must in the Hegelian system, bring 
about a society neither capitalist nor communist. Moreover, in the Hegelian 
scheme of events, this new synthesis will reflect the concept of the State as 
God, and the individual as totally subordinate to an all powerful State. This 
was the thought we encountered in "Hubris".

The function of a Parliament or a Congress is for Hegelians, psychology. Merely 
to allow individuals to feel that their opinions have some value, and to allow 
a government to take advantage of whatever wisdom the 'peasant' may 
accidentally demonstrate. This is so obvious in Australian politics today. As 
Hegel puts it:

"By virtue of this participation, subjective liberty and conceit, with their 
general opinion, (individuals) can show themselves palpably efficacious and 
enjoy the satisfaction of feeling themselves to count for something."

War, the organized conflict of nations for Hegelians, is only the visible 
outcome of the clash between ideas. Following the outbreak of war in 1939, 
Social Creditor C.H. Douglas said, "The international money marketeers care no 
more for the immolation of the peoples of a continent that for the death of a 
sparrow"; and "unfortunately the world is in the grasp of theorists to whom 
misery and death of millions is a grain of sand beside the working out of their 
designs". As John Dewey, the Hegelian darling of the modern educational system, 
puts it:

"War is the most effective preacher of the vanity of all merely finite 
interests, it puts an end to that selfish egoism of the individual by which he 
would claim his life and his property as his own or as his family's."

Above all, the Hegelian doctrine is the divine right of States rather than the 
divine right of kings. The State for Hegel and Hegelians is God on earth:

"The march of God in history is the cause of the existence of states, their 
foundation is the power of Reason realizing itself as will. Every state, 
whatever it be, participates in the Divine essence. The State is not the work 
of human art, only Reason could produce it."

For Hegel the individual is nothing, the individual has no rights, morality 
consists solely in following a leader.

Compare this to the spirit and letter of the Australian Constitution: "WHEREAS 
the people" grant the State some powers and reserve all others to the people. 
Whilst it recognizes no State denomination, it places the Christian God as its 
Head, unlike Hegel's "the State is God on earth." To elitists like The Order in 
the USA, The Group in the UK, Illuminati in Germany, and the Politburo in 
Russia, the State is supreme, and a self-appointed elite running the State acts 
as God on earth.

Manipulation of 'left' and 'right' in domestic USA, where Wall Street supports 
both Republicans and Democrats, as their Australian associates support Liberal 
and Labor, is duplicated in the international field where 'left' and 'right' 
political structures are artificially constructed and collapsed in the drive 
for a one-world synthesis. In fact, 'left' and 'right' are two controlled 
factions of the Illuminati.

Textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental results of 
conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiations into physical conflict 
comes about, according to these books, after valiant efforts to avoid war. 
Unfortunately, this is nonsense. War is always a deliberate creative act by 

The Tribunals that investigated Nazi war criminals were careful to censor any 
records of Western Assistance to Hitler. And Western textbooks on Soviet 
economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid 
given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western 
firms and banks.

Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by the politically or 
economically deprived against an autocratic state. Western textbooks never 
reveal the evidence that revolutions need finance; and the source of the 
finance in many cases traces back to Wall Street.

Of course our Western history is every bit as distorted, censored, and largely 
useless as that of Hitler's Germany, the Soviet Union or Communist China. No 
Western foundation will award grants to investigate their own benefactors. Few 
Western scholars can survive by researching such theses, and publishing houses 
daring to accept such manuscripts suffer intimidation or even violence from the 
Establishment. The recent trials of David Irving with his erstwhile publisher 
bears this out.

Like the true revelation of God's Word, largely unrecorded history tells a 
story contrary to what we've been taught to regard as truth. A story of the 
deliberate creation of war, the knowing finance of revolution to change 
governments, and the use of conflict to create a New World Order.

We will explore thesis and antithesis in the development and construction of 
the Soviet Union (thesis) and Hitler's Germany (antithesis). We will also 
explore the continuation of this dialectic conflict into the last few decades, 
specifically in China today and show that the purpose is to create a new 
synthesis, a New World Order along Hegelian lines where the State is Absolute 
and the individual can find freedom only in blind obedience to the State.

Something we have to do is to break an almost universal mindset, that 
Communists and Capitalists are bitter enemies. This Marxist axiom is a false 
statement and for a century has fooled academics and investigators alike. The 
key to understanding modern history is that elitists had as close working 
relations with both Marxists and Nazis as they have with Marxists and 

After World War II the world stage was changed. After 1945 it became the Soviet 
Union on one side versus the United States on the other. The first dialectical 
clash led to the formation of the United Nations, an elementary step on the 
road to world government. The second dialectical clash led to the Trilateral 
Commission and REGIONAL groups, like Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia from "1984," 
and more subtly to efforts for a merger of the United States and the Soviet 
Union. Definitely Orwellian! Various stooges 'fronting' for the faceless elite 
agitate for a new Constitution that will enable them to usurp Australia's 
sovereignty and absorb us into an Asian Bloc, ruled from Beijing or Tokyo.

Western Christian civilization, whose domain was very nearly the world, had 
expanded without notable recession until in 1914. In 1917 it began a retreat 
that has since been uninterrupted (Matthew 24:7-8). Huge amounts of Western 
property, much of it in land, factories and mines, has been stolen by 
revolutionaries, or abandoned by Western owners. Political and strategic losses 
are of more lasting and fundamental importance. But it is not politically 
correct to criticize its demise today.

World history since 1917 reflects an application of Hegelian dialectics. Russia 
was taken over by mainly Askenazi Jews from the East End of New York who 
established Socialism, later called Communism. This Revolution was planned by 
international financiers and financed by Wall Street. Indeed Woodrow Wilson 
sent US troops who took over and held the Siberian Railroad from 1918 to impede 
the transport of grain and raw materials to Germany, and so far as possible 
prevent commerce, until the Soviets were sufficiently established to take over. 
US troops remained until 1920.

Thus we see governments need censorship to classify certain files for thirty or 
fifty years after events, to protect the living from charges of treason, and to 
conceal the past intrigues and long term goals of the hidden elite who call the 

Soviet Russia's first Five Year Plan was devised by Detroit-based Albert Kahn, 
Inc., and Russia's industry financed by Wall Street. Thus was the THESIS: 
Communism, established.

But the MARXIST version of the Hegelian dialectic poses financial CAPITALISM as 
thesis, and Marxist revolution as antithesis. An obvious puzzle in this Marxian 
statement is the nature of the SYNTHESIS presumed to evolve out of the clash of 
these OPPOSITES. It cannot be Communism!

Lenin's statement that the State will wither away at the synthesis stage is 
nonsensical. In fact, as all contemporary Marxist states testify, in practice, 
the State becomes all powerful. The immediate task of "the revolution" is to 
convey all power to the State, and modern Marxist states operate under a 
constant paranoia that power may indeed pass away from the hands of the State 
into the hands of the people.

If MARXISM is posed as the thesis and NATIONAL SOCIALISM as antithesis, then 
the most likely SYNTHESIS becomes a Hegelian NEW WORLD ORDER, a synthesis 
evolving out of the clash of Marxism and national socialism. Moreover, in THIS 
statement those who FINANCE and MANAGE the clash of opposites can REMAIN in 
control of the synthesis.

The elite have artificially encouraged and developed BOTH revolutionary Marxism 
and national socialism while retaining some control over the nature and degree 
of the conflict, therefore it is able to determine the evolution and nature of 
the New World Order.

Out of war and revolution come opportunities for profit by corporations under 
the control and influence of these elites. In the two World Wars, the Korean 
and Vietnamese Wars, there are numerous examples of American banks and 
corporations trading with the enemy.

The antithesis, National Socialism, is no more. The Cold War is over, so we're 
taught the thesis of Russian Communism is also dead. This leaves the once 
Christian now Capitalist West. Since we are 'friends', the West now finances 
Russia at government level, increasing profits and reducing risks for the 
international bankers.

To prevent history coming to its end (he says tongue in cheek) the elite 
introduced a new dialectic process. World War II was the culmination of the 
dialectic process created in the 1920s and 1930s. The clash between 'left' and 
'right', the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, led to creation of a synthesis - 
the UN, and a start towards regional groupings in NATO, the Common Market, 
UNESCO, Warsaw Pact, SEATO, CIS, then the Trilateral Commission. A start 
towards New World Order.

World War II left the Elite with the necessity to create a new dialectical 
situation to promote MORE conflict to achieve a higher level synthesis.

The source of this process may be found in US National Security Memorandum No. 
68 of 1950 which opened up the road for Western technology to build a more 
advanced Soviet Union - which it did in the 1960s and 1970s with computerized 
space-age technology. In true Hegelian tradition it simultaneously argued for 
massive expansion of US defenses - on grounds of a future Soviet threat. (Which 
would not have been possible without the transfer of Western technology). Thus 
the internationalists profited from Soviet and US purchases.

The principal devices used to control the dialectic process in the past two 
decades have been (a) information, (b) debt and (c) technology. These have 
become diluted over time. They don't work as well today as they did in the 

By and large, control of INFORMATION has been successful because the 
intellectual world is still locked into a phony verbal battle between 'left' 
and 'right', whereas the real struggle is the battle between individual freedom 
and the encroaching power of the absolute State. The Soviet Union, with its 
tight censorship, presents a strictly Marxist ('left') orientation to its 
citizens. The enemy is always the 'fascist' United States. The West is a little 
more complicated but not much more so. Whereas financial power is used to 
control politics, information is used to control human perceptions.

Brethren, to the elites, we're 'human cattle' participating in a double blind 
laboratory experiment. By God's Grace, the elect can't be deceived on the 
revealed Word of God, which, as a sharp two-edged sword, divides asunder these 

In the West the choice is basically between a controlled 'left-oriented' 
information, and a controlled 'right-oriented' information. The conflict 
between the two CONTROLLED groups keeps an apparent informational conflict 
alive. Unwelcome facts that fall into either camp are conveniently forgotten. 
Books that fall into either camp can be effectively neutralized because they 
will incur the wrath of both 'right' and 'left'. The faster the cattle run, the 
faster the treadmill takes them to nowhere.

Any publication which points up the fallacy of the Left-Right dichotomy is 
ignored . . . and citizens keep trooping down to the polling booths in the 
belief they have a 'choice'. Witness Australian elections. The Labor and 
Liberal Parties frankly admit their policies are common.

The second control mechanism is DEBT. We all understand that. If Marxist 
countries have to import technology, they need to earn or borrow Western 
currencies to pay for it. Loans have to be repaid. So to some extent, debtors 
are under control of creditors, unless they default. And therein lies the 

The third control mechanism is TECHNOLOGY. If technology to advance to more 
efficient production levels has to be imported, then the recipient is always 
kept away from the 'state of the art'. The weakness for the elite is that 
military technology does not require a market system.

The dialectic plan therefore misfired for several reasons. Firstly, the 
informational blackouts were not as successful as they expected. Control of 
Time and Newsweek gave them dominance over weekly news summaries. The TV 
networks have been able to orchestrate viewers reactions - to some extent - by 
propaganda in movies. (For example, when I went to the giant IMAX movie 
theatre, I noticed propaganda for the 'Greenhouse' HOAX had been subtly 
included in the narrative). But the elite were unable to restrict individuals 
and relatively small non-academic groups, almost always outside Universities 
(whose curricula they control) from exploring obvious inconsistencies in 
Establishment propaganda. These groups, often mistakenly termed 'left' or 
'right,' are outside the manipulated left-right spectrum.

Secondly, the debt weapon was over-used. Communist countries are now saturated 
with debt to Western bankers.

Thirdly, while technology is still a useful weapon, there are distinct 
stirrings among independent analysts of the danger posed for the Western world 
by building enemies.

We've spent 50 years arming our enemies, and developing their industries with 
our technology. And under the LIMA Agreement, have transferred our 
manufacturing infrastructure offshore. Last year China purchased the whole of 
New Zealand's forests "in perpetuity" for US$80 million donated by Australia. 
No wonder our Aborigines are caught up in Communist ideas when we give money to 
foreign nations who consider us "barbarians," and to others, who have the 
Northern half of our continent colored green and labeled "South Irian" in their 
school atlases and on military maps.

Brother Branham said the West was trying to buy her friends, and when we can no 
longer afford to bribe them we will discover they are our enemies (This Day 
This Scripture, 16:132; Influences, 7:40; Genesis 3:15).

Even without interference by the international bankers the consequences are 
alarming, both for America and for the Western world. The West has a brief 
opportunity between the decline of Russia and the rise of China. Europe has 
wasted most of the present decade by pursuing the dangerous IRRELEVANCE of the 
single currency. (No doubt a ploy of her fairweather banking friends). America 
has wasted it on a shallow prosperity; even the recovery hasn't greatly 
strengthened the US economy. Neither Europe nor America is prepared for the 
global competition of the next century. For America, the progressive shift of 
wealth and power to Asia will be humiliating, and perhaps destabilizing.

Consequently, in today's world we can identify two facts in construction of a 
new dialectic. First, cautious reinforcement of the Marxian arm - for example: 
Marxist Angola got a green light, Marxist Grenada got a red light.

Second, the construction of a completely new arm, that of Communist China, 
itself Marxist, but with conflict potential for the Soviet Union. Major efforts 
are in progress, only partly revealed in the press, to create a new superpower 
in conflict mode with the Soviet Union. This is the new antithesis, replacing 
Nazi Germany.

American involvement in China began with Wall Street's intervention into Dr. 
Sun Yat Sen's revolution of 1911. During World War II the US helped the Chinese 
Communists into power. The decision to build Communist China as a new arm of 
the dialectic was made under Richard Nixon and executed by Henry Kissinger and 
George Bush.

By the turn of the century, Communist China will be a "superpower" built by 
American technology and skill, presumably for conflict with Russia. What then 
is left for the USA but an 'accommodation' with the CIS to set up a world 

"And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and 
the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the East might be 
prepared" (Revelation 16:12). The drawing-away of the Holy Spirit from 
apostatising Western (once Christian) civilization gradually diminished our 
invisible barrier and defence of faith in the Word. Thus the pagan ways of the 
kings of the East were entertained and adopted in place of faith. Foreign aid, 
intermarriage, immigration and preferential tariffs began. We have since 
transferred our manufacturing industries to these strange people. With no 
manufacturing we have unemployment and no self-reliance in the event of 
hostilities. Furthermore, we fall further under obligation to the foreign 

The Hegelian dialectic is being employed to secure and sustain absolute world 
power and authority to an elite. We have fallen into a Hegelian trap and don't 
know it. bb970219.htm

Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion 
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
Archives Available at:

<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to