Dear Professor Nosferatu,
 Â Here's some more Ruppert stuff circulating. What do you make of it?
         Â Regards,
           Pondo
From: "Nico Haupt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: December 8, 2004 2:05:11 PM GMT+07:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mike Ruppert accuses 24 9/11 researchers as UFO-Icke-"flakes"
Mike Ruppert accuses 24 9/11 researchers as UFO-Icke-"flakes"
http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1107
WING TV vs. Ruppert enters the next round, and the emotions are getting
higher
Mike Ruppert: 911 Saboteur by Victor Thorn
WING TV -December 7, 2004
"...Read the follow-up article to MIKE RUPPERT UNMASKED to get the real
lowdown on what this guyâs all about. Plus, in response to todayâs
article, I received the follow information from Ruppert himself in
regard to
his fellow 9-11 researchers. This is what he wrote about others in our
field:
âOh, and your vaunted list of 911 researchers â with the exceptions of
Web Tarpley, David Ray Griffin, Jim Hoffman, Tom Flocco and Kyle Hence,
all of them are flakes or well-intentioned neophytes who, because of
their associations with UFOâs, David Icke and the like are certain
destroyers of 911 credibility if the issue were ever to reach the
mainstream.
As youâll see in the above mentioned article, this list includes: Jim
Marrs, Christopher Bollyn of the American Free Press, Ralph Omholt, John
Kaminski, Dave McGowan, Kee Dewdney, Dave Von Kleist, Phil Jayhan, Eric
Hufschmid, George Humphrey, Jerry Russell, Nico Haupt, Russ Wittenberg,
Don Paul, Michael Elliott, Dylan Avery, Daniel Hopsicker, Anthony
Hilder, Stanley Hilton, Karl Schwartz, John Leonard, Richard Stanley,
and
Donn de Grand-Pre...
--
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum supergÃnstigen Komplett-Preis!
====
Re: Mike Ruppert accuses 24 9/11 researchers as UFO-Icke-"flakes"
In a message dated 12/8/04 6:26:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think Ruppert's entitled to hold researchers to his own standards, relative to his own estimations of them. I don't agree with all the choices he's made in either column.
Â
I also think that this is a tempest in a teacup - whose winds need not be fanned. It can only damage the movement in any event.
Â
I think Thorn's full of shit, and Ruppert looks like he's responding to him. He may have gone overboard (or perhaps overbroad)Âin responding (in a few of the cases listed here). But generally I agree with his point.
"President, USA Exile Govt." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Professor Nosferatu,
