-Caveat Lector-

from the December 09, 2004 edition -
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1209/p01s01-usec.html
A landmark move for China Inc.

IBM's sale of its PC unit to a Chinese firm is the latest sign that a new
giant is rising.
By Mark Sappenfield | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

OAKLAND, CALIF. - In a moment on Wednesday, the gathering might of the
Chinese economy became as imposing and obvious as the Great Wall. This was
no economic forecast - no set of percentages and decimal points that hinted
obliquely at the power that 1.3 billion shoppers could someday wield. This
was news that a Chinese company had agreed to buy one of the most venerable
product lines in the history of American technology: IBM's PC business.

The deal, announced in Beijing, evokes images of the 1980s, when Japan swept
through the American marketplace in sorties of Sony TVs, turning homegrown
companies like Zenith into free-market flotsam. Indeed, in coming years, a
tide of Chinese cellphones and refrigerators could find their way into
American homes. Yet China Inc. goes beyond that.

The IBM deal symbolizes one of the first waymarks of the new economic order,
as China not only adds innovation to its well established assembly-line
ethic, but also opens its borders to the global marketplace with an
eagerness - and a population - that Japan could never match.
And while the upshot is not likely to lead to the collapse of the American
business machine, it does point to the seemingly inevitable rise of a
challenger to the economic hegemony America has enjoyed for nearly a
century.

"It's still ramping up ... but China is already the greatest engine of
growth and the greatest agent of change in the world," says Donald
Straszheim of Straszheim Global Advisors in Los Angeles. "It's going to have
a lot more heft, and Americans will have to get used to it."
It is already taking some adjusting. China's construction boom has created a
worldwide shortage of materials such as concrete and plywood, driving up the
cost of housing construction across America. Preparations for the 2008
Olympics have exacerbated worldwide steel shortfalls. And analysts suggest
rising Chinese consumption of gasoline has played a significant role in
$2-per-gallon gas.
The impact of Chinese tech firm Lenovo's bid to buy IBM's PC division,
however, is more symbolic. Unlike the 1980s, when Japan swooped in to snatch
the lucrative consumer electronics market from American corporations, Lenovo
is merely taking a business that IBM is eager to offload. In the $1.75
billion deal, IBM may actually gain ground in the Chinese market through
partnership: It will hold a 19 percent stake in Lenovo, and one of its top
managers will become Lenovo's chief executive. And, to some analysts, it's
not losing much. By today's standards, the personal-computer market is Stone
Age stuff, with prospects of only modest profits in the US. IBM plans to
focus on more profitable software and consulting ventures.
Yet the deal should put the world on notice. China might not be buying
Rockefeller Center just yet, but its businesses are at last looking beyond
their own borders (Lenovo plans to move its headquarters to New York). "It's
an example of the kind of mergers and acquisitions were going to see more
of," says Mr. Straszheim. "China will be buying brands to buy reach, to buy
marketing, and to buy managerial experience, which they don't have."
Setting up shop in the USA
It represents the maturing of China's economy. Like Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
before it, China is starting to move from the labor-intensive assembly
industry that so long defined it into greater innovation and product design.
One Chinese refrigerator company has already moved into a $14.5 million
building on Broadway in midtown Manhattan with plans to hit $1 billion in
sales in the Americas by next year. And the IBM deal gives Lenovo access to
the computer giant's technology and expertise. "[Lenovo] will use that to
fuel innovations in their own product," says Simon Yates, a tech-industry
analyst at Forrester Research in Cambridge, Mass. "In 20 years, Lenovo might
have the sort of brand attachment as Dell or HP."
Others agree that the Chinese wave might not be imminent, but the Lenovo bid
suggests it is not far off, and it could effect everything from mobile
phones to automobiles. "In five years' time, China will become the source of
some innovation in the high-tech sector," says Dieter Ernst of the East-West
Center in Honolulu, a research center that studies Asian Pacific nations.
"We've got to get accustomed to the idea of having an innovative China in
addition to Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The dynamics are changing."
Moreover, China's economic influence is bound to be far greater than that of
Japan simply because it has opened itself to the world more than Japan did.
While Japan effectively erected a force field around its economy, China is
turning itself into an international business mall.
Obviously, many products made by American companies are manufactured in
China. But China has also shown an appetite for foreign goods, as well. Some
85 percent of the computer chips in the Chinese market come from abroad, for
instance. In an economy that has averaged 8 percent growth for the past 25
years, the economic opportunities set off more salivating than Pavlov's
bell.
"It's been growing stupendously and it will continue to grow at great
rates," says Stephen Cohen, codirector of the Berkeley Roundtable on the
International Economy in California.
That's not to say that China is on a primrose path to untold prosperity.
Consider environmental challenges alone: Smog is so thick that it is cutting
crop yields. Add to this a centralized government that will increasingly
come into conflict with the free-market Frankenstein it has created, and
China could face serious problems in the future.
Flourishing together?
To many analysts, though, China's potential is a glimpse of the United
States a century ago - standing on the cusp of a new age of economic
influence. What this means for the America of today is unclear. Contrary to
the angst that accompanies the rise of an economic competitor, economists
generally see a healthy China as a boon to the United States. Prevailing
economic theory has long held that flourishing economies are mutually
beneficial, with each country naturally specializing in a way that helps
itself and others.
Clearly, for all of China's strides, the United States still holds an
enormous entrepreneurial advantage as a place with a history of venture
capital and innovation. In 2001, for example, American firms filed for more
than 87,600 patents; Chinese companies filed for fewer than 200. China has
enormous ground to make up, and America's prosperity lies in maintaining
this advantage in an era of white-collar outsourcing.
Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and
related links



www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2004 The Christian Science Monitor. All
rights reserved.
For permission to reprint/republish this article, please email Copyright

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to