-Caveat Lector- Couldn't of said it better myself!(see below)
Remember:More people have died in Ted Kennedy's car than have died in United States Commercial Nuclear Power plant operations visit my web site at http://www.info-quest.org Visit my energy page at http://www.info-quest.org/Energy.html Check out the latest on the anwr drilling project http://www.anwr.org visit my blog at http://info-spectrum.blogspot.com My ICQ# is 79071904 See the Pledge of alleginace to the flag that the 9th circuit court of appeals doesn't want you to say. for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto: http://www.info-quest.org/Enumerated.html ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:30:06 -0500 From: David McDivitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why aren't the environmentalists behind this technology? Environmentalists are often a leftist/Marxist front. They do not say anything constructive. Only destructive. Not all, but the goal of much environmentalism is to attack the West and attack capitalism. For them the environment represents an opportunity, only, to champion yet one more victim. To be supportive of a new technology would mean they would support the continuance of capitalism and individualism, which they will not do. Does this answer the question? >From: "William A. Bacon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:34:46 -0400 (EDT) > > >It's the Integrated Gasification Combined cycle. >check out >http://www.cogeneration.net/IntegratedGasificationCombinedCycle.htm >It's a method to utilize coal biomass and other carbon based materials to >not only generate electricty cleanly, but to synthesize othe useful >products like gasoline using the fischer-Tropisch method and other >useful materials like feed stock to the chemical industry with zero >emmisions. >Why aren't you guys shouting on the roof tops promoting this technology? >Could it be that it would put into effective competition to opec? With an >estimated 460 BILLION TONS of coal? >Well it's self evident isn't it? It would provide fierce competition to >opec, provide americans jobs (primarily in RED states), It would provide a >clean and effective way to dispose of trash, provide electricity cheaply >and cleanly, reduce dependence on opec oil.... Hmmm I wonder could this be >the motivation behind the "environmental movement?" -- http://nonspiritual.com http://freeconservative.org http://todiscuss.com www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
