APB Online

  BORN CRIMINALS?
  New Book Explores Genetics and Violence

  April 19, 1999

  By Stephanie Kirch

New York (APBNews.com) -- A new book
exploring the connection between
  genetics and human aggression comes to the
  controversial conclusion that genes do play a role
  -- but not an exclusive one -- in the development
  of society's most violent criminal types.

  "Troubled parents inflict troubled homes as well as
  their DNA on their unsuspecting children,"
  neurobiologist Debra Niehoff writes in The Biology
  of Violence: How Understanding the Brain, Behavior,
  and Environment Can Break the Vicious Circle of
  Aggression (The Free Press, $25).

  Mild as it is, even this acknowledgement that any
  aspect of criminal behavior could be passed on in
  genes from parent to offspring is a controversial
  one. Some U.S. scientists are so loath to consider
  that possibility they have boycotted major
  conferences where the issue was simply scheduled to
  be discussed by other scientists.

  "Few aspects of the behavioral biology of
  aggression make people more nervous than the
  suggestion that violent, antisocial, or criminal
  behavior might have roots in the genome," writes
  Niehoff, who received her Ph.D. from Johns-Hopkins
  University. "Yet, the opposing viewpoints -- the
  safe viewpoint -- that behavior and heredity are
  independent events can't be correct either.
  Behavior is not grafted onto the nervous system as
  a cultural afterthought. It begins and ends in a
  brain built according to recipes filed in the
  genome."

  Exploring a taboo issue

  Proceeding carefully, Niehoff
  explores this taboo issue from a
  responsible middle ground. She
  plods through decades of human and
  animal genetic research studies to
  establish what is actually known
  about the biological transfer of
  traits from parent to offspring.

  She also notes that stories in the
  popular press suggest that there
  may soon be genetically engineered
  "fixes" for any number of problems. "We as a
  society are entranced right now by molecular
  biology," she said in an interview with
  APBNews.com. "We've heard a lot of media talk about
  'genes for this and genes for that.' But research
  does not support the finding that there is a single
  gene for violence. The idea that we'll be able to
  predict aggressive behavior from a gene screening
  at birth has no validity."

  But when leading-edge research does suggest a
  correlation between certain biological indicators
  and the most fearsome kinds of criminals,
  policy-makers should take serious note, Niehoff
  advises. For instance, she said, anatomical
  evidence is emerging that suggests how to recognize
  and treat predatory serial offenders, the group
  with the reputation of being most resistant to
  rehabilitation by traditional treatment models.
  Clinically, they are diagnosed as suffering from
  anti-social personality disorder.

  Stalking as foreplay

  "There are men," Niehoff writes, "for whom stalking
  and killing have taken the place of foreplay." Many
  predatory killers prefer to strangle their victims,
  duplicating the way stalkers most frequently kill
  their prey in the animal kingdom.

  She rejects the theory that the brains of such
  infamous predators as Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy or
  Jeffrey Dahmer were infected at birth by a twisted
  gene or "a bad seed."

  Instead, she argues, "crime is a developmental
  process beginning in the earliest days of life,"
  often with a traumatic event that caused physical
  or emotional separation from the mother at infancy.
  Primate studies have demonstrated that infants
  separated at birth from their mothers become
  sluggish and aggressive in strange ways.

  Niehoff told APBNews.com that "if you look at a
  group of human babies, they'll all be different.
  One small group will be over-reactive, fidgeting
  and crying from every noise they hear. There will
  be a large group that are moderate in their
  response level...but at the other end there will be
  a group of babies that respond slowly, that tend to
  need to be jump-started. Five to 10 percent of
  those slow-reacting babies typically will develop
  into toddlers and preschoolers who are bold,
  fearless, and defiant."

  Such children seem to lack the antenna to read
  non-verbal cues from caregivers and others
  signaling them when a behavior is not appropriate,
  Niehoff said.

  "These young children demand a different kind of
  parenting," she continued. "They have a social
  learning deficit. What they need desperately is
  specific training in social skills and expert
  parenting."

  Emerging sex killers

  She also recommended a wider acknowledgment that
  the signs of certain kinds of emerging criminal
  personalities -- like serial sexual predators --
  can be recognized early and should be
  systematically addressed by society.

  "The only solution to murderous sexual aggression
  -- like all other antisocial aggression -- is to
  prevent it by adopting a zero-tolerance policy on    for game
  childhood sexual abuse and by learning to recognize  enthusiasts and the
  the early warning signs," she writes. "Boys who are  chance to play CEO
  loners with a precocious interest in sex, who set
  fires, torture animals, express little regard for    ROCK & RUMBLE: Will
  other people, or are fascinated with violent sexual  the killings never
  images in movies or magazines should set off alarm   end?
  bells. The clock is ticking if we want to have any
  chance of catching them before they go over the
  edge."

  Stephanie Kirch is an APBNews.com correspondent
  living in Asheville, N.C.
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).







Reply via email to