-Caveat Lector-

Begin forwarded message:

From: RoadsEnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 12, 2006 3:40:56 PM PDT
To: Cia-drugs Cia-drugs <Cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: RoadsEnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [cia-drugs] President Bush’s Reality

ex=1315713600&en=675f8dc1aefe729a&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

New York Times
Opinion



Editorial
President Bush’s Reality


Published: September 12, 2006

Last night, President Bush once again urged Americans to take  
terrorism seriously — a warning that hardly seems necessary. One  
aspect of that terrible day five years ago that seems immune to  
politicization or trivialization is the dread of another attack. When  
Mr. Bush warns that Al Qaeda means what it says, that there are  
Islamist fanatics around the world who wish us harm and that the next  
assault could be even worse than the last, he does not need to press  
the argument.

After that, paths diverge. Mr. Bush has been marking the fifth  
anniversary of Sept. 11 with a series of speeches about terrorism  
that culminated with his televised address last night. He has  
described a world where Iraq is a young but hopeful democracy with a  
“unity government” that represents its diverse population. Al Qaeda- 
trained terrorists who are terrified by “the sight of an old man  
pulling the election lever” are trying to stop the march of progress.  
The United States and its friends are holding firm in a battle that  
will decide whether freedom or terror will rule the 21st century.

If that were actual reality, the president’s call to “put aside our  
differences and work together to meet the test that history has given  
us” would be inspiring, instead of frustrating and depressing.

Iraq had nothing to do with the war on terror until the Bush  
administration decided to invade it. The president now admits that  
Saddam Hussein was not responsible for 9/11 (although he claimed last  
night that the invasion was necessary because Iraq posed a “risk”).  
But he has failed to offer the country a new, realistic reason for  
being there.

Establishing democracy at the heart of the Middle East no longer  
qualifies, desirable as that would be. Where Mr. Bush sees an infant  
secular Iraqi government, most of the world sees a collection of  
ethnic and religious factional leaders, armed with private militias,  
presiding over growing strife between Shiites and Sunnis. Warning  
that American withdrawal would “embolden” the enemy is far from an  
argument as long as there is constant evidence that American presence  
is creating a fearful backlash throughout the Muslim world that  
empowers the fanatics far more than it frightens them.

Fending off the chaos that would almost certainly come with civil war  
would be a reason to stay the course, although it does not inspire  
the full-throated rhetoric about freedom that Mr. Bush offered last  
night. But the nation needs to hear a workable plan to stabilize a  
fractured, disintegrating country and end the violence. If such a  
strategy exists, it seems unlikely that Mr. Bush could see it through  
the filter of his fantasies.

It’s hard to figure out how to build consensus when the men in charge  
embrace a series of myths. Vice President Dick Cheney suggested last  
weekend that the White House is even more delusional than Mr. Bush’s  
rhetoric suggests. The vice president volunteered to NBC’s Tim  
Russert that not only was the Iraq invasion the right thing to do,  
“if we had it to do over again, we’d do exactly the same thing.”

It is a breathtaking thought. If we could return to Sept. 12, 2001,  
knowing all we have seen since, Mr. Cheney and the president would  
march right out and “do exactly the same thing” all over again. It  
will be hard to hear the phrase “lessons of Sept. 11” again without  
contemplating that statement.
Next Article in Opinion (1 of 9) »
Related Articles

     * THE VICE PRESIDENT; Cheney Returns to a 9/11 Forum for Iraq  
Defense (September 11, 2006)
     * C.I.A. Said to Find No Hussein Link to Terror Chief (September  
9, 2006)
     * Blair to Give Up Post as Premier Within One Year (September 8,  
2006)
     * Times Select Content Senator Backs The War in Iraq And  
Rumsfeld In a TV Debate (September 4, 2006)

Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company




Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:




= www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to