-Caveat Lector-

Begin forwarded message:

HAS FILM CREW FOUND THE DNA OF JESUS?

Michael Posner
Globe and Mail, February 26, 2007
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070226.TOMB26/ TPStory/Entertainment

It's an improbable story worthy of a Hollywood film.
In what is expected to be a wild and woolly news conference, the makers of a new documentary film claiming to have discovered the tomb of Jesus Christ and his family -- and his DNA -- will face the media this morning at New York's Public Library. If their evidence is verified, the film, The Lost Tomb of Jesus, and a companion book, would raise profound questions for Christians and their faith. The filmmakers -- Emmy-award winning director Simcha Jacobovici and his executive producer, Oscar-winner James Cameron -- suggest ossuaries once containing the bones of Jesus and his family are now stored in a warehouse belonging to the Israel Antiquities Authority in Bet Shemesh, outside Jerusalem. Although the evidence contained in the film and book is hardly definitive, it is compelling. Inscribed in Hebrew, Latin or Greek, six boxes -- taken from a 2,000-year-old cave discovered in 1980 during excavation for a housing project in Talpiyot, south of Jerusalem -- bear the names: Yeshua [Jesus] bar Yosef [son of Joseph]; Maria [the Latin version of Miriam, which is the English Mary]; Matia [the Hebrew equivalent of Matthew, a name common in the lineage of both Mary and Joseph]; Yose [the Gospel of Mark refers to Yose as a brother of Jesus]; Yehuda bar Yeshua, or Judah, son of Jesus; and in Greek, Mariamne e mara, meaning 'Mariamne, known as the master.' According to Harvard professor François Bovon, interviewed in the film, Mariamne was Mary Magdalene's real name. The bones contained in the boxes have long since been reburied, according to Jewish custom, in unmarked graves in Israel. If the evidence adduced is correct, the bone boxes, and microscopic remains of DNA still contained inside, would constitute the first archeological evidence of the existence of the Christian saviour and his family. Tests on mitochondrial DNA obtained from the Jesus and Mariamne boxes and conducted at Lakehead University's Paleo-DNA laboratory in Thunder Bay, show conclusively that the two individuals were not maternally related. According to Carney Matheson, head of the lab, this likely means they were related by marriage. Thus, the book and film raise seminal questions, not only about the early movement of Judeo-Christians that Jesus led, but about whether, as some scholars believe, he might have been married to Mary Magdalene and fathered a family. Nothing in the film or book directly challenges traditional Christian dogma regarding the resurrection. But it could pose a problem for those who believe the ascension of Jesus, 40 days after the resurrection, was both physical and spiritual. And, if further DNA testing were to link Jesus and 'his brother' Yose with Mary, it would call into question the entire doctrine of the virgin birth -- a foundation stone of Christianity. The $4-million documentary will air on Canada's Vision TV on March 6 and two days earlier on Discovery U.S. The companion book, The Jesus Family Tomb, by Mr. Jacobovici and Dr. Charles Pellegrino, has just been released (HarperCollins). For this morning's news conference, the Jesus and Mary Magdalene ossuaries, which were flown in from Israel, will be on display. Meanwhile, security agents have been hired to stand guard outside the Talpiyot apartments beneath which the controversial tomb lies, covered by a large concrete plate. "I don't think this changes the fundamentals of faith," Mr. Cameron said in an interview last week. "But the evidence is pretty darn compelling and it definitely bears further study." Not everyone agrees. "It's a beautiful story, but without any proof whatsoever," archeologist Amos Kloner, who wrote the original report on the Talpiyot cave findings, told Deutsche Presse-Agentur last week. "The names . . . found on the tombs are names that are similar to the names of the family of Jesus. But those were the most common names found among Jews in the first centuries BCE [before the common era] and CE [common era]." Yet if the individual names were common, the film and book ask: What is the likelihood that this particular group of names, so resonant of the Jesus story, would appear together, contained in the same family tomb?
"There are really only two possibilities," Mr. Jacobovici said.
"Either this cluster of names represents the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth and his family. Or some other family, with this very same constellation of names, existed at precisely the same time in history in Jerusalem." To calculate the odds, Mr. Jacobovici took the data to University of Toronto mathematician Andrey Feuerverger. Factoring in the commonality of these names in first-century Israel, Prof. Feuerverger puts the odds of this tomb not belonging to Jesus and his family at one in 600. Another estimate, commissioned by James Tabor, chair of the department of religion studies at the University of North Carolina, puts the odds at one in 42 million. "If you took the entire population of Jerusalem at the time," Prof. Tabor said, "and put it in a stadium, and asked everyone named Jesus to stand up, you'd have about 2,700 men. Then you'd ask only those with a father named Joseph and a mother named Mary to remain standing. And then those with a brother named Yose and a brother named James. Statistically, you end up with one person." The James reference is significant because of the 10 ossuaries found at Talpiyot, one later disappeared. Many experts believe that coffin is the now infamous 'James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus' ossuary that turned up a few years ago and was put on public display at the Royal Ontario Museum. Although many scholars have called the inscription 'brother of Jesus' a modern-day forgery, at least as many academics continue to believe in its authenticity. Moreover, tests conducted for The Lost Tomb of Jesus show that the patina encrusted on the James ossuary bears precisely the same chemical thumbprint as the other ossuaries found at Talpiyot. Neither the provenance nor the age of the ossuaries is in dispute. The boxes, never out of the control of professional archeologists, are effectively self-dating, since the practice of re-interring the bones of the dead in limestone boxes a year after death was conducted by Jews in the Holy Land for a period of only 100 years. Prominent families stored the boxes in family tombs. Moreover, all the inscriptions have been corroborated by some of the world's leading epigraphers, including Harvard's Frank Moore Cross. The 'Jesus, son of Joseph' marking is considered rare; of thousands of inscriptions so far catalogued, only one other bone coffin contained the same construction. No Christian tradition suggests that Jesus had a son, but the Gospel of John does refer to "the beloved disciple" who rests on Jesus's lap at the Last Supper. And perhaps, says Mr. Jacobovici, "although this is pure speculation, when Jesus on the cross says, 'Mother, behold thy son,' he's not referring to himself or to his mother, but to his son, who is there with Mary Magdalene." The Book of Mark, he adds, also contains a passage that might allude to a son -- a reference to a young man, wearing nothing but linen who follows Jesus after his arrest and, when guards try to apprehend him, slips out of his clothes and escapes naked. "That's a very odd story," Mr. Jacobovici said. "There's no name given for the young lad, but the gospel writer obviously thought it was important to tell it." "None of us are gleefully presenting this as though we've trumped Christianity," maintains Dr. Tabor, whose 2006 book, The Jesus Dynasty, brought news of the Talpiyot cave to the masses. "If anything, it might help clarify and refine it a bit. Some people will immediately say this is sensationalism. I don't agree with that. I know enough about it to say this is a subject that deserves serious and continued investigation." Indeed, it's likely that there will be a sequel to The Lost Tomb of Jesus. While searching for the original Talpiyot cave, the filmmakers stumbled upon a second crypt, only 20 meters away, that has never been explored by archeologists. A miniature camera inserted into the tomb revealed three ossuaries. ______________________________________________________________________ __ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.

----------MB_8C92804DBF3D5C6_1954_83F2_WEBMAIL-MA17.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

<HTML><BODY>
<div><SPAN contentEditable=false style="DISPLAY: inline- block"><STRONG><FONT size=4></FONT></STRONG></SPAN><STRONG><FONT size=4>HAS FILM CREW FOUND THE DNA OF JESUS?</FONT></STRONG></div>


<div><br>
Michael Posner <br>
Globe and Mail, February 26, 2007<br>
<A href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC. 20070226.TOMB26/TPStory/Entertainment">http:// www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070226.TOMB26/TPStory/ Entertainment</A></div>


<div><br>
It's an improbable story worthy of a Hollywood film.</div>


<div>In what is expected to be a wild and woolly news conference, the makers of a new documentary film claiming to have discovered the tomb of Jesus Christ and his family -- and his DNA -- will face the media this morning at New York's Public Library.</div>


<div>If their evidence is verified, the film, The Lost Tomb of Jesus, and a companion book, would raise profound questions for Christians and their faith.</div>


<div>The filmmakers -- Emmy-award winning director Simcha Jacobovici and his executive producer, Oscar-winner James Cameron -- suggest ossuaries once containing the bones of Jesus and his family are now stored in a warehouse belonging to the Israel Antiquities Authority in Bet Shemesh, outside Jerusalem.</div>


<div>Although the evidence contained in the film and book is hardly definitive, it is compelling.</div>


<div>Inscribed in Hebrew, Latin or Greek, six boxes -- taken from a 2,000-year-old cave discovered in 1980 during excavation for a housing project in Talpiyot, south of Jerusalem -- bear the names: Yeshua [Jesus] bar Yosef [son of Joseph]; Maria [the Latin version of Miriam, which is the English Mary]; Matia [the Hebrew equivalent of Matthew, a name common in the lineage of both Mary and Joseph]; Yose [the Gospel of Mark refers to Yose as a brother of Jesus]; Yehuda bar Yeshua, or Judah, son of Jesus; and in Greek, Mariamne e mara, meaning 'Mariamne, known as the master.' According to Harvard professor François Bovon, interviewed in the film, Mariamne was Mary Magdalene's real name.</div>


<div>The bones contained in the boxes have long since been reburied, according to Jewish custom, in unmarked graves in Israel.</div>


<div>If the evidence adduced is correct, the bone boxes, and microscopic remains of DNA still contained inside, would constitute the first archeological evidence of the existence of the Christian saviour and his family.</div>


<div>Tests on mitochondrial DNA obtained from the Jesus and Mariamne boxes and conducted at Lakehead University's Paleo-DNA laboratory in Thunder Bay, show conclusively that the two individuals were not maternally related. According to Carney Matheson, head of the lab, this likely means they were related by marriage.</div>


<div>Thus, the book and film raise seminal questions, not only about the early movement of Judeo-Christians that Jesus led, but about whether, as some scholars believe, he might have been married to Mary Magdalene and fathered a family.</div>


<div>Nothing in the film or book directly challenges traditional Christian dogma regarding the resurrection. But it could pose a problem for those who believe the ascension of Jesus, 40 days after the resurrection, was both physical and spiritual. And, if further DNA testing were to link Jesus and 'his brother' Yose with Mary, it would call into question the entire doctrine of the virgin birth -- a foundation stone of Christianity.</div>


<div>The $4-million documentary will air on Canada's Vision TV on March 6 and two days earlier on Discovery U.S. The companion book, The Jesus Family Tomb, by Mr. Jacobovici and Dr. Charles Pellegrino, has just been released (HarperCollins).</div>


<div>For this morning's news conference, the Jesus and Mary Magdalene ossuaries, which were flown in from Israel, will be on display.</div>


<div>Meanwhile, security agents have been hired to stand guard outside the Talpiyot apartments beneath which the controversial tomb lies, covered by a large concrete plate.</div>


<div>"I don't think this changes the fundamentals of faith," Mr. Cameron said in an interview last week. "But the evidence is pretty darn compelling and it definitely bears further study."</div>


<div>Not everyone agrees. "It's a beautiful story, but without any proof whatsoever," archeologist Amos Kloner, who wrote the original report on the Talpiyot cave findings, told Deutsche Presse-Agentur last week. "The names . . . found on the tombs are names that are similar to the names of the family of Jesus. But those were the most common names found among Jews in the first centuries BCE [before the common era] and CE [common era]."</div>


<div>Yet if the individual names were common, the film and book ask: What is the likelihood that this particular group of names, so resonant of the Jesus story, would appear together, contained in the same family tomb?</div>


<div>"There are really only two possibilities," Mr. Jacobovici said. </div>


<div>"Either this cluster of names represents the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth and his family. Or some other family, with this very same constellation of names, existed at precisely the same time in history in Jerusalem."</div>


<div>To calculate the odds, Mr. Jacobovici took the data to University of Toronto mathematician Andrey Feuerverger. </div>


<div>Factoring in the commonality of these names in first-century Israel, Prof. Feuerverger puts the odds of this tomb not belonging to Jesus and his family at one in 600. </div>


<div>Another estimate, commissioned by James Tabor, chair of the department of religion studies at the University of North Carolina, puts the odds at one in 42 million. "If you took the entire population of Jerusalem at the time," Prof. Tabor said, "and put it in a stadium, and asked everyone named Jesus to stand up, you'd have about 2,700 men. Then you'd ask only those with a father named Joseph and a mother named Mary to remain standing. And then those with a brother named Yose and a brother named James. Statistically, you end up with one person."</div>


<div>The James reference is significant because of the 10 ossuaries found at Talpiyot, one later disappeared. Many experts believe that coffin is the now infamous 'James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus' ossuary that turned up a few years ago and was put on public display at the Royal Ontario Museum.</div>


<div>Although many scholars have called the inscription 'brother of Jesus' a modern-day forgery, at least as many academics continue to believe in its authenticity.</div>


<div>Moreover, tests conducted for The Lost Tomb of Jesus show that the patina encrusted on the James ossuary bears precisely the same chemical thumbprint as the other ossuaries found at Talpiyot.</div>


<div>Neither the provenance nor the age of the ossuaries is in dispute. The boxes, never out of the control of professional archeologists, are effectively self-dating, since the practice of re-interring the bones of the dead in limestone boxes a year after death was conducted by Jews in the Holy Land for a period of only 100 years. Prominent families stored the boxes in family tombs.</div>


<div>Moreover, all the inscriptions have been corroborated by some of the world's leading epigraphers, including Harvard's Frank Moore Cross.</div>


<div>The 'Jesus, son of Joseph' marking is considered rare; of thousands of inscriptions so far catalogued, only one other bone coffin contained the same construction.</div>


<div>No Christian tradition suggests that Jesus had a son, but the Gospel of John does refer to "the beloved disciple" who rests on Jesus's lap at the Last Supper.</div>


<div>And perhaps, says Mr. Jacobovici, "although this is pure speculation, when Jesus on the cross says, 'Mother, behold thy son,' he's not referring to himself or to his mother, but to his son, who is there with Mary Magdalene." The Book of Mark, he adds, also contains a passage that might allude to a son -- a reference to a young man, wearing nothing but linen who follows Jesus after his arrest and, when guards try to apprehend him, slips out of his clothes and escapes naked.</div>


<div>"That's a very odd story," Mr. Jacobovici said. "There's no name given for the young lad, but the gospel writer obviously thought it was important to tell it."</div>


<div>"None of us are gleefully presenting this as though we've trumped Christianity," maintains Dr. Tabor, whose 2006 book, The Jesus Dynasty, brought news of the Talpiyot cave to the masses. "If anything, it might help clarify and refine it a bit. Some people will immediately say this is sensationalism. I don't agree with that. I know enough about it to say this is a subject that deserves serious and continued investigation."</div>


<div>Indeed, it's likely that there will be a sequel to The Lost Tomb of Jesus. While searching for the original Talpiyot cave, the filmmakers stumbled upon a second crypt, only 20 meters away, that has never been explored by archeologists. A miniature camera inserted into the tomb revealed three ossuaries.<br>
</div>

<div class="AOLPromoFooter">
<hr style="margin-top:10px;" />
<a href="http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/ 1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol% 2Ecom%2Fnewaol" target="_blank"><b>Check out the new AOL</b></a>. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.<br />
</div>

</BODY></HTML>

----------MB_8C92804DBF3D5C6_1954_83F2_WEBMAIL-MA17.sysops.aol.com--


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to