-Caveat Lector-


Begin forwarded message:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 7, 2007 12:22:33 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: class war -- coming to a town near you

Beware -- the class war

may be coming to a town near you

David Sirota
May 4, 2007
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/51447/


What happens when the class war comes to your little town? That's what I explore in my new column for the San Francisco Chronicle today. You can read it here. Over the last week, we here in the rural state of Montana were the target of an intense onslaught by conservative class warriors, both in the state legislature and at a glitzy international economic summit in Butte - the most unglitzy, hard-scrabble, salt-of-the-earth places in America. And as the column says, you can bet what happened here could happen anywhere. As Republican legislators threatened to shut down the government over their demands to enact massive new cuts for out-of-state corporations and landowners, captains of global finance came to the Mining City to lay down cover fire for Montana Sen. Max Baucus (D), whose Finance Committee will be deciding whether to push forward with the lobbyist-written trade agenda Democrats across the country campaigned against in the 2006 election. Attacking as "isolationists" those who want our trade policies reformed to include protections for the environment, human rights and wages, CEO after CEO got up to the podium not to talk about Montana's economy, but to demand Congress bend to the will of K Street.

What's most unnerving is how these class warriors don't even try to take the sheen of hypocrisy off their arguments. In the legislature, Republicans say they want to cut taxes for out-of- state corporations and kill Democrats' plans to strengthen tax enforcement on out-of-state wealthy landowners as a way to lower taxes for in-state residents - even though in-state residents are forced to pick up the tab when out-of-staters are allowed to avoid paying what they owe. Republicans also say they are trying to protect taxpayer money, even though the emergency special session their antics forced will cost taxpayers $38,000 per day.

Same kind of nonsense at the conference. When I stood up in front of 2,000 people to ask the $20-million-a-year chairman of the Business Roundtable whether he believed trade deals should include protections for people (labor, human rights, and environment) that are a strong as the protections already included for profits (intellectual property, patents, copyrights), he turned into a blithering ball of incoherent babble.

The behavior is just the local version of what's echoing through Washington. The Hill Newspaper reports today that as a courageous group of Democrats works to build consensus for adding labor protections to our trade pacts, "business groups say they will not support an agreement that would allow U.S. labor laws to be challenged" by multinational unions and governments. Yet, the very same business groups have successfully fought for years to include provisions in trade deals that allow U.S. environmental and consumer protection laws to be challenged by multinational corporations and governments - in many cases, forcing states to overturn their laws and pay multinational corporations tens of millions of taxpayer dollars in "compensation." Here's an excerpt from my book Hostile Takeover to explain what I'm talking about:


"At the very same time lawmakers lie about who is actually filing lawsuits and claim they want to stop 'lawsuit abuse,' they are actually granting corporations special privileges to file even more lawsuits. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) quietly established special courts where foreign companies can sue U.S. federal and state governments for compensation when their laws protecting health, labor or environmental standards cut into corporate profits. One company, for instance, sought nearly $1 billion from California (more than 1 percent of the state's entire budget) as compensation for a state law that prohibited the use of an environmentally hazardous gasoline additive. In all, Big Business has used these special tribunals to force American taxpayers to hand over $1.8 billion."


Go over to the San Francisco Chronicle's site to read the full column** http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/ archive/2007/05/04/EDGTLOS9JV1.DTL ... and beware -- the war on the middle class could be coming to your town soon.

---------------

*When the class war goes local

David Sirota

San Francisco Chronicle, May 4, 2007

WHEN MOST non-Montanans think of Montana, they think of "A River Runs Through It" -- they don't think of the central front in the war on anything (except, maybe trout, if you consider fly fishermen "warriors"). But for the last week, this sparsely populated state has been the central front in the war on the middle class, and the onslaught Big Sky country experienced shows that this fight could be coming to a town near you.

Our story begins in the Montana legislature, though it could be anywhere, as this lawmaking body is a microcosm of America's ideological divides. Democrats pushed to boost education spending and give each resident homeowner a $400 property tax rebate. To fund the plan, they proposed closing tax loopholes and strengthening tax enforcement in a state where roughly half of all Fortune 500 companies doing business get away with paying less than $500 a year in taxes.

But such a move offends conservative politicians and the corporate lobbyists who crowd the hallways of state capitols like the one in Helena -- and these types don't take lightly to being offended.

The GOP-controlled Montana House pressed a tax cut for corporations financed by spending cuts, including one eliminating all public- health programs. When last week it came time to negotiate a compromise, Republican class warriors dug in further, offering amendments to kill Democrats' proposal to beef up corporate tax enforcement.

The result? The legislature ended without a budget, and Montana is now on the brink of its own version of the 1996 Gingrich-Clinton government shutdown. It is a troubling situation for middle-class Montanans, but for anti-government Republican politicians and lobbyists, it is a big victory in their war on the middle class.

Days later, Montana's U.S. Sen. Max Baucus, a Democrat, joined Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in headlining an economic- development summit in Butte, a devastated city that is one of America's all-too-common casualties in this economic war. Once the bustling capital of the copper industry, Butte today is known for its salt-of-the-earth inhabitants and for its canyon-like Superfund site known as the Berkeley Pit -- a defunct open-pit mine that the Anaconda Company abandoned with a pool of deadly chemicals at the bottom.

The captains of global finance attending this summit no doubt saw Butte's boarded-up brick buildings and rusting mine shaft skeletons from the windows of their private jets that crowded the town's airport. Yet, they delivered speeches as if they were attending an executive conference at a Caribbean resort.

Corporate leaders looked out over Butte's wreckage and not only trumpeted the supposedly booming economy, but then berated worker protection laws and lavished praise on the "benefits" of free-trade policies -- policies that have decimated wages and job security by forcing American workers, farmers and small businesses to compete in a global race to the bottom.

Executive Dan Rice of Printing for Less criticized Montana for being "an employee-slanted state;" for considering a bill asking businesses to take into account the environmental and community impact of their decisions; and, thus, for being hostile to job growth. He didn't explain why, if this was true, Montana has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the nation.

Similarly, the $20-million-a-year CEO of McGraw-Hill, Harold McGraw III, claimed America's trade policies have "had a net positive impact on U.S. manufacturing jobs." This, despite 3 million manufacturing jobs lost since the China free-trade pact was signed in 2000.

That so many major players trekked to Montana to read the same script proved this event wasn't about local economic development -- it was about making sure Baucus remains a reliable Washington ally in the war on the middle class. The Senate Finance Committee he chairs oversees America's economic and trade policies, and Baucus has been feeling pressure to stand up for his middle-class constituents after the Montana state Senate passed a resolution demanding he oppose more free-trade deals. Such volleys rarely go unanswered by Corporate America in this war, and so the big guns came to Butte to tell the locals to back off.

At a time of growing job insecurity, stagnating wages and Great Depression-level economic inequality, the 2006 election gave us reason to hope for change. But as events in Montana show, change will not come with one election, nor will it come easy. If the war on the middle class can make its wrath felt in a small state's part- time legislature or cheerily propagandize at a decimated town's economic-development meeting, you can bet it can -- and will -- come anywhere.

David Sirota worked for Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer's 2004 gubernatorial campaign. He lives in Helena, Mont.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/ 2007/05/04/EDGTLOS9JV1.DTL

This article appeared on page B - 11 of the San Francisco Chronicle

© 2007 Hearst Communications Inc.





See what's free at AOL.com.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to