-Caveat Lector-

----- Original Message ----- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 09:49
Subject: Man Made Global warming A UN fraud.


World's Top Scientists 'Manmade Warming' Is A Dangerous Lie 

12-15-7


  Man made global warming is a dangerous con. 
    
  The fact that TV news programs repeatedly show ­ steam-cooling- 
water-recovery-collection-towers ­ deceptively to represent CO2 emissions 
should be sufficient evidence for even the most dumbed- down individual to see 
that somebody is desperate to con somebody. 
    
  Today's big question is: are our "leaders" being conned, or are they part of 
the con? 
    
  "One of the penalties for not taking an interest in politics is that you end 
up being governed by your inferiors". --Plato 400BC 
    
    
  The National Post Canada 
  Don't fight, adapt 
  We should give up futile attempts to combat climate change 
    
  Sonny Tumbelaka/AFP/Getty Images 
  UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the UN climate conference in Bali. 
    
  Open Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations 
  Dec. 13, 2007 
    
  His Excellency Ban Ki-Moon 
  Secretary-General, United Nations 
  New York, N.Y. 
    
  Dear Mr. Secretary-General, 
    
  Re: UN climate conference taking the World in entirely the wrong direction 
    
  It is not possible to stop climate change, a natural phenomenon that has 
affected humanity through the ages. Geological, archaeological, oral and 
written histories all attest to the dramatic challenges posed to past societies 
from unanticipated changes in temperature, precipitation, winds and other 
climatic variables. We therefore need to equip nations to become resilient to 
the full range of these natural phenomena by promoting economic growth and 
wealth generation. 


    
  The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has 
issued increasingly alarming conclusions about the climatic influences of 
human-produced carbon dioxide (CO2), a non-polluting gas that is essential to 
plant photosynthesis. While we understand the evidence that has led them to 
view CO2 emissions as harmful, the IPCC's conclusions are quite inadequate as 
justification for implementing policies that will markedly diminish future 
prosperity. In particular, it is not established that it is possible to 
significantly alter global climate through cuts in human greenhouse gas 
emissions. On top of which, because attempts to cut emissions will slow 
development, the current UN approach of CO2 reduction is likely to increase 
human suffering from future climate change rather than to decrease it. 


    
  The IPCC Summaries for Policy Makers are the most widely read IPCC reports 
amongst politicians and non-scientists and are the basis for most climate 
change policy formulation. Yet these Summaries are prepared by a relatively 
small core writing team with the final drafts approved line-by-line by 
government representatives. The great majority of IPCC contributors and 
reviewers, and the tens of thousands of other scientists who are qualified to 
comment on these matters, are not involved in the preparation of these 
documents. The summaries therefore cannot properly be represented as a 
consensus view among experts. 


  Contrary to the impression left by the IPCC Summary reports: 
    
  z Recent observations of phenomena such as glacial retreats, sea- level rise 
and the migration of temperature-sensitive species are not evidence for 
abnormal climate change, for none of these changes has been shown to lie 
outside the bounds of known natural variability. 
    
  z The average rate of warming of 0.1 to 0. 2 degrees Celsius per decade 
recorded by satellites during the late 20th century falls within known natural 
rates of warming and cooling over the last 10,000 years. 


    
  z Leading scientists, including some senior IPCC representatives, acknowledge 
that today's computer models cannot predict climate. Consistent with this, and 
despite computer projections of temperature rises, there has been no net global 
warming since 1998. That the current temperature plateau follows a late 
20th-century period of warming is consistent with the continuation today of 
natural multi-decadal or millennial climate cycling. 


    
  In stark contrast to the often repeated assertion that the science of climate 
change is "settled," significant new peer-reviewed research has cast even more 
doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human-caused global warming. But because 
IPCC working groups were generally instructed (see 
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/docs/ wg1_timetable_2006-08-14.pdf) to consider 
work published only through May, 2005, these important findings are not 
included in their reports; i.e., the IPCC assessment reports are already 
materially outdated. 


    
  The UN climate conference in Bali has been planned to take the world along a 
path of severe CO2 restrictions, ignoring the lessons apparent from the failure 
of the Kyoto Protocol, the chaotic nature of the European CO2 trading market, 
and the ineffectiveness of other costly initiatives to curb greenhouse gas 
emissions. Balanced cost/benefit analyses provide no support for the 
introduction of global measures to cap and reduce energy consumption for the 
purpose of restricting CO2 emissions. Furthermore, it is irrational to apply 
the "precautionary principle" because many scientists recognize that both 
climatic coolings and warmings are realistic possibilities over the medium-term 
future. 
  The current UN focus on "fighting climate change," as illustrated in the Nov. 
27 UN Development Programme's Human Development Report, is distracting 
governments from adapting to the threat of inevitable natural climate changes, 
whatever forms they may take. National and international planning for such 
changes is needed, with a focus on helping our most vulnerable citizens adapt 
to conditions that lie ahead. Attempts to prevent global climate change from 
occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of 
resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems. 
    
  Yours faithfully, 
    
  Signatories of an open letter on the UN climate-conference


    
  Published: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 
    
    
  The following are signatories to the Dec. 13th letter to the Ban Ki- moon, 
Secretary-General of the United Nations on the UN Climate conference in Bali:

More- http://www.rense.com/general79/d3m.htm







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See AOL's top rated recipes and easy ways to stay in shape for winter.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to