[CTRL] [2] MELLOW APATHY" FLUORIDE PAPER

[Kris Millegan]

 -Caveat Lector-

from:
http://enteract.com/~mgfree/Medical/Fluorine/FluorineHalogen.html
<A
HREF="http://enteract.com/~mgfree/Medical/Fluorine/FluorineHalogen.html">The
UKOPRP: Chem_sen, FLUORIDE II: "WE ALL LIVE
</A>
--[2]--
DELIBERATE LONG-TERM FLUORIDE OVERDOSE OF ALASKAN SCHOOL CHILDREN:
Keeping Dr. Taylor's findings and his above heartfelt plea in mind, how
can the following be justified by any sane scientist:
According to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services publication
"FLUORIDATION CENSUS 1985", which lists the current fluoridation levels
of every fluoridated area in the United States, for the entire year of
1985 the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) deliberately
over-fluoridated four Alaskan village schools at the rate of FIVE PARTS
PER MILLION, instead of at the currently approved rate of 1 PPM. The
schools were Unalaska, St. Michael, Shishmaref, and Stebbins. Why were
these unsuspecting people being thus experimented upon? How can five
parts-per-million (a whopping 20 milligrams per gallon of water) be
justified? Whatever the excuse, such covert slow genocide should be
actionable in a court of law. That was just the 1985 record; previous
years haven't yet been checked. (A subjective first-hand eyewitness
observation, by this author, of the people living in Stebbins and St.
Michael in 1995 gave a definite impression of a tragic spiritual
wasteland; something seemed very out-of-place with those people, almost
like looking into the haunted faces of prisoners in German death camps
in World War II. Go see for yourself.)
The EPA lists fluoride as a "contaminant." The above intentional
long-term 5 PPM overdose of innocent native schoolchildren occurred when
the EPA's "Maximum Contaminant Level" (MCL) allowable for fluoride was
just 2.4 parts per million.
In the early 1990's there was talk of having the EPA reduce the MCL of
fluoride down to .4 PPM, due to recent studies that had connected
fluoride with cancer.
A challenge: Have some autonomous toxicologists with no special-interest
axe to grind, do an honest, unbiased and thorough long-term scientific
study of the residents of the above Alaskan towns. Also include a study
of the residents of Hooper Bay, Alaska, where in May of 1992 a fluoride
overdose severely poisoned 290 residents and killed Dominic Smith.
(Since thirst is one of the fluoride overdose symptoms, Dominic just
kept drinking water until he poisoned himself.) Study what has happened
to the above people since fluoride became part of their lives and
include their physical, dental and mental histories as part of the
study. Dental health is, after all, why this entire situation began.
If fluoridation was doing its job as advertised, then the dental health
of Alaskan natives would be quite acceptable, but that's just the
opposite of the way it really is. Note this 12/17/90 article in the
Ketchikan Daily News: "NORTH SLOPE DENTAL HEALTH CALLED WORST IN
U.S. Examiners reported finding active cavities among Native children
aged 3 through 5 at three times the national average. Nearly
three-fourths of the 62 native elders aged 65 or older had no teeth at
all, the dental examiners said. ... The study population represented 38
percent of the total number of Alaskan Natives in the North Slope
Borough." Examiners said 40 percent of elementary students had cavities,
and 70 percent had cavities by the time they reached high school.
In spite of the above poor record, in 1991 the Director of the Alaska
Health and Social Services publicly stated, ". . . fluoride has
substantially improved the dental health of Alaska Native Children."
What's wrong with this picture?
It's well-known that Alaskan natives today have almost the worst dental
health in the country, in spite of having been subjected to fluoridated
water for 40 years. (Incidentally, they practically live on candy bars
and soda pop.)
--Which leads us to ask, just exactly what causes dental cavities? On
the average, each American consumes 20-50 teaspoons of refined sugar
each day. Using 40 teaspoons as an average, multiplying 40 teaspoons
times approx. 250,000,000 people totals 10 billion teaspoons of sugar
sold EACH DAY, just in the United States alone. That's very big
business.
ADA AND U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ASSERTION: "GOD IS STUPID"
Vested interests who sell fluoride and pharmaceuticals, or who repair
the damage, would have you believe that God screwed up so badly in
engineering man's teeth that ALL of mankind is now born with a permanent
deficiency of fluoride, and thus mass medication--with a nerve agent--is
the most cost effective way to correct God's stupid error. However, the
facts state differently. Regarding dental cavities, refined sugar and
soda pop are two of the top contenders, whereas a sweeping
lifetime-deficiency of rat poison and nerve agents in our bodies is one
of the biggest, most blatant lies in all history.
Each year it's easy to find a school district science fair whereby a
smart kid makes an experimental study of soaking various items (pennies,
extracted teeth, etc.) in soda pop to see how long it takes to dissolve
them. In one such experiment it took only 14 days for Pepsi Cola to
dissolve the entire outer layer of enamel from a human tooth.
For the benefit of enlightening the U.S. Public Health Service, the ADA,
the AMA, and the sugar and soda pop industries, try this complicated
scientific experiment: Obtain a couple of extracted teeth, give just one
of them a standard stannous fluoride treatment which supposedly proofs
it against cavities, soak both of them in Coca-Cola or Pepsi--with a few
teaspoons of sugar added--for a couple of weeks, daily changing the
liquid and scrubbing the one tooth with fluoridated toothpaste, and then
examine the two teeth. That should conclusively prove who is more
stupid, God or the broad general public.
Since fluoridation was originally promoted as effective just for
children under 14 years old, then the public health officials had a
problem. How to justify mass-medicating adults with poisonous fluoride?
One of the latest public health schemes along this line actually states
that fluoride in saliva kills tooth plaque, emphasizing that the only
way to get fluorine in your saliva is via drinking fluoridated water!
Nothing is said of the toxic, life-shortening effects caused by having
that much fluorine in your body, however. It not only kills plaque, but
everything else in its path.
Is the object only to give you the brightest smile in the morgue?
An unexplored avenue of interest here is the chemical concoction inside
a can of soda pop. Given the above statements about the corrosive action
of soda pop, and also given the data on aluminum's probable relationship
to Alzheimers disease, and also given the fact that soda pop is made
with fluoridated water, and given the fact that poisons combine
synergistically, usually in unpleasantly toxic ways, is there ANY
guarantee whatsoever that your typical fluorinated can of soda pop will
not even slightly assimilate some of the aluminum metal out of the wall
of the can, and thus make a synergistic soda-fluoride-aluminum-sugar
cocktail that has slow acting, long-term lifetime effects?
Simple research challenge: Find some unopened soda pop that's several
years old, and have a laboratory analyze the ingredients to check the
aluminum and fluoride concentration.
SWEDEN FLUORIDATION FAILURE
NOTE: The following data on Sweden and Holland could not be found in
official medical, dental or other scientific literature, almost as if it
had been purged or never been reported at all.
13 June 1970 the Gothenburg POST (Sweden); 5 Aug 1970 the NEWS REGISTER
(Sweden); and 1 May 1970 NORSK FOLKEHELSELAG (Norway) TRANSLATED INTO
ENGLISH:
In 1969 the country of Sweden intended to fluoridate their water supply
due to the strong advice of Professor Yngve Ericsson, a Swedish dentist
who was also the senior representative on the World Health
Organization's Expert Committee on Fluoridation. However, it was then
found that Professor Ericsson coincidentally was the holder of two
highly-profitable patents on fluoride toothpaste!
A subsequent investigation disclosed that the World Health
Organization's numerous so-called "objective" comparative studies on
mortality and morbidity for fluoridated vs. non-fluoridated areas simply
didn't exist! The investigation stated that the World Health
Organization's report was unacceptable from a scientific point of view,
and that some of the claims set forth in the WHO report actually lack
any and every basis in fact. The conclusion was that the details given
by WHO on risks and safety margins were grossly defective. Sweden thus
remains non-fluoridated, to this day.
HOLLAND FLUORIDATION FAILURE
In the mid 1970's the Netherlands fluoridated the city of Amsterdam,
after which an investigation disclosed that between 100,000 and 200,000
people had developed "more or less severe side effects" to fluoride. A
subsequent campaign by concerned physicians and public resulted in
fluoride's complete removal from the Netherland's water supply, and the
national law was also changed in such a way to permanently ban future
fluoridation for the Netherlands.
3-YEAR-OLD NEW YORK CHILD POISONED TO DEATH IN DENTAL CHAIR
June 28, 1974: Little William Kennerly, age 3, of New York died just
four hours after receiving a brush-on stannous fluoride treatment during
his first and only trip to the dentist. William didn't know that he
wasn't supposed to swallow the fluoride, and he paid with his life.
Extracts from the autopsy report, performed by a Dr. Torno on 25 May
1974 at Kings County Mortuary:
"William Kennerly
Case #K74-3511             AUTOPSY REPORT
Age: 3 years
Height: 39"
Weight: 32 lb
Clinical history - the child swallowed about 45cc of 2% stannous
fluoride
solution in the pediatric dental clinic, Bristol Street Clinic, at 9:30
a.m.
He was given epinephrine I.M. in dental clinic and sent to Brookdale
Medical Center for close observation. The child came to Brookdale
Medical
Center at 12:30 noon, was well until 1:00 when suddenly went into
Cardiac respiratory arrest and was in shock. The child vomited out and
had an unrecordable blood pressure. He finally expired on May 24, 1974,
at 2:00 p.m."
A toxicologist's report stated that little William had swallowed the
equivalent of three lethal doses. His parents later collected several
hundred thousand dollars in a wrongful-death lawsuit, but that was small
consolation for the senseless loss of their son.
Toothpaste is similar in this regard, because a typical family-sized
7-ounce tube of toothpaste contains enough stannous fluoride or sodium
fluoride to kill a 20-pound child. To test this, just call the 800
number listed on your toothpaste box, tell them that your 2-year-old
child has just eaten half a tube of toothpaste and that he's now
vomiting, act frantic, and watch how quickly your call gets patched
directly through to a Poison Control Center. (It's common for a child to
vomit for 12 hours, after eating a large quantity of toothpaste.)
CONGRESSIONAL INACTION
July 21, 1975: When confronted with new evidence regarding the role of
fluoride in causing cancer, U.S. Congressman Delaney recommended
immediate suspension of all artificial fluoridation, pending further
research. His recommendation was ignored.
Dec. 16, 1975: Congressman Delaney entered into the Congressional Record
the results of a new study showing another link between fluoridation and
cancer. This time he demanded "that all artificial fluoridation of our
water supplies be suspended immediately." Once again, his unprofitable
demands were ignored.
DENTAL ASSOCIATION PR LIE REVEALED
THE LIE: August 1, 1979: A letter from the Secretary of the Victorian
Branch of the Australian Dental Association stated, "In a community with
a fluoridated water supply, the dental manpower required to maintain a
good standard of dental health in a community is always halved."
THE TRUTH: The 1976 edition of the C.B.S. News Almanac published figures
showing the number of dentists per 100,000 population in 30
"Representative American Cities." Of these 30 cities, 16 were
artificially fluoridated. A simple comparison of the fluoridated vs.
non-fluoridated cities shows that there were an average of 76.7 dentists
per 100,000 population in the fluoridated cities, vs. 59.2 dentists per
100,000 in the non-fluoridated cities. Furthermore, data from the 1971
American Dental Directory, the 1971 U.S. Statistical Abstracts and the
1973 World Almanac reveals that the three American cities which have
been fluoridated the longest (Grand Rapids, Newburgh, and Evanston)
averaged 121 dentists per 100,000 population, or over twice the national
average, after approximately 25 years on fluoridated water. (Data
compiled by Phillip R.N. Sutton, D.D.Sc., Melbourne, Australia, 1979.)
JAPANESE FLUORIDE-RELATED CANCER RESEARCH
24 August, 1982: The Japan Times published an article expressing concern
about potential hazards of topical fluoride applications (9000 ppm) to
teeth, and fluoride mouth rinses (250-500 ppm) has prompted researchers
at the Nippon Dental College in Tokyo to investigate effects of fluoride
on hamster fetal cell cultures, with results that can only be described
as very disturbing. At the August '82 meeting of the Japanese Society
for Cancer Research, Associate Professor of Pharmacology Taketi Tsutsui
and his colleague, Dr. Maizumi, reported that 24-hour contact with
sodium fluoride solutions at concentrations of 34, 45, and 57 ppm
(fluorine ion), results in morphological changes and malignant
transformations in second-generation hamster fetal cells. After the one-
day fluoride treatment, one group of cells was cultured for one week and
then fixed and stained for study. Survival rates of 90, 50 and 30% were
found for the exposure to 34, 45, and 57 ppm respectively, with
morphological changes of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0% in the surviving colonies.
In the untreated control cultures, the incidence of abnormalities was
significantly lower -- only 0.03% or less.
In another series of experiments, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm fluoride
treatments were found to have acquired the ability to proliferate in
soft agar for an additional 50 to 200 days. These cells were then shown
to have developed a strong tumor-forming capacity. In the untreated
control cultures, neither proliferated in soft agar nor acquisition of
tumor-forming capacity were observed, and only one of four cultures had
transformed into one having infinite proliferative characteristics.
Between 100 and 200 days after the sodium fluoride treatment, cells from
the 34 and 45-ppm treated cultures were transplanted subdermally into
each of two 10-hamster groups. The animals were then observed for the
appearance of tumors. All surviving three hamsters in the group that
received cells from the 34-ppm treated culture developed cancer
(fibro-carcinoma) at the site of injection. Likewise, all eight
surviving hamsters receiving the 45-ppm treated cells developed cancer.
The other hamsters in both groups died from causes other than cancer,
before the experiments were completed. None of the hamsters in the
control group that received the untreated cells, developed cancer.
FLUORIDE BANNED IN CUMBERLAND
1990: The residents of Cumberland, Maryland voted to ban fluoride from
their drinking water, not long after the community's 26-year ban on the
chemical was lifted because of the urging of dentists and other
special-interest officials. The fluoride issue divided the city such
that it was reportedly responsible for the defeat of Cumberland's
incumbent pro-fluoride mayor George Wycoff, who lost to Harry Stern, a
strong opponent of fluoridation.
1992: Statement by Pennsylvania Justice Flaherty, after 40 days of court
hearings on fluoride: "... I entered an injunction against the
fluoridation of the public water supply for a large portion of Allegheny
County. ... In my view, the evidence is quite convincing that the
addition of sodium fluoride to the public water supply at one part per
million is extremely deleterious to the human body, and a review of the
evidence will disclose that there was no convincing evidence to the
contrary." Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice John P. Flaherty (Townsend
Letter For Doctors - June 1992, p. 450)
DEATH FROM FLUORIDATED WATER, 1992
May 23, 1992: 290 residents of Hooper Bay, Alaska were severely poisoned
by sodium fluoride when the city's fluoride dispenser malfunctioned,
injecting 150 PPM of fluoride into the drinking water for over a week.
Dominic Smith, previously healthy 41 year-old leader of the local
National Guard, died of fluoride poisoning after swallowing an estimated
1200-2400 mg of sodium fluoride from the local drinking water supply.
One overdose symptom of fluoride is thirst, and Dominic just kept
drinking more water until he died.
Fluoride is cumulative in the body--somewhat like radiation--so it's
been predicted that those poisoned residents who didn't die will have
worsened health for the rest of their life. (We'll know in a few years.
Half of the town drank from a different well, and they didn't get sick.)
It's common for a private vested interest to put up a "smokescreen" by
redefining terminology to fit their needs. In this case a Public Health
Service report regarding the above incident called it an "outbreak" as
if it were a live disease organism out of control, instead of the mass
poisoning that it actually was. (The end justifies the means; it's all
God's fault, after all, by being stupid and neglecting to engineer
enough fluoride into our bodies...)
NUMEROUS U.S. MECHANICAL FLUORIDE DISPENSER FAILURES
Similar malfunctions of fluoridation equipment have occasionally
happened nationwide over the past 40 years, each accompanied by a
careful news cover-up.
Fluoride dispensing machinery is not perfect. Human overdoses of
fluoride can be found in such places as Annapolis, Maryland in 1979,
when their water treatment plant dumped up to 50 PPM fluoride into their
water supply, giving approximately 50,000 people toxic reactions.
Officials kept it quiet for 2 weeks afterwards saying, "We didn't want
to jeopardize the fluoridation program."
However, Dr. John Yiamouyiannis studied the Annapolis situation after
the spill, and reported his findings in a book, "Fluoride the Aging
Factor". On page 63 of his book, he stated that more than 5 times the
normal number of people died of heart failure in Annapolis during the
week following the fluoride spill.
During a conversation in 1992, Dr. Yiamouyiannis stated that the actual
cause of the Annapolis spill was a human error, done to cover up a
mechanical malfunction that had occurred. Evidently Annapolis had a
small fluoride day-tank which was supposed to fill up with fluoride and
then the pump would stop. However, the pump malfunctioned and kept
running after filling up the tank, and the excess fluoride spilled over
into a large waste-sump before it was finally discovered. To cover up
the error, the operator who discovered it deliberately pumped the entire
overspill (1,000 gallons) directly back into the fresh-water supply.
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA 1980:244; 7) had
this short PR article on the above fluoride spill, meanwhile carefully
avoiding using Annapolis' name:
FLUORIDE. In what the PHS [Public Health Service] calls "the first
instance of fluoride overexposure known to have caused serious illness
in the 35 years since fluoridation of community water supplies was
begun," eight patients undergoing renal dialysis (kidney bypass) in a
Maryland community became ill and one died. Charles M. Wax, MD, assigned
by the CDC to the Maryland State Department of Health, said
investigation revealed that failure to close a valve in the community's
treatment plant led to the spilling of 3,800 Liters (1,000 gallons) of
22% hydrofluosilicic acid into the water supply. Further investigation,
he said, "raised the possibility of widespread mild fluoride
intoxication within the community as the result of drinking
overfluoridated water."
Dr. Yiamouyiannis said that many fish in Annapolis pet shops died
shortly after the Annapolis fluoride spill.
JAMA's report was false, however. Public records show that contrary to
the above PHS claim that Annapolis was the first of such a malfunction,
the following 12 U.S. communities had had overdoses of sodium fluoride
in their water supplies before that time:
Rome, PA 6/6/72
Stanley County, NC, 4/16/74
Lebanon, PA, 8/20/75
Seattle, WA 5/76
Stanford Univ., CA 1976
Syracuse, NY 3/29/77
Marin County, CA 1977
Harbor Springs, MI 1977
St. Charles, MN 1978
Los Lunas, NM 11/17/78
Fenton, MI 1979
Island Falls, ME 1979.
Further, since 1979 the following communities have also had fluoride
overdoses in their drinking water supplies:
Nisqually Indian Res. WA 1980
Shaftsbury, VT 8/30/80
Potsdam, NY 1981
Morristown, NY 2/7/81
Saratoga Springs, NY 5/81
Pendleton, OR 6/28/81
Jonesboro, ME 10/6/81
Alameda County, CA 1982
Rouses Pt. NY 1982
New Braunsfels, TX 7/3/82
Painted Post Village, NY 12/14/82
Plattsburgh, NY 1/1/83
Marysville, MI 1983
Crown Pt. NM 1983
Grand Rapids, MI 7/84
Vancouver, WA 1/20/85
Elkhart, IN 2/5/85
Charleston, IL 1985
Sequoyah, OK 1986
New Haven CN 1986
Antigo, WI 1989
Hooper Bay, Alaska, May 1992 (one fatality, 290 toxic reactions).
In the July 84 Grand Rapids MI spill, 8 PPM of fluoride was reportedly
dumped into that city's water supply for more than a month, before being
discovered and repaired. In the 5/92 Hooper Bay Alaska spill, up to 150
PPM fluoride was tested in the village water supply one week before the
death of Dominic Smith, the near-death of his sister, and simultaneous
flu-like symptoms experienced by over 290 villagers.
80% OF ILLINOIS FLUORIDE TREATMENT PLANTS WERE FAULTY IN 1989
In 1989 the State of Illinois had 1,931 public water facilities, 1,000
of which were fluoridated. The State Health Department gave awards out
to each state water treatment facility that was able to maintain the
recommended dosage of fluoride in their water for the entire year, but
they only gave 115 awards out to the 1,000 fluoridation facilities that
year, meaning that 885 treatment plants did NOT keep the fluoride
dosages within required limits. (Crete Record, Crete, IL 9/21/89)
JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF FLUORIDE DECREASES REACTION TIME
>From an article in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 2,
Pp. 230-238: Researchers in the Dept. of Psychology at Florida
International University, North Miami, found a statistically significant
delay (almost 1/2 second longer to respond) in visual response to a
peripheral light stimulus in subjects given just 1/2 milligram of sodium
fluoride. That dose is less fluoride than the amount you get from
drinking one cup of coffee or tea made from fluoridated tap water.
FDA NEVER APPROVED CHILDREN'S FLUORIDE SUPPLEMENTS
June 3, 1993: New Jersey State Assemblyman John V. Kelly held a press
conference in Room 109 of the New Jersey State House in Trenton, NJ. He
requested that the FDA remove all children's fluoride supplements from
the market, after he asked the FDA to supply his office with the studies
supporting the safety and effectiveness of children's fluoride
supplements and the FDA evidently searched their files back to 1939 and
reported to him that NO DRUG APPLICATIONS HAD EVER BEEN FILED FOR THESE
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. All children's fluoride supplements, in the FDA's
own words, were and are "unapproved new drugs." The pharmaceutical
companies have been openly running a scam for years, by selling these
products.
Thus illegal, unscientific but highly profitable fluoride supplements
are still being promoted and sold by the medical and dental professions,
meanwhile in 1997 the FDA is quietly gearing up on an active campaign to
ban common herbs and food supplements from our health food stores for
the purpose of redefining them as "drugs" so that pharmaceutical
companies will then have a monopoly on these substances. (Follow the
money.) To find more data on this, do an internet search on the word
CODEX, which is the European program already in place.
1994: The US Public Health Service and the American Dental Association
are both continuing to strongly promote and expand the profitable U.S.
fluoridation campaign. They boast that over 60% of the United States
population is now drinking fluoridated water every day, even though
fluoride's only original stated purpose was to aid the developing teeth
of children under 14 years.
VARIOUS FLUORIDE POISON REFERENCES
"Fluorine was substituted for chlorine in Lindane, to make it a far more
toxic substance." (Plummer, W.J. and Wall, L.H. Science, Vol. 127, 1958)
"Fluorine is substituted for chlorine in DDT to produce more effective
and more toxic insecticides." (Reimschneider, R. Suddent. Apoth. Ztg.
1947)
"Fluorine in the atmosphere increases the sensitivity of the thyroid
gland to damaging effects of atmospheric sulfur dioxide." (Gabovich,
R.D. et. al., Chemical Abstracts, p. 9051) In other words, fluoride has
a synergistic poisoning effect with sulfur dioxide, a component of smog.
"Sodium silicofluoride spray on oranges remains in the peel, and so can
cause severe toxicity..." (Union of So. Africa, Dept Agr. Forestry Sci.
Bull. No. 236, 1943) Note: Marmalade is made from citrus peel.
"1080, or Sodium Fluoroacetate, is described in a federal training
manual as a 'biological high-explosive.' " (Los Angeles Times, December
6, 1970)
Sodium fluoroacetate (also known as FAC, RATBANE 1080, COMPOUND 1080,
FRATOL, FURATOL, YASOKNOCK, SODIUM MONOFLUOROACETATE, and SODIUM
FLUOACETIC ACID) is listed in a hazardous waste book as being 500 times
more toxic to rats than was regular sodium fluoride. This is because
it's an "organic metabolite." 1080 was used to kill rodents as early as
1944, but was eventually banned for use in buildings due to dogs dying
from eating poisoned rats. In 1952, according to Circular No. 140 of the
UCLA College of Agriculture, it was reported that 1080 worked so rapidly
that it was impossible to save experimentally poisoned animals, even
with first aid and under the best of laboratory conditions. Scientists
had yet to find an antidote for 1080 at that time. Only our nerve
warfare laboratories have the full story.
QUESTION: If fluoridation of our water supplies was originally stated to
be just for the "developing teeth of children under 14," then why were
U.S. military bases among the first to fluoridate their water supplies?
Why would anybody want Rambo to be STUPID, DOCILE, and SUBSERVIENT? (And
why did Admiral Forrestal "commit suicide" by jumping out a window with
his hands tied behind his back and a sheet knotted around his neck, not
long after he'd adamantly opposed the fluoridation of his military
bases, among other things?)
Incidentally, fluoride reactions resemble Attention Deficit Disorder in
a certain percentage of the population, and especially in hyperactive
children. The simple test of this is to get the person under question
off of ALL sources of fluoride (fluoridated water, toothpaste, soda pop
bottled with fluoridated water, canned soup, etc.) and see if their
condition improves over a period of 3-4 weeks. Use distilled water,
because most simple charcoal water filters will not remove fluorides. To
remove possible variables, also test the child for negative reactions to
sugar and sugar-substitutes.
It's a tragedy that children are given the habit-forming drug Ritalin to
counter the effects of a "disease" that might only be due to their
adverse reactions to the drug fluoride, and/or to sugar. Following the
money, this tragedy is good business, and the "sickness industry" is a
multi-multi-billion-dollar business.
Note the following fluoride symptoms as referenced in "Encyclopedia of
Pure Materia Medica," Vol IX, p.333. These symptoms--by volunteers who
took varying quantities of fluorides--were listed one hundred years ago,
in 1887!
FLUORIDE SYMPTOMS:
--Great loss of memory, forgets almost everything.
--Good memory in morning, forgetfulness every evening.
--Forgetfulness in his daily employment of dates.
--On making notes, mistakes right for left.
--Mental weakness.
--Mental excitability.
--Feels indifference towards those he loves best.
--Aversion (intense dislike) to his own family, bordering on insanity.
--Gay disposition, everything is satisfactory.
--Excessive hilarity; great buoyancy of mind.
--Greatly depressed in mind.
--Exceedingly anxious, causing sweat; greater in morning than evening.
--Sensation as if danger menaced him, but without fear.
--Felt certain that something dreadful would happen, with dullness in
head.
--Fear of apoplexy (stroke).
--Anxiety.
--Irritable, disagreeing mood.
--Moodiness in evening, greater than morning.
--Very ill humored.
--Discontent and excessive ill humor followed by indifference and
forgetfulness, and finally by perfect contentment and uncommonly gay
disposition of mind.
--Congestion of blood mostly to forehead.
--Feeling in brain as if on the verge of being struck with apoplexy. (A
stroke)
--Vertigo with sickness of stomach.
--A kind of sinking weakness, has to sit down.
--Feeling as if in an earthquake.
--Sensation of weakness, like numbness in head, same in hands.
--Sensation of numbness in forehead.
--Congestion of blood in forehead.
--Heaviness above eyes, with nausea.
--Severe pressing of both temples.
--Compressing pain in temples.
--Slight pain in right temple, followed by left.
--Headache in skull, behind ears.
--Headache accompanied by congestion of blood to head, sensation of
numbness.
--Headache every morning.
--Sensation of weakness, like numbness in head.
--Numbness in head and hands.
--Dull, heavy headache.
--Congestive headache.
--Dullness & pressure in back of head.
--Dullness in back of head.
--Pressure on both sides, back of head.
--Headache in back of head, with fullness in head.
--Headache from neck to forehead; dull feeling in head.
--Atrophy of brain.
Is it a coincidence that the above-listed fluoride symptoms sound almost
exactly like the TYPICAL EVERYDAY ANECDOTAL PATIENT ILLNESS COMPLAINTS
which today's expensive TV commercials, pharmacies, physicians and
psychiatrists are so eager to "cure" with their endless supply of
profitable new drugs, many of which contain fluoride? This is like a
snake swallowing his own tail.
The bottom line is to follow the money. Look at the high standard of
living of those who are promoting and distributing the current crop of
pharmaceuticals, versus the lower living standards and drug-education
level and gullibility of the ignorant general public who are becoming
convinced that pharmaceuticals in general are a NUTRIENT. Public
sickness and ignorance is good business, in some circles.
--Found on the Internet, March 18, 1997:
ENVIRONMENTALLY-CAUSED MENTAL RETARDATION
Mental Fluorosis: Brain Damage from Exposure to Fluorides
By George Glasser
(Courtesy of Sarasota ECO Report, Guy Alland, Publisher. P.O. Box 35500
Sarasota, FL 34242 (941) 925-1946)
"Those who are for and against fluoridation have little common ground
other than issues they disagree on. They cannot dialogue objectively
because they have different realities. They see things differently, and
have different criteria in determining validity. Our lives are enriched
by artists for whom "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." But our
lives are often endangered when scientific truth is in the eye of the
beholder." (Dr. Schatz, discoverer of streptomycin)
Only now are the insidious facts about Sarin (nerve gas) surfacing as
more comes out about the "Gulf War Syndrome" and the Tokyo subway
incident. It appears that with both incidents, the people exposed to
Sarin are suffering from a variety of chronic adverse health and
lingering neurotoxic effects such as memory loss.
Sarin is the most potent neurotoxic substance known. Sarin is also a
fluorinated organophosphate similar to, but more toxic to humans than
the insecticide Parathion. Sarin is the prime example of toxicokinetics
of the fluorine ion. When the fluorine ion is combined with relatively
benign substances it often creates a powerful toxicant (toxic
synergism). With Sarin, the fluorine ion is like an arming mechanism for
the relatively benign organophosphate which transforms it into a
compound with one hell-of-a-wallop.
Acute exposure to Sarin, a drop about the size of a grain of sand,
causes spasms (tetany), heart palpitations (cardiac arrhythmia), many
other neurological disorders, and possibly, collapse of the nervous
system and death. Production of acetylcholine, the most important
chemical for nervous system function is disrupted. Acetylcholine is
responsible for carrying all neuro-transmissions in the brain and
throughout the nervous system of the body.
Many animal studies of fluorinated organophosphates also suggest a
delayed neurotoxic reaction similar to those experiences by those people
exposed to Sarin.
With water fluoridation, the public is exposed to a variety of
fluorides, and aside from the fluorine ion, some of those fluorides are
neurotoxic. Many scientists discount the fluorine ion as being
neurotoxic; however, the weight of scientific evidence strongly
indicates that the fluorine ion is, if nothing else, the perpetrator.
This is evidenced by the variety of highly effective fluorinated drugs
that are used to treat mental disorders, and the fluorine ion's role in
the devastating effectiveness of Sarin as a chemical nerve agent.
Many psychoactive drugs are fluorinated. Two of the most noted are
Prozac and Rohypnol (better known as the infamous date-rape drug,
"Roofs."). Rohypnol is fluorinated Valium, which is about 20-30 times
more potent than Valium alone. Essentially, these drugs effect enzyme
functions in certain areas of the brain to achieve the desired effect.
The primary ingredients of most psychoactive drugs suppress enzyme
production, and the fluorine ion is also an enzyme inhibitor. The one
particular side effect common to almost all fluorinated drugs which is
mentioned in the Physician's Desk Reference is memory loss. These drugs
include Fenfluramine (a fluorinated weight loss drug), fluorinated
corticosteroids, and fluorinated psychoactive drugs. Memory loss and
learning disorders are associated with the hippocampal area of the
brain.
On page 125 of the Toxicological Profile for Fluorides it is stated:
"Neurotoxicity: Because fluoride interacts with calcium ions needed for
effective neurotransmission, fluoride can affect the nervous system."
This statement is reinforced by recent studies performed by Dr. Robert
Isaacson and Dr. Phyllis Mullenix which were concluded shortly after the
publication of the profile.
Since 1992 there have been three studies confirming that fluorides
affect brain functions. Dr. Robert Isaacson, Binghamton University, New
York conducted two studies using low levels of aluminum fluoride and
sodium fluoride. The levels were similar to the amounts people are
exposed to on a daily basis from fluoridated toothpastes and drinking
water. Results showed that both types of fluorides were neurotoxic. The
most recent study, "Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride in Rats", Mullenix,
et al, published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1995, was done using
larger doses of sodium fluoride and corroborated the results of both
Isaacson studies (1992 &.1994).
All the studies demonstrated that the hippocampal region (learning
center) of the brain was the most susceptible to the effects of
fluorides.
It was also stated in the study published in Neurotoxicology and
Teratology, 1995, Mullenix, et al, that: "Hyperactivity and cognitive
deficits are generally linked with hippocampal damage, and in fact, the
hippocampus is considered to be the central processor which integrates
inputs from the environment, memory, and motivational stimuli to produce
behavioral decisions and modify memory." However, the researchers said
that although the behavior of rats does not extrapolate to humans, the
generic behavioral patterns created in rats from fluoride exposure can
and probably do occur in humans. They also said the problems that might
occur in humans from typical chronic fluoride exposure during pregnancy
and early childhood are: "motor-sensory dysfunction, IQ deficits' and/or
learning disabilities" (environmentally induced retardation of brain
development).
While Dr. Mullenix's study dealt only with sodium fluoride, Dr.
Isaacson's studies focused on aluminum fluoride compared to sodium
fluoride and were performed to determine if fluoridated water's effect
on leaching aluminum or combining with the aluminum sulphate added to
some water as a clarifier [by water treatment facilities] had an impact
on the development of Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimer's studies had
determined that there was a significant build-up of aluminum in the
brains of people with Alzheimer's disease. Population studies also
suggested that there appeared to be a higher incidence of Alzheimer's
disease among people who lived in fluoridated areas which was the
impetus for Dr. Isaacson's study.
Isaacson's study indicated that the aluminum fluoride was more
neurotoxic than the sodium fluoride.
Recent studies in China, where coal containing fluorides is used for
cooking and heating, determined that fluorides released during burning
and inhaled by young children were responsible for lowered IQ's.
Documents with regards to the neurotoxic effects of fluoride exposure
among the workers who processed uranium for the first nuclear bombs in
1944 were recently declassified by the government. These documents
indicate that the US Government has known for more than fifty years that
fluorides are neurotoxic. Other studies dating back to 1949 indicate
that exposure to fluorides can have neurotoxic effects on animals.
The first form of nerve gas, Soman (a fluorine compound) was developed
by the Germans during World War II which indicates that scientists were
well aware of neurotoxicity of fluoride compounds almost sixty years
ago.
Through water fluoridation, the general population, especially children
who are most susceptible to developmental changes, are exposed to
fluorides. In the "Toxicological Profile for Fluorides", 1993, page 90,
it states, "The fluorine ion carried in human blood serum exists in two
forms, namely as an inorganic ion (F-) and in combination with an
organic molecule. The toxicological significance of the latter form is
unknown. A portion of circulating fluoride acts as an enzyme inhibitor
because it forms metal-fluoride-phosphate complexes that interfere with
the activity of those enzymes requiring a metal ion cofactor. In
addition, fluoride may interact directly with the enzyme or the
substrate. It is a general inhibitor of the energy production system of
the cell...."
The fluorine ion has a negative electrical charge while metal ions have
a positive electrical charge, and they readily combine to form
metal-fluoride-complexes. Both metal ions and fluorine ions are very
small. Consequently, they can easily pass through cell membranes. Once
in the cell, a natural chemical reaction occurs where the fluorine ion
is released from the metal ion. The fluorine ion interferes with the
enzyme function and continues on, while the metal ion is left behind. It
is also possible for the fluorine ion to attach to a trace mineral such
as zinc which is essential to enzyme function and remove it from the
cell. This same scenario is how fluoride acts as a delivery mechanism
for psychoactive drugs, but with water fluoridation, the passenger is a
neurotoxic substance such as lead, mercury or aluminum for which the
brain is the target organ.
Because the poisoning of the brain is accomplished from chronic,
low-level doses of highly potent (synergized) metal-fluoride-complexes,
conventional standards used to determine intoxication would be
inadequate (a linear dose-response to a particular neurotoxic
substance). Like Rohypnol or Sarin, the neurotoxic substances may well
be synergized with the addition of the fluorine ion. Consequently, lead
or mercury fluoride combinations could be much more neurotoxic than the
independent metal ion.
While symptoms may indicate that a person is suffering from
neurotoxicity, the method and standards used to measure toxicity and/or
serum levels of substances would not indicate toxic levels in the body.
The present accepted method used by researchers to determine adverse
effects is to attempt to target a single substance as the causative
rather than address chemical interactions that can and do occur when
chemicals are metabolized in the human body or through environmental
reactions. The consequences of not considering synergized chemical
interactions would be misdiagnoses and possibly the prescribing of a
medication that may exacerbate the condition. To further confound the
problem, there are only several animal studies available on the
neurotoxic effects of metal-fluoride-complexes on which to base any
diagnosis.
The present thought among most pro and anti-fluoridation scientists and
researchers is that since the neurotoxic metal-fluoride-complexes are
only found at trace levels in fluoridated water, they are of little
significance. Most scientists are only concerned with how much of a
specific toxicant will cause an adverse immediate health effect, not how
little of a synergized toxicant will cause an adverse health effect with
prolonged chronic, low-level exposure.
The problem with fluorides is that it is difficult to prove that the
fluorine ion had anything to do with a metabolic crime involving
neurotoxic damage related to metal-fluoride-complexes. This is because
the fluorine ion is the vehicle that carries the neurotoxic substance,
effectively delivers it to the target area of the brain where it will do
the most damage, leaves it, and then continues on its metabolic journey.
With lethal doses of poisons such as Sarin or sodium fluoroacetate, it
would be almost impossible to determine that a person had been poisoned
from the fluorinated toxicants. This is because of the bioactivity of
the fluorine ion which is in a constant state of transition as it
travels through the body. With these fluoride compounds, the examining
physician would have to know that a person was exposed to these
substances to determine the cause of death, otherwise, it would be
written off as heart failure. Diagnosing the effects of chronic,
low-level exposure to fluoride compounds would be almost impossible
unless appropriate research was done to determine what those adverse
affects were and that the physicians were aware of the research.
In essence, it can be said that the ubiquitous fluorine ion when
combined with another substance could be the perpetrator of almost
perfect neurological or biological crimes. This is because: 1. Neither
toxic levels of the fluorine ion nor the accomplice substance can be
placed at the scene of the crime in significant amounts to indicate
intoxication; 2. Scientists generally discount toxic synergism as a
factor with chronic fluoride toxicity; and 3. there is no research data
on which to base a diagnosis.
The weight of scientific evidence suggests that the fluorine ion is the
most logical perpetrator of neurotoxic damage. It is also a scientific
fact that the fluorine ion has a particular affinity for metal ions of
which some, such as lead, aluminum and mercury are neurotoxic and
accumulate in brain tissues. And it is a well known scientific fact
among toxicologists that the fluorine ion acts as a synergizing agent
for many toxicants. Consequently, it is only logical to assume that the
neurotoxic metal-fluoride-phosphate complexes act as potentiated
neurotoxicants. [Note: Only several hundred registered professional
toxicologists exist in the entire U.S.)
The only adverse effects most scientists are interested in with regards
to water fluoridation are the effects of the fluorine ion, which is an
intangible, and which accumulates in endpoint tissues after the fact
(meaning, after the metabolic damage has been done). The fluorine ion,
alone, only exists instantaneously in a transitional phase during such a
chemical reaction. Long term effects of low-level chronic exposure to
synergized fluoride compounds/complexes are possibly considered
inconsequential, although the population is exposed to low-levels of
these cumulative chemicals on a daily basis via fluoridated water,
toothpaste, mouthwash, residual fluorinated insecticides, pesticides,
herbicides and fungicides on fruits and vegetables along with
environmental fluoride pollution.
In the Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 69, Feb. 1990, pg. 584, there is
a mention of toxic synergism and concern over metal-fluoride complexes
in Recommendations from Session IV, Needed Research, #7, "Consider
variations in physiological, nonphysiological, and pathological changes
__ for example, diet, ambient temperature, altitude, environmental
pollution and disease states. Environmental pollutants __ heavy metals,
for example __ should be monitored not just for their effects on
Fluorine but for their other effects per se".
The effects of long-term, low-level exposure to these cumulative
metal-fluoride complexed neurotoxicants and organophosphates are
contingent on several factors: The age of the person, diet, health,
vitamin and mineral deficiencies, genetic disposition, ethnicity, length
of exposure, previous exposure to neurotoxicants, medications, and
environmental factors. Not all people react the same.
There is much research data on the neurotoxic effects of lead, mercury
and aluminum: Lead is associated with environmental retardation
(learning disorders); mercury is associated with various nervous and
mental disorders (the "mad hatter" syndrome, where hatters once used
mercury to make felt hats); and aluminum has been associated with memory
loss (Presenile dementia, or Alzheimer's disease). However, since there
are only several studies about neurotoxic metal-fluoride-complexes, one
can only speculate what effects chronic, long-term, low-level exposure
to synergistic combinations of these complexes could be.
In reviewing pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical warfare research
data, it appears safe to assume that the neurotoxic effects of
metal-fluoride-complexes would be magnified as with the case of Rohypnol
and other psychoactive drugs. It is also logical to believe, that like
soldiers suffering from Sarin exposure ("Gulf War Syndrome"), there
might not be an antidote for the adverse metabolic reaction caused by
organophosphates that are also used in agricultural products or
metal-fluoride-complexes. Possibly, continued chronic exposure to
low-levels of fluorides might well exacerbate the initial effects.
(END of George Glasser's article)
===================================================
SARIN (MILITARY DESIGNATION "GB")
As previously stated, Sarin was developed and used by the Nazis in
Germany, used by terrorists in Tokyo several years ago (in Newsweek
Magazine's coverage photos of the Tokyo gas attack, did you notice the
photo of numerous small light-green barrels clearly marked SODIUM
FLUORIDE, in the terrorist's Sarin-manufacturing facility?), and used by
Iraq in the Gulf War.
The following EPA Chemical Profile of SARIN nerve gas was recently
published on the Internet, after pressure from Gulf War Syndrome
veterans. Notice this quote from SECTION VII of the following chemical
profile, regarding the neutralization of SARIN: "Rapidly hydrolyzed by
dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate forming relatively
non-toxic products. Water alone removes the fluorine atom, producing a
non-toxic acid (Merck 1983, p. 1204)"
THUS, THE FLUORINE ATOM IS THE SINGLE INGREDIENT THAT CHANGES A
NON-TOXIC ACID INTO SARIN, ONE OF THE MOST VIRULENT AND DEADLY NERVE
GASES KNOWN TO MANKIND.
===============================================================
EPA CHEMICAL PROFILE October 31, 1987
CHEMICAL IDENTITY - SARIN (Military Chemical Nerve Agent)
CAS Registry Number: 107-44-8
Synonyms [alternate names]: (NIOSH/RTECS 1983 Synonyms, Volume 3, p.
122)
-- GB
-- MFI
-- IMPF
-- T-144
-- T-2106
-- TL 1618
-- Sarin II
-- Trilone 46
-- Isopropyl Methylfluorophosphate
-- Isopropyl Methanefluorophosphonate
-- Isopropoxymethylphosphoryl Fluoride
-- Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl Fluoride
-- Phosphine Oxide, Fluoroisopropoxymethyl
-- Methylphosphonofluoridic Acid-Isopropyl Ester
-- Phosphoric Acid, Methyifluoro-Isopropyl Ester
-- Phosphonofluoridic Acid, Methyl-Isopropyl Ester
Chemical Formula: C4H10FO2P
Molecular Weight: 140.11
SECTION I -- REGULATORY INFORMATION
CERCLA (SARA) 1986:
Toxicity Value Used for Listing Under Section 302: LC50 inhalation
(human) 0.07 mg/liter (*NIOSH/RTECS 1985)
TPQ: 10 (pounds)
RQ: 1 (pound) (statutory, for notification under SARA Section 304(a)(2))
Section 313 Listed (Yes or No): No
SECTION II --PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Physical State: Liquid
Boiling Point: 2970F, 1470C (Merck 1983, p. 1204)
Specific Gravity (H2O=1): 1.10 at 200C/40C (Merck 1983, p. 1204)
Vapor Pressure (mmHg): 2.9 at 250C (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)
Melting Point: -710F, -570C (Merck 1983, p. 1204)
Vapor Density (AIR=l): 4.86 (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)
Evaporation Rate (Butyl acetate=1): About the same as water (U.S. Army
1975, p. 3-4)
Solubility in Water: Miscible with and hydrolyzed by water (Merck 1983,
p. 1204)
Appearance and Odor: Liquid (Merck 1983, p. 1204). A colorless liquid
and vapor. Almost no odor in pure state (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-3 to 3-4).
SECTION III -- HEALTH HAZARD DATA
OSHA PEL: Not Found
ACGIH TLV: Not Found
IDLH: Not Found
Other Limits Recommended: Not Found
Routes of Entry: Inhalation: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)
Skin: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)
Ingestion: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)
Health Hazards (Acute, Delayed, and Chronic): Extremely toxic; lethal
dose in humans may be as low as 0.01 mg/kg. [10 parts per billion.]
Extremely active cholinesterase inhibitor. Toxic effects similar to, but
more severe than those of parathion (Merck 1983, p. 1204). Death within
15 minutes after fatal dose is absorbed (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4).
Medical Conditions Generally Aggravated by Exposure: Not Found
SECTION IV -- FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
Flash Point (Method Used): Non-flammable (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)
Flammable Limits:
LEL: Not Found
UEL: Not Found
Extinguishing Methods: Extinguish with foam, carbon dioxide, and dry
chemical (Sax 1984, p. 1662)
Special Fire Fighting Procedures: Protective clothing and respiratory
protection (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-5).
Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: Non-flammable (U.S. Army 1975, p.
3-5)
NFPA Flammability Rating: Not Found
SECTION V - REACTIVITY DATA
Stable: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)
Conditions to Avoid: Not Found
Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid): Slightly corrosive to steel (U.S.
Army 1975, p. 3-4). Hydrolyzed by water (Merck 1983, p. 1204).
Hazardous Decomposition or Byproducts: Acidic conditions produce
hydrogen fluoride; alkaline conditions produce isopropyl alcohol and
polymers (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4). When heated to decomposition or
reacted with steam, it emits very toxic fumes of fluorides and oxides of
phosphorus (Sax 1984, p. 1662).
Hazardous Polymerization:
May Occur: Not Found
May Not Occur: Not Found
Conditions to Avoid: Not Found
SECTION VI -- USE INFORMATION
Quick-acting military chemical nerve agent (U.S. Army, p. 3-4). Chemical
warfare agent (Merck 1983, p. 1204).
SECTION VII -- PRECAUTIONS FOR SAFE HANDLING AND USE
Rapidly hydrolyzed by dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide or sodium
carbonate forming relatively non-toxic products. Water alone removes the
fluorine atom producing a non-toxic acid (Merck 1983, p. 1204).
Decontaminants include bleach slurry, dilute alkali, hot soapy water,
steam and ammonia (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4).
SECTION VIII-- PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
For emergency situations, wear a positive pressure, pressure-demand,
full facepiece self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) or
pressure-demand supplied air respirator with escape SCBA and a
fully-encapsulating, chemical resistant suit. See the introductory
information section at the beginning of the profiles for additional
information.
SUIT MATERIAL PERFORMANCE (Based on EPA/USCG "Guidelines", 1987)
(Chemical Resistance/Amount of Data)
Butyl/Neoprene GOOD/LIMITED**
Viton/Neoprene GOOD/LIMITED**
*Based on qualitative performance information.
**Based on a chemical analog.
SECTION IX -- EMERGENCY TREATMENT INFORMATION
Signs and Symptoms of Exposure: Symptoms include difficulty in
breathing, drooling, excessive sweating, nausea, vomiting, cramps,
involuntary defecation and urination, twitching, jerking, staggering,
headache, confusion, drowsiness, coma, convulsion, dimness of vision and
pinpoint pupils (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-3)
Emergency and First Aid Procedures: Immediate decontamination of the
smallest drop is essential. Vapor penetrates the skin (U.S. Army 1975,
p. 3.4). Toxic effects are similar to parathion (Sax 1984, p. 1662).
Treatment for parathion is as follows: move victim to fresh air; call
emergency medical care. If not breathing, give artificial respiration.
If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. In case of contact with
material, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least
15 minutes. Speed in removing material from skin is of extreme
importance. Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes at the
site. Keep victim quiet and maintain normal body temperature. Effects
may be delayed; keep victim under observation (DOT 1984, Guide 55).
====================================================================
             *** END OF "MELLOW APATHY" FLUORIDE PAPER ***
=================================================================
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om