Post Number 122: Gun Control 1 Never in history has any government disarmed the people of the nation unless genocide was planned. For reference, please see Russia and China in this century, not to mention Nazi Germany. The intent of the so-called leaders of any nation can be revealed, clearly, in these actions to create a defenseless populace. The frightening thing is that so few people understand that the country which is the premier leader in disarming people is the British government. As the quote which follows reveals, the British have been doing this for a long time, and not solely in India. A study of what went on in South Africa during the Boer Wars will give you a very good look into the heart and soul of the British, and it is not a pretty sight. For the first time that I know of, extermination camps were used for civilians by the British in the Boer Wars. Now, they were not called this, but by far the greatest losses the Boers suffered during these wars was the frightening losses suffered in these camps, of their women, old men and children. And it makes no sense to argue that these deaths were an accident, just as it does no good to argue that the so-called Un-Constitutional laws �within� the United States are an accident, and if we just work a little harder, we can get them changed. Ridiculous! If they were an accident, they would be changed already. Just as the way that the British ran their camps in South Africa would have changed after the first 10,000, or maybe after the first 20,000 deaths in the camps. That the British did not change how the camps were operated reveals the true intent behind the camps, as nothing else can, just as the laws which continue to be enacted �within� the Untied States reveals the true intent behind those in Washington, DC. For reference, see Post #4; Real republicans. "Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act which deprived a whole nation of arms as the blackest." -- Mahatma Gandhi, An Autobiography, p. 446. When the police can't protect us OCR May 2, 1999 Why did the police SWAT team, whose armored members surrounded the high school for hours, not enter the building more quickly? Predictably enough, the Columbine High School massacre has provoked calls by the Clinton administration and gun-control activists to do something about gun violence, such as further limiting Americans' access to firearms. The basic idea behind gun control is that average people should not be allowed to possess firearms for self-protection � since some will use them improperly - but should depend on the police and other authorities in the face of danger. Yet a close look at the tragedy in Littleton, Colo. does more to debunk this basic gun-control premise than to support it. An article in The New York Times last week gingerly raised a question that has become a heated topic on the Internet and talk radio: Why did the police SWAT team, whose armored members surrounded the high school for hours, not enter the building more quickly? In a recent column, James Bovard, author of freedom in Chains: The Rise of the State and the Demise of the Citizen, quoted some of the explanations offered by Littleton-area police: One deputy who initially exchanged fire with a shooter, then left to call for backup, said his actions helped fleeing students. The sheriff said his forces were outgunned. A sheriff's department spokesman said they were worried about protecting policemen. These bromides only reinforce Mr. Bovard's premise: [T]he ... slow response by SWAT teams and other lawmen to the killings in progress turned a multiple homicide into a historic massacre. The ... excuses being offered vivify how law enforcement has no legal liability to people they fail to protect. The Colorado killings offer stark evidence why citizens cannot rely on government for personal safety. Indeed, the government's position is simple: We don't trust you to protect yourself with handguns or rifles, but the police have no obligation to protect you, either. This point, rather than hand-wringing about violent video games and easy access to guns, needs to capture more attention, because it holds the key to making schools safer. There's nothing wrong with trying to learn what makes some seemingly normal teens commit such an atrocity. Or to look at nihilistic aspects of our culture, which may have contributed to the killings. But such approaches offer imprecise answers at best. Even if all guns were outlawed, the black market would flourish, just as it does for illegal drugs. Rather than aim for the unachievable goal of banishing all firearms, policy makers should look for ways to ensure that law-abiding citizens have access to them when they're needed. In Israel, requiring teachers to be armed put a very rapid end to the PLO's longstanding strategy of targeting school children, David Kopel told us; he's a New York University law professor and research director of the Colorado-based Independence Institute. He doesn't suggest that American schools require teachers to pack iron, but he does suggest that the law allow properly trained teachers to do so. Other recent U.S. school shootings have ended after school officials or passersby confronted the attackers with weapons, according to John Lott, the University of Chicago law professor who has written extensively about concealed-carry laws. In Edinboro, Pa., for example, the shooting was stopped only after a bystander pointed a shotgun at the shooter when he started to reload his gun. The police did not arrive for another 11 minutes. In other words, rather than mistakenly assume that police will always be there to protect unarmed citizens - a fallacy vividly refuted by the Littleton tragedy - policy makers should look for ways to make gun ownership more accessible for law-abiding people. But, to fully understand the debate which is going on in America about gun control, you must have access to the information about the King of England receiving some of the tax dollars that United States citizens pay into the Internal Revenue System. You must understand that the Bank of England is the registered agent for the Federal Reserve System, and you must understand the relationship between the Constitution and the King of England. I suggest you read my series, if you are interested in understanding. Please E-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let�s get started! "....an unarmed and defenseless Citizenry soon becomes a nation of misabused slaves." ROCKY MOUNTAIN SURVIVAL GROUP - AN INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE FOR SURVIVAL & SELF-RELIANCE- "The Right To Keep & Bear Arms" RMSG believes in & supports the original U.S. Constitution & Bill of Rights. However, we also believe it is wise to keep track of what those who would pervert, subvert or destroy it are saying and doing. Since we believe that (as history has repeatedly shown) an unarmed and defenseless Citizenry soon becomes a nation of misabused slaves, the disarmament groups and laws restricting law abiding Citizens from keeping & bearing small-arms of a conventional and technically equivalent nature pose a very real (although possibly unintentional) threat to the security of our nation, its people, and our way of life. RMSG believes that the founding fathers of our nation held all forms of government in suspicion, yet recognized them as a necessary evil - to be kept in check by the people they governed. We believe that the intent of the second amendment to the Constitution, in complement to the provision that no standing army be kept for a period greater than two years (Article 1, Section 8:12) and the further provision to call forth "the Militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections, and repel Invasions," (Article 1, Section 8:15) clearly indicates that the right to keep & bear arms was not intended to apply merely for sporting activities firearms. We believe that every able-bodied man was expected to keep a serviceable small arm of current design and ability, and a sufficient supply of ammunition for it, in the event that they be called to service in the militia. This could reasonably be expected of every man as the small arm served the dual purpose of protection & provisioning in those days. While we are no longer required to hunt for our food anywhere other than our grocer's aisles, none of the other factors requiring ownership of weaponry in those days have changed in relation to modern times. There may not be any Indians left fighting for their way of life and their lands, but there are gangs, drug lords and criminals fighting for their way of life and their "turf! " And they are as indiscriminate and ruthless as any of the raiding Indians of old - and a great deal less honorable or admirable. Since Article 1, Section 8:16 provides for the "organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia," we do not believe the 2nd Amendment assumes we have the right to cannons, mines, atomic bombs, tanks, and other weapons of mass destruction, but we do believe the right to keep & bear arms includes rifles, pistols and shotguns of a similar design and capability to those used by the military services of the world. The establishment of a permanent standing army, is in direct conflict with the powers conferred by the Constitution. The National Guard & Reserve system may be viewed as being in line with the Constitution, yet the individuals making up this force do not own or keep their small arms weapons, nor do they bear them, unless involved in tactical training. Their "issue" small-arms are kept in a locked armory with limited and restricted access. They can only familiarize and train with their weapons when the government "allows" and instructs them to. Not exactly a formula for success! (The National Guard is federal and has been since it�s inception. This was brought to light in a couple of lawsuits by various governors who learned that they do not have the right to call out the guard without federal approval. - David) Our forces met and defeated an army of superior numbers and equipment in our revolutionary war largely because of grim determination - but it would have been unlikely that they would have succeeded if they had only been allowed to familiarize themselves and train with their weapons only once every six months or so! These people lived with and used their small arms on a daily basis. Even the most avid hunter and sportsman today cannot make that claim, with very few exceptions. This is not true of our friendly neighborhood criminal. You can bet that they know all about their weapon, its use, and its capabilities. 26 October 1997 http://www.artrans.com/rmsg/megsed/2nd.htm Bard Visit me at: The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm Federal Government defined: ...a benefit/subsidy protection racket! The above is good, but there are a couple of errors in it; for instance, about the National Guard. Another error is not understanding the real focus of the militia; have you ever watched a western movie where the sheriff walked out of his office and called the posse? You and you, and you! Get your horse, enough food for a week, and bring your gun! We�re going after the bad guys! How, and why, could he do this? Because as the highest elected official in the county, as agent for �the People,� he was calling out the militia, or at least as much of it as he needed to get the job done. Now, if you think this does not scare the H--- out of the thieves in Washington, DC, then you need to read the Declaration of Independence again to really understand. And, please, read it carefully, all the way through, and not just the first couple of paragraphs which seems to be all anyone bothers to read. UN interested in disarming the private gun owners in the US or BS? From: "Walter J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 4/26/99 9:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time U.N. Resolution Proposed to Restrict U.S. Second Amendment The Clinton Administration is supporting a resolution in the United Nations which would take away the right of American Citizens to keep and bear arms. This is a direct assault upon our Second Amendment rights by our own President who wrongly believes it would reduce international crime. (There is NO second amendment �right� to keep and bear arms. The Constitution is Simply restrictions upon the actions of those in the so-called government. � David) In the section entitled "Measures to Regulate Firearms" which would directly target the rights of law-abiding American gunowners we find the following proposals: * A requirement for hunters to store their firearms in so-called "Sporting Clubs." * Allowing only shotguns (smooth-bore firearms) for personal protection. * Allowing firearms collectors to possess only those firearms that have been altered so they can no longer be fired. * Requiring anyone wishing to own a firearm to establish a need for possessing guns. * Requiring hunters to obtain insurance before hunting. * Generally discouraging the private ownership of firearms. According to the New York Times, the Clinton Administration is fully backing the United Nations effort to enact these proposals. The above proposals are what the U.N. has listed for now. Do you think they will stop at anything less than complete disarmament of the American people? It may be hard to believe that an American President would help international power grabbers disarm our law-abiding citizens, but this is not the first time the Clinton Administration has given away our sovereignty to the United Nations. Bill Clinton has given federal lands to the United Nations, forced our Armed Forces to wear the blue helmet of the U.N. Army (court-martialing those American soldiers who refused to do so), allowed negotiations on the U.N. Global Climate Treaty in spite of a 95-0 vote in the Senate, and remains silent when U.N. leaders debate the types of "Global Taxes" they want us to pay. As more and more people begin to starve to death around the world, Because of actions directly related to Washington, DC, perhaps more Americans will begin to understand why judgement will come against them. I urge you to pass this post on to others, as they may need to understand what is going on. We all have a moral obligation to help understanding and knowledge spread across America. "But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes the life of one of them, that man will be taken away because of his sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his blood." Ezekiel 33:6 (NIV) The cost of liberty is eternal vigilance I am now selling copies of the book �Strategic Withdrawal; the Peaceful Solutions Manual.� If you would like a copy of the paper �Strategic Withdrawal in a Nutshell,� please E-mail me and request it at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In addition, various people around the country are arranging Seminars for the author of this book. If you are interested in seeing a schedule of upcoming events, please let me know and I will supply the information. Is information in this post for real? I assure you it is. If you do not understand, I suggest you begin reading the papers that I have prepared for people just like you (no cost; no obligation). There are currently 18 papers in all and they cover health, cancer, nutrition, the Constitution, citizenship, law, case law, nature, and many other subjects. Currently, there are at least 5 doctors, 2 lawyers, 1 judge (that I know of), 3 college/university professors and many others reading the information. They read because they are learning; maybe you should as well. Your first paper will be about United States citizenship, and what case law says about it. Case law from the Supreme Court, for instance. The second paper is on the Constitution. To understand the world around you it is necessary to understand Scripture, and one piece of information from Scripture is particularly telling; �the LOVE of money is the root of ALL evil.� Not some evil; not most evil; ALL evil. Private courts the IRS uses are simply another way to prey on the uninformed; please, do not stay uninformed. Learn what is really going on in America. Learn why the United States government (a corporation [in bankruptcy]) allows abuse of people like the fraudulent IRS. I will be sending other Posts I consider important; please pass them on to those you consider in need of information. Please watch for them. David If you are interested, please E-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and let�s get started! And for those of you who have been reading and stopped for some reason, any reason, please continue. Believe me, the real information begins after Part X! There will be a total of 20 parts, and those who are finishing are learning much more, and this learning is changing how they look at the world around them, in some ways, drastically. God Bless, David "Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble across truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened." - Sir Winston Churchill When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest. Lawyers: 99.9 percent of them give the rest of the profession a bad name. I don't think you can make a lawyer honest by an act of legislation. You've got to work on his conscience. And his lack of conscience is what makes him a lawyer -- Will Rogers (1879-1935) It can be said better: When do you know a lawyer is lying? When his mouth is open.
