-Caveat Lector-

from alt.conspiracy
-----
As always, Caveat Lector.
Om
K
-----
Subject: Military Corruption/Drug Trafficking -- Pt.2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Abemarf)
Date: 5/21/99 2:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Colonel Sabow knew that Colonel Callahan had been ordered back to El Toro, and
that the Marine Corps would have to pay for his commercial flight. Since
Colonel Sabow had to come that way, he let Callahan know that he could make
the
flight back with him. So this "illegal flight" amounted to transporting a
friend back to the base, and saving the Marine Corps money!

The report also claimed that Captain Verducci voluntarily removed himself from
the reinvestigations. Upon seeing this, Verducci was appalled. He told David
that this was an outright lie. "I wanted to investigate this case to get to
the
bottom of it," he said. Commenting on the report, Verducci added, "Not only is
this a mass of lies, it is a gross violation of law!"



Irrefutable Evidence of Murder

After ten months, David was finally able to obtain the autopsy report and
other
forensic materials. As he reviewed the material, he slowly began to understand
why it had been withheld: The reports contained hard, irrefutable evidence of
murder. These are some of the findings:



Colonel Sabow was killed by a 12-gauge shotgun blast that made contact with
the
soft palate. This is difficult to fathom for two reasons. First, unlike the
relatively insensitive hard palate, the soft palate reacts negatively to
touch.
Contact with the soft palate initiates a gag reflex in a conscious person.
Second, the soft palate is narrow, causing David to wonder, "How could my
brother have put the shotgun up against his soft palate, when the barrel is
literally as wide as the soft palate?" This evidence suggests that Colonel
Sabow was unconscious during the time of the shot.



The autopsy report states that the brain was literally pulpified from the
shooting. It was completely lacerated and turned to pulp. Yet, the autopsy
report states that Colonel Sabow's lungs were filled with aspirated (inhaled)
blood. This would indicate that the colonel was able to breathe without a
brain
or brain stem, an impossibility. Several minutes of coordinated breathing were
necessary to fill the lungs with blood. After the brain was destroyed in this
manner, the colonel would have been unable to take a single gasp. It proved
that his brother was rendered unconscious and breathed for several minutes
before the shooting destroyed his brain.



The report indicated that there was no exit wound. Therefore, the entire
explosive force of the 12-gauge discharge was contained within the confines of
the skull itself, except for the "blowback" out the mouth. The fact that the
entire explosive energy was contained in the brain and rendered the cervical
spinal cord functionless precludes any chance of even a slight gasp, let alone
several minutes of coordinated respirations. So it is far more likely that a
powerful blow to the head rendered Sabow unconscious but breathing for several
minutes before the shooting. Autopsy photos and interviews of Sally Sabow and
Cheryl Baldwin, an NIS agent in charge of investigation, indicate a large
bulge
on the back of the colonel's head, an obvious sign of external trauma. The
military has consistently denied this evidence.



Colonel Sabow s fingerprints were not on the gun. Yet, he would have touched
the gun several times in a suicide scenario.



No blood was found on the gun or on any portion of the colonel's body below
his
upper chest. Yet, from the way he was discovered, it was assumed that the
colonel shot himself while sitting in a patio chair. David states, "If he had
bent over to stretch his right arm to discharge the weapon and to hold the gun
barrel in his mouth with the left hand, the blowback would have drenched the
intervening clothing. The posture would have placed his face with mouth open
directly over his chest, torso, thighs, legs, and feet. But there was no blood
below the chest, none over his bathrobe, none on his pajama bottoms, none over
his athletic socks, and none on his slippers. But even more impossible and
more
ridiculous--not one drop of blood was on the gun!"



Furthermore, photographs demonstrated that the ring and small finger of the
left hand were covered with blood, but that there was absolutely none on the
thumb, index, middle fingers, and back of his hand. If he held the gun in his
mouth, his left hand, the back of the hand, thumb, and forearm, including the
gun, would be covered with blood. David states that this is extremely
important
because the NIS said that Colonel Sabow was sitting in a lawn chair holding
the
gun in his mouth against the soft palate, his left hand grasping the barrel.
He
then supposedly reached down with his right hand to depress the trigger with
his right thumb or index finger. If the weapon had been discharged in that
position, blood would have blown back, covering his thumb and index finger,
and
the web of the hand and the gun. But there was no blood there whatsoever.
David
points out, "Indeed, when you look at the way he was lying, the ring and
little
fingers were fairly close to his mouth, and the left forearm was right in
front
of his mouth."



After careful study of the material, evidence of homicide was obvious. In
fact,
it was so apparent that David at times doubted his own judgment. To see if he
had been making some mistake in interpretation, David realized he should
consult with respected experts. He did contact two such people. One was a
leading specialist in the neurological control of respiration, and the other
an
authority in ballistics trauma.

Dr. Jack Feldman is chairman of the Department of Neuroscience at UCLA. He
lectures worldwide and has published over 500 treatises on how the nervous
system controls breathing. Upon studying Colonel Sabow's autopsy reports, Dr.
Feldman asked, how did blood enter the lungs? As David had thought, blood in
the lungs was a sign that the colonel had been breathing for several minutes
before he died. Furthermore, the body was discovered laying on its right side,
and blood was found in both lungs. A strong, coordinated breathing effort
would
have been necessary for the blood to travel uphill to the left lung. Dr.
Feldman concluded that since respiration requires an intact brainstem and
spinal cord, and since the blast produced massive damage to this area, the
colonel would not have been able to generate respiratory movements after the
gunshot. On June 20,1994, Dr. Feldman wrote and signed an affidavit that
painted the most likely scenario:



"Colonel Sabow was rendered unconscious or immobile by a blow to the head that
fractured the base of the skull, causing bleeding into the pharynx. Breathing
continued after this injury, aspirating blood into the lung. Sometime later, a
shotgun was placed in the mouth and triggered (by another party), causing
death
and obscuring any evidence of prior injury. This scenario is consistent with
the evidence available."



Dr. Feldman wrote to David that the investigation should be reopened and the
evidence reexamined to explore alternatives to the conclusion that Colonel
Sabow committed suicide. "It seems to me," he said, "that the evidence as
presented in the autopsy is inconsistent with the scenario that Colonel Sabow
placed a shotgun in his mouth, shot himself, fell to the ground, and wound up
with a significant amount of aspirated blood."

David next approached Dr. Martin Fackler with the same evidence. Dr. Fackler
founded the Wound Ballistics Laboratory at Letterman Army Institute of
Research
at the Presidio in San Francisco, and directed it for ten years. Newly retired
from the army after 30 years of service, he was the Department of Defense's
expert on wounds. In his report to David, Dr. Fackler's comments closely
echoed
those of Dr. Feldman. These were his main conclusions:



"The position of the shotgun (under his body) and the lack of gross blood on
the front of the white garments that Colonel Sabow was wearing at the time of
his death make suicide appear, to me, unlikely...."



"The amount of blood, and edema, found at autopsy in Colonel Sabow's lungs
would seem, to me, to indicate that he took at least a dozen breaths after the
shot. The structures destroyed by the shot, however, would seem to preclude
this: the autopsy report states 'No intact brainstem, including midbrain,
pons,
or cerebral peduncle is identified'"....



"The fact that none of Colonel Sabow's fingerprints were found on the shotgun
seems strange to me, but the techniques of fingerprinting are out of my field
of expertise. One of the reasons given, however, for the lack of
fingerprints--that the barrel gets so hot that any fingerprints on it would be
burned off--is simply absurd. This is within my area of expertise: I have
handled many shotguns immediately after they have been fired--the barrels are
not even hot to the touch."



Dr. Fackler says the strongest evidence of murder is the small amount of blood
found on the victim. He says, "Since no blood went out the back of his head, I
would expect more of it to blow back and be over things in the front of him.
As
far as I'm concerned, that's the most supportive evidence to support Dr.
Sabow's beliefs."

Deputy Sheriff Freiberg of the San Diego Sheriff's Department, whose field of
expertise is fingerprint evidence, was also contacted. According to the JAGMAN
reinvestigation, Freiberg said that it's not infrequent for no fingerprints to
be found on a shotgun if the individual washed his hands with strong detergent
prior to the use of the shotgun. It further refers to him as stating that the
heat of even a single shot commonly obliterates fingerprints on a shotgun.

When he found out what was attributed to him, Freiberg became incensed and
denied making the statement. Then he vaguely recalled someone from El Toro
calling him and concocting an imaginary scenario of a suicide in which the
weapon was devoid of prints. Freiberg's response to the far-fetched situation
was, "I suppose anything is possible." He was given no factual information
surrounding Colonel Sabow's death, and was only asked to render an opinion on
some hypothetical, unlikely situation.



In Search of Justice

Gene Wheaton, a retired military investigator, learned about David from an
article in the Los Angeles Times, and offered his help. Wheaton began by
educating Dr. Sabow on dark forces within the government, the unelected
"shadow
government" that resorts to any means to exert control, including, when all
else fails, threat of financial ruin and assassination.

At first, David did not understand how this affected him, but as he delved
into
matters he could not help coming to the conclusion that "Colonel Sabow was
murdered by fellow Marines, and a conspiracy to cover up the murder involved
officers locally and at Marine Headquarters, Navy headquarters, the NCIS, the
Department of Justice, including the FBI, and the Orange County Coroner's
Department. It probably also included at least one federal court judge."

At one point, the Marine Corps contacted Wheaton about the Sabow affair, and
David sent him to Washington, where he met with senior field grade officers
and
gave them an account of the evidence proving murder. He also let the Marine
Corps know that Dr. Sabow was not out to ruin the Corps, since his brother had
served with them for almost 30 years. He was out to get to the bottom of the
murder.

Wheaton let the Marine Corps know that Dr. Sabow was available for discussion
and willing to fly to Washington at his own expense and to cooperate fully.
But
no one ever called.

Dr. Sabow appealed to the Department of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy,
and
even FBI Director William Sessions. No one would listen. He commonly received
form letters with words to this effect: We have reviewed all of the in-depth
investigations that have been carried out in great detail, and we find no
evidence of foul play.

David gave up on the military and sought private channels. He had an equally
difficult time finding a lawyer. No one wanted to help. They claimed it was
too
difficult to win such a case. Several attorneys said that the Feres doctrine
prevented servicemen or their families from suing the government. It soon
became obvious that trying to get a law firm to take on a case involving the
government was almost impossible.

Finally, David found a small law firm in southern California that was willing
to work with him. The firm was having financial difficulties and would not
work
on a contingency basis. They would proceed on a per hour basis only. David
accepted the terms as they were the only law firm willing to take on the case.
They prepared a Federal Torts Claim Act (FTCA) against the government.

Dr. Sabow requested partial discovery because he knew that full discovery
would
not be granted. The government would become too vulnerable. But the judge in
the Santa Ana federal district court, Alice Marie Stodler, refused to grant
the
plaintiffs even limited discovery.

In the meantime, the Department of Defense was ordered by Congress to
reinvestigate certain deaths due to an act signed by President Clinton in
early
1994. Due to David's persistence, the DOD knew that they would have to at
least
make a pseudo attempt at a reinvestigation. In March 1994, Special
Investigator
Larry Swails was assigned to the case. Swails was from the Division of
Criminal
Investigation Services (DCIS) for the Inspector General of the DOD.

Swails interviewed several key people, including Colonel Sabow's immediate
family, Lt. Col. Bill Callahan, Captain Anthony Verducci, Randy Robinson, Dr.
Jack Feldman, Gene Wheaton, and individuals from the Orange County Coroner's
office.

Many of these people had key information to offer. Robinson, for example, had
witnessed tampering with the patio chair's position at the scene of the death,
and discovered the ammunition inside a garage cabinet. He saw the same
ammunition photographed on the garage floor to make it appear that it had been
found in that location. Gene Wheaton provided Swails with much evidence of
murder. Captain Verducci told Swails that Dr. Sabow was the only one who had
ever investigated the case, and that he had overwhelming evidence of foul
play.
But Swails was only interested in finding out what these people knew about
covert activities. He was not interested in the events of the death and the
material that pointed to murder.

Needless to say, the FTCA claim was thrown out of court by Federal Judge Alice
Marie Stodler. And this was despite the fact that Dr. Sabow was able to prove
that no thorough investigation was ever done.

Sabow learned that a huge legal team was working against him. The Justice
Department sent a Mr. Zipperstein from Washington, D.C., to southern
California
to coordinate the efforts of the government against him.

David summed it up: "The end result was that we were denied our day in
court....The decision of the judge was at best outrageous in addition to being
unconstitutional."

In October 1994, Larry Swails finally interviewed Dr. Sabow. When Swails
started his investigation in March 1994, Sabow expected that he would be the
first person interviewed. He called Swails several times and asked why he was
not seen. After all, he had autopsy material, photographs, and other
documents.
He had more than an opinion to offer--he had the hard evidence. Despite this,
Sabow was the last to be summoned.

A week before the interview, Swails phoned David and requested Sally Sabow's
presence at the meeting. Sabow surmised that this would be an exit interview
and did not bother to tell Sally about it.

A couple of days prior to the meeting, Sabow invited a close friend to sit in
on the talks. Judge Marshall Young was a prominent judge and a past president
of the National Judicial College in Reno, Nevada.

On October 22, 1994, Larry Swails and his assistant, Nancy Sundervan, came to
David's home. The investigators immediately started questioning Sabow about
his
knowledge of covert activities, and his sources of documentation. Their
questions were direct: Who are your sources? Who supplied you with information
from headquarters? And so on. David told them that he was not interested in
this type of conversation. He reminded them that there was only one reason for
the interview, and that was to establish the manner of death of Colonel Sabow.

The two were clearly at odds in their intent. David would start to present his
evidence, but before he could finish a sentence, Swails would say, "no, that's
not quite right. It's this way." Judge Young interrupted several times saying
that he didn't understand the way the interview was being conducted. They had
come all this way to find out what Dr. Sabow knew regarding the manner of his
brother's death. Yet any time Dr. Sabow opened his mouth to present a piece of
evidence, they would counter it by saying that their experts say otherwise.
This was not a court, Judge Young reminded them, but a fact-finding mission.

Sabow insisted on going over the evidence point by point, and the two
so-called
investigators continued to resist. They were not open to any evidence that did
not support their point of view. The two were particularly disturbed by
statements and autopsy photos regarding a large lump on the back of Colonel
Sabow's head, and by the idea that it was not likely that a person would hit
himself over the head before shooting himself. According to David, whenever
such an inconsistency arose, the two would ignore it, change the topic, or
offer to show it to the FBI. At one point during the interview the
investigators actually said that they were not going to consider any evidence
that was not pointing toward suicide.

After Swails and Sundervan left, Judge Young told David that "I have never
seen
anything in my life like this, and I've been on the bench for over 30 years. I
have never seen a capital crime proved so conclusively. You have proved murder
in spades." He went on to say, "But I want you to know, you're dealing with
evil people. And you make one grave mistake. You have faith in the judicial
system. I don't."

Three or four days after the meeting, Gene Wheaton called Larry Swails to find
out how the Rapid City investigation went. Gene had known Larry years before
when he was a criminal investigator for the army. Swails answered that the
meeting was "an absolute waste of time. All Dr. Sabow wanted to talk about was
the investigation of his brother's murder. He didn't want to say anything
about
covert activities."

Judge Young told David about a dedicated FBI agent, Bill Grode, and David was
able to arrange a meeting with Grode. He expected their talk to last a half
hour or so, but Grode was deeply interested and stayed for 3� hours. He took
voluminous notes and left with copies of the evidence. In early January 1995,
Grode called to set up another meeting.

At this meeting, Sabow started showing a magnetic resonance film demonstrating
the extent of damage that would have occurred with a shotgun blast contacting
the soft palate. But after a few words, Grode looked at him and said, "Dr.
Sabow, that's really interesting, but we know it's homicide." Sabow dropped
his
pointer and began to weep. This was the first time in four years that anybody
in the government had acknowledged him.

Interestingly, Grode had said we instead of I. Subsequently, David learned
that
the other person was an Agent Fred Collins, head of the north central FBI
district and stationed in Minneapolis. Together, Grode and he reviewed
information before sending a report to Washington. David subsequently learned
that from Washington it had been referred to the Los Angeles FBI bureau but
that "it was too hot to handle" and sent back to Washington.

Dr. Sabow wrote a letter to the director of the FBI after not hearing anything
for several months. The letter was detailed, and filled with hard evidence. A
week or two later, Dr. Sabow received a letter from the Congressional liaison
and public affairs officer for the FBI, a man by the name of Collingwood,
stating, in essence, that the FBI had already conducted investigations into
the
matter in 1993, and had found absolutely no evidence of foul play. They were
sorry that his brother was dead, but it was over. The FBI didn't want any part
of it.

David was devastated at this point. By this time, he had been stonewalled by
the Marine Corps, the Secretary of the Navy, the Justice Department, and the
FBI. He had written to Senators and Congressmen, and had received nothing
except perfunctory responses, such as that they had given the material to the
Marine Corps or to the Department of Defense, and they were looking into it.
He
could not get a major commitment from anybody.

His law firm did launch an appeal, which is in front of the court right now.
It
appears that it will be a year to a year-and-a-half before he will get a
decision.

In the interim, David decided to go to Washington. He was fortunate in that he
met Senator Tom Daschle, a man who he feels has the integrity and commitment
to
help him all the way. Upon seeing the evidence, Senator Daschle acknowledged
its importance. Currently, his staff is working with David. With this help,
David continues to pursue justice. His plan is to request a special Senate
inquiry and a meeting with Janet Reno and Louis Free at which time they will
demand a federal grand jury.

One thing is for sure: Dr. David Sabow is not going away. He is sure that it
is
only a matter of time before the truth will out, and Colonel Sabow's name is
cleared.



Pete Barbee and the Drug Connection

Dr. David Sabow's investigation has proven without a shadow of a doubt that
Colonel Sabow's death was murder, not suicide. But why was he killed? Captain
Pete Barbee, who has conducted investigations into drug trafficking at air
bases for several years, claims to know.

Barbee was a mustang in the Marine Corps (a mustang is an officer who came up
through the ranks). In 1985, Barbee was a Captain in the Marine Corps in
Tustin, California, serving as a helicopter aircraft commander. Barbee was
selected for a degree completion program, so he left the Marines for two years
to obtain a Bachelor's Degree at the University of California at Irvine.

During this time, Colonel Sabow became aware of drugs on the base. He and his
staff decided to use undercover methods to find out how the drugs were getting
there. Somebody recommended Barbee, who, as a mustang, had rapport with the
troops. In the latter part of 1987, Colonel Sabow contacted Barbee and
discussed his concern about drug trafficking within the El Toro and Tustin
bases.

Investigations confirmed suspicions that drug activity was taking place. But
the information uncovered was surprising. After much research, Barbee
discovered chemicals used to make methamphetamine were being sold.

In 1987, Barbee graduated from the University of California at Irvine, and was
assigned back to the Marine Corps in Tustin, where he continued to investigate
and report on chemical trafficking. Colonel Sabow advised him to report to him
and no one else.

Barbee learned that the chemicals red phosphorus and P2, a bluish liquid used
for cleaning ships and aircraft for quality control, were being removed from
the military stockpile and transferred through DRMO, the Defense Regional
Management Office, and several NIS agents.

Barbee left the Marine Corps but he did stay in southern California, and
therefore saw the newspaper articles about Colonel Sabow's death in the Los
Angeles Times and the Orange County Register. When he read about the "suicide"
he immediately said that that was impossible. He knew the death had something
to do with drug interests. Barbee had a great respect for Colonel Sabow, and
felt that he owed him a debt. He would repay the debt by continuing with the
investigations in an attempt to find the killer. Barbee continued to go to
DRMO
auctions to watch what was happening, and to gather information and leads. In
the back of his mind, he could hear the colonel's words, "Trust no one."

In 1993, Barbee moved to Fontana, close to Waters' Country store, the center
of
massive and open drug dealing. Twelve to twenty drug dealers worked there
seven
days a week, and he could not understand why they were dealing so openly, and
why nothing was being done to stop them. There were no drug busts made, and no
police monitoring them. Yet everything from heroin to cocaine, speed, and pot
were being sold and bringing in easily $50,000 to $70,000 a week.

Barbee became too visible. On the night of November 10, 1993, he was kidnaped,
drugged, and left for dead in Ventura County. Several underlings who worked
for
drug lords Carlos Segura, Rudy Garza, and Augustine were responsible. They
were
major dealers and providers at Waters' Country Store.

Barbee was discovered by the police, and after a short stay in the emergency
room was taken to jail on drug charges. After getting out of jail, he obtained
a gun, and continued his search. He slowly gathered more knowledge on why and
how these dealers were allowed to operate with such impunity. He discovered a
great deal of corruption.

With the backing of the Ventura sheriff's office, Barbee was able to make an
agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Waters. His goal was three-fold. He wanted to
remove the debris that they had collected for over 40 years in back of Waters'
Country Store, to remove the drug dealers, and to remove the people who were
living in the back of the store.

Barbee worked with the sheriff's office for approximately three months, during
which time he denied the drug dealers access, moved things around so that they
weren't familiar with their territory, and gave the sheriff's department
information about types of drugs and drug deals being made.

At the end of three months, a big raid took place, and the drug dealers were
gone. Once they found out that Barbee had a lot of information, and that he
was
passing it along, Garza and Augustine saw to it that Barbee was badly beaten.
This happened more than once. Guns were pulled on him, his head was cracked,
and his nose was crushed.

After recovering, Barbee continued working. Garza was determined to put an end
to his interference. He told several people that he was going to take Barbee
down because of his connection with the sheriff, and because he had eliminated
him from the drug scene. Barbee did not perceive this as an idle threat. Garza
had a rap sheet three or four pages long filled with violent assaults,
including murder.

On August 29, 1994, Garza attacked Barbee with a knife at his place of
business. Barbee pushed Garza away and armed himself. Garza came at him again,
and Barbee shot him four times in the head.

Several witnesses saw what Garza had done. Others heard Garza's threats to
kill
Barbee. Unfortunately, the sheriff chose to ignore witnesses. They also
ignored
reports by emergency medical technicians who found Garza lying on the
pavement,
knife in hand. Barbee was arrested that night for first-degree murder, which
shocked several police officers who had been working with him.

Barbee subsequently identified the district attorney in the Fontana Court as
someone he frequently saw with Garza at Waters' Country Store. He told the
sheriff's investigator, and co-defender investigator this information. They
informed Barbee that they were doing an investigation into the prosecuting DA.
They said that the situation would be worked out and that it would not be a
problem--this was strictly a case of self-defense.

Barbee then learned that the DA was aware of the investigation. As a result,
he
had an even greater dislike of Barbee.

While in jail, Barbee was threatened and beaten. He was told he would be
killed
in jail. At one point, Barbee was moved from his cell block to another one,
right next to Rudy Garza's cousin, Eddie. Like his cousin, Eddie Garza was
involved in a great deal of violence and drug trafficking.

In prison, Barbee has given information to the sheriff's department concerning
DRMO involvement in the sale and use of red phosphorus and P2. The information
has panned out for them. Yet he has not received any help in return. They also
have records of Barbee's investigation with the sheriff's department into the
Garza crime family.

On November 17, 1994, Diane Barbee, Pete Barbee's wife, saw Connie Chung's
Eye-to-Eye television program, which had a report about Dr. Sabow
investigating
the death of his brother. They phoned Pete to tell him about the show. Pete
Barbee broke down in tears when he learned that someone else cared enough to
investigate the murder. As a result, Dr. Sabow and Pete Barbee made contact.

Dr. Sabow informed Jim Willworth, an investigative reporter for Time magazine,
about Barbee, and he subsequently interviewed him in depth several times.
Willworth later told Dr. Sabow, "I've done this business for 28 years. This
man
is legitimate." After Jim Willworth's interview, the prosecution changed the
charge against Barbee from first-degree murder to manslaughter. The reason
given for the manslaughter charge: He had overreacted with his gun. Rather
than
fight this in court, Barbee pleaded no contest. (His attorney had said that
they could fight it, but if they lost he could get up to a ten-year penalty.
Believing the system to be corrupt, Barbee thought it best to serve for a
lesser time, especially since the time served before he was given bail is
included.)

So Barbee took the plea of manslaughter and has been sentenced to three years
in state prison. The last time his wife, Diane, visited him, Barbee stated
that
he needed to talk about Colonel Sabow. He needed to get all the information to
them so that he could repay the debt he owes. Diane says that her husband
wants
to verify that he brought up Colonel Sabow's death long before he was
incarcerated.
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to