-Caveat Lector-

>From OrlandoSentinel



Tragedy-fueled push for more gun control is based on a lie

Published in The Orlando Sentinel on May 18, 1999.

The current push for more federal gun control is fueled by the Littleton, Colo., 
tragedy and based on a lie, which is repeated over and over not only by gun-control 
ideologues but by talk-show hosts and politi-cians.

The big lie is that guns are more accessible today.

This is factually false. It is demonstrably false. The truth is that, despite the 
Second Amendment, guns are less accessible today than at any time in American history. 
There are more than 20,000 gun-control laws and regu
lations already on the books.

Before 1968, there was no federal regulation at all of ordinary handguns and long 
guns. The only federal regulation was one passed in the 1930s that did not ban, but 
required a special license to purchase, fully automatic
 weapons, sawed-off shotguns and silencers. Before that legislation, anybody who 
wanted to could buy a sub-machine gun, fully automatic, at most any store, without 
filling out any paperwork at all.

Guns are to America what the sword is to Japan. We would not exist as a country today 
without guns. For the majority of America's history, guns were as common in an 
American household as a broom or cooking pot.

Today, most states will not allow children to own a BB gun or to shoot one unless an 
adult is present. I received my Daisy BB gun at age 5, and I shot it unsupervised. I 
received a .22 caliber rifle for my eighth birthday
, and I already possessed my own pistol, a .380 semi-automatic, which had been given 
to me by my brother-in-law, who had fought at Normandy. It was among a duffel bag full 
of pistols he brought back from the war.

American soldiers brought home all kinds of enemy weapons -- pistols, rifles, 
true-assault rifles, submachine guns. Today, even an admiral or a general is forbidden 
to bring back a rifle as a souvenir.

There have been changes, and one change is that guns are less accessible than before. 
Another is that more and more Americans have been born and reared in big cities where 
they had no opportunity to use a gun recreational
ly or for personal security. Another is that, with the end of the draft back in the 
1970s, fewer and fewer Americans have an opportunity to be trained in weapons use in 
the military. Another change, probably related to th
e others, is that more journalists and politicians are simply ignorant of firearms, 
though that never stops those people from talking about and wanting to regulate 
firearms' ownership and use.

What happened in Littleton had nothing to do with firearms. Every other kid at that 
high school had the same access to firearms as the two shooters, and that's true in 
all the other school shootings. If you're going to ar
gue that all the other kids had the same access to culture and they didn't go berserk, 
therefore you can't blame culture, then you must acknowledge that the same argument 
applies to firearms.

What you are seeing all around you is the old Hegelian principle at work -- thesis, 
antithesis, synthesis. First you create or call attention to a problem; then you 
generate hysteria about it; and then, voila, you offer a
 solution. In this case you have two kids go berserk, you fan hysteria and then 
propose, as a solution, restrictions on the right of all Americans to acquire and own 
firearms.

The land of the free is gradually becoming the land of the unfree. There are 
Americans, you know, who don't believe in freedom -- at least not for others. We 
should never forget that humans are humans regardless of their
nationality. There are always some people who have a terrible lust to control the 
lives of other people.

Better to be free in a society with risks than a safe slave in a
dictatorship.



[Posted 05/17/1999 7:42 PM EST]

 � 1999 Orlando Sentinel Online


>From Christian Science Monitor

CHILD REARING BY PRESCRIPTION IS BECOMING PERVASIVE.



Using drugs to rein in boys

Brad Knickerbocker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

When he was 11 years old, Michael Gurian was diagnosed as hyperactive, and for six 
months he was given regular doses of a drug called Ritalin to control his behavior.

"It helped me and my parents," recalls Mr. Gurian, now a family therapist in Spokane, 
Wash. But what he really needed, he sees now, "was a different kind of school and 
family environment - a better structured, more attent
ive one."

The Littleton, Colo., school-shooting tragedy has highlighted the widespread use of 
powerful prescription drugs to treat what are diagnosed as emotional and behavioral 
problems in adolescents - the great majority of them
boys.

Several of those involved in recent school shootings were being treated with drugs, 
and the number of young Americans regularly taking prescription drugs for such things 
as depression and "attention deficit disorder" has
shot way up in the past few years. It's now in the millions - many times higher than 
in any other country.

Advocates say such drugs can help certain kids through the already-tough teen years, 
preventing antisocial and even criminal behavior later in life.

Russell Barkley, director of psychology at the University of Massachusetts Medical 
Center in Worcester, Mass., calls Ritalin "the most effective treatment we have 
available for the management of this disorder."

Critics charge that some of these substances have not been adequately tested on young 
people, and federal agencies warn of possible adverse side effects.

Some experts say such heavy reliance on drugs is an easy and relatively cheap cop-out 
favored by disengaged parents and insurance companies who'd rather have kids pop a 
pill than deal with root causes through counseling a
nd the family. There's also evidence that widely used prescription drugs such as 
Ritalin (a stimulant used to treat those diagnosed with attention deficit disorder) 
are being abused by teens and college students, much lik
e amphetamines and cocaine.

"Our society has institutionalized drug abuse among our children," says Peter Breggin, 
director of the Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology in Bethesda, Md., 
and one of the most outspoken critics. "Worse yet,
 we abuse our children with drugs rather than making the effort to find better ways to 
meet their needs."

"In the long run, we are giving our children a very bad lesson - that drugs are the 
answer to emotional problems," says Dr. Breggin, whose recent book is titled "Talking 
Back to Ritalin."

"We are encouraging a generation of youngsters to grow up relying on psychiatric drugs 
rather than on themselves and other human resources," says Breggin, suggesting that 
creativity - perhaps even brilliance - is being st
ifled in such young people.

Nonsense, says Dr. Barkley, who recommends the use of drugs as part of a treatment 
regime. "Characterizing this group of children as our best, most creative, and 
brightest does a severe injustice to the facts of the matte
r and is woefully misleading to the public in general and to parents of these children 
in particular," says Barkley, who accuses Breggin of violating the physician's oath to 
"do no harm."



Characteristics of ADD



Simply put, attention deficit disorder (ADD), also known as attention 
deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD), means the inability to sit still, pay attention, 
and concentrate on an assigned task - such as classroom schoolwor
k.

>From time to time, any exasperated parent or teacher may think they spot these 
>ants-in-their-pants characteristics in offspring or pupils. But the scientific 
>symptoms attached to such behavior can be fuzzy and therefore c
ontroversial.

In their book "Driven to Distraction: Recognizing and Coping with Attention Deficit 
Disorder from Childhood through Adulthood," physicians Edward Hallowell and John Ratey 
suggest 100 questions to ask a patient to determin
e the presence of ADD (the more "yes" answers, the greater the likelihood of a 
problem). Among them: "Do you change the radio station in your car frequently?" "Are 
you particularly intuitive?" "Are you a gung-ho, go-for-i
t sort of person?" "As a kid, were you a bit of a klutz at sports?" "Are you a 
maverick?" Many of these characteristics, critics say, amount to nothing more than 
rambunctious, boy-like behavior. Harvard psychologist Willi
am Pollack estimates that 90 percent of those so diagnosed are boys. While some 
adolescent males may need such drugs, says family therapist Michael Gurian, many 
others are misdiagnosed and do not.

"Most boys are Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer," says Mr. Gurian, author of "A Fine Young 
Man" and several other books on adolescent boys, "and if Huck and Tom were alive today 
and going to school, they'd be drugged."



Rise in prescriptions



Ritalin (known generically as methylphenidate or MPH) is a stimulant that - 
paradoxically - is said to calm agitated children. Estimates of the number of children 
in the United States taking Ritalin range from 1.5 million
 to upwards of 4 million - most of them white, middle-class boys who live in the 
suburbs. (In addition, more than 800,000 American children are taking antidepressant 
drugs such as Prozac or Luvox. Eric Harris, one of the
alleged assailants in Littleton, had been taking Luvox.)

The number of prescriptions for MPH products reportedly has increased by 50 percent 
over the past five years, to more than 9 million prescriptions in 1998. According to 
the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), t
he United States "manufactures and consumes five times more MPH than the rest of the 
world combined," noting also that MPH "is now the most commonly prescribed 
psychotropic medicine for children in the US."

"Treatment rates for ADHD in some American schools are as high as 30 percent to 40 
percent of a class and children as young as one year old are treated with 
methylphenidate," the International Narcotics Control Board, a U
nited Nations agency, reported in March.

In addition, the report noted, "American culture and its drug-taking behavior have a 
strong influence on other regions. Methylphenidate use for children has rapidly 
increased in Australia, Canada, and several European cou
ntries."

The DEA describes MPH as "a central nervous system stimulant [that] shares many of the 
pharmacological effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, and cocaine." The DEA warns 
that a "significant number" of children and adole
scents are misusing Ritalin.

"Students are giving and selling their medication to classmates who are crushing and 
snorting the powder like cocaine," reports the DEA, which urges "greater caution and 
more restrictive use of MPH."

Such caution appears to have been confirmed in a recent survey of family physicians 
and pediatricians.

At a meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies in San Francisco May 1, clinical 
scholar Jerry Rushton of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine at Chapel 
Hill reported that 72 percent of 600 family physicia
ns and pediatricians surveyed had prescribed antidepressant drugs for patients under 
age 8. But just 8 percent of those surveyed said they had adequate training in the 
management of child depression.

"Our survey data suggest that despite a lack of research support, adequate training, 
and comfort with the management of depression, [antidepressant drugs] are gaining 
physician acceptance and becoming incorporated into pr
imary care practice," says Dr. Rushton.

While such drugs "show promise," he adds, "they should be used with caution and 
monitored closely, not used haphazardly for transient problems - not for school 
problems or nebulous behavioral problems."

Some medical professionals have begun to see that there are broader issues involved 
here.

"Demands on children have grown, while the strength of their social supports - school 
and family - has decreased," says Lawrence Diller, a pediatrician in Walnut Creek, 
Calif., and author of "Running on Ritalin: A Physici
an Reflects on Children, Society, and Performance in a Pill."

"Children are expected to learn earlier and learn more, yet we have higher 
student-teacher ratios in the classroom," Dr. Diller wrote recently in the San 
Francisco Chronicle. "Parents are working harder and longer. That m
eans less time for their children and more structured day care and
latchkey kids."

In the wake of the school shootings in Springfield, Ore., and
Littleton, Colo., (where the attackers had been taking prescribed
drugs), some lawmakers are urging greater government oversight.

In a letter to Food and Drug Administration commissioner Jane Henney
earlier this month, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) of Ohio expressed
concern that the FDA (which must approve prescription drugs) "has
failed to provide adequate oversight of the health consequences of
prescribing certain drugs to children."

Representative Kucinich called for "comprehensive clinical trials by
the pharmaceutical companies prior to FDA approval."

He wrote: "It should be apparent that this matter carries
considerable urgency."



<Picture: bullet>Before bookmarking this page in your browser, click
here.

<Picture: bullet>The URL for this page is:
http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1999/05/19/fp1s2-csm.shtml

<Picture: bullet>For further information:



�Luvox and the Littleton Columbine High School Shootings Center for
the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology �Drug found in Harris' body
Denver Post


Please Note: The Monitor does not endorse the sites behind these
links. We offer them for your additional research.

Send Editor E-mail | Go to Forums | Get Free E-mail Update


----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Home | Today's Paper | Archive | @csmonitor.com |
Subscriptions | About Us/Help | Feedback

(c) Copyright 1999 The Christian Science Publishing Society.
All rights reserved

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to