-Caveat Lector-
Rather than the below remarks, I would state:
1. The US cannot rule Europe and Germany without control of NATO and a
Russian threat.
2. The current Balkan War serves the German-Vatican-Islamic axis
interests vs the Orthodox Slavic forces and maintenance of US power in
Europe. However, if NATO is perceived to "loose" NATO could be disolved or
radically transformed to a German lead European force [exit the US], the
basis for a new Holy Roman Empire with ravenous eyes toward the East.
Lloyd Miller, A-albionic Research
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 5:33 PM
Subject: NATO against Germany
<< Subj: Re: A NATO TO CONTROL GERMANY
Date: 5/22/99 1:44:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anti-Censorship News Agency)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From : Guillermo Coletti
> P.O. Box 61221
> Pasadena CA 91106
> USA
>
>May 22, 1999
>
>The following piece contains information crucial to the
>improvement of our understanding of the current war of
>aggression against the Serbs and the former and on-going
>hostilities against the German people. Help me propagate
>this article. Forward it to friends, journalists, like-
>minded people, post it in your website, etc. Many thanks.
>
>A NATO TO CONTROL GERMANY
>by Guillermo Coletti
>Send your comments to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I have often considered writing about the real purpose of the
>North Atlantic Treaty Organization as I see it, however,
>lack of means to substantiate a number of my suspicions
>was a major reason of discouragement. Now I have something
>at my disposal that can help me break the ice: an American
>General speaks candidly on the real reasons for the existence
>of NATO. What he has to say is quite interesting for the
>uninitiated as well as for the irreverent and the perennial
>skeptic. I will use this opportunity to explain some of
>my initial ideas on this matter.
>
>Adolf Hitler, along with Mussolini, and other European leaders,
>was involved in an extraordinary effort to eradicate the
>threat of Bolshevik tyranny from Europe. The stability of the
>governments they led was threatened via the USA as much, or
>perhaps more, than any danger that could have originated in
>Moscow. When Hitler's defense of Europe was forced into the
>military alternative the Unites States made an alliance with
>Stalin. That to me was an indication that America was becoming
>friendlier to Communism than to the values of traditional
>Europe. We know that American intervention resulted in a
>greater and stronger Soviet Russia. The Communists have indeed
>a debt of gratitude to America for the expansion of Bolshevism.
>But when the Second World War was over America "agitated" the
>anti-Communist cause and formed NATO! Why NATO? It all
>sounded very phony to me because if America had truly stood
>against Bolshevism it should have joined Hitler, Mussolini and
>Franco, instead of Josef Stalin. Yet, America never admitted
>to have fought ont he wrong side. I can't help but asking
>myself when was NATO a real problem for the stability of
>Soviet Communism? Certainly not when Russian tanks and the
>Red Army occupied the streets of Prague, or Budapest. The anti-
>Communism of the American Establishment was always been as
>serious as an Abbot and Costello movie. America's true concern
>was what Germany represented and what to this day survives in
>the German. Ellie Wiesel expressed similar sentiments when he
>advocated that every Jew must have some room in his heart for
>hatred against the Germans. The difference between Wiesel and
>non-Jews Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Eisenhower is that Wiesel
>expressed his emotions with sincerity. The real threat to the
>American Way, the America of the Gay Pride Parades and Martin
>Luther King Day, was not Bolshevism but the Traditional Western
>values that Germany tried to maintain at the expense of a
>multitude of sacrifices.
>
>On April 24, 1999, NBC aired John McLaughlin's "One on One."
>The show had the participation of two guests: Lieutenant
>General William Odom and Professor Harvey Sapolsky. We are
>going to review some of the remarks made by General Odom.
>General Odom was introduced as a graduate from West Point
>who obtained his PhD at Columbia. He served in President
>Carter's National Security Council and during President
>Reagan's administration in the Office of the Army Chief of
>Staff for intelligence and for the director of Reagan's
>National Security Agency. He is currently director of
>International Security Studies at the Hudson Institute and
>professor of Public Policy and Organization in the Department
>of Political Science at the prestigious Massachussetts
>Institute of Technology, where he is also the Director of the
>Security Program. Gen. Odom authored six books, the latest
>of which is "The Collapse of Soviet Military."
>
>What I have suspected as the real purpose of NATO was disclosed,
>much to my surprise, right at the beginning of the show by
>Gen. Odom:
>"(NATO) was created not as most people think to defend
>against the Soviet military threat. The French didn't even
>mention the Soviet Union in the debate for it. They wanted
>NATO to deal with the German question. The British wanted
>NATO to keep the U.S. in Europe." Gen. Odom added, still
>remarkably candid, that "the expansion of NATO is for the same
>reason; the German question versus Poland, Czechoslovakia and
>Hungary is put to bed if there is a NATO roof over it."
>
>The type of policy advocated by this American General is
>strikingly similar to what the Germans were accused of at the
>Nuremberg Trials. Here are two more passages of this conversation
>between McLaughlin and Gen. Odom:
>
> Mr. McLaughlin: Are we supposed to run Europe?
> Gen Odom : It pays. Yes.
> Mr. McLaughlin: Why does it pay?
> Gen. Odom : You are richer today because of it.
>
>And then,
>
> Mr. McLaughlin: Can the United States defend its interests in
> Europe without NATO?
> Gen. Odom : No.
>
>One of Odom's last comments brings to public attention a second
>player in the game, further substantiating the Germanophobic
>character of NATO: "In 1994, the British foreign secretary said
>it would be better to have the Russians on the Adriatic than the
>Germans."
>
>I hope that this brief article will bring some light to those
>who still don't understand why Dresden was destroyed and why
>millions of Germans were exterminated in American and Russian
>concentration camps at the end of the war.
>
>Those who desire to verify the veracity of these quotes can
>order their own transcript of "One on One" from:
>
>Federal News Service
>620 National Press Building
>Washington, DC 20045
>(202) 346-1400
>
>- - - - - -
***********************************
Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research (POB 20273,
Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the
entire political-ideological spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales,
rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date
Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources.
To Discuss Ideas:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msen.com/~lloyd/
For Ordering Info & Free Catalog:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a-albionic.com/formaddress.html
For Discussion List:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
text in body: subscribe prj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <http://a-albionic.com/search.html> **
Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>
Video Finder, Free Catalogs, Links, Sweepstakes, What-Not:
http://www.msen.com/~daugh/store.htm
***********************************
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
