-Caveat Lector-

nurev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  -Caveat Lector-
>
> Robert Tatman wrote:
<snip>
> > It has occurred to me that there may be method to this madness. Suppose,
just
> > for the sake of argument, that what is going on here, starting with the
> > supercomputer sales to China and continuing with the policy laid out in
> > Drudge's story, is not simply cupidity, but is actually designed to gather
> > highly-sensitive intelligence. Suppose that deep inside each computer,
perhaps
> > built into the microprocessors themselves, is a radio transmitter. Suppose
> > that this transmitter is set to send a coded message from time to time,
> > perhaps to a U.S. satellite, perhaps to an SR-71 or AEGIS destroyer,
reporting
> > all of the operations that the computer's new owners have carried out on
it in
> > the past <ump> days. Suppose that U.S. officials have deliberately set out
to
> > make themselves look like idiots, to draw in and trap other countries into
> > swallowing the bait. No, I don't have any evidence for this. But just
> > suppose...
> >
> > Bob
>
> Bob, you need to start shelling out more for better quality acid.
> " American" corporations have a long history of treason. With the
> "new"
> ideology of globalization, there are fewer rabid nationalists in the
> government who give a damn about national sovereignty.
>
> This treason is not new. Treason is not treason in a capitalist
> society
> if you can make money. Selling high tech equipment and weapons to an
> enemy is very good business. It means that the government MUST spend
> more
> money to pay for new generations of weapons and computers to develop
> and
> run them. Thus creating a new market where there wasn't one before.
>
> Stalin and Krushev said that the Capitalist West will sell them the
> rope
> to hang us. They understood the pigs running this country much better
> than our fellow citizens ever do.
>
> The Rich are only loyal to the acquisition of more money.
>
> Know your enemy.
>
> Joshua2
I won't deny the slipperiness of capitalist ethics. But I do know that the R&D
that led to the creation of the supercomputers we're talking about here was
funded heavily by the Federal government, including much gelt from the black
budget. The computer business is as tied to government for its funding as is
the defense industry. (Look at the origins of both the defense industry and
the computer industry--both were originally created either directly as
government initiatives or with substantial government funding and direction.)
Without the Feds stoking the fire, nothing would ever get done on R&D. (BTW,
that's not an advertisement for Big Government but a simple statement of
historical fact. By itself, industry will concentrate on producing the same
thing as the competition in a different package...that's what capitalist
competition amounts to.) And if the Feds suggest that a *slight addition*
might be made to the chips in the computers, why, who are the captains of
industry to say no to a perfectly reasonable request? These deals with China
and other "pariah states" are most certainly not the result of operations by
rogue companies. They are instead carefully calculated to further specific
long-range policy objectives of the Federal government, or rather of certain
agencies of the Federal government. IMHO, of course.

Bob

=================================
Robert F. Tatman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove "nospam" from the address to reply.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For

more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

POSTING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTERNET DOES NOT IMPLY PERMISSION TO SEND
UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL E-MAIL (SPAM) TO THIS OR ANY OTHER INTERNET ADDRESS.
RECEIPT OF SPAM WILL RESULT IN IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF THE SENDER'S ISP.

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to