Greetings, Colleen.

VOMIT UK 25/99
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment        19 June 1999


Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed
right of
reply.   JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the
Judaeo/Masonic
Faction.   The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the
machinations
of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are.

THE PORTER WESTMINSTER COUNCIL SCANDAL
        An appeal has just been "launched" in this case.   Presumably
Deloitte Touche has appealed to the House of Lords.    We know that
Porter should be punished but we would settle in the meantime for the
sacking of the Legal Services Ombudsman, Ann Abrahams and Deloitte
Touche as auditors to any local authority.

HER MAJESTY'S PRISON - WORMWOOD SCRUBS
        This prison has attracted attention because prison officers have
been charged with seriously assaulting prisoners.    Presumably there is
an interest on account of the scale of the problem.    Some twenty-five
prison officers are involved.   The Scrubs is the one prison that
answers to no other authority.    It is the only prison with its own
Masonic lodge on the premises.

HER MAJESTY'S ARMED FORCES
        We appeal to Chris Mullin and Cupid Irvine to stop persecuting
Masons.    Everybody knows that officers in the armed services are
Masons with few exceptions.    Following complaints from the wife of a
serviceman the Government, as with the judiciary and the police, is
coming down hard on Masons.    In fact the power of Masons has not been
curbed in the slightest.     Until we have a government with guts the UK
will be effectively governed by Freemasonry which is the antithesis of
democracy.     There must be legislation, which makes all organisations
with secret memberships unlawful.

FROM JOE CITTADINI IN USA
Words of Wisdom:          ' An organization is like a tree full of
monkeys - all on different levels, some climbing up. The monkeys on top
look down and see a tree full of smiling faces. The monkeys on the
bottom look up and see nothing
but assholes.'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MAGNA CARTA  A NON STARTA
        We have a report from Mr Philip Colfox (Fax 01308 424 1180)
explaining how Lord Spens' recent experience of the legal system
highlights the fact that our fundamental rights under Magna Carta and
European Law have been whittled away.   Spens had a valid claim against
the Bank of England but his only remedy was to show that the bank had
been guilty of misfeasance thanks to the tightening up of the 1979
Banking Act in 1987.    The revised Act ensured that the Bank of England
and regulators enjoyed the privilege of immunity from claims unless it
was proved that there had been misfeasance in public office.   The Legal
Aid Board withdrew Legal Aid at a critical time and effectively stymied
Lord Spens.    He had some vitriolic words for the Government, Bank of
England, the Lord Chancellor and the Legal Aid Board.      If ever a
legal system required an overhaul our system does.    For hundreds of
years we have been swallowing our own propaganda about the fairness of
British Legal system when in fact it has been the main instrument of
oppression at home and abroad.
        We are amused by Lord Spens' argument that the Legal Aid Board
stood to recoup one million pounds it had already spent on the Spens
action.     The sole purpose of Legal Aid is to ensure that there are
cases and that lawyers are paid out of the public purse.    Had the bank
lost the case it would simply have increased the interest rate for
borrowers or reduced the rate for depositors.   Either way the public
would have had to pay.
        Mr Colfox emphasises that the fundamental principal of justice
that all men (and women) are equal before the law has been undermined by
the creation of a body of officials and quangos, which are above the
law.    In Mr Colfox's words "The creation of regulators who are above
the law has turned the United Kingdom into bandit country".    From
where we stand we would say that there will be violence in this country
against a political/legal system that terrorises and ruins decent
citizens and protects people in high places.
        Mr Colfox's French friends cannot understand why we protect high
level crooks.    The Prefait of Corsica was recently jailed and half a
dozen French Mayors are in chokey.    The UK political/judicial argument
is that public confidence would be undermined if the public knew just
how many crooks were running the country and acting in a judicial
capacity.     To this the French reply "Introduce le Maitre des Petits
Pains to Madame Guillotine pour encourager les autres".    To which we
say "Voici, voici " or "Entendez, entendez".
        Incidentally one of the first set of crooks to be given immunity
was Lloyds of London.    Listen Mr Blair and listen well.   Yours is the
final responsibility for cleaning up the legal system.    While you
concentrate on the problems outside UK you are creating an underground
army that will eventually take up arms.


COURT HEARING
        Two cases, The Law Society v Geoffrey Scriven and James Chapman
& Co v Geoffrey Scriven, were to be heard at Warrington Crown Court,
Leigh Street, at 10.30 a.m. on Monday 21 June.    Stockport County Court
provided James Chapman & Co. with a Court Order dated 8 June
transferring the Chapman hearing to Warrington County Court but did not
notify Mr Scriven of the transfer until Thursday 17 June about a hearing
which was to take place on the following Monday.   On Friday 18 June
Warrington Crown Court faxed Mr Scriven a message that an unnamed
District Judge had decided that the Chapman case could not be heard on
21 June because there was insufficient time.   A feature of Mr Scriven's
cases has been the collaboration between court officials and Mr
Scriven's opponents.   This is yet another attempt by the powers-that-be
to have a determined litigant bankrupted and rendered homeless.
        Mr Scriven has written to the Court Manager requesting a proper
public hearing in line with Lord Woolf's directions.    He has also
submitted to the Court a copy of his letter dated 15 June to Rear
Admiral D M Pulvertaft the Ministry of Defence "D Notice" censor who is
supposed to be concerned about national security.   All the Pulvertaft
types appear to do is censor anything that is critical of people in
authority even when innocent men are being set up for long prison
sentences (Matrix Churchill).   Mr Scriven correctly points out that
national security is threatened by a corrupt judicial system.    Indeed
the same lack of justice in Ulster led to the formation of the IRA and
the same absence of justice causes the IRA to retain its weapons.    Mr
Scriven lists the following cases, which we publish in, order that
investigative reporters will know where to look for a story.
1.   Royston Leicester Ph/Fax 01273 323523   2.   Brian Hudson Ph/Fax
0171 221 5572    3.   Mr & Mrs Gerald Adshead Ph/Fax 01298 813182   4.
Mr Nicholas Haralabidis Ph/Fax 0161 257 3723   5.   Mr & Mrs J Masefield
Ph/Fax 01308 485412   6.   Mr Dennis Gardner Ph/Fax 01909 591675   7.
Mrs Philomena Cullen Ph/Fax 01276 24121 .   We list a few more victims
with apologies to the people we have omitted.   8.   Mr Barry Hunt
Ph/Fax 01305 777348    9.   Mr Gerald Coulter Ph/Fax 01923 262726   10.
Mr Charles Beresford Ph/Fax 01442 249999  11.   John R Jeffrey Ph/Fax
01535 642282   12.   Mr Norman Scarth  Ph/Fax 0113 262 0449   13.   Mrs
Thelma Symons   Ph/Fax 01752 789427   14.   Mr Peter Hayward Fax 01892
520254   15.   Mr Paul T Jenkins Ph/Fax 01572 812042   16.   Mr Geoffrey
Harold Scriven Fax 0161 428 1159   17.   Mrs Marisa Sarda de Waite
Ph/Fax 01926 633462   18.   Mrs Wendy Armitstead Tel/Fax 01229 861481
19.   Mr Colin Peters Ph 01274 688136   20.   Mr David Husband  Fax
01305 860086   Ph 01305 826900

MAURICE KELLETT (Email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        Mr Kellett went walkabout last week wielding the sword of truth.
We were not extrasensorily perceptive and spent hours trying to locate
him.    His report this week caused us to weep.   
Mr Kellett repeats the story about his appearance as a Plaintiff twice
and Defendant once in Newcastle Court on 21 October 1996.    He inserts
the fact that Lord Nolan made use of his reports on Freemasonry to the
Committee on Standards in Public Life and that his contribution to the
enquiry was to become a "very significant factor in future events".
Unhappily Maurice does not tell us the outcome of the hearing or the
significance of his reports to Nolan.     However he does tell us that '
By virtue of the Statute of Limitations and Prescription, we had thus
became the lawful owners of that land'.    It is the same old story.
The Masons were using his neighbour and police frame-ups to ruin him.
His neighbour was allowed to lie and commit perjury.   Mr Kellett was
not allowed a favourable verdict.   Two of the bent judges were
Cuthberston and Fryer-Spedding.    Mr Kellett will explain later how the
judiciary is infested with Freemasonry.    Next week he will be giving
lessons to all grandmothers on the art of sucking eggs.
We were led to believe that Mr Kellett was awarded Legal Aid a few hours
before his pleading diet on 3 June and was represented by Charles David
Hughes of Harding, Swinburne, Jackson & Co of Sunderland (Fax 0191 510
0334).   Northern Electric were going to cut off Mr Kellett's
electricity supply.    The Official Receiver was going to have him
imprisoned for contempt of court.    On top of that someone tried to put
the wind up him by telling him that he could serve 5 years in prison for
trespass which breached of an injunction.    If we were Mr Kellett we
would pay less attention to the history of his persecution and
concentrate on current events.   He should keep us fully informed.   He
should also keep a running diary.    A solicitor is only as good as he
is allowed to be.     The Legal Aid Board will certainly double-cross
litigants  who criticise the legal system.

WOULD YOU BELIEVE IT?
        We have previously reported the childish and vindictive attempts
by the Labour Party and by Demon Internet Limited to silence the voice
of VOMIT.   There follows a letter from Oftel.

###   Our reference CR/166629/99            Date  10 June1999
To:   Mr Todd, Vomit UK, Misbourne Frambouse(sic), Amesham(sic) Road,
Chalfont St Giles, Bucks HI'S 4RU
From: Paul Lonsdale of Oftel, 50 Ludgate Hill, LONDON EC4M 7JJ
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]           fax:  0171  634 8845
Dear Mr Todd,                        UNSOLICITED FACSIMILE MESSAGES
I am writing in response to a written complaint received by OFTEL about
unsolicited sales calls from your company to: Mr R Kennedy, Regional
Director, The Labour Party(sic),The Labour Party (Midlands Region), 67
Birmingham Road, West Bromwhich (sic) B70 6PY       Fax numbers:0121 553
6602 and 0115 943 1888
Mr R Kennedy has informed us that despite writing to your company making
it clear your services were not required and that no further faxes from
your company should be sent, a further faxes (sic) have been received.
You may wish to know that on 8 November 1989, new restrictions were
introduced in response to public concern about unsolicited sales
messages. They are currently contained in the Self Provision Licence
(SPL) and the Telecommunications Service Licence (TSL), which are the
main class licences under which the majority of private
telecommunications systems are run. If you are in any doubt as to which
one to run your telecommunication system under, we recommend that you
inspect copies of the TSL and SPL and the Explanatory Guide, in order
that you may know which of these is more relevant to the operation of
your system. Turning to the specific complaint, I would point out
condition 6 of the SPL and TSL requires Licensees to cease sending
unsolicited sales messages to people who have made such a request. Those
licences also require Licensees to maintain a record containing the
relevant particulars of all such people and to make that record
available to the Director General of Telecomrnunications for inspection
on reasonable notice.
With regard to this specific complaint, OFTEL is concerned to note Mr R
Kennedy was still receiving unsolicited faxes despite efforts to stop
them. OFTEL would therefore like to seek your assurance that the
situation will be corrected and that they will not be contacted in this
manner again.
I would be grateful if you could confirm in writing to OFTEL that your
company has arrangements in place to stop sending faxes to people that
receive them and who subsequently no longer wish to be contacted.
The licences under which most individuals and businesses operate their
telephone systems require people to respect the wishes of those who have
asked not to receive further calls, or unsolicited faxes, from that
organisation. Our Director General can initiate action if further calls
are made.
I look forward to receiving your reply.
Yours faithfully,    Paul Lonsdale    Consumer Representation.   ###

We replied to Lonsdale pointing out that we were not a company offering
items for sale, that we had not faxed Kennedy and that we did not like
Lonsdale's veiled threats.    We asked Lonsdale what law we had violated
and what sanctions he could apply to us.    This Kennedy idiot started
by faxing us numbers after midnight.    His faxes were anonymous as were
the numbers.    Then another idiot from British Telecom ordered us not
to fax Kennedy.    To the BT and Oftel nincompoops we have said that
when the Blair mob stops pushing leaflets through our door and spinning
lies on the news media we will stop faxing our news to Labour offices.
On account of the petty vindictiveness exhibited by these people and the
number of misspellings in their correspondence we believe that we are
dealing with a Mandelson/Davies circle of friends who telephone each
other every time we criticise homosexuals.    We repeat that the
majority of citizens in the UK believe that sodomy is a filthy form of
recreation with its attendant skidmarks and risk of ring myxomatosis and
other unspeakable infections.    All the perfumes of Arabia will not
quench the smell in a room with sodomites.    Our advice to Kennedy and
Lonsdale is to stop bleating and start wearing backward facing chastity
belts.    You, Lonsdale, are guilty of the criminal offence of
misconduct in public office in that you are misinterpreting the law in
order to allow a friend to vent his spleen on an upright and honest
heterosexual.   Shame on you!   
On 2 March 1999 Demon Internet decided to close down our Web page which
was attracting a large number of readers throughout the world.
Demon's excuse was firstly that we had libelled Dacorum Borough Council.
Demon changed its story when it was pointed out that Dacorum could not
sue for libel.    It then relied upon unspecified libels against
unspecified persons.     We could not delete the libels because we could
not identify them.    On 4 June Demon denied us access to the Internet
News Groups again for no valid reason other than that we published a
letter about Pulvertaft.   At the same time it shut off our 8 year-old
grandson who never contacts News Groups and whose computer had never
been used to contact News Groups.    Bear in mind that the man who co-
ordinates media censorship is Rear Admiral Pulvertaft, the D Notice
supremo.
At the end of February 1999, two days before our Web page was closed
down, Mr Rod Matthews was ousted as Managing Director of Scottish-
Telecom, the parent company of Demon Internet.    Since Mr Matthews was
the man who built the company he was not well pleased.    This suggests
a ganging up on Mr Matthews and dirty work in the boardroom.    We are
talking here of a billion pound business.   We are also talking about a
Scottish business.    The likely explanation for Mr Matthews' departure
is that a Masonic ring decided to take the business from Mr Matthews.
That is how it is done in Scotland where Masons call the shots.    The
Masons would also decide to censor the Vomit Web page because it was
primarily anti-Masonic.
We had hoped to use Virgin as our Internet Service Provider until we
learned that Virgin insisted on having the copyright of everything we
posted on the Web.   Anyone using our material, including us, would have
had to pay Virgin for the privilege.   No thanks Richard Branson! 

MUTUAL AID
CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB.   Fax 01223
327042.
Ph 01223 327634           (Organiser - Suzon Forscey-Moore, American Law
Researcher)

POW TRUST,  (A registered benevolent and social welfare charity) 295a
Queenstown Road,
London SW8 3NP.   Tel.0171 720 9767  Fax 0171 498 0477 (Gen.Secy. Peter
Sainsbury).

TRY "PUNCH" AND BUY "PUNCH"(�1.50 fortnightly) Punch Letters,100
Brompton Road,
LONDON SW3 1ER. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax 0171 225 6766.

NEW DEMOCRACY ACTION, PO Box 187, Chesterfield, Derbys.S40 2DU Ph/Fax
01246 555713
(Organiser Eric Giles)

ECOWARRIORS v. Chiltern District Council
http://www.fintco.demon.co.uk/siblets  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DACORUM ACTION GROUP v.  Labour's Masons in the Borough Council
http://www.dacorupt.demon.co.uk  Contact David Fisher  Phone 01442
260329.

Published by J M Todd,    Misbourne Farmhouse,    Amersham Road,
Chalfont St Giles,    Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright.  Tel 01494 871204.  Fax 01494 870031 
       E-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

-- 
The Avengers
Awaiting new web site corruptly removed by Demon.
Await the file http://www.vomit.org/Demon


Reply via email to