-Caveat Lector-
>
> WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : Britain
>
> Britain's Freedom of Information Act � a charter for state
> secrecy
>
> By Jean Shaoul
> 3 July 1999
>
> Back to screen version
>
> The introduction of �right to know� legislation was one of Prime
> Minister Tony Blair's key election promises. A Labour government
> would be open, accountable and transparent, he said. But the
> long-awaited draft Freedom of Information (FoI) Bill not only
> fails to fulfil this pledge, it is entirely retrogressive. The
> FoI bill strips the White Paper, published 18 months ago, of its
> few progressive features.
>
> The new draft bill creates a right of access to records,
> including personal files, held by public bodies and some private
> bodies carrying out public functions or contracts, inside a
> 40-day period. But there is a long list of exemptions (22 to be
> precise). These include the secret services, international
> relations, law enforcement, internal policy advice�including
> background or factual documents prepared for central government,
> the privatised utilities, and the findings of health and safety
> investigations.
>
> In addition, information can be kept secret when its release
> �would prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs�, a
> clause which replaces the �substantial harm� proviso in the
> original draft. This formulation is so vague that it will make it
> far easier for the authorities to argue against disclosure. Such
> a claim will not be subject to judicial review by the courts. The
> current code of good practice devised by the Tory government
> states that information that could remain secret should be placed
> in the public domain if there is a strong public interest
> argument for doing so. Thus the new bill undermines existing
> provisions.
>
> The Freedom of Information Bill also means:
>
> * The government will be free to invoke �commercial
> confidentiality� to preserve its secrets.
>
> * Information whose disclosure is not itself harmful can be
> suppressed if, combined with any other confidential information,
> it would be �prejudicial�.
>
> * Government may withhold information on the basis of the
> (assumed) motives for the request, or if it is too costly to
> provide it.
>
> * Even when information is released, ministers may prohibit the
> recipient from publishing it. The bill also enables ministers to
> create new exemptions at short notice, by parliamentary order.
>
> * An Information Commissioner, with no power to override
> government refusals to disclose, will supervise the public's
> �rights�.
>
> Access to information from health and education services will be
> easier, and even actively encouraged. But in the context of
> government policies that are allowing such services to wither on
> the vine, this simply constitutes another means to legitimise the
> privatisation and/or closure of so-called �failing services�.
>
> It will be impossible to obtain a copy of a health-and-safety
> report carried out after a fatal accident at work, even if the
> employer's safety practices were found to be negligent. Food
> inspection reports will not be placed in the public domain,
> neither will the evidence submitted to government advisory
> committees that formulate policy on such matters as genetically
> modified foods. Corporations lobbied the government and won the
> right to keep virtually all commercial information out of the
> public domain.
>
> The US introduced a statutory right to access information in
> 1966, and most western countries followed suit in the 1970s and
> early 1980s. Britain has lagged far behind the rest of the world.
> In Australia, most applications have been to see personal files.
> It has been difficult, if not downright impossible, to access
> other information, as successive governments have used their
> ministerial certificates and delaying tactics to block access.
>
> In the US, 50-60 percent of requests are from companies seeking
> information about their competitors. FoI legislation has spawned
> a huge private industry in government information. Companies have
> been set up which specialise in selling information or asking for
> data on behalf of companies or individuals who do not want to ask
> for it publicly themselves.
>
> However, the 1966 law did not give companies advance notice of
> the release of information or the right to object. Major
> corporations fought and won a series of high-profile court cases,
> and the government amended the legislation to provide
> corporations with �reverse FoI rights�. This is a vital weapon
> for corporations in strengthening their hand against consumers
> and downsizing government. British corporations are already
> complaining that such �reverse FoI� provisions are absent from
> the UK bill.
>
> Most commentators have put the British Bill's lack of progressive
> content down to government �obsession� with secrecy. But the
> government is not only shielding its own activities, it is also
> shielding the activities of big business.
>
> Not surprisingly, the bill says not one word about the panoply of
> legislation, conventions and codes that prevent the publication
> of government documents, and which make Britain the most
> secretive of all the �democratic� countries. It leaves intact
> more than 100 statutes that make disclosure of information a
> criminal offence.
>
> At the heart of government secrecy lies Section 2 of the Official
> Secrets Act. The original Act, rushed through parliament in 40
> minutes at the height of the Agadir crisis in 1911, when war with
> Germany loomed, gave blanket protection for every single piece of
> information inside Whitehall. It was only after a string of high
> profile cases in the 1970s and 1980s, and the prospect of a
> likely successful challenge before the European Commission of
> Human Rights by civil rights campaigners, that Section 2 was
> replaced. The new legislation, introduced in 1989, is slightly
> less restrictive, but correspondingly, more enforceable.
>
> Press freedom is bound by the gagging system of �D notices�, the
> 1934 Incitement to Disaffection Act, contempt of court, Crown
> privilege and even, on occasion, the law of confidence which was
> originally designed for trade secrets. Deprived of independent
> right of access to information about public affairs, under the
> �lobby system� journalists are only provided information in the
> form of unattributable briefings by ministers and their
> spokesmen. It is an ideal system for spreading disinformation,
> flying government kites, rubbishing political opponents and, most
> of all, burying the truth.
>
> It is simply not possible in Britain to call up officials who
> know the facts and ask about them without getting special
> clearance. Every ministerial department has a public relations
> office that relates nothing more than what is contained in the
> day's press releases, and these are often inaccurate.
>
> Government papers automatically stay sealed for 30 years, and
> some �sensitive� papers are closed even longer�for up to 100
> years. Documents considered too sensitive to ever see the public
> light of day (for example, those concerning the abdication of
> Edward VIII in 1936) stay closed forever, as do all post-war
> documents mentioning the activities of MI5 and MI6. Some
> documents are known to be withdrawn from public records offices
> soon after release.
>
> Increased restrictions on the public's right to know go hand in
> hand with the dismantling of the welfare state, increased police
> budgets and powers, oppressive immigration and asylum laws, and
> other incursions against civil liberties. The new bill will
> strengthen the British establishment's ability to operate in
> secrecy from its own citizens.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Copyright 1998-99
> World Socialist Web Site
> All rights reserved
>
>
<<And we know that Eddie #8 was not only the one to marry the
American woman but had some leanings toward the Germans as well.
On this last note, I seem to recollect (after researching same
to elicit specificity of facts), it may have had something to so
with 'family ties', warranting -- in part -- being closed
forever:
> Queen Victoria's third child, Alice, passed hemophilia to the
German and Russian imperial families. Of Alice's six children,
three were tainted with hemophilia. At the age of three, her
son, Frederick, bled for three agonizing days from a cut on the
ear. Eventually, the flow of blood was stanched. But a few
months later, while playing boisterously in his mother's room,
the boy charged headlong through an open window and fell to the
terrace below. By the evening he was dead from the internal
bleeding. <
http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/hemo.htm >>
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
