-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 99-07-15 01:32:14 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >House, a shadowy figure who is practically unknown to the American public >these days, was one of the most influential men in twentieth century >American politics. He engineered the election of Woodrow Wilson to the >presidency; he played a key role in the formulation of the Federal Reserve >Act; he represented Wilson in the negotiations that finalized the disastrous >Treaty of Versailles; also, he was one of the invisible king-makers behind >Franklin Roosevelt. All this, and Col. House was only the pawn of even BIGGER "invisible king-makers," namely the "Society of the Elect," governed for decades by Lords Cecil and Balfour -- British prime ministers both, and designers of the Royal Institute for International Affairs (of which the CFR is only the American wing) and a host of other "front groups," not only political but religious and even occult, which served the modern British imperial agenda even when allegedly fostering "Anglo-American collaboration." (But since that agenda was being bankrolled by the Rothschilds, we need to include them among the "Elect.") House took his diplomatic orders directly from Robert Cecil, Lord Salisbury, and was flattered to have been granted an entre into his "lofty" company. Woodrow Wilson, in turn, took his orders from House. House's "think tank" called, I believe, the Inquiry, was born in WWI under Wilson and it continued to function as an Anglo-American "State Department" during Roosevelt's rise to power. The Rothschilds used middlemen such as House to enlist wealthy Jewish Americans in the Anglo-American "New Deal" plan with which Roosevelt, being the political figurehead at the time, has become identified. There's little purpose in putting the spotlight on House without ALSO mentioning his role in the tight-knit Anglophile "conspiracy" in which he too was only a cog in a larger wheel. Any decent diplomatic history of the WWI period will straightforwardly provide the international chain of command in the Versailles negotiations. What's being called "socialism" here is more a "benevolent feudalism" such as Bismarck was introducing, and for the same reasons: if you didn't throw the peasants a few crumbs, they'll revolt against their aristocratic masters. The blueprint of the "Society of the Elect," as I understand it, was a two-tiered affair -- a "liberal" society for the masses -- but masses STILL ruled autocratically by a conservative, imperially predatory and ambitious, elite. That duplex structure still befuddles "either-or" ideologists who don't "get" Orwell's 1984 --.simplistic minds who can't see foreground and background at the same time. It's "socialism" for the "proletariat" at the bottom AND "fascism" for their rulers at the top. DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
