-Caveat Lector-
I have a couple questions I hope you won't mind answering..
I have a hard time seeing what's wrong with it - don't get me wrong, I'm not
saying I know it's right, but I can't see much bad. It seems like a good
thing in that it keeps people from screwing up nice places. Which we do all
the time. I don't see how buying up land in national parks forces people
into the more manageable cities. As far as I know people don't live in
national parks. Can you explain it more?
I don't like the idea of it being UN owned, though.
What is the global biodiversity plan?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Bard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, July 15, 1999 2:40 PM
Subject: [CTRL] UN Thugs Place OUR National parks off-limits
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither
>inclined nor determined to commit crimes...
>Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the
assailants;
>they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides,
>for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence then an armed
>man."
> --- Thomas Jefferson
>
>
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_dougherty/19990715_xnjdo_national_p.sh
t
>ml
>
>
>THURSDAY
>JULY 15
>1999
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>----
> National parks off-limits
>U.N.-designated panel
>calls for increased 'buffer zones'
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>----
>
>By Jon E. Dougherty
>© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com
>
>Last year a United Nations-designated panel, at the behest of the Clinton
>administration, called for the creation of uninhabited "buffer zones"
around
>several U.S. national parks. Since then roughly two dozen U.S. parks and
>preserves, covering millions of acres of public land, have been included in
>the plan.
>Now, however, new plans to expand these zones are in the works, and the
>outrage has reached a near fever pitch among experts who say these
>U.N.-designated sites are merely attempts to "globalize" huge portions of
>the United States -- with taxpayers picking up the tab.
>
>Henry Lamb of Eco-Logic -- a watchdog organization that monitors U.N.
>activities and U.S. sovereignty issues -- told WorldNetDaily that one
>example -- at Yellowstone National Park, where the creation of a larger
>buffer zone is well underway -- was "just a sign of things to come."
>
>"Inside Yellowstone, the U.S. Park Service is shutting down campgrounds as
>the park is being prepared to become the core of a huge biosphere reserve,
>as part of the United Nations global biodiversity plan," he said. "Once
>established, no human activity will be permitted in the area," even though
>U.S. taxpayers must continue to fund the maintenance and upkeep of
>Yellowstone and other popular outdoor tourist sites.
>
>Lamb said that in order to increase the buffer zone around Yellowstone, the
>Park Service drove local businesses away by refusing to maintain access
>roads. When the businesses folded as a result of heavy financial losses,
the
>land was bought with taxpayer money and a larger zone of inaccessibility
was
>created by default.
>
>"Once they buy the land, the government is obviously not going to resell
>it," he said, thus creating permanently larger buffer zones.
>
>"The purpose of establishing sites as U.S. national parks was to have
people
>in them enjoying them," Lamb added. "But the Clinton administration has
>completely bought into this U.N. notion that our land ought to be their
>land, managed by them. And as such, it ought to be uninhabited as well."
>
>He said if most Americans "knew what was going on (with their national
>parks), the uproar would be deafening."
>
>In the case of Yellowstone, Lamb said the government's acquiescence to the
>U.N.'s agenda cost a gold mining company about $30 million and in the end
>prevented them from mining one ounce of known gold reserves, even though
the
>government indicated they initially would have allowed it.
>
>"The owners of the Crown Butte New World gold mine, which is outside of
>Yellowstone National Park," he said, "were told by the government to comply
>with a list of environmental requirements before they could move in and
>begin mining."
>
>But after being threatened with non-stop litigation from environmental
>groups funded by U.N. agencies that could have lasted decades, the mining
>company finally agreed to a deal that leaves at least $650 million of known
>gold reserves in the ground instead. That deal provided the company with
>about $65 million dollars for "more exploration." Of that amount, the
>government said about $21 million had to be used for "environmental
>clean-up."
>
>Lamb said that Congress has consistently ignored Clinton administration
>orders and directives designed to implement many of the U.N. mandates.
Clint
>on, he said, is implementing U.N. directives via executive order and
>presidential directive "because then he doesn't have to worry about getting
>Senate treaty ratification."
>
>At present a U.N.-sponsored biodiversity treaty, designed to limit U.S.
>public access to so-called "World Heritage Sites" and "Biodiversity sites"
>is languishing in the Senate. No action is scheduled on its ratification.
>
>Lamb added that in the course of the next several years, with no
>congressional oversight, the addition of more U.S. parks to the "Heritage"
>and "Biodiversity" sites lists will follow.
>
>"It is a well-documented fact that the U.N. is trying to gain control over
>vast amounts of U.S. territories to herd more people into cities where they
>are more manageable," Lamb said. "That can't be done without at least tacit
>approval from Congress, regardless of the political agenda of any
>administration."
>
>Lamb said he has "allies" in Congress that are opposed to the
implementation
>of this, and other, U.N.-mandated land use plans.
>
>"But they're relatively few and as such equally unsuccessful" in stopping
>such initiatives, he added.
>
>Jon E. Dougherty is a senior writer and columnist for WorldNetDaily, as
well
>as a morning co-host of Daybreak America.
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>----
>© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>----
> This page was last built 7/15/99; 1:26:19 AM Direct corrections and
>technical inquiries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_dougherty/19990715_xnjdo_national_p.sh
t
>ml
>
>
>The Libertarian Party
>Tax Plan: Select "Text Files" on the Left.
>http://harrybrowne2000.org/
>
>"Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it;
>and this I know, my lords, that where laws end, tyranny begins."
> --- William Pitt
>
>
>Bard
>
>Visit me at:
>The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government
>http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm
>
>Federal Government defined:
>....a benefit/subsidy protection racket!
>
>DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
>==========
>CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
>screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid
matters
>and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
>frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
>spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
>gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
>be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
>nazi's need not apply.
>
>Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
>========================================================================
>Archives Available at:
>http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
>http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>========================================================================
>To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
>SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
>SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Om
>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
