-Caveat Lector-
you are frogetting one! France still has something to do
with GM food. some kind of legal tangle that if France
declines GM food it could allow the rest of Europe to
potentially do the same.
-- That is just the way that I understood what I read
Piper --
All I know is that if someone eats garlic, you can smell it.
If a plant has herbicides or pesticides it seems as if you would
get a dose of those in the offactory glands as well. So ***
could that trigger an alergy? Would would happen to perfume
made with flowers that have been treated with herbicides or
pesticides?
All I know is that I do not want to send anyone that is in the
hospital FLOWERS (expessally a new born) and considering
that are replacing the natural scents and oils with petrocemicals
or might use things like canola oil, I just do not like perfume
until I can make my own perfume and poperi.
France does not grow as many flowers for perfume as
it has done in the past. Maybe people do not
like perfumes made with sick flowers and maybe the ones
with petrochemicals deaden certain scent areas of the ofectory
glands.
If this is true what would happen to people when they eat
plants that have pesticides and herbicides built in Genitically?
Would the people cause allergic reactions to the same
people that are allergic to the sick flowers?
After eating some (or enough) GM food could you become
allergic to yourself?
Piper
Alamaine wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Institute for Public Accuracy
> 915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
> (202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___________________________________________________
>
> Thursday, July 15, 1999
>
> TRADE ISSUES: AFRICA, AGRICULTURE
>
> There have been a number of developments on trade issues this week: The World
> Trade Organization ruled on the European Union�s ban on U.S. hormone-injected
> beef, the Secretary of Agriculture made a speech on genetically modified foods
> and the House is set to vote on major Africa trade legislation. Among the
> analysts available to discuss these issues are:
>
> LORI WALLACH, [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.citizen.org
> Director of Public Citizen�s Global Trade Watch, Wallach said: �The House is
> about to vote on legislation that a coalition of oil companies dubbed the
> �African Growth and Opportunity Act.� It certainly does nothing to help Africa
> grow or expand its opportunities, although it is full of special perks for
> foreign corporations. In exchange for modest new rights to import textiles and
> apparel, the bill requires African nations to mortgage their future by slashing
> public investment in health and education, cutting corporate taxes, removing
> hunger-fighting price supports, and opening Africa�s natural resources to
> foreign exploitation. Our other trade agreements don�t impose harsh conditions
> on trading partners; neither should agreements with Africa.�
>
> NJOKINJOROGE NJEH�, [EMAIL PROTECTED],www.50years.org
> Director of the 50 Years Is Enough Network, Njeh� said: �If the African Growth
> and Opportunity Act becomes law it will take away sub-Saharan Africa�s right to
> determine her own destiny. The bill mandates that countries adhere to more of
> the same flawed IMF austerity programs in order to qualify for trade benefits
> with the United States. The benefits would flow to a few U.S. corporations,
> while the vast majority of African people would be disempowered and hindered
> from developing or benefitting from Africa�s great potential and resources.
> This is outrageous and unacceptable. Continuing to bleed Africa of her
> financial resources when the health, social development, and future of her
> people are at great risk is not only hopelessly immoral -- it is also a
> grievously short-sighted way to treat a trading partner.�
>
> KRISTIN DAWKINS, [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.iatp.org
> A program director at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Dawkins
> said: �The U.S. is demanding that the Europeans buy beef with artificial growth
> hormones and the Europeans are adamantly opposed to that. A virtually identical
> stand-off is shaping up around the issue of genetically engineered foods. If a
> small number of countries succeed in pushing deregulatory policy through the
> WTO, it will show the undemocratic nature of the WTO and fly in the face of
> overwhelming popular demand for healthy foods on both sides of the Atlantic.�
>
> For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
> Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
--
Any man can stand adversity,
The true test is to give a man power.
http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/~index.htm
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
