-Caveat Lector-

from:
New York History
Vol.XLVII No.3  July 1966
New York State Historical Association©1966
Cooperstown, New York
-----

The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays.
By Richard Hofstadter. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965. Pp. xiv, 315. $5.95)

Richard Hofstadter's style of history rather than the paranoid style of
American politics provides unity to this collection of essays. Readers
familiar with Hofstadter's history will recognize most of the seven essays.
Despite this, their publication as a unit is fortunate, because in the heated
historical debate which has whirled around Professor Hofstadter since the
appearance of The Age of Reform in 1955, the arguments often centered on
specific points of fact or peripheral issues, overshadowing the conceptual
pattern fundamental to Hofstadter's approach. While the lucid style and
provocative conclusions which characterize the essays, make them incisive in
their own right, the book as a whole, perhaps derives its greatest value from
the opportunity it provides for a much needed dispassionate re-examination of
the author's historical methodology.

After considering the "paranoid style" in American history, Hofstadter
examines the recent expression of that style in the political right. He
defines the paranoid style as a conspiratorial world -view seen in
apocalyptic terms, which dictates a militant and uncompromising posture for
adherents in their struggle against the demonic conspiracy which would
destroy the nation, culture and way of life. This style Hofstadter tells us,
appeared as early as 1798 when elements of the New England clergy saw the
Bavarian Illuminati behind the Jeffersonians, and has  since reappeared in
various historical guises: the anti-Masonic move-ment, anti-Catholicism,
Populism, McCarthyism and the contemporary radical right. Hofstadter
suggests, but  unfortunately fails to explore in depth, that the paranoid
world view stems from religious millennialism. In discussing the forces that
propel the paranoid disposition into, political activity, Hofstadter returns
to a basic theme, and the paranoid style becomes for him an ex-pression of
"status politics."

Hofstadter's conception of "status politics"  juxtaposed to "in-terest
politics" provides the framework for the remaining essays. He argues that
non-economic issues stemming from anxiety over social status and identity,
which the melting pot and social mo-bility heightened, find greater
opportunity for political expres-sion in periods when material interests
appear less urgent. Hof-stadter concludes that "in depressions or during
great bursts of economic reform people vote  for what they think are their
economic interests, in times of prosperity they feel free to vote
Their prejudices." Thus, in Hofstadter's view, the contemporary  radical
right fits this pattern because their pseudo-conservatism appeals to the old
stock white Republicans losing status and immigrant groups. on the rise. For
these groups, Goldwater's presidential campaign represented a clear appeal to
status politics against the immorality of "something for everybody" interest
politics.

In the second group of essays Hofstadter applies his conception to other
aspects of the modern era. Status politics, rather than rational economic
arguments, gave impetus to the Spanish American War and imperialism, as well
as the turn of the century anti-trust movement and the recent
institutionalizing of anti-trust activity. In the Final essay, Hofstadter
details the free silver movemerit and the place of William H. "Coin" Harvey
in that movement. Harvey represented popular thought, and Hofstadter's
description of the Populist mind was earlier explicit in The Age of Reform.

With the essay on Harvey, Hofstadter brings the historian back to the start
of the debate, and again underlines the significance of status politics as a
tool for understanding American history. He engages in some honest revision,
which his critics will find gratifying, but on the whole reaffirms his
historical approach.

WILLIAM E. AKIN
Harpur College, State University of New York

pps.314-315
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to