-Caveat Lector-

An excerpt from:
The Ohio Gang
Charles L. Mee, Jr.�1981
M. Evans and Company, Inc.
216 East 49th Street
New York, New York 10017
ISBN 0-87131-340-5
218 pps � out-of-print/one edition
--[12]--

XXXIV.

The People Crushed

HARDING, WHO HAD tried to remain aloof, stepped in at last. He asked Lewis to
have the workers return to work, temporarily, on the basis of the current
wage scale, and then to promise to agree to the recommendations of a
presidential commission that Harding would appoint to determine a fair
settlement. The proposal was doubly rigged against the miners: eight of the
eleven members of the commission would be owners or Harding-appointed
representatives of the "general public" (who could be expected to be opposed
to the miners), and in any case, the commission would return to the old
method of determining settlements district by district, destroying the
national union by dividing it. Lewis declined.

"I want to convey to you in this message," Harding telegraphed to the
governors of twenty-eight coal-mining states, "the assurance of the prompt
and full support of the federal government whenever and wherever you find
your own agencies of law and order inadequate to meet the situation." The
president's message was somewhat vague, but the governors-and the miners-all
interpreted it the same way: if the owners wanted to reopen their mines,
whether with strikebreakers or any other kind of laborers, they would have
federal troops to back them. With rumors of a shooting war, all sides pulled
back for a brief respite.

In the very midst of the coal strike, the Railroad Labor Board, which had
been constituted in 1920 to hear arguments and determine wage and work-rule
settlements for railroad workers, ordered a $48 million (13 percent) wage cut
for 400,000 maintenance-of-way railroad workers. The board followed this
order eight days later with another decision: to cut the pay of 400,000
railroad shopmen by $60 million. Ten days after that the board ordered $26.5
million cut from the payrolls of 325,000 clerks and signalmen. The railroad
shopmen walked out.

"The Red agents of the Soviet Government," said Harry Daugherty, "who had
bored into the organization of our coal miners . . . worked day and night, by
inflammatory circulars and fanatical speakers, to precipitate a clash of
arms." Their goal was nothing less than to "tie up every artery of commerce
in America," to destroy the "foundations of the Republic," to "overthrow our
government and substitute a Soviet Regime." Daugherty knew his duty. He went
to the president and told him "that the coal strike would have to be broken,
or we must surrender to the gentlemen in Moscow who were directing it."

Daugherty, uninterested in economics or the study of historical phenomena in
general, himself a schemer and conniver who always had dozens of small and
large plots and conspiracies and counterplots and deals and string pullings
going at the same time, could only assume that everyone else did, too, and
that, somewhere in the world, there was a great and greatly malevolent,
master plotter who was trying to do him in. Whether Harding was entirely
convinced by Daugherty seems doubtful, although, once again, he found
Daugherty's counterplottings useful.

"I've a war map on the wall of my office," Daugherty told Harding, "in which
pins are stuck daily marking the spot where a train has been wrecked, a
bridge dynamited, a riot has broken out, a worker been kidnapped, another
assaulted, a murder committed. Hundreds of cases are covered up. Men are
maimed and killed and the crimes concealed.

"I have records piled high in black and white, from eye-witnesses whose words
are beyond question. Of known murders by the strikers. A thousand and five
hundred cases of felonious assault with intent to kill. Sixty-five accounts
of kidnapping accompanied by brutal assault, eight cases of tar and
feathers....

"The real import of this movement is not on the surface. You must look deeper
to find it. We are face to face with a determined conspiracy to overturn the
government itself."

The Soviets, said Daugherty, planned to seize control of the labor unions
first and convert them into "fighting units." These would then be fused into
a single whole. The leaders of this conspiracy could be found easily enough:
they were leaders of the "Liberal" groups and of the "Civil Liberties,"
"Parlor Bolshevik," and "Intelligentsia" groups.

"The class struggle," Daugherty continued, "which so long appeared in forms
unrecognizable to millions of workers, develops now into open combat, civil
war."

"It looks like it, doesn't it?" the president muttered- whether in agreement
or fatigue at the harangue is not clear.

"Looks like it!" Daugherty shouted. "It is civil war. And it's so widespread
and serious we don't dare allow the facts to be known! The Labor Lobby in
Washington that attempts a stranglehold on legislation is no longer
conservative. It is controlled by the Red borers in its ranks."

Harding had no reply to this.

"We can't afford," Daugherty went on, or claimed he did, lecturing the
president right into the carpet, "to proclaim a condition of civil war at
this time, though we are actually in it. The reckless young of the rising
generation, who have caught the spirit of anarchy from the war conditions,
have begun to question all things you and I hold sacred and worthwhile."

"Well," said Harding at last, having suffered Daugherty's full course on The
Menace, "what is your answer to this?"

"Direct, drastic, firm action by the United States Government. Can it live
and move and assert its power? Have we a government?"

"I believe," Daugherty remembered-or imagined- Harding's reply, "we have."

pps. 181-184

=====

XXXV.

An Absent-Minded
Elimination of Free Speech,
Assembly, And So Forth

WHATEVER HIS CONVERSATION with Daugherty may have been, Harding did decide to
go ahead with a dramatic speech to Congress, where he spoke to a packed joint
session of House and Senate. This gave him a superb opportunity to appear
decisive, forceful, a firm leader, and altogether presidential.

"We must assert," Harding declared, "the doctrine that in this Republic the
first obligation and the first allegiance of every citizen, high and low, is
to his government.... And to hold that government to be the just and
unchallenged sponsor for public welfare and the liberty, security, and rights
of all its citizens.

"No matter what clouds may gather, no matter what storms may ensue, no matter
what hardships may attend, or what sacrifices may be necessary, government by
law must and will be sustained." Daugherty was dispatched on the night train
to Chicago, where he appeared before Judge James Wilkerson, who had been
appointed Justice of the Northern Illinois District Court by Harding, on
Daugherty's recommendation. Wilkerson issued the injunction that Daugherty
had drafted: it affirmed the open shop and the right to work and forbade
union members from interfering with strikebreakers' coming in to take over
their jobs. More than that, however, it enjoined union members from the
exercise of all sorts of their constitutional rights. They were not to be
allowed to "loiter" near railroad offices or yards; they were not to
"congregate" near railroad shops or terminals; they were not to picket; they
were not even to speak to anyone to persuade them not to work; they were not
allowed "in letters, circulars, telegrams, telephones, or word of mouth, or
through interviews in the papers, [to] encourage or direct anyone to leave or
enter the service of the railroad companies."

The injunction stunned the strikers and broke the strike within forty-eight
hours. The mine workers, already chilled by Harding's apparent promise to
call out federal troops, found their way back to the negotiating table, too,
and agreed to a settlement worked out by a friend of Andrew Mellon's�the
"Cleveland formula," similar to Harding's old proposal.

When Daugherty returned triumphantly to Washington, he discovered that his
injunction had stunned his fellow cabinet members, too. None of the members
of the cabinet objected to the intention or the outcome of the injunction,
not Hoover or Hughes or Mellon or Davis or any of the others, but almost all
of them were appalled at its heavy-handedness.

Hughes and Hoover went on record that the injunction was "outrageous in law
as well as morals." Hoover pointed out to Daugherty that the injunction was a
mistake because it virtually eliminated civil liberties. Theodore Roosevelt,
Jr., who had been made an assistant secretary of the navy and was sitting in
for the absent Denby, pointed out that the injunction was too broad and that,
furthermore, it was politically imprudent- because congressional elections
were coming up, an observation that gave pause to all the men sitting around
the table.

Harding turned to Daugherty and told him to withdraw those parts of the
injunction that infringed on civil liberties.

Daugherty left the cabinet meeting with his feelings badly bruised. Far from
getting the congratulations, indeed the adulation, he thought he deserved for
having saved the Republic, he had been roundly abused. At that moment,
Daugherty understood, a Communist conspiracy was out to get him.

pps. 188-185

=====

XXXVI.

A Little of the Old Soft Soap

POLITICS IS COMPOSED almost as much of symbolic acts, or appear-ances, as it
is of actual policies. Sometimes a symbolic act will prepare the public for
the policy to follow; sometimes the symbolic act will announce the beginning
of the policy; sometimes it will boost a policy along. Often, however, a
symbolic act is most useful when it flatly contradicts an actual
policy-helping to confuse and draw the sting from the opposition. To speak
one way and act another will allow a politician to stand on both sides of an
issue.

Eugene V. Debs, the grand old man of American socialism, had been sent to the
Atlanta penitentiary in 1918 for "actively and purposely" obstructing the
draft. While he was in jail, he had been nominated, as he had so often been
in the past, to run for president in 1920 on the Socialist ticket�and he had
gotten almost a million votes.

Although Debs was understood, first, to be a Socialist and an antiwar critic
of the government, he had come, also, to be regarded more generally as a
champion of outsiders of other sorts. "An aftereffect of the Great War," said
Mark Sullivan, "had been irritation on the part of some labor groups which,
fostered by a few radical leaders, seemed pointed towards serious social
unrest. These leaders were making skillful use of Debs's incarceration. Debs,
they declared, was the victim of persecution by the same profit-greedy men
who had maneuvered America into the war and made labor do the fighting while
they amassed riches." Debs became, in spite of himself, the hero of the left,
and of labor.

When Harding took office, he was besieged with letters and petitions seeking
Debs's release from jail. Another of America's Socialist leaders, Norman
Thomas, who had worked for a time as a newsboy for Harding's Marion
newspaper, wrote to Harding to urge the release of all "political" prisoners,
as Woodrow Wilson had dubbed them, of whom there were three classes: those
who had personally tried to avoid the draft, for whatever reason; those who
had spoken out against the war as a matter of principle; and those who, such
as members of the international Workers of the World, advocated the overthrow
of the wartime government.

Of all those jailed during the war, 13,735 had already been released. Only
several hundred, including Debs, remained in jail. In Britain, Italy, and
Belgium, all such prisoners had long since been released. Only the United
States still held such "political" prisoners. Although the American Legion
opposed the pardoning of any of these prisoners, the World War Veterans
favored a general amnesty. It was pointed out that of all the seventy-six
Wobblies in jail, none had actually committed a violent act. "They had
received a total of eight hundred years of jail time," as Andrew Sinclair has
written, "for speaking against the government and the war." George Bernard
Shaw joined the chorus for their release, along with H. G. Wells, Upton
Sinclair, and Henri Barbusse. Still, Harding waited, letting the pressure
build even more.

In Daugherty's view, none of the prisoners ought ever to be released. The
crimes of the Wobblies, said Daugherty, "were more horrible than outright
murder." If any of them had to be pardoned, then they ought to be made to
take a loyalty oath in which they acknowledged their crime, expressed
contrition, and promised to behave themselves in the future. Daugherty said,
however, that Debs should not take such an oath. "He is such an habitual
violator of the laws of this country and has such a chronic disregard for his
country and is so ignorant of his obligation to society that he might go upon
his honor, if he has any."

Harding instructed Daugherty to bring Debs up from Atlanta and have a chat
with him�perhaps to see whether he still seemed like a dangerous man. Debs
was put on a train, without escort, and sent up to Daugherty's office. Jess
Smith met him at Union Station and drove him over to see Daugherty. Debs and
the attorney general sat and talked all day. Daugherty had to duck out for a
lunch date (Debs asked to have some fresh fruit brought in for him), but he
returned after lunch and talked through the afternoon. He found Debs a
straightforward man�"woefully wrong," but "sincere, gentle, and tender. . . .
He unfolded frankly his ideas on government, his ideas on religion, his own
case, the cause of Socialism with which he was identified, his beliefs and
disbeliefs. A more eloquent and fascinating recital I never heard fall from
the lips of any man.... I found him a charming personality, with a deep love
for his fellow man.... He did not flinch at anything. He looked every fact
squarely in the face. He made no apologies.... Daugherty always admired a man
who did not apologize for himself, and so he eased up on his opposition to a
pardon for Debs. Jess took Debs back to the train station, and along the way
as they got to talking about prison life, Debs mentioned that one thing he
particularly missed was toothpicks. Jess stopped the car, dashed into a
store, and brought out a big bundle of quill toothpicks to the grateful Debs.

At last, when the campaign for Debs had reached its peak, Harding told
Daugherty that he was going to pardon Debs. Daugherty, overcoming his
distaste for the proposal, suggested the end of the year, 1921. Harding said
no, he wanted to release Debs on Christmas Eve so that Debs could spend
Christmas Day with his wife. Daugherty said such an act would desecrate
Christmas. Nonetheless, Harding released Debs on Christmas Eve, 1921, and
asked him to come up to Washington and stop by the White House the day after
Christmas.

When Debs appeared at the door of Harding's office, the president bounced out
of his chair. "Well," Harding said happily, "I have heard so damned much
about you, Mr. Debs, that I am now very glad to meet you personally."
Harding, like Daugherty, always found that he had some sympathy for the
outsider, if he could put aside other considerations for a moment. Debs and
Harding had a jolly conversation, and Debs, on his way out, told reporters
that "Mr. Harding appears to me to be a kind gentleman, one whom I believe
possesses humane impulses."

Harding, standing up for Debs�and against six hundred thousand miners, four
hundred thousand railroad shopmen, and millions of other workers, farmers,
renters, and buyers-came out slightly better than even.

pps. 189-193
--[cont]--
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to