Just like the reporting of Ronn Brown's crash, I read that the early reports (and the official meteorological records) show that the weather was clear and, later, after at least one Time magazine article was spiked, the media changed the story to say that the weather was stormy -- complete BS. Check it yourself. Of course, they never reported the bullet through Brown's head either but ... details, details. -Sr P.S. The Ronn Brown story was sent through [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] a few months ago .... it might still be on their web site - three parts, as I recall. Try <A HREF="http://www.egroups.com/group/mediagatesolutions">http://www.egroups.com/ group/mediagatesolutions</A> JFK JR.'S FINAL FLIGHT--BLASTED OUT OF THE SKY Copyright � 1999 NewsHawk Inc., All Rights Reserved (Rights of UNALTERED reproduction/distribution hereby waived.) The initial news reports about the disappearance of John Kennedy Jr.'s plane and passengers stated that Kennedy's flight path was eastward along Long Island. Now all accounts describe Kennedy's flight path as having been substantially farther north, along the Connecticut shoreline. ON THIS ISSUE ONLY it does seem in fact as if this later information is probably correct: indications are that JFK Jr. changed his route due to his awareness of undoubtedly "hostile" surveillance. In case anybody has forgotten, ALL early news reports described weather conditions as near ideal, with a slight haze and NO fog, mist or other vision-obscuring conditions. I have confirmed this as fact from local sources on eastern Long Island and Martha's Vineyard. NOW, all news reports indicate that weather conditions over eastern Long Island, Long Island Sound, Block Island Sound and Martha's Vineyard were SIGNIFICANTLY worse than originally reported. These later reports of weather conditions are utter, absolute, unadulterated BULLSHIT. By Monday July 19th, EVERY major TV network in the country trotted out "expert" after "expert" all day and all evening long , who to a one described in almost the exact same terminology how an "inexperienced" pilot like Kennedy would have had major problems with orientation, direction and trajectory due to the extremely thick haze over the entire area. One would have thought these puppets were reading from the same script. These statements are LIES! Such were NOT the conditions at the time of the disaster, and what's more every single person who had any occasion to witness JFK Jr.'s flying skills, including EVERY INSTRUCTOR he ever had, described him as an EXTREMELY careful, cautious pilot who NEVER took risks. Kennedy had amassed a great number of hours piloting aircraft and one of his instructors noted that Kennedy was probably proficient enough to have qualified for a COMMERCIAL PILOT'S LICENSE! These same armchair pundits gave uniformly negative, highly critical assessments of Kennedy's abilities as a pilot, along with longwinded, thoroughly unintelligible (and I DO speak English!) explanations of how this non-existent (in this case) pea-soup haze commonly causes such completely unqualified pilots to become totally disoriented and and to fly their craft headlong into the ground, or ocean, as the case may be. I don't know what drugs these guys take when flying but I have been in many airplanes and have NEVER mistaken "down" for "up". GIVE US A BREAK FROM THESE EXTRAORDINARY LIES! Not ONE of these clowns gave an explanation of these nonexistent external conditions and how they can cause a pilot to become disoriented, confused and physically unbalanced that was even REMOTELY logical, sensible or UNDERSTANDABLE. Complete and utter gobbledygook. And again, such does NOT correlate with the conditions in this area at the time of the flight nor the condition of the pilot. Furthermore, Kennedy was anything BUT an inexperienced, daredevil, reckless pilot. I quote here DIRECTLY from one of Kennedy's flight instructors, Arthur Marx, of Martha's Vineyard. "The last time I flew with him was a year ago, and I definitely did not see the kind of person who took unnecessary risks. If anything, (he was) under-confident," said Marx. In support of this assessment of Kennedy's abilities and safety-mindedness, The Toronto Star reported Sunday that Kennedy used a co-pilot when he flew to that Canadian city earlier this month: Kennedy had felt the need to fly with a co-pilot since breaking his ankle in a paraglider crash three weeks earlier, and he had told acquaintances he was happy to fly solo again after having a cast removed from his ankle the day before last Friday's flight. It is now established Kennedy was NOT wearing a foot cast as in weeks preceding the disaster--it came off the day before the fatal flight. In case anyone hasn't noticed, ALL early news reports made note of the fact that Kennedy RADIOED the Martha's Vineyard airport at 9:39, and made NO MENTION whatsoever of any kind of difficulty whatsoever. This contact is 100% VERIFIED! Yet radar returns from SECONDS AFTER THIS CALL show what was likely his plane plunging in a headlong dive to certain death. What happened in those intervening seconds to cause such total and fatal change in the flight conditions? I believe it's outrageous and TOTALLY unfounded for armchair pundits to demean and defame this man in death by questioning his character, ability and sensibility so extensively in this rush to judgment which claims his inexperience and lack of ability were the primary cause of the crash. This radar evidence is COMPLETELY in accordance with Kennedy's plane having been subjected to an extremely destructive object, force or agent of some kind--be it missile, particle beam laser, pulse weapon, on-board bomb or other. Kennedy was NOT in the process of landing, nor, as far as can be determined, was he engaged in any other maneuver which could conceivably lead to any problems with control of the aircraft. A number of eyewitnesses from Martha's Vineyard DID see and hear an airborne explosion to the southwest of the Vineyard right around the time the plane apparently went into it's fatal dive. Are we supposed to believe that it was Kennedy's supposed lack of experience that caused the plane to ignite into a fireball in MIDAIR while in the middle of a perfect, uneventful and untroubled flight? And the American public is BUYING such utterly worthless, intentionally disinformative garbage analysis? If people insist on being this stupid I can only conclude they may well deserve the government they have. And in regard to this last issue--it is considered an open secret that in addition to contemplating a N.Y. Senate campaign against Hillary Clinton, JFK Jr. was CERTAINLY considering a run for president in the year 2000. It has been suggested by knowledgeable sources that he was quite cognizant of the fact that his father and uncle were murdered by a covert government cabal and would CERTAINLY have endeavored to bring down the house of cards and the walls of lies and silence surrounding these wretched chapters in our national history. As noted, Kennedy's George magazine had recently published an interview with George Wallace--focusing in strongly on the obvious conspiracy behind the attempted assassination on HIM, as well as a expose of the Rabin assassination in Israel. Other information reveals that some the upcoming articles he had planned for George magazine included an investigation into the Roswell incident AND one involving a substantial airing of Hillary Clinton and company's "dirty laundry." Moreover Kennedy was in the process of setting up an interview with Attorney General Janet Reno, and in fact had just submitted a formal request for such with the Justice Department! Considering the gallons of innocent blood on the hands of Reno, her bosses in the White House and on the hands of so many of the Clintons' cohorts, this impending grilling of Reno regarding such savage, hideous events as the Waco massacre may well have been the straw that broke the camel's back. Suspicious in all this has been the extremely muted reaction from Kennedy family members to this nightmare--almost as if they know damn well what was really going on with JFK Jr.'s death, and are literally powerless to do anything about it. Only his sister Caroline Kennedy-Schlossberg has made any public indications that all may not be right with the official story. Now we hear that family members--supposedly--have requested a burial at sea. This seems a distinctly odd request and one can only wonder why this would be desirable. Another aspect which seems quite suspicious is the fact that before just about anyone else, Bill Clinton was informed early Wednesday morning, July 21, of the fact that divers had located the wreckage of Kennedy's plane and the passenger's bodies: in fact it was the White House which made the official announcement to the media of the location and immanent recovery of same. Does anyone out there still think that John F. Kennedy Jr. just came completely unglued on a completely smooth flight in excellent flying weather with NO indication of mechanical problems AT ALL and dove his plane with two other passengers into the deep blue sea? GET A CLUE, AMERICA! Copyright � 1999 NewsHawk Inc., All Rights Reserved (Rights of UNALTERED reproduction/distribution hereby waived.)
