-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.30/pageone.html
<A HREF="http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.30/pageone.html">Laissez Faire City
Times - Volume 3 Issue 30
</A>
-----
Laissez Faire City Times
July 26, 1999 - Volume 3, Issue 30
Editor & Chief: Emile Zola
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hackers, Cyberpunks, and the Apocalypse

by Randy Danneskj�ld


Cyberpunk literature is nothing less than the epic texts of a radical
new philosophy of life, the universe and everything. In his book
Hackers, Steven Levy has commented on what he calls the hacker ethic - a
loosely identified set of beliefs that he can't seem to quite put his
finger on precisely, but which pervades hacker communities everywhere.
You might find these statements puzzling. What do bits dancing around in
electronic circuits have to do with weighty questions of ethics and
metaphysics?

As it happens, plenty.

Life, The Universe and Everything

Life, to a hacker, is an integral part of hacking. Life is a laboratory,
a place to experiment, shake things up, fiddle with the system till
something interesting pops out. No other class of human beings could as
a general rule have this much detachment towards their own individual
fortunes and misfortunes, except perhaps professional religious
ascetics. Every life experience is, to a hacker, just that. An
experience - a rich source of information - of intel. He will take it
apart, analyze it, get exalted and paranoid over it in turns, to
experience it from every angle. Then he will break it right down to its
basic educative points, remember those and forget the rest.

Remember also that the present generation of hackers, most in their late
teens or early twenties, and even the 'oldies' still around, have lived
through probably the most dramatic, turbulent phase of human and
technological history. Rapid change and an almost bizarre variety of
experience is normal. Who better to comment on life in today's
technosaturated world than those who are most at home in it?

Further, hackers are quite used to playing God. When you're in control
of a powerful piece of computing machinery, you're in control of a
little universe, with its immutable laws and (if it's a real hackers'
computer) a multitude of complex information systems in constant,
dynamic interaction. You have the power to create structures and systems
of arbitrary complexity, limited only by your own imagination and level
of technological mastery. Who better to speculate on the nature of the
Universe than someone whose life has been a virtual SimUniverse game
since as far back as he1 can remember?

Computer programmers are also the greatest generalists since Da Vinci.
The core tasks of programming are, as any hacker will tell you,
problem-domain independent, and a good hacker can tackle programming
jobs in any field. Every competent hacker who's worked on more than a
few projects has surely developed highly effective techniques for
quickly extracting and representing all the relevant information
required to achieve his goals in most any system or situation.
"Specialization is for ants" is a favorite hacker slogan. Who better to
make grand statements about everything than someone who knows how to
instantly specialize in anything?

Add to all that the typical hacker's natural curiosity about everything,
his unquenchable thirst for higher levels of knowledge and expertise,
his sophisticated ability to access, process and analyze information,
and you have the makings of a great philosopher.

And an opinionated one. Most hackers have very strong views on
practically any topic, which they can articulate brilliantly and defend
with all the right arguments and references. Making life especially
uncomfortable for those who derive their spiritual upliftment and
enlightenment from Saturday newspaper supplements and TV talk shows, a
hacker will never stand by silently and allow inaccuracy to go
unchallenged. The easiest way to recognize the hacker at a dinner party
- he's the guy who listens intently and doesn't say a word, except for
frequently interjecting 'Not true' and lapsing back into smug silence.
He really does believe he has all the answers to life, the universe and
everything.

The Hacker Ethic

So what is the hacker ethic? What is this common ethical philosophy that
all hackers above a certain level of sophistication subscribe to? Free
software, free markets, and a free society would probably top the list.
The hacker way of life generally couples basic humanity with a healthy
appreciation of the value of minding one's own business (what could be
more interesting anyway?). Hackers usually combine a very benevolent
live-and-let-live attitude with a very strong emphasis on personal
responsibility and individual effort. Taking the initiative and the
risks is almost universally accepted amongst hackers as the only route
to the big time2. Most talented hackers are gentle, friendly creatures
with a versatile sense of humor.

Hackers universally abhor senseless violence, in fact senselessness or
violence of any kind. The most pacifist of all varieties of humans,
their peace trappings may often make them identify with, and be mistaken
for 60s hippies, though there is a lot that sets them apart from people
whose experience with virtual reality is limited to the use of
psycho-active drugs. Some hackers have experimented with a variety of
drugs nevertheless, and all would agree that nothing really beats the
high you get from hacking a complex system. Creativity and intelligence
are the ultimate trip.

Hackers automatically resist and rebel against external authority of any
kind. They also love to de-emphasize its importance through humor and
practical jokes designed to embarrass rather than wound, because they
know that the only way to deal with someone seeking authority is simply
not to grant them any. Authorities don't exist in nature, they are
created by human beings. We can collapse their authority by collapsing
the aura of authority. A bumbling clown has no authority, only amusement
value. It is very enlightening to observe an encounter between a pu
ffed-up authority and a skinny, fidgety, bored hacker looking for
something to entertain himself with.

There's only one thing that gets a hacker more irritated than the
posturings of bogus authorities - stupidity. The three principal virtues
of a hacker, according to Perl lore, are Laziness, Impatience and Hubris
. These traits apply in a hacker's dealings with people as well as in
his dealings with computers. Laziness, in a typical twist of hacker
linguistics means taking the trouble to come up with a one-time solution
to a problem rather than having to deal with it every time it occurs. If
you irritate a true hacker, he'll take the time out to make sure you
understand what you did wrong and why it's in your interest to change
your behavior. But if the hacker's laziness doesn't help you, his
impatience and hubris will demolish you. Get out of the way.

The topic of the elite IRC channel #perl, which is host to some of the
world's most talented programmers, is usually a list of things the folks
there don't want to waste their time dealing with or even discussing.
One of them is 'non-programmers'. The average length of stay of
non-programmers on the channel before they are kicked out in disgrace:
30 seconds. Hackers, like Gods, are quick to judge...

Judgment Day

We are at a crucial point in our evolution on this planet. The point of
acquiring sophisticated technology that will no longer sustain a world
torn with internal contradictions and conflict. Technology is an amoral
force - amplifying the natural intent of human actions for good or evil.
Every significant technology has brought with it both horrors and untold
benefits. In the Cyberpunk's view, technology is created by hackers3 for
the benefit of all mankind - not for destruction or tyranny. No inventor
known wanted to see his inventions put to malicious use. Alfred Nobel
felt so guilty after inventing gunpowder, he instituted the Nobel Peace
Prize. Albert Einstein was so awed and fearful of the powerful forces he
had shown how to unleash, he spent the last part of his life campaigning
for world peace, eventually ending up winning (inheriting?) the child of
Nobel's guilt.

As technology advances, advances in human consciousness and civilization
must keep pace, because technology in the wrong hands can be
devastating. And the greater the level of technology, the greater the
damage caused by the lack of a moral society. It might be a cliched
observation, but it's true nonetheless: most of us were born into a
world that possesses the technology to completely destroy itself.
Powerful forces like this are unleashed by man's mind, not his animal
instincts. They must be kept under control by the same minds that
created them. This is not how it is in our world. Technology invented by
pacifist hackers is routinely handed over to illiterate megalomaniacs,
military bullies, religious fanatics, psychotic killers.

That can't go on forever. It can only happen, with terrible consequences
even then, during a civilization's nascent period of technological
achievement. Once technology advances beyond a certain threshold, its
use by the wrong powers for the wrong purposes will annihilate the
entire civilization and the ecosystem supporting it. I would place this
threshold, as do most commentators concerned about this issue, at the
point where a civilization develops nuclear technology and sophisticated
digital information processing systems. Once that happens, the
contradiction between technology and morality within the society must
 get resolved before the second law of thermodynamics, known to hackers
as Murphy's Law, leads the civilization inevitably towards the big boom.


It's the Nuclear Decision Threshold. And you're in it.

It's no surprise that this generation (like all generations) seems well
aware of its unique importance in the course of history. Generation 'X',
it's called, or GenerationeXt - by Pepsi. For this reason: we are the
link between a brutal, uncivilized, destructive, sub-human past and a
future of resonance with our own nature as free, intelligent beings and
with the natural order of the other elements of our environment.
Assuming we are to have any future at all. It's paradise regained, or a
world lost forever.

No wonder this undercurrent flows through all of Cyberpunk and has
started seeping into the "mass mind" of pop culture. Pop culture is
indicative of what people believe; therefore of what decisions they will
make; therefore it shows glimpses of the future. One of the most popular
books of recent vintage, The Celestine Prophesy alludes to a dramatic
imminent revolution in human consciousness and our basic concepts of
good and evil - an allusion that is playing an increasing role in
Hollywood movies as well, witness two of the best SF movies in recent
years: The 5th Element and Contact. Incidentally, both films are
excellent entertainment and essential survival training for the near
future. The year two thousand is on its way, and every brand of psychic
from Nostradamus on down has foretold momentous events in store for the
coming millennium. The second coming is also scheduled for next week or
next month (or soon, anyway). Planet Earth has been at Nuclear Decision
Threshold for over fifty years...

And it looks like our time's just about up.



------------------------------------------------------------------------


Footnotes


1. There are no female hackers, it seems (except, notably, Dagny Deb).
After much research, Levy seems to concur with this view. I'm hoping
it'll be proven wrong.

2. Yes, hackers are the good guys, not crackers, who break into systems
to cause chaos or steal money. A proper, historically correct
examination of the term hacker would be outside the scope of this
article, but for our purposes this definition will do: Someone who takes
pleasure in exploring, creating and controlling complex informational,
mechanical, biological or other systems. Note that this includes
dedicated scientists, engineers, geneticists, and others, not just
computer programmers. I usually use the term 'hacker' to mean hackers
who are computer programmers, though I sometimes use it in the wider
sense as well.

3. Used in the wider sense, see last footnote.



------------------------------------------------------------------------



Randy Dannejskold developes free-software solutions for network
computing applications.

-30-

from The Laissez Faire City Times, Vol 3, No 30, July 26, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by
Laissez Faire City Netcasting Group, Inc.
Copyright 1998 - Trademark Registered with LFC Public Registrar
All Rights Reserved
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to