-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent:              Mon, 26 Jul 1999 09:42:17 -0500
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:                   "John C. Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                NCPA Policy Digest 7-26-99

National Center For Policy Analysis
DAILY POLICY DIGEST
Monday, July 26, 1999

PointCast can automatically load NCPA's Policy Digest summaries
on your desktop for easy reading.  For information go to
http://www.ncpa.org/pointcast.html

IN TODAY'S DIGEST

   o   MEDICARE HAS AN $8.9 TRILLION UNFUNDED LIABILITY, say
       experts; thus an expensive new entitlement to drug
       coverage is not the best option....NCPA

   o   SOCIAL SECURITY TRUSTEES' FORECAST A 17-TO-22-PERCENT TAX

       RATE will be needed by 2045 to pay benefits -- not
       counting health care expenses for the elderly....NCPA

   o   ONLY 3 OF 15 MAJOR TAX ACTS SINCE 1980 HAVE CUT TAXES, and
       the tax burden kept rising after the 1997 tax cut...NCPA

   o   THE U.S. SHOULD RETHINK AND REFORMULATE ITS PENSION SYSTEM
       by opening up investment possibilities....NCPA/INVESTOR'S
       BUSINESS DAILY

   o   IMMIGRATION PROSECUTIONS ARE UP thanks to increased
       Justice Department emphasis, enhanced technology....WALL
       STREET JOURNAL

   o   WOMEN'S COLLEGES CONTINUE ENROLLMENT GAINS, continuing an
       eight-year trend....WASHINGTON TIMES

IN TODAY'S NEWS

SOLUTIONS FOR ELDERLY PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

President Clinton's proposed new prescription drug entitlement
for people on Medicare has significant problems, say experts.
For instance, it would expand Medicare at a time when Medicare's
unfunded liability ($8.9 trillion over the next 75 years) is
twice the size of Social Security's.  Also, it would duplicate
coverage that 65 percent of seniors already have through private
insurance and Medicaid.  And while covering some drug costs, it
would leave the elderly exposed for catastrophic expenses.

   o   About 360,000 Medicare beneficiaries spend more than
       $5,000 out-of-pocket every year on Medicare-covered
       services.

   o   In order to limit their financial exposure, about 75
       percent of seniors acquire, either through a former
       employer or private purchase, supplemental (medigap)
       insurance, which pays many or all of the expenses Medicare
       does not.  (See figure
       http://www.ncpa.org/ba/gif/ba300fig.gif )

   o   However, federal law requires medigap insurers, like
       Medicare, to cover small-dollar items such as the Part A
       and Part B deductibles; but they need not cover the
       largest bills, and drug coverage is an option.

Were insurers given more freedom, say analysts, they could offer
more generous drug coverage, with no increase in premiums.
A Milliman & Robertson analysis found that with the average
amount Medicare currently spends on a each senior, a private plan
could in principle establish a $1,585 across-the-board deductible
and cover hospital, physician and drug costs above that
deductible.

Many seniors are already spending $1,500 to $2,000 a year for
medigap coverage, but a better option for seniors would be to
take that money and put it in the bank.  For instance, Roth IRAs
could potentially serve as "backended" Medical Savings Accounts
for the elderly.

Source: John C. Goodman (NCPA President) and Merrill Matthews
Jr. (vice president of domestic policy), "Simple Solutions for
Elderly Prescription Drugs," Brief Analysis No. 300, July 26,
1999, National Center for Policy Analysis, 12655 N. Central
Expy., Suite 720, Dallas, Texas 75243, (972) 386-6272.

For text http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba300.html

For more on Medicare http://www.ncpa.org/pi/health/hedex7.html

PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM

As we consider reform of Social Security , analysts say we should
keep in mind that the system's trust funds are merely an
accounting mechanism and do not provide real assets to pay any
retirees' benefits.  Under our pay-as-you go system, taxes paid
by today's workers are immediately spent on benefits.
According to the Social Security trustees' latest projections, as
baby boomers retire, the tax rate needed to fund benefits will
keep growing.

   o   By 2045, when today's 20-year-olds reach retirement age -
       which at that time will be 67 - the government will need
       17.4 percent of workers' wages to pay projected benefits.

   o   Add in the amount needed to fund Medicare and other health
       care programs for the elderly and we will need a total tax
       rate of more than 31 percent. (See Figure I
       http://www.ncpa.org/ba/gif/ba302fig1.gif )

   o   Under the trustees' pessimistic assumptions, by 2045 the
       government will need 21.7 percent of workers' wages to pay
       projected Social Security benefits and more than twice
       that figure for elderly health care.

   o   The total  tax rate needed will be more than 48 percent of
       workers' incomes. (See Figure II
       http://www.ncpa.org/ba/gif/ba302fig2.gif )

A solution to Social Security's problems requires investment in
income-earning assets, say analysts.  In an analysis for the
NCPA, Texas A&M University economist Andrew J. Rettenmaier found
that with an annual contribution of 4.2 percent of wages, a
personal retirement account invested in a balanced portfolio
could replace Social Security benefits.

Despite the difficulties of reform, the government can guarantee
benefits for individual retirees.  Two reform proposals -- by Sen.
Phil Gramm (R-Texas) and by Reps. Bill Archer (R-Texas) and Clay
Shaw (R-Fla.) -- explicitly guarantee that all retirees will
receive a pension at least as great as the one promised under the
current system.

Source: John C. Goodman (NCPA President) and Joe Barnett (Policy
Analyst), "Five Principles of Social Security Reform," Brief
Analysis No. 302, July 26, 1999, National Center for Policy
Analysis, 12655 N. Central Expy., Suite 720, Dallas, Texas 75243,
(972) 386-6272.

For text http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba302.html

For more on Principles of Reform
http://www.ncpa.org/pi/congress/cong5d.html

TAX CUTS ARE OFTEN REVERSED

Last week, Republican moderates nearly derailed a major tax cut,
concerned that it was too big and would reduce the budget surplus
too much.  But new entitlements, such as Bill Clinton's proposed
prescription drug benefit, are a far greater threat to budgetary
restraint than a tax cut.

History shows that while entitlements are indeed very, very
difficult to reduce once in place, Congress has proven more than
willing to undo tax cuts.

   o   According to a recent Treasury Department study, there
       have been 15 major tax bills since 1980.

   o   Only three were tax cuts, while two had no net impact on
       revenues.

   o   The remaining 10 bills were all tax increases that offset
       much, if not all, of the tax cuts.

This suggests that even if the House tax bill is too big in some
sense, it can simply be undone later; for example, in 1982
Congress moved swiftly to take back more than one-third of the
1981 tax cut in the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act.

Another point skittish moderates should remember is that failure
to cut taxes from time to time means that taxes will
automatically rise.  As long as we have progressive tax rates and
a tax system that is not fully indexed, inflation and real growth
will push people into higher tax brackets and increase their tax
burden.  Indeed, this effect is so strong that the 1997 tax cut
didn't even keep taxes from rising.  Estimates of federal
revenues by the Congressional Budget Office were significantly
higher after the tax cut was enacted in August 1997 than before
(see figure http://www.ncpa.org/pd/gif/pd72699.gif ).

If we can't cut taxes when we have a large budget surplus, when
can they ever be cut?  Those concerned about fiscal
responsibility should worry more about new entitlement programs
and less about tax cuts.

Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy
Analysis, July 26, 1999.

For text http://www.ncpa.org/oped/bartlett99.html

For Treasury study http://www.ustreas.gov/ota/ota81.pdf

For more on Current Tax Legislation
http://www.ncpa.org/pi/congress/cong2.html

REINVENTING PENSIONS

With the rise of two-earner families and an increasingly mobile
labor force, the country needs to rethink and reformulate its
pension system, experts argue.

Here are some of their suggestions:

   o   Enable workers to shelter from taxes 10 to 15 percent of
       their annual income.

   o   Do away with vesting, which requires an employee to wait
       some years before being guaranteed a pension, replacing it
       with a system in which employers contribute, say, two
       percentage points of an employee's allowed contribution to
       his pension the first year, four percentage points the
       second year, six the third year, and so on.

   o   Establish a safe-harbor investment option by giving
       employers immunity from future lawsuits if they establish
       a choice of investment options and actively encourage
       plans that are diversified and designed to grow with the
       economy.

   o   Eliminate laws which prohibit the creation of some
       retirement accounts if not enough lower- and middle-income
       employees participate.

Other suggestions include:

   o   Encouraging portability by allowing any employee leaving a
       company to cash out his pension benefits -- including
       defined-benefit plans.

   o   Minimizing or eliminating restrictions on all pension plan
       rollovers.

   o   Splitting pension contributions equally between spouses at
       the time of deposit -- or treat them as community property
       in the case of divorce.

   o   And to protect accounts against employer or union
       manipulation, making plans "visible" and subject to third-
       party oversight.

Source: Merrill Matthews, Jr. (National Center for Policy
Analysis), "A Blueprint for Pension Revolution," Investor's
Business Daily, July 26, 1999.

For more on Nonwage Compensation
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/economy/econ7.html

PROSECUTIONS JUMP AT INS

The Immigration and Naturalization Service doubled the number of
prosecutions it launched between 1992 and 1998, a major factor in
the sharpest annual rise in federal prosecutions since 1971.

The analysis, based on Justice Department data, comes from the
Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, which is affiliated
with Syracuse University.

   o   The INS now ranks second in convictions among federal law
       enforcement agencies, following the FBI.

   o   Annual INS prosecutions rose from 7,335 in 1992 to 14,616
       in 1998.

   o   The length of prison sentences jumped significantly from
       an average of two months in 1992 to 12 months last year.

   o   Overall, there were 82,071 federal prosecutions in 1998.

An INS spokesman attributes the increased numbers to more
sources, enhanced technology, improved efficiencies and increased
emphasis on immigrations-related cases at the Justice Department.

The future structure of the agency is currently being debated on
Capitol Hill.  Lawmakers critical of the agency want it
completely revamped, while the Clinton administration wants to
reorganize it to more clearly delineate enforcement and service
functions.

Source: Marjorie Valbrun, "Beefed-Up Enforcement by INS Leads to
Doubling to Convictions, Study Says," Wall Street Journal, July
26, 1999.

For more on Immigration Policies
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/immigrat/policies.html

WOMEN'S COLLEGES EXPERIENCING ENROLLMENT GAINS

Female high school graduates are increasingly opting to enter
all-women's colleges, researchers report. That trend began about
eight years ago.

   o   Of the nation's 79 women's colleges, 96 percent are four-
       year institutions.

   o   Just over half of them are located in the Northeast.

   o   One-third of them have historical ties to the Catholic
       church,  18 are affiliated with other religions and
       49 percent are independent.

   o   Nearly half of the graduates of women's colleges have gone
       on to earn advanced degrees.

Wesleyan College in Georgia granted the first degrees to women in
the U.S. in 1836, and Spelman College, also in Georgia and founded
in 1881, became the first college for black women.

Source: Andrea Billups, "Engendering Renewed Support," Washington
Times, July 26, 1999.

For more on Other Higher Education Issues
http://www.ncpa.org/pi/edu/edu13b.html

**********************************************************************
                  NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
                            DALLAS, TEXAS

                    "Making Ideas Change the World"

                           Internet Address:
                          http://www.ncpa.org
**********************************************************************


A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to