-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://thenewamerican.com/tna//1996/vo12no24/vo12no24_editor.htm
<A
HREF="http://thenewamerican.com/tna//1996/vo12no24/vo12no24_editor.htm">The
New American - Letters to the Editor - Nove
</A>
-----
Both Collier Brothers have passed on. Interesting JBS arguing against a
conspiracy . . . they're(Collier brothers) just a bunch of hippes what do
they know?
Om
K
-----

Vol. 12, No. 24
November 25, 1996
Table of Contents

Letters to the Editor

Brickbats from Votescam Author

I�m sure the intent of the article by Robert W. Lee (October 14th issue,
�Does Your Vote Really Count?�) was to destroy the credibility of my
book Votescam: The Stealing of America.

Based on the feedback I have received, he has failed miserably. Most
knowledgeable people feel that Lee�s article was merely a dreadful bit
of bad reporting and purposeful distortion.

Let�s start with Lee�s assertion that people such as Pat Robertson and
Mike Wallace did not report on the book due to its lack of credibility.
Votescam clearly states that Gaeton Fonzi, one of the top investigators
in the country, and Brian Ross, NBC�s chief investigative reporter,
quoted Wallace as saying: �Votescam is a scandal of major proportions.�

In 1994 I personally handed Wallace the Votescam book and he said: �Jim,
as far as this book is concerned, I have permanent Alzheimer�s.�

Pat Roberston paid $2,500 to show the Votescam video shot in Miami
(showing the League of Women Voters using pencils to punch holes in the
computer vote card) just once on his 700 Club.

ABC�s Supreme Court correspondent, Tim O�Brien, was prepared to air the
tape nationally when he was stopped by his bosses.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, when she served on the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, ruled that our evidence was
worth a full hearing.

All of that is in the book. How could Robert Lee have possibly missed
it?

Lee also excuses Elvera Radford, former Election Supervisor of
Cincinnati, for officially issuing 98 cent tweezers to the League of
Women Voters. We videotaped them plucking out a slate of candidates on
the computer-ballot card. Lee said that nobody was prosecuted, thereby
assuming that it was an honest way of handling the votes. He reports:
�... merely tapping a card loosens the chad, but in some instances
tweezers are necessary.�

The videotape we shot shows blistered vote cards, not hanging chad that
could be whisked away. Mr. Lee should ask himself why the Elections
Division presupposed hanging chad, then hired a contingent of women (at
taxpayers� expense) and issued them tweezers where a flick of the finger
would have been sufficient. In fact, the act of issuing pencils (as they
did in Miami) or tweezers in Cincinnati, or hors d�oeuvres sticks in
California, is illegal. To allow a private group of people to determine
voter intent is a third-degree felony.

He continues that it is �truly remarkable, if the videotape actually
�documented� the illegalities they allege, that no prosecution
followed.� I cannot believe Mr. Lee is so naive as to assume that the
District Attorney of Cincinnati or then-State Attorney in Miami, Janet
Reno, would automatically order prosecution in politically controlled
cities. As detailed in Votescam, when Attorney Ellis Rubin, appointed by
the Miami Circuit Court, brought our evidence of vote fraud to Janet
Reno in Dade County, she told Rubin that prosecution would bring down
too many people, including judges and news media heads.

Mr. Lee claims there is no hard evidence of vote fraud in the Arizona
primary, when in fact the Maricopa County Elections Department printed
60,000 extra vote cards and issued them to privileged voters so that
they could vote twice. I have documented this evidence and Pat Buchanan
is aware of it.

However, Mr. Lee alibies for the duplicate cards, saying �there is no
credible evidence the duplicate cards resulted in multiple voting.�

There is indeed credible evidence they were voted twice. I interviewed
the election chief of Maricopa County and was told that ten people were
hired after the election to punch 219,000 seven-digit numbers into a
computer. The seven-digit number was an identification number on the
ballot card. When a voter registers in a precinct, the card is punched
so it cannot be voted twice, and the seven-digit number is recorded in
the precinct.

The elections chief said the ten worked for 34 hours after the election
punching approximately 1.5 million digits (219,000 voters times
seven-digit ID numbers) into computers. It would have meant punching one
digit per second into the computer, without a break, for 12 hours. She
said only two numbers came up twice out of 60,000. I asked for the names
of those ten people. She refused to give them. I asked for the readouts
which showed the 219,000 numbers punched in. She again refused.

To this date, no citizen in Maricopa County has been able to obtain
names of those supposed ten people who surely must be suffering from
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome.

One last point: Mr. Lee states, �The Colliers helped raise funds for
these [referring to Tom Hayden, Jerry Rubin, and Abbie Hoffman]
revolutionaries.� That�s either purposeful bad reporting or
intentionally trying to use liberal names to damage our case. In fact,
we never raised a nickel for anybody; we merely reported that the
�Chicago Seven� had no funds for legal defense. That story was picked up
by newspapers around the country.

This only scratches the surface of the massive distortions in Mr. Lee�s
reporting on Votescam: The Stealing of America.

James Collier
New York City

Robert W. Lee Responds

My article asserted, correctly, that the Colliers �helped raise funds�
for Hayden, Rubin, Hoffman, and the rest of the so-called �Chicago
Seven.� Mr. Collier creates a straw man by claiming that �we never
raised a nickel for anybody,� since helping to raise funds, and raising
 funds, are two disparate activities. On pages 54-55 of Votescam, the
Colliers describe how they became owners of an underground newspaper
which they named The Daily Planet. �One of our first Planet stories,�
they write, �was about Tom Hayden. Hayden was another buddy of our youth
in Royal Oak, Michigan....� After Hayden told the Colliers �that nobody
but [folk singer] Joan Baez had given a nickel to the Seven�s defense
fund, we headlined it in the Planet. The Underground Press Service
 picked up the story and distributed it to every other underground paper
in the nation, including the college press. The Seven�s defense fund
swelled mightily soon after.� That, by any reasonable standard, is
helping to raise funds.

Mr. Collier quotes 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace as saying that
�Votescam is a scandal of major proportions,� but in Votescam Wallace is
merely paraphrased (not quoted) by the Colliers� source. An article by
Gaeton Fonzi in the July 1974 issue of Miami Magazine states merely that
Wallace was looking �into what he had been told might be the most
shocking vote fraud scandal ever to rock the nation.� Whatever Wallace
found, 60 Minutes did not air the story.

Regarding this year�s presidential primary in Arizona, Mr. Collier
claims that 60,000 extra vote cards were printed and issued �to
privileged voters so that they could vote twice.� The incident occurred
in Maricopa County. A post-election report by the Maricopa County
Recorder and Elections Director acknowledged, �During the mailing of the
voter I.D. cards, 60,000 duplicate cards were sent. A thorough review of
the situation reveals error on our part and that of the vendor.... All
voter registration cards, including duplicates for an individual, carry
the same voter I.D. number, which does not change even if the individual
changes political party, residence, address, mailing address, or other
names. Additionally, voters can request a duplicate voter registration
card by mail or by phone.� (Emphasis added.) Mr. Collier states that the
�election chief� claimed that �only two numbers came up twice out of
60,000,� which is hardly what one would expect if the 60,000 duplicate
cards were intended to allow �privileged voters� to vote twice.

Mr. Collier asserts that, based on what he was told by the �elections
chief,� the search for duplicate votes by ten workers would have
entailed �punching one digit per second into the computer, without a
break for 12 hours.� His implication is that punching one digit per
second is a virtually impossible task. Yet someone who types a mere 60
words per minute �punches� approximately five times as many �digits�
each second. One digit per second is equivalent to a snails-pace 12
words per minute! Clearly, Mr. Collier�s assumptions and calculations do
not jibe with his implication.

Mr. Collier, understandably, does not attempt to refute our account of
Votescam�s demonstrably inaccurate portrayal of the 1988 GOP
presidential primary in New Hampshire. Nor is he apparently prepared to
apologize to Elvera Radford, elections supervisor in Cincinnati in 1985,
for Votescam�s blatantly unjustified attempt to tarnish her reputation.

All that aside, there is no doubt, as I indicated in my article, that
�vote fraud, especially when computer-oriented, can be very difficult to
detect�; that the �potential for electoral hanky-panky� is all too real;
and that �a major overhaul of our electoral procedures is
imperative....� But the needed effort to fraud-proof the franchise
should be based on facts, not overstatements or downright
misinformation.

 � Copyright 1999 American Opinion Publishing Incorporated
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to