From: "Mike Ruppert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I find the NewsHawk report very suspicious. I was being fed almost the exact same information from a source in Britain six days ago. I was being encouraged to print this story in my newsletter, From The Wilderness. I decided not to do so because of "anomalies" in the data. A great deal of effort has gone into trying to make me think that JFK, Jr. was murdered. Visibility was eight miles. John-John was 10 miles out. Approach lights at smaller airports are not activated until the a/c is 2 miles out. Final approach is not begun at 10 miles out. It starts at between two and three miles out once the "outer marker" is passed. JFK, Jr. was in total darkness and he was not instrument rated. I have interview several pilots with several thousand hours as military and commercial instructors. The physics as reported are quite possible if JFK, Jr. had turned the wings sideways or entered a spin, or stalled. In fact, the instructors all told me that such situations are terrifyingly real for newer pilots and that they can happen at any time. Unlike TWA 800, where there is real physical evidence of a Navy shoot down, along with radar tracking showing separation and other trajectories, and that evidence has been seen, there is nothing here but second hand bs. I have spoken to people on-site, seen photos of the evidence in 800. Talked to Jim Sanders with the PETN resin on the seat cover. Here there are anonymous sources, talking about fictitious reports. Yes, particle beams exist. Yes Montauk exists. But there's no evidence that any of that had anything to do with this event. But what really turns me off at the NewsHawk report is that an alleged investigator at the scene digresses into two pages of political analysis. I was an LAPD detective and I have been writing, reading and studying real law enforcement documents, military and intelligence documents for 25 years. I have 25,000 pages of files. No investigator, from any real agency would have included the two different styles of reporting in the same document, nor would an on-site investigator have done anything other than report facts. Period. Somebody bought a big piece of disinformation here. Additionally, having been a Statewide press spokesman for a Presidential campaign (Perot 92 - whom I no longer support), having good political sources and knowing something about politics I find the statements about JFK, Jr. running for Pres. patently ludicrous. He has never held elective office once, has no political experience and much family baggage that Perot did not have. Rumors of that plan, if it existed, would have surfaced already. Throughout his life he shunned political issues and Jackie had almost raised him on the notion that politics was out, over, bad. He lived that way. If JFK. Jr. was murdered it is not proved or even strongly supported by this shabby document. I'll keep my mind open and I am most qualified to talk about these things. I am no friend of NWO and certainly not of the people who killed JFK, Sr. My dues and my credentials are solid. I just need to call bs when I see it. When I see something convincing I will support it. Mike Ruppert www.copvcia.com -----Original Message----- From: Robert Flaim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 2:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: http://azwest.net/user/slim/
