More evidence suggesting mass murder in Waco, TX
by the U.S. Government has come to light. This is
in addition to the FLIR video showing machine-gun
fire into the Branch Davidian's community on the
last day (4/19/93) and the possible firings of
incendiary devices. The FLIR video appears in
the award-winning documentary "Waco: The Rules
of Engagement" (http://waco93.com) produced in
part by Michael McNulty, who was recently allowed
to examine previously-hidden evidence from the Waco
crime scene. The Dallas Morning News reports that:

 "In those visits, Mr. McNulty said, he and an
 expert assisting his film company examined a
 40 mm shell casing and two 40 mm projectiles
 that he contends are pyrotechnic devices.

 "He said they also found that at least six items
 listed in Texas Ranger inventories as silencers or
 suppressors were actually "flash-bang" devices.
 Those devices are commonly used by law-enforcement
 officers to stun suspects, and they sometimes ignite
 fires in enclosed spaces because they emit a loud
 bang and flash driven by a small pyrotechnic charge."

--------------------------------------------------------
IAN'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm
________________________________________________________
http://www.kreative.net/carolmoore/davidian-massacre.html
http://www.indirect.com/www/dhardy/waco.html
http://www.flash.net/~wyla/


Full Article:
========================================================
http://www.dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/0728tsw100davidians.htm

Official disputes FBI account of Davidian fire
Justice Department denies incendiary devices used

07/28/99

By Lee Hancock / The Dallas Morning News

(c) 1999, The Dallas Morning News

WACO, Texas - The head of the Texas Department of
Public Safety said Tuesday that evidence held by
the Texas Rangers since the 1993 Branch Davidian
siege calls into question the federal government's
claim that its agents used no incendiary devices
on the day that a fire consumed the sect's compound.

"There's some evidence that is at least problematic
or at least questionable with regard to what
happened," said James B. Francis Jr. of Dallas,
chairman of the Texas Department of Public Safety.

Mr. Francis declined to detail the evidence but said,
"With the proper experts analyzing it, it might shed
light as to whether an incendiary device was fired
into the compound that day."

Myron Marlin, a spokesman with the Justice Department
in Washington, D.C., dismissed the allegation.

"It's more nonsense. We know of no evidence to support
an allegation that any incendiary device was fired
into the compound on April 19, 1993," Mr. Marlin said.

He declined to comment further, citing a continuing
wrongful-death lawsuit filed by surviving sect members
and families of the more than 70 people who died when
the compound burned.

Sources close to the government's Davidian investigation
say the current questions center on several 40 mm
munitions found in the compound wreckage.

In repeated sworn statements and testimony, FBI and
Department of Justice officials have maintained that
FBI agents did not fire a shot during the 51-day siege.

FBI and Justice officials have insisted that FBI
agents did not use any pyrotechnic or incendiary
devices during the tear-gas assault that ended with
the compound consumed by fire.

The Texas Rangers have had custody of the evidence
from the Davidian investigation since 1993, when they
were assigned to investigate the standoff and its
fiery ending. The siege began with a firefight and
the deaths of four agents from the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms, which had tried to search the
compound for illegal weapons and arrest Branch
Davidian leader David Koresh.

Mr. Francis said Tuesday that some FBI officials
made statements to Texas Rangers immediately after
the fire "that are contradictory" to the federal
government's account of what happened.

Complaints studied

Mr. Francis told The Dallas Morning News that he
only recently became aware of those statements as
he began looking into complaints about the lack of
public access to evidence in the Davidian investigation.

Mr. Francis said he became concerned enough to
contact U.S. District Judge Walter Smith of Waco,
who has presided over all the cases arising from
the deadly standoff. DPS recently filed a motion
asking Judge Smith to take control of the evidence
in the case.

"I took the steps to turn it over to the court so
the court could decide what to do," Mr. Francis
said. "I think it's very important that whatever
the evidence is and whatever it shows, that all
of it come out and let the chips fall where they may."

Judge Smith, who heard the criminal case arising
from the Davidian siege, is presiding over the
wrongful-death lawsuit filed by sect members
against the federal government.

In a ruling issued July 1, Judge Smith refused to
dismiss Davidian claims that the FBI may have fired
at the compound April 19 and allegations that FBI
negligence was responsible for the final tragedy.
A trial has been set for mid-October, but both sides
have said the complexity of the case may mean it
will not go to trial until next year.

Mr. Francis said he told Judge Smith that a Justice
Department policy blocking all public access to the
Davidian evidence had created what amounted to an
"absurd" shell game, with the DPS stuck in the middle.

"I said, 'It is in effect a cover-up. It is not
intended to be, but in effect it is," Mr. Francis
said. "It is a complete stonewall."

Mr. Francis said he doesn't think there was "some
grand conspiracy to hide the evidence. I think it
evolved into a situation where that was the effect of it."

He said the judge asked only "how much space are we
going to need," when Mr. Francis proposed turning over
the evidence in the case to his federal court in Waco.

Material gathered

After the siege, about 40 Texas Rangers were assigned
to investigate and gather evidence in the case, and
their investigation became the backbone of a 1994
criminal trial in which eight Branch Davidians were
convicted of charges ranging from manslaughter to
weapons violations.

More than 24,000 pounds of evidence was gathered
from the burned wreckage of the Branch Davidian
compound, and much of that remains in federal
storage in Waco.

Evidence used in the federal prosecutions was
transferred to DPS headquarters in Austin for
safekeeping. Although Texas Rangers had custody
of the material, Justice Department officials
retained authority over who could see it. They
ordered DPS officials to route requests for
access to Washington.

Mr. Francis and others in the agency said DPS
officials became increasingly frustrated as they
learned that Justice Department officials routinely
sent those requests back to Austin with the
explanation that the evidence was in the custody
of Texas officials.

"It was a perfect Catch-22 to block everybody from
seeing the evidence," Mr. Francis said. "There is
some evidence there that the world needs to see, in
my opinion. The government does not want this
evidence out, and yet, that's not right."

Justice Department lawyers filed a response Friday
asking the judge to delay action on the DPS motion
until next week to allow federal authorities to try
to negotiate an agreement.

The lawyers declined to comment on the matter
Tuesday. But several said privately that the
dispute is nothing more than a legal issue.

"It's not a matter of trying to hide anything,"
one lawyer said.

The issue began coming to a head last spring when
DPS officials began fielding complaints that a
Colorado documentary researcher had been allowed
access to the evidence.

Evidence reviewed

The researcher, Michael McNulty, was a producer and
principal researcher in a 1997 documentary that
alleged that government agents fired into the Davidian
compound and set off devices that started the fire.
He is preparing a new documentary on the standoff,
with release expected in September.

Mr. McNulty's visits were approved by a Justice
Department public-affairs official who has since
left the agency, and they were supervised by Assistant
U.S. Attorney Bill Johnston, the Waco-based federal
prosecutor who handled the Branch Davidian case from
its inception.

Mr. Johnston said he supported the decision to give
Mr. McNulty access because "I didn't want to be a
party to even a perception that we had something to hide."

"Although I may not agree with him on many things,
I believe that Mr. McNulty has a right to his opinions,"
Mr. Johnston said.

In those visits, Mr. McNulty said, he and an expert
assisting his film company examined a 40 mm shell
casing and two 40 mm projectiles that he contends
are pyrotechnic devices.

He said they also found that at least six items
listed in Texas Ranger inventories as silencers or
suppressors were actually "flash-bang" devices.
Those devices are commonly used by law-enforcement
officers to stun suspects, and they sometimes ignite
fires in enclosed spaces because they emit a loud
bang and flash driven by a small pyrotechnic charge.

Mr. McNulty said he thinks those devices could be key
evidence because Texas Rangers' evidence logs indicate
they were recovered from areas of the compound in which
the fires broke out.

Mr. McNulty said he shared his information about the
devices with Mr. Johnston and with lawyers representing
Branch Davidians in their wrongful-death lawsuit.

"It's our belief that these pieces of ordnance could
- and probably did - have an impact on the fire on
April 19th," he said.

A fire investigation conducted after the standoff
concluded that the fire was set by sect members.

Mr. McNulty said he was contacted last week by Mr.
Johnston and asked to speak with a Texas Ranger who
questioned him for more than two hours.

Mr. McNulty said the discussion led him to think the
Rangers have opened a preliminary criminal investigation.

Mr. Johnston, Mr. Francis and DPS officials in Austin
declined to say whether the agency has opened an investigation.

After Mr. McNulty's last visit in March, Mr. Johnston
said, lawyers from the Justice Department who are
handling the Davidian wrongful-.death lawsuit contacted
him to complain that anyone had been allowed access
to the evidence.

Dallas Morning News Washington bureau staff member
David Jackson contributed to this report.

[ Texas & Southwest | Dallasnews.com ]

(c) 1999 The Dallas Morning News


Reply via email to