-Caveat Lector-

      Administration spin
      to go global


      By Ben Barber

      THE WASHINGTON TIMES

          former senior Clinton administration official
          charged on July 28 that a new multiagency plan
      to closely control the dissemination of public
      information abroad is really aimed at "spinning the
      American public."

           The plan, disclosed on July 28 by The Washington
      Times, emerged out of concern that the U.S. public
      has refused to back President Clinton's foreign policy,
      said the former official, who spoke on the condition
      he not be identified.

           Administration officials "say news coverage is
      distorted at home and they need to fight it at all costs
      by using resources that are aimed at spinning the
      news," said the former official, who had close
      knowledge of the plan's development.

           Mr. Clinton in April issued Presidential Decision
      Directive 68, ordering the creation of the International
      Public Information (IPI) system, designed to make
      sure that all government agencies disseminating
      information abroad share a single message.

           A draft charter obtained by The Washington
      Times says the purpose of IPI is "to prevent and
      mitigate crises and to influence foreign audiences in
      ways favorable to the achievement of U.S. foreign
      policy objectives."

           Officials of U.S. defense, intelligence, diplomatic
      and other agencies met for the first time on July 28 at
      the State Department to go over the draft charter,
      said a source who spoke on the condition of
      anonymity.

           Only "minor changes" were made to the charter at
      that meeting, the source said, but it was possible that
      "major" changes would be made in the near future.

           Future meetings of an IPI "core group" developing
      the new information system are to be chaired by
      Morton Halperin, head of policy planning at the State
      Department.

           The draft charter says information aimed at U.S.
      audiences should "be coordinated, integrated,
      deconflicted and synchronized with the [IPI] to
      achieve a synergistic effect."

           The former senior official complained that the
      charter "did not distinguish what would be done
      overseas and what would be done at home. . . . It
      talks about a news war."

           In a telephone interview after the meeting, an
      administration official rejected accusations that IPI
      could be used in a partisan manner or be used to
      influence American public opinion.

           "This is absolutely not the case," said the official,
      who also declined to be identified. "We are very
      cognizant of the history of the '80s. There are
      congressional controls now."

           The official was referring to the 1980s Iran-Contra
      affair, in which some Reagan administration officials
      covertly sold arms to Iran to raise money to fund the
      Contra war in Nicaragua.

           After October, IPI will be run by the newly
      created undersecretary of state for public diplomacy,
      who will take over most of the duties of the U.S.
      Information Agency (USIA), which is being
      disbanded. Former White House aide Evelyn
      Lieberman has been nominated for that post.

           However, the IPI system was said to be the
      brainchild of White House intelligence chief Dick
      Clarke. His aide, former White House fellow Jamie
      Metzl, largely wrote the plan and is now serving as
      IPI senior coordinator, according to the former senior
      administration official.

           Media and political analysts expressed concern
      about the plan.

           "This . . . indicates a measure of desperation in
      President Clinton's foreign policy," said Seth
      Ackerman of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, a
      liberal media-watch-dog group. "When it is not received
      well abroad, he resorts to propaganda."

           On the other end of the political spectrum, Ariel
      Cohen of the conservative Heritage Foundation said
      he worried that the IPI system could be used by the
      party in power to push its own agenda, rather than the
      national interest.

           "It would be a mistake to turn the U.S. public
      information system into a tool of a partisan agenda,"
      said Mr. Cohen.

           "It cannot be driven by any political-correctness
      agenda that will not be representative of what the
      American people think or that will reflect only a
      social-change agenda of extremist activist groups," he
      said.

           The IPI plan calls for establishing a system of
      control over all government information going abroad,
      with a stated goal of countering anti-American
      propaganda and aiding U.S. overseas military
      missions.

           It also offers to help the United Nations use the
      system during its peacekeeping and humanitarian
      operations.

=================================================================
           Kaddish, Kaddish, Kaddish, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to