-Caveat Lector- The reason I'm putting this out, apart from the need to get it off my chest, and the whole thesis http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~pegasus/ took me a good ten years - is that I made the obvious but sickening discovery that there is nothing new under the sun. I uncovered a Secret Theosophical Degree which was supposed to have been destroyed - and find that the following threeness stuff is EXACTLY the same principle as the Occult degree, only mine doesn't use Hindu jargon, but modern philosophical jargon. This stuff is the real philosophy behind the fabled 'I CHING' and its symbolism and shows, I think, that there always was one school for US, and another, far better education for THEM, and 'THEY' have been sitting on this stuff for a Very Long time. It eventually leads to Free Energy and a non-Einsteinian particle physics that look very much like Nicola Teslas 'Environmental Energy' Thesis .... It may well be stuff that THEY don't want out .... It makes use of Philosophy of Science jargon mainly because I wanted the Scientists to 'understand' .... but then, maybe they already knew. Imagine my surprise when I read the First Degree of the Esoteric School of Theosophy - which had been lying in a black box in a cupboard since 1920 .. Andrew Hennessey 1. TRIPARTITE ESSENTIALISM ABSTRACT 1. The Cosmos is in a state of flux 2. A transfer of energy between two points or systems via a common intervening medium is a process called Osmosis. [a Universal state of affairs] 3. The most basic of an infinite number of transfers of energy in the Cosmos of 3 dimensions of space and one of time is between two systems. 4. This basic transfer can be modeled in several ways. a. Osmosis. ie. The diffusion of a high concentration to an area of lower concentration through a semi-permeable membrane. b. As a metaphysically continuous extension of one system into another, where the second system 'Emerges' out of the potential created by the activity of the first. eg. Morphogenetic Attractor, Evolutionary Vacancy c. The relationship between the two systems can be empirically modeled by an inverse square power law ie. The more one system increases in magnitude, the more the effect of the other system diminishes in turn. d. by a binary and tripartite arithmetic, where system A, system B and the common medium system C have a holistic relativity which can be represented as efficacious by 1's or 0's denoting on/off, extant/disabled At any time 1, there can be eight essential states of that Tripartite Relativity. These 'essences' or 'atomic state descriptions' at time 2 can be any of the other eight. The number of possibilities for changes of state is modeled by a closed set of 64. When the 64 transitions of state are tabulated by placing non-efficacious relativity or chaos or non-structure in sequence with time, we end up with a metaphysical model of the activity of elements in the periodic table of chemistry, where top left, the reactive elements, bottom right the most structured, and in the middle, transitional states which are complex. Mathematical modeling of spontaneous emergence for artificial life experiments [Langton 1992] with the same arithmetic criteria as these essences produce the same Periodic Table of states. From this metaphysics can be derived an Octal Arithmetic with an unusual concept of zero, for zero in this system has substance, ie. Three substances which are not relating at a given moment efficaciously - but which also are 'something' in relation to a given context - ie. There is no absolute zero. e. Semantic model. System1 is denoted 'Macro', it is the umbrella of basic constituents and energy source from which emerges an energy transfer. Eg. the Sun this energy is then processed by the intervening system, denoted 'Meso' which has Structure and Mechanics eg. grass, that acts on system2 eg. cow, the 'Micro', which is the Evolutionary Asset or product of this chain of relativity. The cow is considered an evolutionary asset in some 'Context', eg. human/sociological. This chain of relativity has given a general evolutionary opportunity for a herbivore. f. Dr Plichta's model of Tripartite Relativity isbn 1-86204-014-1, pub element 1997 demonstrates that 3'ness is an archetypal and a priori state with the mathematics of prime numbers, and demonstrates that Structure evolves out of mathematical chaos. 5. Order spontaneously emerges out of Chaos - a Natural Law 6. The Cosmos and its energies are in a state of Chaos, and emerge systems that are ordered, but all energy and all matter and all time have the characteristics of Chaos - they are Non-Linear, both in the Macrocosm and the Microcosm. 7. The properties of matter modeled here, are Telic - end based and suggests that Emergence doesn't stop at causing system 2, but that successive systems emerge as part of an ongoing process. 8. Entropy and demergence are part of this dualistic process of construction and destruction, but it is suggested that this process of expansion and contraction occurs around a tendency to equilibrium eg. the elements of Chemistry tend to transitional equilibrium states. These states may also be considered to be Complex states at the Edge of Chaos and the Edge of Structure. 9. The heresy of a claim to Essences is that of unfalsifiable Absolute Truth of at least a synthetic a priori nature. 10. There is a Completeness Proof in formal logic for the set of Essences. 11. This is a closed set of 64 Logically Real atoms called the Language 'T' 12. There is also a Complete set of 729 atoms that include undecided states this is called the Language 'A' and is a form of Modal Logic which is formally complete. 13. Tripartite Essentialism states that there is Limited Independent Variety THE TRIPARTITE PRINCIPLE. >From a set of simple rules, and using the strong analogies generated, this holistic paradigm proposes many sought after answers eg. to Universal Knowledge Representation - for robotics, and for particle physics; a sort of superglue formula which modifies Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, and identifies new relationships within the universal ergosystem The format is a Tripartite system - a way of seeing relativity and function in a holistic and also logical way. To introduce it - the idea is a Universal Ohm's Law. >From within an umbrella of potential eg. the potential difference between one site/event and another, energy passes/diffuses/discharges from a site of higher energy to one of lower energy and by that process creating the potential for another emergent system. Before exploring the broad remit of teleological processes now enabled by the perspective of Tripartite Essentialism, we must first formally classify Tripartite Essentialism within the Philosophy of Science. Tripartite Essentialism is based upon the field theory notion that there is a continuous relation between one system and another. To add to this idea is the notion of Emergence, where one less sophisticated system by its holistic action produces - [emerges] another more sophistictaed system. This is accomplished by the transference of energy from the lesser evolved system to a site of competition with another system in the same context. The product of this transference of energy or discharge is some system or artefact that is said to have emerged or filled the vacancy created by evolution and competition. In America at the Santa Fe Institute, the biological implications of this 'vacancy' were labelled as 'Morphogenetic Attractors'. This discharge or current occurs through a medium which offers resistance. There are three broad types of discharge. The 'electricity' of this discharge varies in the 8 teleological classes; where the alpha class ie. idioms 1-3 convey energy as photons, the beta class ie. idioms 4&5 where energy is bound up in and invested in mechanics of an organic nature and the 'electricity' of the discharge between two poles becomes invested in systems more teleologically sophisticated than a mere trail of electrons. The gamma class, idioms 6-8, employ the two previous types of 'Voltage' but also includes the additional teleological sophistication of energy being further abstracted and manipulated by types of artefact or information systems. Easily measured in a simple format - as electricity, this tripartite format is known in more complex, compound and crystallised energy substrates/matter - eg. in psychological systems, which are relatively abstract systems (in comparison with a copper wire), the discharge of motivation has been measured by Lewin [1925] - unconsciously using a Tripartite principle. Kurt Lewin has developed this as a 'Field Theory in Psychology'. In Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, this 'electricity' becomes the value of the speed of light, where the Resistance - or 'Interval' becomes a value of the conductivity of the physical universe as observable in this locality. Perhaps the reason Einstein searched in vain for an ultimate answer was because of the lack of context dependency he attributed to the behaviour of sub atomic particles. The case for Tripartite Essentialism in the Philosophy of Science is presented as follows: The trigram is a basic representation of a metaphysically continuous relationship between any two systems: denoting the validity of a discharge of energy from one system of a higher, to another of a lower potential through a common substrate. Whatever the symbol set used to denote the three categories - it can be a whole line or broken line, 1 or 0 or some other; The upper line is to be denoted Macro which represents the origin of the discharge: from the most basic ingredients or substrate. The middle line, denoted Meso, represents the substrate through which the discharge takes place, a system more developed than the macro, but less emergent in sophistication than the Micro. The micro [holistically] extends into some other Macro of another system in the context (Macro 2). This extension can be regarded as deterministic relativity in continuous operation - [cf. Fractal] an evolutionary result of one system becoming the foundations of a different - but contextually related second system. The Micro, the bottom line, represents the site of discharge of the macro. It is a more teleologically sophisticated ergonomic system and structure which emerges and evolves to exploit macro2. Macro1, the macro or umbrella is the basic backdrop under whose auspices the possibility of further related relativity emerges - the most basic and extensive set of ingredients. The relativity between macro1 and macro2 can be described by a power law called the inverse square law U @ 1/R Where U represents the Utility of macro1, inversely related to the resistance that macro2 is putting up. This is a unifying and universal equation seen in gravity, particle dynamics, cycling in ecosystems (predator/prey relativity), deterioration with distance of all sorts of electromagnetic phenomenon in three dimensions, and most obviously described by Ohm's Law. Where V or voltage represents the energy potential difference between macro1 and macro2. R, represents the resistance of the intervening substrate, (meso) to the passage of the discharge , and the evolutionary asset (Micro) is the amount of energy delivered to the site of competition where evolution works itself out at the boundary between two different systems - The energy carried through system1 discharges at macro2. (I) MACRO=V, MESO=R, MICRO=I In Biological conditions, this equation sounds like, 'If the V, food and conditions are good, the physical difficulties of properties in the landscape R, ie. its topography disposition and systematic organisation etc. [meso], diminish : and the evolutionary asset is an increased population I. In physics, 'As the distance between two particles diminish, the potential for 'discharge' V, increase in proportion eg. gravity at a rate (Einstein fixed at the speed of light) in context with the sub atomic body [SAB] and the various sets and classes of phenomenon that make up the sub atomic substrate R. (This is the meso) - and, the [micro, the] amount of time involved in the collision and the extant properties of the substrate macro, is the evolutionary and emergent property of the combination I. In fixing the speed of light c at a constant, Einstein was basically maintaining that in all electrical systems, resistance and current are fixed. [we can hypothesise here that ether/resistance may vary the speed of light] They may actually be fixed however in ANY GIVEN CONTEXT. There follows a Sentential Logic depiction of the formation of Tripartite Essences. The macro is the substrate S from which the discharge towards emergence E occurs in the context T of time and space. At the next telic level of organisation, this extant ergonomic system becomes aligned A in time and space with a format evolved from S and the context T. The system comprising S, A and T further evolves at t2, when it either competes, emerges and improves its parameters Ez in context T, or fails. Context (time) T [ T and not T = RAA] Substrate S, (-S) -> (-A @ -E) Alignment A, (-A) -> (-E) v (-T) Emergence E, (-E) -> (-A) v (-T) The basic trigram and context either have or have not structural identity whenever the underlying function is valid in relation to the context ie. some form of competition may disintegrate the function of the systems 3 parts ie. (Sx, Ay, Ez) have structural integrity, and (S,A,E) do not - The eight essential states can be generated from synthesis of the a priori diagrams. [his stuff looks just like the I CHING ...] T, (time/context). S S S S Sx Sx Sx Sx A A Ay Ay A A Ay Ay E Ez E Ez E Ez E Ez Where E is either Emergent or Demergent depending on the Competitive process with respect to the context T ie. (t1-t2) The Linguistic tuple of noun, verb and adjective are directly related to the Tripartite Essentialist ideological framework: where macro is the noun, that is, the ingredients' system and its fabric. meso would be the verb, that is how the fabric is deployed in an active and existential sense, and the micro would be the adjective, that is how the system would be depicted, its qualitative performance in relation to some other system macro2. 000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111 > depict all the states of functional integrity at time1, however there are 8 times 8 possible state descriptions with time. Eg. 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111 010 010 010 010 010 010 010 010 000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111 ..... etc [there are 64 such sixes within this Closed and Limited set.] This Logically/Formally Complete set of functional relativity/ events: can be depicted as a Periodic Table of Energies [PTE] and as a simple model of the presence of chaos and structure - could be a simple 'Instrumentalist analogy' cf. Duhem, to the Periodic table of Chemistry etc. The synthesis of a priori fact in Tripartite Essentialism is a Phenomenological event, but the essential relativity of such events belongs to a Logically Complete and closed set of relativistic functions - and those functions are responsible for the fact of the noun and its ingredients. The epistomological status of Tripartite Relativity and its one basic 'law' ie. the inverse square law comes from a continuous relation between the components of the 3part system and their context: a discontinuous relation in this sense is a reductio, since it implies no relativity and hence no measurement or phenomenon. All materials generated by Tripartite Essentialist formalism belong to the one basic set of 64 atomic events which physically increment by gradual 64 transitions to the greatest level of structure at 64. The metaphysical distinction between the materials of essence and space is that Tripartite Essentialism is a field theory, where a powers system is in continuous relation. In metaphysics, to categorise Tripartite Essentialism with the three main types of individual, produces a bit of a quandry, for [TRE] embraces all three types. The set of 64 Essential events and members are constituted Parmenidean individuals: changeless, permanent entities. The atomic stance that entails from this is that change can only come through their rearrangement. The Heraclitean (phenomenalist) and Aristotelian aspects of Tripartite Essentialism come from the Emergent and Demergent properties of energy, structure and chaos: - where Heraclitean arrangements of the Parmenidean (atomic) set of 64 can be fleeting and ephemeral, or persist longer (Aristotle). The emergence of structures for nothing from the Heraclitean 'fires' as it were is described by the generative theory of causality. Where the cause is supposed to have the power to generate the effect and is connected to it. Such cause in [TRE] has a natural law as an internal relation. Whereas the succession theory of causality would hold that the phenomena observed are psychological synthesis, the a priori element of the Tripartite atom creates a real connection between cause and effect and that this can be identified by a causal mechanism eg. using Ohm's Law, a light bulb, and the application of a potential difference in energy relativity between the filament. The Primary quality of Tripartite Essentialism is energy flux. The ergonomic status of all systems is not fixed and is subject to change or the rearrangement of the sets of atoms that comprise the system. The phenomenon of change gives rise to the secondary qualities associated with the Primary quality of flux. For example the primary quality of Ohms Law generates the secondary quality of light and heat. The emergent properties of flux can be defined in terms of the property of the whole being produced by the properties of the parts, and that these emergent holistic properties derive from the whole structure. The set of 64 basic ergonomic atoms in Tripartite Essentialism could be referred to as a Corpuscularian system with one important distinction. These systems are said to result from one substance ie. binary substrate, and change is possible because it is divided into units or hexagrams which are capable of motion and hence rearrangement. EXAMPLES OF TRIPARTITE RELATIVITY . The Universal Power Law upon which [TRE] is based can be translated into any physical and ergonomic medium in which relativity subsists. In electronics and physics, generally speaking, a potential ergonomic difference (Voltage) between two systems resolves itself in a discharge of energy (Amperage) through a common and shared medium, whose physical resistance to the discharge of energy, caused by the orientation of the atomic superstructure, causes an attenuation of the energy stream in the course of its passage to a site of discharge of lower potential than the Ergonomic Macro from which the relativity 'Emerged'. Using the same considerations, the attenuation of discharged Emergent energies are treated in a more sophisticated manner by the more evolved organic systems whose advances incorporate a more diverse range of evolved minerals, the evolutionary priorities of which are biochemical. The discharge of energies through these systems has become more a stream of evolved 'products', or energies which have crystallised or evolved into a more sophisticated format. Immanuel Kant, whose Critique of Teleology will be tackled in the next chapter, is one of the philosophers who did not recognise that Biological systems had an intrinsic physical order that was part of the one basic ergonomic and evolutionary hierarchy - and who drew the line of demarcation between the a priori knowledge of physics and mathematics and the messy biological stuff, whose aesthetic appeal seemed to delude us into thinking that it all made properly constituted mathematical sense simply because we had an expectation that it did so. Today, however, it has become more important to develop a unified ergonomic strategy with which to chart the cosmos, and the new theories of Complexity and Emergence, and [TRE] (1990), have given us an important insight into the behaviour of ergonomics in the more complex systems where energy flow is invested in a complex hierarchy of 'Morphogenetic Attractors', or, as [TRE] would have it 'Evolutionary Vacancies'. The idea being that in chaos relativity, structure is produced out of the supply and demand relativity between various systems - ie. systems produce niches and the ingredients to fill them. As a discharge of potential is involved in ergonomic relativity, and that discharge is mediated and attenuated by some other system or set of related systems between the origination and the destination of the discharge, such a universal process could be called Ergonomic Osmosis. Osmosis is a biological term used to describe the active transport of salts from an area of high concentration to an area of low concentration through a semi-permeable membrane. The basic premise is that any system is a 'membrane' between two others. This meso role identifies the membrane as the attenuating artefact in the process. The structure and mechanics of which pass on the 'discharge' to the site of systemic competition. Energy flowing into or being fed into the locus of components that comprise a Tripartite system finds a condition of impedence to its flow; where the original stream becomes transmuted or metabolised into those substances or effects which maintain the system's function, whether biological or physical. Given a consistent, qualitative flow, the structure can specialise on the resources of its input to exploit systems ever more different and incongruous to the energy system from which it emerged. This factor is dependent on the stress imposed externally at the site of competition between this system and its context and the competing context into which the ergonomic 'discharge' is directed - for example in the story of the prehistoric evolution of amphibians where the developing respiratory mechanism of the organism enabled the exploitation of new habitat and context on the shore - this adaptation, initially, may have often failed under the critical stress of lack of humidity and high temperature. In using biological concepts as tools to interpret more general physical systems, it becomes easier to visualise Tripartite systems living in habitats, eating, metabolising and competing in a world readily accessible to the senses, and in this way, the energy that is being processed and competed for, may be more easily tracked in terms of a biological analogy through the very accessible concept of organic holism. A system becomes a system when a group of components are used consistently to receive and process energy. If consistency develops, it is because there is a context or input which caters for the collective needs of this group of components. In the macrocosm, eg. in a fish, after feeding, the organs metabolise the input and distribute the metabolites to every part of the organisation/organism where they are used in the process of growth/competition or maintenance. Speaking more abstractly; this structure and mechanics or supporting mechanism/metabolism is an energy-distribution infrastructure, as much seen in civilisation as it is at the superphysical level. In treating Civilisation as part of the set of Organic Holism, it too has a brick and mortar body powered by the metabolite of electricity obtained in the competitive jungle of Capitalism. The context of a Civilisation is its minerals, resources and materials and the processing capacity of the system itself is dependent on the efficiency with which raw materials are exploited eg. farming, mining, factory and processing technology. The 'heart' of the nuclear reactor, pumps sustenance along the veins and arteries of its power cables, and cognisant ganglia of the stock exchanges allocate lines of trade and communication, where secondary Capital metabolites are shipped through the enormous organic system of the infrastructure in a quest for sustained growth and competition for available resources according to stimulii or Labour Market Intelligence. As in a biological system, the technological system processes and reprocesses raw input through a chain of useful and cumulative effects, investing time, capital and utility in these metabolic products. The evolutionary assets of a Civilisation are information based, where the management and control of information leads through policy and science to the maximisation of output, for the minimum of input. Sustained growth/metabolism, a necessity in an entropic ergosphere can only be maintained by the maximisation of inputs as a whole, and since the power law (to be illustrated later) is involved in the demographic and ergonomic cycles of growth and decay, the exponential demand on resources made by exponential consumption can only be maintained by correct and competitive scientific advance. At this level of complexity, the Osmosis analogy includes many more sets of artefacts, systems and formats into which the energy discharge of the context macro has been encoded. Here are a few more examples of Tripartite Relativity . (ie. Three parts and a context ie. Context and Macro: CMacro, Meso, Micro.) Food, has as its context the Sun, which powers the green cycle and turns the available Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphor into Carbohydrate Sugars and oxygen. This series of trophic and vegetational cycles produce a complex ecosystem and food web from which is extracted for the benefits of the gastronomical structure and mechanics of Man, energy packets of variable relative quality and quantity. A kitchen receptacle, when examined holistically with Tripartite Relativity has a macro or function which suits it for the context of the kitchen in design and purpose. The size of the bowl, the energy of the umbrella that it provides to sustain its utility - the macro or utility for the conveyance of fruit. The Meso of the bowl is basically its components and structural constituents, and the Micro of the bowl, basically, its evolutionary assets are its qualitative aspects eg. if the purpose of the bowl was solely general utility, then plastic is an asset to enable continuity of function; if however, its quality is not selecting it to attain conditions of continual use eg. porcelain bowl at a banquet may be more acceptable, then the Micro of the bowl is dependent on context conditions and the amount of psychological pressure its system can 'bring to bear' or weather in the selection process. The cupboard should, like the bowl, be seen in terms of the function that makes it a specific type of cupboard, and not necessarily seen in terms of the energies of its manufacture. (The cupboard is the end product (Micro) of a Sawmill (Meso) that manufactures to differing qualities from forests (Macro). Te context of the cupboard per se would be its overall capacity to perform its container function of holding utensils eg. bowl. Its Meso would be its structural arrangements and partitioning and fitments and the evolutionary assets or qualitative aspects - Micro, would be the difference between Oak and Hardboard, plastic and brass. A record player has a Macro of electricity, capital and the context and function of an information transformer. The Meso or structure and mechanics of the hardware would have a qualitative aspect of HiFi. A Book has as its context its topic and a Macro determined by the information formats and ingredients of its source, Its Meso or structure and mechanics are the ideologies or idea formats that collate and relate it to the general purpose and function of the book. Whereas the evolutionary asset of the book, its Micro, would be how effective and intelligent an ideological tool it was for the exploitation of the resources of the context to which its main premise was applied. A lampost has as its context, the illumination of infrastructure for the purposes of efficient society etc, and as a Macro both the capital of taxation and the power of electricity, its Meso is the structure and components of the object itself, and its qualitative aspects are mainly aesthetic in relation to how much light it provides, how high and the quality of both structure and function. A Home has as its context the housing of a family unit for the purposes of labour maintenance within the context of the infrastructure - the family or Macro will maintain the input of capital, fuel, energies, supermarkets, reservoirs, petrol, and these will be utilised by the structure and mechanics of the social context to be invested in maintaining and sustaining the fabric and quality of the social environment. The Qualitative aspects are related to capital input, class and other types of ideology (aesthetic). These prior examples are capable of being mechanised by a simple algebraic format which can illustrate the relationships involved. This example is of a simple Homeostatic mechanism dependent on the qualitative aspects of the competitive Micro in its exploitation of the Context from which it is deriving its sustenance. The example illustrates how the 'World' refines itself to provide the context in which a (fish) may evolve .. The world, made up of many components representing land; elements and variously derived systems that will contribute to the oceanic system. From this Pedosphere, rivers drain, precipitation of solvents, boundaries of various mineral strata and rocks etc mark the junction or estuary where the concentrated presence of all the microfactors that feed the sea is sent to provide the ingredients or context for our fish. In effect, the coast has acted like a vast membrane between the context of the land and the context of the sea. From which, the various factors and co-factors useful to the promotion and creation of an evolutionary vacancy for the fish precipitate into the ocean from another exogenous system (Unified at a global organic level by an interdependency of the same components eg. Carbon, Oxygen, Nutrient Minerals, Water etc) The diluting body of water separates from the high concentration of salts, biomass, bases etc injected by the rivers, the substances that will provide in some form, the energy source of the fish. This input is further processed by other organic and inorganic processes in the ocean - and some factors eg. salts may be bound up by Calcium Sulphate in Plankton and may be precipitated out of the system as sediment, or, these factors may be consumed and passed, usefully processed, to some other tier of the food chain. At this stage, the original microfactors may have found their way into the production of many useful nutrients and co- factors. These may either contribute to the food factors in the macro of the fish, or may be precipitated out through other cycles less useful to the context and environment of the fish. A similar complexity of changes is reflected in the algebraic model. taking the algebraic model as a useful archetype, it may again be applied to the system of the fish.. The energy source of the fish is the system of microfactors supplied by the land, sifted and specialised to augment life - or death. Where these factors become the energy source of the fish, the organism itself has a demand for those ingredients and products it has evolved with. The organism is thus surrounded by or has evolved into that immediate environment which can fulfill its needs. (That environment is a Morphogenetic Attractor). The Macro of the fish, then, supplies the structure and mechanics (Meso) with the nutrients that it is currently evolved to process; and through various energy exchange mechanisms or meso's/membranes or biochemical pathways, the essence of what is vital for life, evolution and adaptation is conveyed in various stages to the Micro, where those evolutionary assets are employed or cancelled in the struggle with the context environment (Q). The following narrative relates the behaviour of the algebraic model with reference to syntax. 1. The niche that provides the context to contain this organism/organisation/system is represented by various factors or groups of letters. Those factors directly used by the organism are ASB(E) or food and energy input to the Energy Gathering Mechanism VN. 2. The Meso - processing E (Evolutionary Advantage) for use at Q. ASB takes E - Evolutionary Advantage forward. 3. Paying a toll of (B) at a membrane (P) for the furtherance of AS(E). 4. The toll (B), paid, mechanism P - the site of the toll brings and enables a carrier mechanism RV(T) to bind AS(E) and convey it down pathways that demand it. 5. Part (T) of RV(T) can only take AS(E) forward if it can locate its binary receptor mechanism RV(Y). T and Y are mutually attracted, however Y is a resource which is only produced when the organism as a whole is competing well with 'exogeny' ie. the contect at factor Q - where Q is a chaotic energy demand that affects the integrity of organism Z. 6. Thus when Z is doing well, Y enables the progress of AS(E). Y represents the potential exhaustion has to debilitate the organism to a state of extinction, making the quality of substance of Z, reserves etc. an important factor in surviving the competitive stress of Q. Q on the other hand represents the freedom of external factors to interfere with the evolution of a system. 7. With Y present, AS(E) is taken to and bonded to mechanism W which further filters out RV. The number of exchanges from one mechanism to another represent, here, the increasing complexity which binds and processes, refines and directs food/energy input into the specialised compartment of the Micro which is interphasing with the environmental competition. 8. 'Food' factor (AS) is then expended to convey (E) - Evolutionary Advantage to the Micro or Assets of the organism - enabling Z to hold its own, And where Z has advantage over Q, it produces Y - its potential for continued survival. This process of natural selection may be illustrated at work in the story of the dinosaur .. where supported by the body of energies that comprised the atmosphere and its trophic range - under this umbrella it flourished, finding a tolerable equilibrium between air temperature, body temperature and energy consumption. The dinosaur lost energy to the atmosphere in an exchange or toll paid at a comfortable rate. When the climate changed and the air grew colder, the biological identity of the reptile could not support the massive heat loss and the increased toll, which made greater demabds on its energy reserves than it could cope with. With no new equilibrium between the cold weather and the biology of the dinosaur being possible the only other outcome was extinction. ie, the toll of Q was too much for Z to sustain. **************************************************************** DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
