8.6.99 As the preponderance of AVAILABLE evidence tends to clearly show the deaths of John Kennedy, wife and sister-in-law were NOT accidental (we should know as we and many others have worked VERY HARD to get such evidence and information to the public), it is UNCONSCIONABLE that such a "possibility" is not even being seriously considered by those agencies and officials charged with "investigating" the wildly SUSPICIOUS deaths. That alone is almost CERTAIN proof that this "possibility" is in fact the ACTUALITY -- i.e.; the deaths were murders. This being the case, and as apparently complicit and/or compromised officials WILL NOT investigate the incident as a multiple homicide, I guess it's up to us. You know, THE PEOPLE. With any such investigation one looks for basic things like motive, opportunity, and means. Motive? Kennedy's tremendous "electability" as a political candidate combined with his obvious and demonstrated penchant for pulling the lid off at least a FEW coverups and conspiracies littering the political landscape AND the fact that his own father and uncle were assassinated by a covert, totalitarian "NWO" cabal for exhibiting just such "maverick" behavior as 'Junior" was showing, ALL give any of a number of potential political rivals and ALSO perpetrators/conspirators in the assassinations and coverups of the two previous Kennedy assassinations (putting aside for now uncles Ted's' extraordinary rash of "near-death" experiences) ample MOTIVE for sending Kennedy into the drink. Opportunity? Tons. Means? Given the variety of weapons and technologies available today, the ways in which a plane could be "interacted" with in a "hostile" and terminal fashion are too numerous to go into. Take your pick� Use your imagination. Several days back we made note of the fact that the government's blanket of lies, distortions and deceptions regarding their murderous, psychotic assault on the Branch Dravidian's Waco compound in 1993 is seriously unraveling at this time. TOP dogs on duty during the Waco massacre and ultimately responsible for the actions and conduct of the federal forces there? Attorney General Reno and HER boss Clinton. HARD EVIDENCE from a number of different sources is tearing the government's wretched coverup of this monstrosity to shreds as this is written. Texas Rangers (God bless 'em!) have staked out a position firmly in opposition to the revolting, ongoing distortions of truth and OBSTRUCTION of justice still being perpetrated by the federal government regarding the Waco slaughter. The Rangers are in possession of material evidence clearly showing that incendiary devices and potential incendiary devices WERE fired into the compound by federal agents despite nonstop claims by Reno to the contrary. Other evidence solidly supporting this fact has come from documents and materials provided by the National Reconnaissance Office and even the FBI. (Obviously some agents cannot stomach the grotesque horror unleashed by the government at Waco). Suffice to say this is HARD, irrefutable EVIDENCE. One of the principal attorneys helping Waco survivors in their legal efforts to reopen the whole issue and bring the truth to light is former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark. Clark, interestingly enough, has been VERY closely connected to the late John Kennedy Jr. for some time. The two had collaborated on a number of undertakings and were known to share viewpoints on a number of issues relating to government and government policies, principles, guidelines and such. Bear in mind here the timing: as Kennedy had just confirmed all arrangements necessary for conducting an interview with Adminstration bruiser Janet Reno in the very near future. It's KNOWN that tough questions about Waco and Reno's and the Clinton Administration's tactics there were HIGH on Kennedy's list for Reno. Kennedy had been devoting lots of paper to exposing "conspiracies" and coverups in George Magazine. Kennedy by all indications was going to run for national political office; probably next year against Hillary Clinton in the NY Senate primary; perhaps even right for the presidency in 2000. He was DEFINITELY set to make a move. Kennedy's close buddy Ramsey Clark had been DEEPLY involved in unearthing solid and POWERFUL evidence of federal government malfeasance regarding their conduct at Waco. The efforts of Clark, the Texas Rangers, "Rules of Engagement" filmmaker Michael McNulty, Texas Department of Public Safety chairman James B. Francis Jr. and a number of disaffected federal agents are currently causing the wall of lies and coverup about the government's massacre of defenseless citizens to crumble--and when it does, Clinton, Reno along with ATF, FBI and other agency chiefs will be revealed as the murderous criminals they are. Ramsey Clark is right in the MIDDLE of this process, and would UNDOUBTEDLY have been funneling critical information to JFK Jr� JUST as Kennedy's interview with Reno would have been ready to publish. Ouch. A simultaneous and damning article in George on top of a complete legal collapse of the federal government's position and tactics regarding Waco may have been just too much for these vermin to contemplate. Thus, I consider it a strong possibility John Kennedy Jr.'s death and those of his wife and sister-in-law can be added to the "Clinton Kill Count". John Quinn/NewsHawk Inc. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Please read this excerpt from a Washington Times editorial page article dated Aug.4, 1999. The Washington Times - Opinion The Waco cover-up begins to unravel By Paul Craig Roberts In July 27, the chairman of the Texas Department of Public Safety, James B. Francis Jr., told the Dallas Morning News that evidence in possession of the Texas Rangers calls into question the federal government's account of the deadly federal assault and subsequent fire that claimed the lives of scores of men, women and children in the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, in 1993. Mr. Francis wants to turn the evidence over to federal district court Judge Walter Smith. The U.S. Department of Justice is trying to block the Texas Rangers from releasing the evidence. Mr. Francis says that the Rangers have "some evidence that the world needs to see, in my opinion. The government does not want this evidence out, and yet, that's not right." Mr. Francis added: "It is a complete stonewall."� �Lawyers and investigators involved in the wrongful death suits tell me that they have powerful evidence that the federal government is guilty of criminal assault, criminal negligence, and reckless endangerment. The evidence of wrongful death is partly the work of seasoned investigators like Gordon Novel, and persistent attorneys such as David Hardy, who succeeded in forcing release of information through the Freedom of Information Act. But some important evidence appears to have leaked from government officials sickened by the federal massacre and cover-up. There is a belief within the government itself that if the federal government gets away with its Waco cover-up, the casualty will be the rule of law. Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark is a lawyer for many of the wrongful death suits. He described to me some of the key evidence: the FLIR tape (Forward Looking Infra Red), which shows federal automatic fire into the compound on the day of the fire. Mr. Clark also has Dr. Edward F. Allard's "Thermal Imaging Report" and the "Sun Reflection Geometry Report" prepared by Maurice Cox of the National Reconnaissance Office. These reports make clear that the images on the FLIR tape are images of federal gunfire. Mr. Hardy says he has an FBI report that acknowledges federal gunshots during the fire originating from an FBI position designated as Sierra One. Mr. Hardy also has an Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms memo reporting that three ATF agents went on a friendly shooting excursion with David Koresh nine days before the initial ATF assault on the compound. Koresh was the Branch Davidian leader who the government claims could not be lured out of the compound to be served with a warrant. Recently, the Texas Rangers allowed Michael McNulty, producer of the award-winning 1997 documentary "Waco: The Rules of Engagement," access to physical evidence that incendiary devices were fired into the compound by federal agents on the day of the fire. Mr. McNulty is working on a sequel to his award-winning film. Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark says the evidence of wrongful death is overwhelming --even without the powerful evidence in his possession. "The first civil right," Mr. Clark says, "is to be free from unlawful and excessive force by your own police. That is the difference between a free society and a police state." "At Waco a police force exceeding 700 men with armored vehicles began a systematic aggressive attack in a situation rife with flammable materials and high winds. It is indisputable that this is reckless endangerment." "How could it happen that a flimsy building full of men, women and children could be assaulted by the U.S. government in that way?" This question demands an answer. � 1999 The Washington Times Paul Craig Roberts is a columnist for The Washington Times and is nationally syndicated.
