-Caveat Lector- >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 >Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 15:10:00 -0400 >To: "02 - UFO UpDates Subscribers":; >From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: C-E: Hubble Moon Photos Found > >From: David Rudiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 20:57:16 EDT >Subject: Re: C-E: Hubble Moon Photos Found >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >From: Kutovoy, Anatoly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 08:09:58 +0200 > >Fwd Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 12:08:22 -0400 > >Subject: C-E: Hubble Moon Photos Found > > > >NASA Lied Again - Hubble Moon Photos Found > > >http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pr/1999/14/pr-photos.html > > >The Space Telescope Science Institute (STSI) released pictures > >of a celestial object that most people thought the Hubble > >telescope was not allowed to view: our own Moon. - Sky and > >Telescope Magazine. Many People have requested NASA to cause the > >Hubble Space Telescope to be pointed towards the Moon and send > >back high resolution pictures of any or all of the alleged > >Apollo Lunar landing sites showing any equipment left behind > >such as the LEM pads, or anything large enough to be spotted by > >the HST at an average distance of perhaps 1.28 billion feet, > >which is an average of about 15,400,000,000 inches distance from > >Earth. NASA objected stating, "the Moon is too bright", commonly > >followed-up by, "the Hubble can't focus on something that close" > >[250,000 miles?]. We knew that this was a lie since the HST has > >sufficient resolution to return exquisitely clear images of the > >Lunar landscape. Positive evidence has turned up that indeed > >NASA & Co. have been lying all along about this Moon is too > >bright/too close balderdash. I'd just like to say... See?... I > >told you so. - Bible Thumper > > >HEY NASA! Now that we know you CAN do it... how about taking > >high resolution close up photos using the Hubble Telescope of > >the following alleged Apollo landing locations on the Lunar > >surface: Mare Tranquillitatis 0.67N - 23.49E, Oceanus > >Procellarum 3.20S - 23.38W, Fra Mauro 3.67S - 17.47W, Hadley > >Rille 26.10N - 3.65E, Descartes 8.99S - 15.51E, Taurus-Littrow > >20.16N - 30.76E > > >What lie will NASA tell now? > >They aren't lying about not being able to resolve lunar landing >sites with Hubble. I suggest you read your own referenced >Website: > >http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pr/1999/14/pr-photos.html > >Note the part near the bottom which reads: > >(lower right) A close-up view of Copernicus' terraced walls. >Hubble can resolve features as small as 280 feet across. > >280 feet is a bit larger than a LEM, much less a LEM pad, no? >Can Hubble do better than this? Not according to basic optical >physics. A mirror about 2 meters across imaging something >220,000 miles away in blue light (which would give maximum >resolution), can only barely resolve features about 280 feet >across. > >Sorry, that's just the way it is. No lies by NASA here. > > >David Rudiak > > > >\_______________________________________________/ > > UFO UpDates - Toronto - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > A UFO & Related Phenomena E-Mail List operated > by Errol Bruce-Knapp - 416-696-0304 > > UFO UpDates Archives are available at: > http://www.ufomind.com/ufo/updates > > 'Strange Days...Indeed' - available live via > MediaPlayer 11:00pm Eastern, Sunday nights at: > http://cfrb.com/default.htm > > The MUFON Ontario Pages are at: > http://globalserve.net/~updates/mufon/index.htm --- "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
