-Caveat Lector-
Like many of you, I have mixed feelings about this plethora of UFO,
paranormal material that keeps surfacing here in and there---much of it
being featured on late night talk radio.
Is the government playing a role in feeding us all of these tales of
the strange and paranormal? And to what purpose?
Dr. Duke argues that the government isn't involved in cattle mutilations.
He does make a good argument that they have the resources to
experiment on animals in secret if they so wished, so why would they go to
the trouble of mutilating animals at random in such a horrific way?
If we rule out cultists and the government, what are we left with?
Aliens? I'm not convinced.
I've read Dr. Jacobs's THE THREAT. After twenty-five to thirty years of
researching UFO abduction experiences, he's concluded that the aliens are
here to turn us into slaves. His conclusion is based on
thousands of hours of research and interviews--most of it based on
the hypnotic regression of alleged abductees.
I don't think there's any question that the abductees have been the victim
of some kind of horrific experience, and their claims should be taken
seriously; however, there is still no hard evidence to link the
abduction experience to extraterrestials.
Isn't it more likely that the government is promoting the UFO-cattle
mutilation-abduction scenario as part of its ongoing experimentation on
us?
Since we have entered an era in which the image has supplanted
reality and as we know from past experience, our government has
consistently lied to the American people over the years, and we know that
in the past our government has poured millions of dollars into mind control
research, I think the answers to the phenomena can be found closer to
home.
Perhaps the UFO phenomena is just one more brick in the wall, a new
paradigm that is being constructed for us. At the end of the
twenty-first century, we've learned to accomodate ourselves to horrors,
haven't we?
There is no doubt that crimes are being committed; the stories don't go
away. But until there is concrete proof that extraterrestials are to
blame, I think a more earthly explanation is in order.
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Nicola Molloy wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Cattle Mutilation Phenomena and HIV
>
> (c) 1999 Phillip S. Duke, PhD.
>
> Introduction: Cattle mutilations are logically explainable only as
> Extraterrestrial activities. The mutilation body materials taken all
> correspond with
> sites of HIV transmission or replication (blood) in humans, except for
> the ear, which may contain a locator device. Circumstantial evidence
> suggests cattle are mutilated primarily to harvest HIV antibodies and
> virus from blood in quantity, and to obtain information relating to
> possible
> HIV transmission in humans, by study of the materials taken from
> corresponding cattle mutilation sites. The left ear is always taken,
> presumably
> to facilitate locator retrieval. Healthy, live fetuses are also taken
> from animals to be mutilated. The primary reason for cattle mutilations
> may be to
> harvest HIV antibodies. Cattle mutilation phenomena support the AIDS-ET
> Connection.
>
> By cattle mutilations I mean cattle found minus their blood and minus
> certain body parts, removed with surgical precision, which humans and
> animals do not eat by choice. Cattle are the family Bovidae,
> domesticated Bos Taurus.
>
> Cattle mutilations generally occur where cattle are raised and kept in
> quantity on ranges or in pastures. Feed lots and related locations with
> animals under relatively close human surveillance are not affected.
> Cattle mutilations occur only when animals are out of human sight.
> Prime,
> strong, healthy animals are affected. I don't know of a single case
> where an animal which is obviously unhealthy or injured was later found
> mutilated. Mutilations commonly but not always occur at night. A
> pedigreed, especially valuable animal is quite healthy and doing well
> one day,
> and found dead and mutilated the nest. Cattle mutilations are routinely
> reported throughout the world, apparently wherever cattle are kept in
> quantity. Since there is no central agency keeping records, the number
> of mutilations is unknown, but it must number something more than a
> thousand every year. It is not known how long cattle mutilations have
> been occurring, but they have been reliably reported for at least
> several
> decades. There is no universally agreed upon explanation concerning what
> or who is doing cattle mutilations (1,2). All investigators who are not
> county agents agree; cattle mutilations are not the work of animal
> predators.
>
> The evidence suggesting cattle mutilations are ET phenomena is varied
> and comes from numerous different sources. It is arrived at by logical
> exclusion of all alternative explanations, and by being the only
> explanation capable of explaining the strange facts. The ET explanation
> is bizarre
> but then so are the facts.
>
> I consider it established beyond any doubt that animal predators are not
> responsible. The removals of biological materials are invariable stated
> to be "with surgical precision." There are no teeth marks on the
> carcasses, no animal (or any other) tracks, even when animals are found
> lying on
> moist ground which would clearly show tracks. The animal parts eaten by
> preference for food are not affected. The left ear is taken. All this
> plus
> the absence of blood in the carcass and on the ground shows clearly that
> animal predators are not responsible for cattle mutilations. The
> explanation propounded by county agents and others also bound to the
> same politically correct position, which of course means they cannot
> consider ETs, is that "coyotes are responsible." This was responded to
> by one cattleman with the statement, "If coyotes can do this we are in
> deep trouble."
>
> It has been proposed that human beings cause cattle mutilations. As the
> valuable meat is left to rot, and as the body locations mutilated are
> bizarre and include those related to reproduction and excretion, it was
> suggested that some kind of bizarre sexual cult activity is involved.
> The
> evidence suggests otherwise. No cult is known which treats animals this
> way, and no one has ever claimed 'credit' for these illegal activities.
> The
> number, nature, and geographical extent of world wide mutilation is so
> great, that an immense, very large, very well funded, and will organized
> human organization would be required.It would be much easier and safer
> for such a cult to buy animals and mutilate and dispose of them in
> secret. Due to the absence of any evidence that any such cult exists,
> the absence of any logical human motive, the absence of a human ever
> claiming 'credit' for them, I readily discard the concept that humans
> are responsible for (the vast majority) of cattle mutilations. If that
> were the
> case, there would surely be at least some evidence suggestion this, when
> in fact there is none at all.
>
> In the absence of anything better, and in view of the facts, hard headed
> down to earth cattle people with no interest at all in science fiction
> and
> without any knowledge of the subject have been left with only "flying
> saucers" as the explanation of cattle mutilations. Mutilated animals
> have
> been found with broken legs and backs and with their horns stuck deep
> into the ground, as if they were dropped from considerable height. A
> bull was found in a tree. Numerous such incidents suggest cattles are
> performed on animals which after being taken up into the air are dropped
> or otherwise returned. (1). This explanation of aerial mutilation also
> explains the absence of tracks and blood. In theory it would be possible
> for
> humans to somehow capture cattle, hoist them up into (sizable)
> helicopters, perform the mutilations, including blood removal (how long
> would
> this all take?) return the animals, and then leave. But the key question
> is, why should they do this The military has plenty of money to buy all
> the
> cattle it wants, and then it could do whatever it wants with them, at
> its convenience, in secrecy. Why on earth should the military go to this
> much trouble to accomplish something it could otherwise do so much more
> easily? And without leaving any evidence of what it has done? And
> remember, cattle mutilations are world wide phenomena. This clearly
> indicates "the military" is not primarily responsible for cattle
> mutilations.
> Sightings of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) are not uncommon in high
> cattle mutilation areas.
>
> The military is, however, quite interested in all alien activities
> including cattle mutilations, and actively seeks to investigate them.
> Black
> (unmarked, presumably military) helicopters have been seen in the
> vicinity of cattle mutilations, and the military may be sampling such
> animals
> after they are found. They may also be performing "look alike" cattle
> mutilations, to obtain data, throw investigators off the track, or other
> reasons (3).
>
> In theory it is possible to identify candidates for mutilation before
> the fact, by detection of their (left) ear implant, and sample such
> animals prior
> to alien mutilation. As to whether or not our military is doing this, I
> don't have the least idea. I hope they are, because I suggest that if
> they will
> only determine the HIV test status of mutilated or mutilation candidate
> cattle, a great light will shine all at once on the mystery of cattle
> mutilations.
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
