-Caveat Lector-

>     THURSDAY
> AUGUST 19
> 1999
>
>
> <Picture: FreeLife><Picture: Claire Wolfe>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ------- <Picture: WND Exclusive Commentary>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ------- (Not) Everything you ever wanted to know about SSNs
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
> � 1999 Claire Wolfe
>
> Last week's column about babies without Social Security numbers
> drew a ton of mail. Usually, that's good. This time it was a
> mixed bag. I heard from gutsy people refusing to cooperate with
> government child-tracking schemes. I heard from people with
> helpful info. But I also heard from lots who either didn't get or
> didn't like what "Lawyer X" and I had to say. This week I want to
> deal with some of their objections.
>
> "How will baby drive, get credit or buy a house without a
> government number?"
>
> Last week's column argued, "Give baby a chance to choose whether
> or not he wants a number. He can't do that when he's an hour
> old."
>
> I didn't take a stand against all government citizen-numbering
> (though, in fact, I do and will). I just said that the decision
> to bear a tracking number has far-reaching consequences for
> freedom and privacy, and that an individual is entitled to make
> that decision for himself, not to have it imposed upon him at
> birth.
>
> Yep, years from now -- when it comes time to drive or go to
> college -- grown-up baby will have some tough decisions to make.
> Of course, baby might face a more hopeful future if enough people
> -- today -- tell the government (and its Little Brother
> corporations) to take a leap into the abyss with their control
> schemes.
>
> "But how will I get my tax deduction if I don't number the baby?"
>
>
> The government wants more of your freedom. If you don't give in,
> it'll extract more of your money. And if you do give in, it'll
> know it can take even more money or freedom from you next time.
> Are these the kinds of choices you want to continue to be
> pressured to make? Or do you want to say a resounding NO to such
> blackmail?
>
> There is an alternate government number you might be able to
> wheedle for your baby in order to write him off. Ask the IRS
> about it. You can always make deals -- if that's the kind of
> world you want.
>
> "But you have to use an SS number. Otherwise, you can't live a
> normal life!"
>
> This objection -- repeated by more correspondents than I care to
> think about -- depressed me for days. Of course it's true.
> Absolutely, totally, completely true. If you don't have -- or if
> you refuse to use -- an SS number for ordinary activities like
> driving, connecting utilities, purchasing firearms, renting
> videos, etc. -- you'll find yourself leading a curtailed life or
> constantly fighting with bureaucrats, store clerks and company
> officials.
>
> But can't you see? That's exactly why it's so crucial to fight
> this universal numbering business as fiercely as if you were a
> rabid Tasmanian devil!
>
> The abuse of SS numbers has been growing since the first SS
> legislation was spawned. But only since 1996 have the worst
> abuses been codified into law. You -- and your children -- are
> slowly being squeezed into a position of absolute submission to
> authority -- with your SS number as the lever. It's being used to
> control your access to everything from credit to health care to
> work to investments to education to insurance to housing to
> travel -- and eventually, to food. Free people do not tolerate
> such control over their lives. It must be halted -- and reversed.
>
>
> "You didn't tell me how I can get a credit card or health
> insurance without a number."
>
> Right. First of all, it was a 1,500-word column about babies. You
> darn betcha I didn't solve the entire SS problem in that limited
> space. I couldn't solve it in a book -- though in fact, I have
> written one on the subject.
>
> Anyone who imagines 1) that regaining freedom is going to be an
> easy little thing or 2) that any writer, adviser, expert,
> consultant, guru -- or politician -- is going to give them all
> the answers -- all wrapped up in a nice, tidy package -- is
> dreaming.
>
> I'll do what I can to supply leads and info on various ways to
> live free. I hope to have much, much more on this topic, over
> time. But actually getting free takes dedication, research and
> risk -- on the part of each and every person who seriously wants
> freedom. The only question is: Do you consider freedom important
> enough to make the effort?
>
> As former slave Frederick Douglass observed: "Those who profess
> to favor freedom yet depreciate agitation are men who want the
> crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without
> thunder. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many
> waters. ... Power concedes nothing without demand. It never has
> and never will. ... The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the
> endurance of those whom they oppose."
>
> "I just don't like your method of resisting."
>
> One acquaintance wrote:
>
> I don't see the merits that you do of separating oneself from the
> advantages of mass society just because some idiots are in charge
> and are making a pest of themselves.
>
> My orientation has always been to either "get out" entirely
> (through, e.g., establishing several alternative identities along
> with passports for each) or to simply ignore the bastards
> whenever possible, comply meekly like a good little sheepie when
> you can't avoid them, and throw grit in the gears over one's
> shoulder.
>
>
>
> And to this I say, "Great!" "Gopherit!" "Hooray for you!"
>
> I've written frequently that the rowdy, unpredictable power of
> the individual -- millions of individuals -- is the most potent
> weapon against tyranny. You do whatever works for you. Just as
> one car, one color, one book isn't the one for everyone, neither
> is there only one road to freedom. We can confuse the heck out of
> the control-freaking creeps by following our individual
> inclinations and opportunities.
>
> I have just one fear about freedom lovers who choose apparent
> submission -- with heartfelt beliefs that they'll monkeywrench
> the tyranny works along the way. And that is that, too often,
> they're fooling themselves. They suck up the benefits, accept the
> easy life -- and never take a real, effective step for freedom.
> Oh, but they will someday. Sure, someday. ...
>
> But heck, however you can screw up a tyrant's plans -- why not?
> Toss that monkeywrench. Misspell your name a dozen times in that
> database. Sue the SOBs. Whatever moves you. Just don't submit.
>
> But I still say your child has the right to make her own choices
> -- when she's old enough.
>
> Finally: a tribute and a sigh
>
> Consequences? There are so many -- and so many heroes who endure
> them for freedom's sake.
>
> Here's the story of one young man, Trey Felton -- 18-year-old
> Eagle Scout and 4H clubber -- a sociable kid from a family that
> "doesn't stand out from the crowd." He has no citizen number
> because of his religious objections. His mother wrote to explain
> just one of his struggles.
>
> First, Trey was hired by Burger King -- after being up-front
> about not having an SS number. A month later (after he pointed
> out that they shouldn't be withholding SS taxes) the franchise
> owner -- whom he had never even met -- came in and fired him.
>
> Then he was hired by a major department store -- again, being
> up-front about not being in the SS system. He worked for one day,
> then was told to get a number. His mother says, "He has since
> furnished them with written documentation explaining there is no
> law that requires him to get a ssn against his religious
> convictions, a complete breakdown of the IRC which explains the
> proper procedure for an employer to follow in such a situation in
> order to avoid penalties, etc., from the IRS, and a copy of an
> EEOC ruling which supports his position."
>
> An attorney for the store -- attempting to utilize a loophole in
> the (non-binding) EEOC ruling -- pointed out that business aren't
> "required to accommodate the employee without a ssn if it would
> place undue hardship on the company." The attorney then claimed
> that reprogramming the store's human resource software to list
> Trey without an SS number would be cost prohibitive.
>
> Trey's mother continues: "I have an extensive background with
> computers and software. I made a call to the software company and
> spoke with a person in the know there who said it could be done
> in any of four simple ways without any expense at all."
>
> The family and the department store are still trying to work
> things out. But when this worried mother -- seeing the
> possibility of a religious discrimination suit on the horizon --
> e-mailed WorldNetDaily's own advertiser, Pre-Paid Legal Services
> Pre-Paid's rep, Faith Thomas told her bluntly:
>
> [A] SS# is required for membership. The SS# is used as a
> membership number.
> and again -- after full discussion of the family's religious
> opposition to numbering:
>
> If you want this service ... then give a SS#. If not I wish you
> the best.
>
>
>
> Pre-Paid Legal has the right to set whatever membership policies
> it wishes. But when a company can confidently expect that an
> audience filled with conservative Christians and libertarians
> will humbly submit their federally issued tracking numbers as a
> condition of doing business, we have indeed come far down the
> road to universal submission.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
>
> Claire Wolfe illustration by Wayne D. Holt
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
> E-MAIL CLAIRE WOLFE | GO TO CLAIRE WOLFE'S ARCHIVE
>
> CONTACT WND | GO TO PAGE ONE | SEARCH WND
>
>
> <Picture: WorldNetDaily.com>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ------- � 1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------




>From WorldNetDaily.CoM

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to