http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_exnews/19990828_xex_reno_planned.shtml


SATURDAY AUGUST 28 1999
Reno planned final assault
with Delta Force operatives
Classified documents, Special Forces sources show military warned her
about use of CS gas


By Betsy Gibson
1999 WorldNetDaily.com

Contrary to public statements made in recent days, Attorney General
Janet Reno and FBI officials planned the final deadly assault on the
Branch Davidian church in Waco, Texas, with top officers of the Delta
Force, according to classified documents obtained through the Freedom of
Information Act and Special Forces sources.

The FBI actually requested that Special Forces Delta Force operatives
consult with them, be present on the scene and maintain equipment in
preparation for a resolution of the 1993 51-day standoff that resulted
in a fire that killed 80 civilians including many children, according to
the documents and a knowledgeable military source.

Despite this powerful evidence, as of yesterday an FBI spokesman, Tron
Brekke, was still telling the Dallas Morning News that he could not say
whether Delta Force might have actively assisted the FBI in any way in
Waco "because I don't think anybody knows. ... That's part of the reason
that the attorney general and the director are, in a very expeditious
manner, going to have 40 assistant inspectors and whoever is chosen to
lead them come down and find out definitively what did happen," he said.
"I don't know what was done or wasn't done down there."

Meanwhile, the documented information WorldNetDaily has obtained reveals
that not only did Reno actively seek involvement by Delta Force, but she
was warned at one meeting she attended with the FBI, Delta Force Colonel
John Boykin and Webster Hubbell that the use of CS tear gas would have a
variety of effects, one of which would be "Some people would panic,
Quote: "mothers may run off and leave infants."

The FBI's admission just days ago that pyrotechnic tear-gas canisters
"may have been used" was an abrupt reversal of a six-year denial that
its agents used anything capable of sparking a fire at the compound. The
Delta Force document detailing the Delta Force/Reno/FBI meeting notes
that when Reno asked Delta Force officers for their "assessment" of the
plan, she was told: "This was not a military operation and could not be
assessed as such. We explained that the situation was not one that we
had ever encountered and that the Rules of Engagement for the FBI were
substantially different than for a military operation. [name redacted]
stated, "We can't grade your paper," as a way of explaining our position."

A WorldNetDaily Special Forces source who analyzed this and other
statements says Delta Force was clearly uncomfortable with any
association with the FBI's plans at Waco.

In another section of the document, a Delta Force colonel writes: "My
final comments were that I believed that the HRT (Hostage Rescue Team)
should consider pulling their people off the target for a short period
to retrain and polish some of the perishable(WND: difficult to read,
looks like "perishable") skills. I made it clear that I was not
encouraging an immediate execution of the operation. My exact words
were, "I don't have a dog in this fight."

WorldNetDaily's source says he believes that statement shows again how
Delta Force cringed over getting involved at WACO, "I believe he (the
Delta Force colonel) meant that he didn't want to be directly involved
in it, and did not want to be dragged into it. Delta Force operators,
and Task Force 160 operators continually cautioned the FBI against
attempting an "open air assault" on the target, and stated emphatically
that they did not want to be involved in firing on or assaulting
American civilians, according to a source. These official and unofficial
comments went ignored and, in fact, one Special Operations Officer was
threatened with court-martial if he continued to protest, the source
said. At another point in the document, Delta Force personnel explain to
Reno that Special Forces encounters are almost always militaristic and
involve outright enemies who are often heavily armed. Delta Force
explains that in its standard modus operandi it was, "The principles of
surprise, speed and violence of action [that] were essential to any
operation. [redacted] stated that momentum should be maintained and that
ground gained should not be relinquished." A WND military source says
"violence of action" usually refers to killing the "hostiles."

A former Special Forces commando says he spoke yesterday to a Delta
Force commando who was present at the final tear-gas assault on the
Branch Davidian compound. Keith Idema, who was a member of Special
Forces and Special Operations units from 1975 to 1992 and helped to
train hostage rescue team personnel for both Delta Force and the FBI,
says pictures from Waco released this week by the Texas Department of
Public Safety have been mistakenly identified by the department as gun
silencers and suppressors belonging to David Koresh and his followers
which were found inside the compound after the fire. Idema says they are
actually concussion grenades manufactured by a company, Defense
Technology, and purchased by the FBI.

Idema also says the bright light seen on video footage as flashing
inside the building moments before the fire broke out have been
misidentified as a fire started by Branch Davidian leader David Koresh,
when, in fact, to the trained eye of a Special Forces explosive expert
it is unmistakably the flash caused by a "concussion grenade" that has
been lobbed inside the compound. A concussion grenade uses a brilliant
flash and loud bang to render an enemy in its vicinity blind, deaf and
immobile for a brief period during which commandos can overpower them.
Such grenades should be used only for military purposes and were wholly
inappropriate, if not illegal to be used in a situation involving women
and children -- and any situation where potentially inflammable tear gas
was still hanging in the air, the former Special Forces operative said.

Charges that the FBI used incendiary grenades which may have caused the
fire were dismissed by Reno. For six years, since the assault on April
19, 1993, until six days ago, Reno maintained that no military weapons
were used. When a report from Texas DPS forced her to admit that some
might have been used, she still dismissed any possibility that they
could have caused the fire, stating that they were used in the early
morning hours before the fire began. According to Idema, the FBI was
taking an ill-advised chance using a military CS tear gas grenade at any
time knowing that, unlike the kind of tear gas used in civilian
situations, this type leaves a vapor that hangs in the air for a longer
period of time and can ignite under certain circumstances.

The concussion grenades and military fuses he says were used moments
before the fire broke out could have ignited the lingering tear gas
vapors and started the fire. Idema also points out that other
photographs released clearly show an FBI agent with a .50-caliber
Browning machine gun next to his leg.

Such weapons are to be used only against armored equipment and weapons,
certainly not civilians, says Idema.

"Why were they there?" he asks. "Koresh didn't have any tanks or
helicopters, or APCs. The Geneva Convention states that these weapons
are never to be used in an anti-personnel role."

The bureau's admission that such devices "may have been used" marked an
abrupt reversal of a long-standing denial that its agents used anything
capable of sparking a fire at the church.

Bureau and Justice Department officials have maintained that the devices
could not have played a role in the fire because they were used hours
before the blaze and were fired at an underground bunker adjacent to the
wooden church compound.

A pending wrongful-death suit filed by surviving Branch Davidians and
families of the dead has alleged that agents launched pyrotechnic
devices into the compound and fired into the building. The government
vehemently denies those charges.

Federal officials from President Clinton down have staunchly maintained
in the six years since the tragedy that FBI agents did not fire a single
shot during the entire 51-day siege.


1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.


Reply via email to