-Caveat Lector-
>Here are just a few of the astonishing charges that sources throughout the
>gay community have leveled at John-John:
>
>--That he frequents the same, gay nightclubs as homosexual billionaire Malcom
>Forbes.
>While the particularities of John-John's taste in men is not altogether
clear -
>since he is typically found in the presence of other preppie bisexuals like
>himself - it is the consensus of insiders, deep insider, that John-John,
>like LFP's Mike Albo, likes young Asian boys. But then again, who doesn't?
Why am I not surprised somehow?
In a message dated 99-08-05 10:24:18 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>You would be surprised at the number of gays who preside on the executive
>boards of major banks and corporations....
We might be surprised too at the number of gays who preside over the
"executive
boards" of Western NATIONS, i.e., the CFR, Trilateral Commission,
Bilderbergers.
About a decade ago, the female French ambassador to one of the great
gatherings of globalist power-brokers returned home in disgust, in the French
press describing the supposedly straitlaced conference as virtually a gay
"bath house," with the American, British (no surprise there) and German
officials the most obnoxious in flaunting their homosexual "superiority"
behind its closed doors, as if attending some kind of queer "family reunion."
It's taken almost a decade for the government of Belgium, doubling as the
capital of the EU, to be exposed as 'coincidentally" also the hub of a
continental pedophile ring. Maybe one day we'll discover just HOW
influential some "kinks" are in the character of those who aspire to be the
"unique and special" overlords of humanity.
In this Politically Correct era --or age of Orwellian truisms like "slavery
is freedom" and "pathology is normalcy"-- some things dare not be said, or
even suggested. I apologize only to those who feel I'm here equating one
minority "sexual orientation" with the role played by that orientation among
the POWERFUL -- in those obsessed with POWER relations, even (and perhaps
more centrally, because symbolically) in sexual terms -- and among those who
megalomaniacally see themselves as "superior," as a reaction against feeling
so "different," almost ALIEN. (A psychology-qua-worldview which has its
roots in ancient Greece, the source of much of our heritage in "Western
Civilization.")
I'm not singling out ordinary homosexuals for any blame; I'm singling out an
elite of the truly powerful, in whom homosexuality provides support for an
"alien" perspective that dismisses women as irrelevant and coldly views most
of us as animal-like "breeders."
A decade ago I recall reading a column by one of the Cockburns --a family of
radical social critics, famed for their investigative journalism-- in which
he stated that, in his opinion, there were three tremendously powerful groups
involved in conspiracies on a global scale. I forget who two of them were --
Opus Dei, as an arm of the SMOM and Vatican intelligence, was one of them, I
believe. The third, however, I remember clearly, because at the time it was
a surprising and, on the surface of it, outrageous statement for anyone of
Cockburn's stature to make. The third most powerful group on his list was
"homosexuals," sans further elaboration. On the surface of it, and
especially in the PC era --after having been systematically brainwashed by
overt and secret homophiles in our culture for at least three decades now--
that sounds like bigoted nonsense without
a shred of rational support. But once one simply entertains the NOTION, and
begins slowly to collect all the scattered bits of data that are and were
normally deliberately EXCLUDED from the "official" public record --thus from
mass-perception-- for a variety of dubious reasons (e.g., in the Victorian
age, from a cultural aversion to the "indelicate," which would damage the
reputations of many among the high and mighty), what's been kept SECRET, kept
OUT of public view, begins to pile up and congeal in a surprisingly orderly
way, illuminating some things that remain otherwise inexplicable or
incongrous, until one gains a greater capacity for vision into what amounts
to a "blind spot" in our whole culturally-conditioned picture of "The Way
Things 'Really' Are." In short, there IS INDEED an argument from which such
an assertion can derive -- but only IF one dares to confront one's
unconscious fears in the face of certain psychological/social "taboos" which
--it turns out-- are ESSENTIAL to our falsely "homogeneous" picture of "human"
society (as if obvious dichotomies in it were superficial rather than more
deeply rooted).
Those with REAL power stake their lives on the reality of a dichotomy between
Masters
and Slaves, between Predators and Prey -- for them, two very DIFFERENT
species ...
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
