-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/090799guns-police-chiefs.html

September 7, 1999


       Police Chiefs Shift
       Strategy, Mounting a War
       on Weapons

       By FOX BUTTERFIELD

         In Baltimore, Police Commissioner
         Thomas C. Frazier has made going after
       guns rather than drugs his No. 1 priority,
       reversing longstanding policy.

       In Louisville, Ky., in a state with a strong
       gun culture, Police Chief Eugene Sherrard
       recently joined a federal program that
       seeks to trace all guns seized in crimes, in
       an effort to cut off the flow of weapons
       from corrupt gun dealers to criminals and
       juveniles.

       In Minneapolis, to discourage drug
       dealers and others with criminal
       backgrounds from carrying guns, Police
       Chief Robert K. Olson has his officers use
       routine traffic stops for minor violations
       to search for weapons.

       Those actions are part of a
       little-publicized change on the part of
       police executives across the nation. As
       Americans debate gun control, those
       officials, in cities large and small, have
       made it a major element of crime control,
       and have also emerged as an important
       voice pushing for new federal and state
       gun-control laws.

       Their new attitude about police work is
       summed up by Olson, who says he
       frequently reminds himself that with
       crime, "it's about the guns, stupid."

       This is indeed a vast change, he says,
       because for many officers, "lock 'em up,
       punishment, was the whole approach of
       police to crime" only a decade ago. Large
       numbers of officers believed then that it
       was un-American to talk about gun
       control, he says, and that Americans
       needed guns "to keep the commies from
       coming up the Mississippi."

       This Thursday, in contrast, about 50 police
       chiefs will accompany their cities' mayors
       to meet with President Clinton at the
       White House, and then go to the Capitol
       to lobby for a bill mandating a
       background check on anyone buying a
       weapon at a gun show.

       The Senate has passed a juvenile-justice
       bill requiring such checks -- and up to
       three days in which to perform them, just
       as at federally licensed dealers -- but the
       House rejected the idea in its version of
       the legislation after pressure from the
       National Rifle Association, which objected
       to any waiting period longer than one
       day. The purpose of the chiefs' lobbying is
       to get a conference committee of the two
       houses to adopt that proposal and other
       gun-control provisions included in the
       Senate bill.

       For many years, most police forces
       attached little importance to tracing where
       a gun came from or trying to halt the
       supply of guns to criminals and juveniles.
       When the police seized a gun, they put it
       in an evidence locker and often resold it
       through a gun dealer. This contrasted
       starkly with police work on drugs, where
       investigators routinely offered reduced
       charges to low-level street dealers in an
       effort to track down drug kingpins.

       The change in police attitudes began in the
       mid-1980s with the dramatic rise in
       homicide brought by the crack cocaine
       trade and the gun industry's introduction
       of rapid-fire, high-capacity semiautomatic
       pistols, said Clarence Harmon, a career
       police officer in St. Louis who rose to be
       police chief from 1990 to 1995 and is now
       the mayor.

       "Every cop on the street was stopping
       somebody with a new semiautomatic
       pistol -- the bad guys were better armed
       than the police -- and we began to wonder
       what was happening," Harmon said. "I
       issued an order, to trace every gun we
       find."

       What his officers discovered, Harmon
       said, was that a handful of corrupt gun
       dealers in rural areas were selling to straw
       purchasers -- intermediaries buying on
       behalf of criminals -- or to traffickers,
       small-time operators reselling the guns
       out of the trunks of their cars.

       "I came to believe that the gun
       manufacturers had to know that certain
       dealers were selling to guys on the street,
       or ought to know," Harmon said, leading
       him to favor requiring that gun makers
       assume more accountability for the way
       their products are distributed.

       What police chiefs were finding back then,
       said David Kennedy, a senior researcher
       at the John F. Kennedy School of
       government at Harvard University,
       "amounted to a sea change."

       "When they discovered that gun
       trafficking was a major national problem,"
       Kennedy said, "it meant the issue was no
       longer about the access of ordinary people
       to guns, but about a new kind of crime:
       the crime of selling firearms to criminals
       and juveniles. That was something law
       enforcement was eager to act upon."

       Edward A. Flynn, the police chief of
       Arlington County, Va., agrees that the
       police have become more sophisticated
       about a need for reasonable gun control as
       a part of crime-fighting strategy. With
       that change, he says, the police have also
       become frustrated by the terms of the
       gun-control debate.

       "It is hard to have a debate about gun
       control," Flynn said. "The people on one
       side only want to talk about gun owners'
       rights and the Second Amendment. That is
       not a debate about better crime control."

       The police in Boston and New York took
       the lead in going after guns as a way to
       reduce crime, and other cities have
       followed , including Minneapolis,
       Indianapolis and Stockton, Calif. Another
       recent convert is Baltimore, where Frazier
       has proclaimed his chief priority is a focus
       on guns, not drugs, "because it is gun
       violence that affects our quality of life and
       causes the most damage."

       "We cannot arrest our way out of the drug
       dilemma -- the courts and jails are already
       overcrowded," Frazier said. "So when I
       make decisions about where to target my
       discretionary resources, our tactical units
       or officers' time, we are going to focus on
       the guys who use the most gun violence."

       In the past year, Frazier has set up a new
       gun unit; begun tracing all guns seized in
       crimes, with assistance from the Maryland
       State Police and the federal firearms
       bureau, and undertaken a crackdown on
       gun traffickers.

       Though the mayors and police chiefs will
       lobby this week for the Senate bill
       requiring background checks at gun
       shows, some believe the proposal is too
       modest, and will push for more steps.

       Harmon wants to end congressional
       restrictions that bar the Bureau of Alcohol,
       Tobacco and Firearms from computerizing
       many of its records, a ban that stems from
       political opposition to anything with even
       a whiff of a national gun registry.

       Tom Sanchez, the police chief in Denver,
       says that even the three days that gun
       dealers are granted to complete the
       federal "instant" background check of
       prospective gun buyers does not allow
       sufficient time to search court records. He
       would like a more comprehensive system.

       The mayor of Louisville, Dave Armstrong,
       a former district attorney and Kentucky
       attorney general, believes owners should
       be required to register their guns, as they
       must automobiles.

       And in Minneapolis, Olson, previously the
       police chief in Corpus Christi, Texas, and
       in Yonkers, N.Y., takes the staunchest
       position, which, he says, "America is not
       yet mature enough as a society to accept":
       a ban on the manufacture, distribution
       and possession of handguns.



       Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company

--
-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to