-Caveat Lector-
The American Civil War was about consolidating federal power
by eroding states rights....history has been written by the
winners of war....Lincoln undid everything Jackson did by
kicking the bankers out....they came back with a vengeance,
big players in the Civil War, and began what was to one day
become the Federal Reserve Paper Money Swindle.
"M.A. Johnson" wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Federal Government Growth Before the New Deal
> by Randall G. Holcombe
>
> Popular opinion holds that most of the credit (or
> blame) for the incredible growth of the federal
> government should go to President Franklin D.
> Roosevelt and his New Deal. While Roosevelt certainly
> was a willing participant in that process, the federal
> government began its amazingly rapid growth well before
> the New Deal, and it is unlikely that it would be much
> smaller today even had FDR never come along.
>
> The origins of federal growth are in the Constitutional
> Convention. But the modern period of growth began with
> the Progressive Era before World War I. Contrary to
> popular belief, that growth continued through the
> 1920s. The percentage by which the federal government
> grew was greater during Herbert Hoover's four years as
> president than during the first seven years of the New
> Deal. Roosevelt merely continued a long-standing trend.
>
> The story of the growth of the federal government can
> be divided into two parts: before and after 1913, when
> the 16th amendment to the Constitution, which permitted
> a federal income tax, was ratified. In 1913 federal
> spending was a mere 2.5 percent of GNP (today spending
> is almost ten times that level); so if the federal
> government is measured only by spending, little growth
> took place before the income tax. Before 1913, however,
> the federal government grew in other ways, by enlarging
> its power and changing its mandate. When the colonies
> came together to form the United States, the founders
> viewed the new government as the defender of its
> citizens' liberty. That meant protecting their
> rights -- and in those days the most significant
> threat to the rights of individuals was, in nearly
> everyone's eyes, the government itself. By 1913 the
> federal government had been transformed into an
> organization not to protect rights, but, ostensibly, to
> further the nation's economic well-being.
>
> The first part of our story, then, is how a government
> that began in 1776 as a protector of individual rights
> had by 1913 evolved into one that presumed to guarantee
> the economic welfare of its citizens. The second part
> of the story is how the federal government, armed with
> a powerful new source of revenue, began a continuous
> expansion that lasted throughout the twentieth century.
> One might be tempted to argue that the income tax was
> the cause of the federal government's growth, but that
> answer would be simplistic for two reasons. First, it
> focuses on spending alone and ignores the growth of the
> federal government's legal and regulatory power that
> began well before 1913. Second, it treats the income
> tax as something thrust on the nation rather than
> something chosen by its citizens. Constitutional
> amendments must have substantial popular support to
> gain the approval of two-thirds of both houses of
> Congress and three-quarters of the state legislatures.
> Americans wanted an income tax because they wanted
> more government, and they wanted more government
> because they believed it would enhance their
> economic well-being.
>
> World War I was a period of enormous federal
> expansion, and the New Deal is likewise well known
> as a period of government growth. Yet the time in
> between, the 1920s, is often characterized as a
> time of retrenchment. In fact, the 1920s continued
> the growth that began in the Progressive era and
> set the stage for the New Deal. Before getting
> into details, we need to place the decade in the
> context of the preceding history of the federal
> government.
>
> Federal Growth from 1776 to 1920
>
> The first major event in the growth of the federal
> government was the ratification of the Constitution
> in 1789. Before that, the United States was governed
> under the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution
> is frequently praised as a document that protects
> the rights of individuals and limits the powers of
> government. But a comparison of the Constitution
> with the Articles reveals that just the opposite
> is true. Under the Constitution the federal government
> gained more power, was less accountable, and had
> greater latitude to determine its own scope of
> action. That is what the Constitution was intended
> to accomplish. (1)
>
> The Constitution established the Electoral College
> for the selection of presidents, but specified no
> method for choosing electors. Several methods were
> used, but in most states the legislatures picked
> them. The framers expected that in most elections
> no candidate would get a majority of electoral
> votes. That would permit the House of Representatives
> to name the president from the five top electoral
> vote getters. That system never worked as envisioned,
> and by 1828, with the election of Andrew Jackson, the
> current system of popular voting for electors had
> become firmly entrenched, and along with it the
> party system. (2) From then on, successful candidates
> owed their success to the support of their parties,
> and in return used the political system to reward
> those who helped them get elected. Undoubtedly the
> biggest event in the growth of the federal government
> was the Civil War, which established its supremacy
> over the states. The Civil War brought much new
> power to the federal government, and laid the
> groundwork for the growth of interest groups. (3)
> The first interest group to systematically raid the
> Treasury for its own benefit was the war veterans.
> Originally, Union veterans were entitled to pensions
> only if they had been injured in battle; they had up
> to five years to claim them. In 1870 veterans pensions
> totaled $286 million in 1990 dollars and should have
> then declined. Instead they rose to $1,548 million by
> 1890, because the Republicans, who dominated the
> White House and looked to veterans for political
> support, increasingly liberalized the pension laws
> until every Union veteran of the Civil War
> qualified. (4)
>
> While veterans were a model for future interest groups,
> the Treasury at that time had decidedly limited means.
> At any rate, other groups were more interested in
> regulatory benefits. The Interstate Commerce Commission
> was created in 1887, and the Sherman Antitrust Act
> passed in 1890. (5) The transformation of the U.S.
> government continued as the turn of the century
> ushered in the Progressive Era. The Food and Drug
> Administration was created in 1906, the Federal Reserve
> in 1913, and the Federal Trade Commission in 1914. A
> government initially committed to protecting the
> liberty of its citizens now seemed to be just as
> firmly committed to looking out for their economic
> welfare.
>
> The Progressive Era was interrupted by World War I,
> during which federal power advanced in unprecedented
> ways. The railroads were nationalized, waterborne
> shipping was regulated, and the United States Food
> Administration, created in 1917, controlled all
> aspects of the food industry, from agriculture to
> distribution to sales. Similar regulation was applied
> to fuels, and eventually to the whole economy. (6)
> When the federal income tax was introduced in 1913,
> the highest tax bracket was 7 percent for all income
> above $20,000. Because of the demand for warrelated
> spending, by 1918 the highest rate rose to 77 percent
> beginning at $4,000. This was the context in which
> Warren G. Harding was elected to the presidency in
> 1920 with the theme, a 'return to normalcy'.
>
> Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover
>
> If one looks only at total federal spending, it
> appears that the Republican administrations of
> Harding and Coolidge are a period of retrenchment
> sandwiched between the big-spending Democratic
> administrations of Woodrow Wilson and FDR. The
> Hoover administration does not fit this view even
> when examined superficially, because the percentage
> increase in spending during those four years exceeded
> the growth in the first seven years of FDR's New Deal,
> before World War II caused spending to skyrocket.
> Despite the conventional wisdom that big government
> began with FDR, a closer examination reveals that
> even the Harding and Coolidge administrations were
> periods of substantial government growth. It was
> masked, though, by the reduction in war-related
> spending following World War I. (7) The 1920s,
> then, were actually a continuation of Progressive
> Era government expansion, which would last through
> the New Deal.
>
> Contemporary political-party ideological stereotypes
> do not fit the pre-New Deal era. At the risk of some
> oversimplification, they should be reversed. The
> Republican party, the party of Lincoln, was the
> advocate of a strong federal government with
> increasing powers, while the Democratic party, which
> had most of its power in the South, advocated states'
> rights and a smaller federal government. Moreover,
> Harding and Coolidge were not particularly strong
> presidents, and the Congress was dominated by
> Republicans with substantial Progressive leanings.
> For Harding and, after Harding's death in 1923,
> Coolidge, a return to normalcy meant a return to the
> Progressive policies begun before the war. This was
> even more true of Hoover, who was an engineer by
> training and a firm believer in applying scientific
> principles of management to government. During the
> Wilson administration Hoover was the head of the U.S.
> Food Administration. He was secretary of commerce
> throughout the Harding and Coolidge years, before
> being elected president in 1928.
>
> Federal Spending During the 1920s
>
> Aggregate federal spending declined slightly during
> the 1920s, when measured in inflation-adjusted
> dollars per person. However, that slight decline is
> really a combination of two different underlying
> trends. In 1916, federal spending per person was
> $83.60. (All data are in 1990 dollars.) By 1919 it
> had risen 16-fold, to $1,329.77. By 1927, federal
> spending had fallen to its low point of the decade,
> $180.57. The huge decline from 1919 is accounted for
> by a reduction in war-related spending, but nonwar
> spending actually increased sharply. Note that
> spending in 1927 was well over double the prewar
> 1916 level.
>
> A more detailed analysis reaches the same conclusion.
> The 1920s saw huge declines in federal military and
> transportation spending (because so much transportation
> was nationalized during World War I). When civilian
> spending programs are isolated, they show substantial
> growth. Throughout the 1920s the average annual growth
> rate of federal spending on commerce, overseen by
> Secretary Hoover, was 13 percent. Agricultural
> spending increased by more than 11 percent a year,
> and spending on labor interests grew more than 12
> percent a year. Federal spending on education grew
> by more than 10 percent per year, as did spending
> on public improvements and the public domain. Among
> broad categories, the fastest growth was federal law
> enforcement, which averaged more than a 17 percent
> growth rate during the 1920s. Thus, one can see
> that civilian spending during the 1920s grew
> rapidly and that spending remained substantially
> higher than it ever had been before World War I.
> Measured by spending alone, the 1920s was a decade
> of major federal government growth.
>
> Prohibition
>
> Much of the rapid growth in the federal law-enforcement
> budget was due to the prohibition of alcohol, which
> began in 1920 with the passage of the 18th amendment
> and lasted until repeal by the 21st amendment in 1933.
> The Department of Justice enforced prohibition, along
> with the Customs Service, Coast Guard, and Bureau of
> Internal Revenue. The bureau participated because,
> while alcoholic beverages were illegal, nonbeverage
> alcohol was to be taxed. But even when illegal
> alcohol was discovered, as far as the Treasury
> Department was concerned, the reason it was illegal
> was that the taxes were not paid. From 1920 to 1930
> bureau spending on enforcement regarding illegal
> alcohol rose from just over $2 million to more than
> $12 million, while revenues rose from just over $1
> million to about $5.4 million. In no year during
> Prohibition did the bureau collect more than it spent
> on enforcement. Apparently, even the Bureau of Internal
> Revenue viewed the law on alcohol not as a method of
> generating revenue but rather of extending federal
> law enforcement. Prohibition is probably the most
> visible area in which the federal government attempted
> to increase its control over the behavior of Americans
> during the 1920s.
>
> Federal Corporations
>
> Early in its history, the United States incorporated
> the First and Second Banks of the United States. After
> the charter of the Second Bank expired in 1836, the
> federal government did not charter another corporation
> until 1904, when one was formed to construct the Panama
> Canal. Federally owned corporations proliferated during
> World War I, beginning with the Merchant Fleet
> Corporation in 1917. After the war, most of these
> federal corporations continued in business and lost
> huge sums of money. The War Finance Corporation,
> chartered in 1918 to help strategic industries borrow
> money, had its charter extended in 1921 to assist
> American business in general. The Federal Land Bank,
> Spruce Production Corporation, and Sugar Equalization
> Board were other federal corporations begun during
> the war that lived on.
>
> These corporations provided a model for government
> growth that extended through the 1920s to the present
> day. In 1923, 12 federally owned banks were created
> by the Federal Agricultural Credits Act. In 1924 the
> Inland Waterways Corporation was established to
> operate vessels on the Mississippi River, and in
> 1929 the Federal Farm Board was established to finance
> agricultural price supports. Creation of those
> corporations was integral to the growth of the
> federal government during the 1920s, but their
> purpose was also significant. In each case they
> were established to help further the economic well-being
> of a particular group of Americans, reinforcing the
> federal government's transition from a guardian of
> liberty to an organization designed to oversee the
> national economy.
>
> Agriculture
>
> The 1920s were a difficult decade for American
> agriculture, largely because the world market
> for farm products was increasingly competitive.
> As a result, the decade is sometimes viewed as
> having favored business over agriculture. But in
> fact, the federal government began a number of
> initiatives to further the economic interests of
> farmers. In 1921 Congress passed tariffs on farm
> imports, and in 1922 the Capper-Volstead Act
> exempted agricultural cooperatives from antitrust
> laws. The Agricultural Credits Act of 1923 made it
> easier for farmers to get credit from the Federal
> Farm Loan Board. In 1926 the Department of
> Agriculture established a Division of Co-operative
> Marketing. The Agricultural Marketing Act of 1929
> created the Federal Farm Board and, as noted, began
> federal price supports for agricultural products.
>
> Adjusting for inflation, federal spending on
> agriculture expanded from $17 million (1930
> dollars) in 1920 to $49 million by 1930. Whether
> evaluated in terms of budgets or number of federal
> programs, the increased support for agriculture in
> the 1920s was substantial. The charge that the
> federal government slighted agricultural interests
> is incorrect.
>
> Antitrust
>
> An examination of federal spending gives some indication
> of the growth of government, but regulation, though
> harder to measure, also had a big impact. Beginning
> with the Sherman Act in 1890, the federal government
> tried to limit the economic power of business
> through antitrust laws. Before 1905 only 22 cases
> were brought under the Sherman Act. But antitrust
> enforcement picked up later in the decade, with 39
> cases brought from 1905 to 1909. From 1910 to 1919,
> 134 cases were brought, indicating more vigorous
> enforcement. In the 1920s, the number declined s
> lightly to 125 cases.
>
> That decline is deceiving, however, because after the
> increased enforcement in the prior decade, businesses
> acted more cautiously. The Scope of antitrust enforcement
> was broadened in the 1920s, and cases were brought against
> firms in unconcentrated industries for conduct that was
> not obviously in violation of the antitrust laws as
> previously enforced. Antitrust enforcement is another
> area in which the federal government increased its
> power -- yet another reason to question the conventional
> wisdom that it was excessively probusiness in the 1920s.
>
> Academic Influences
>
> John Maynard Keynes, in a famous passage in his 1936 General
> Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, remarked,
>
> "The ideas of economists and political philosophers,
> both when they are right and when they are wrong,
> are more powerful than is commonly understood.
> Indeed, the world is ruled by little else."
>
> Intellectuals also pushed the federal government to
> broaden its scope in the 1920s. The ideas of Karl Marx
> were gaining credibility and moving governments into
> economic matters. Perhaps just as significant, although
> with less ideological content, were the concepts of
> scientific management that were gaining credibility
> throughout the United States. Civil Service reform had
> been initiated late in the 1800s to create a more
> professional federal work force, and there was increasing
> interest in applying the principles of scientific business
> management to government.
>
> In 1920 the National Bureau of Economic Research was
> established in cooperation with government, private
> foundations, and academic institutions to better measure
> economic performance statistically so that government could
> apply those principles to the economy. Secretary Hoover was
> a strong supporter of that effort. Indeed, many of the tenets
> of Keynesian economics that gained prominence during the
> 1930s were already part of the conventional wisdom of
> American economists in the 1920s. (8) The alliance of
> academic institutions, private foundations, and government
> in the 1920s was yet another aspect of the growth of the
> federal government during the decade.
>
> Conclusion
>
> The New Deal is often seen as the pivotal event in the
> growth of America's twentiethcentury Leviathan. But the
> federal government has grown since its inception. The
> most important event in the history of federal government
> growth was undoubtedly the Civil War. Then, supported by
> the popular demand for more government involvement in the
> economy, the ideological foundation of the massive growth
> in federal spending was laid during the Progressive Era
> at the beginning of the twentieth century. The federal
> income tax made that growth in spending possible.
>
> That the federal government grew during FDR's presidency
> is undeniable. But Wilson and Lincoln had already set
> precedents for increases in government power in wartime.
> Thus, the main factors underlying the growth in government
> were firmly in place well before the New Deal.
>
> 1. See Randall G. Holcombe, "Constitutions as Constraints:
> A Case Study of Three American Constitutions,"
> Constitutional Political Economy, vol. 2, no. 2
> (Fall 1991): 303-328.
> 2. See Forrest McDonald, The American Presidency
> (Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, 1994),
> for a thorough history of the evolution of the office.
> 3. For an excellent history of the Civil War following
> this theme, see Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, Emancipating
> Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American
> Civil War (Chicago: Open Court Press, 1996).
> 4. A good reference on the subject is Theda Skocpol,
> Protecting Somiers and Mothers: The Political Origins
> of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge,
> Mass.: Belknap, 1992).
> 5. In Terry L. Anderson and Peter J. Hill, The Birth
> of a Transfer Society (Stanford, Cal.: Hoover
> Institution Press, 1980), the origin of big government
> is the Supreme Court's Munn v. Illinois case, which
> allowed the state regulation of grain elevator rates.
> 6. An excellent study of the growth of the federal
> government during the twentieth century, including
> the effects of World War I, is Robert Higgs, Crisis
> and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of
> American Government (New York: Oxford University Press,
> 1987).
> 7. A more detailed exposition of this material appears in
> Randall G. Holcombe, "The Growth of the Federal
> Government in the 1920s," Cato Journal, vol. 16, no.
> 2 (Fall 1996), pp. 175-199.
> 8. See J. Ronnie Davis, The New Economics and the Old
> Economists (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press,
> 1971).
>
> ***
> The preceding article is from The Freeman, Ideas on Liberty
> September 1997 ... for more information see www.fee.org
>
> ============================================================
> Discuss the US Constitution, current events and more
> ... empty message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Discuss Boortz (show and site www.boortz.com)
> ... empty message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
