-Caveat Lector-

forwarded....

Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com
http://www.ioa.com/~davehart


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 1:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (fwd) Texas Rep. Ron Paul, 1994, on Waco


===============================
The Moral Promise of Freedom
by RON PAUL, current member of the U.S. House of Representatives from
Texas.

[This article originally appeared in The Free Market, March 1994. It is
posted here, August 27, 1999.]

"The moral promise of a free society involves the boundaries of private
property. The promise is this: property boundaries cannot be legally
invaded or trampled upon. When property is protected, people can keep the
fruits of their labor and investment, and not have them plundered by
others. People can own land, for example, and this land can be used as the
owners see fit.

Private property allows wide latitude for experimentation. Property
holders can form communities with their own internal cultures. Just as
business can conduct its own affairs, people can separate themselves out
entirely from the rest of society if they so desire. They need only
respect the rights of others to do the same.

It's the nature of private property and a free society that it allows room
for diversity of work, modes of production, and ways of life. That's how
Mr. Jefferson wanted it, and that's what the authors of the Constitution
promised. In the sixties, for example, hippie communes sprang up all over
the country. The participants were eccentric and the utopias didn't work,
but the attempts were tolerated by society and state.

Today the promise of private property is routinely violated by both
private criminals and government dictate. The attack on property began
subtly at first, but today it has become explicit, sometimes brutal, and
sometimes even deadly.

The community of faith that once lived at Mount Carmel in Waco, Texas,
believed the promise of free society. They chose to separate themselves
from society, as so many others have done in our nation's history. This
was not allowed in Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, or Maoist China. That's
one reason we regard these regimes as tyrannical. Yet in its dealings with
the Waco religious dissenters, the central government revealed that it has
become intractably opposed to any individual or group that represents a
challenge to its singular authority. To counter this challenge, the
central government resorted to tactics that resulted in the death of 86
men, women, and children. As for the survivors, the government has put
them on trial.

This sort of brutality is inevitable in a system of absolute and
centralized power. A government that invades private business by demanding
confiscatory taxes, imposes unbearable regulations, and rules over
business culture through pervasive labor controls, builds an appetite for
even more power. As the power builds, so does the extent of corruption at
the top and the disinformation that covers up the truth about its tyranny.

So it was in Waco, where the tragic events combined all the elements of a
government out of control. Most of what the public thinks it knows about

David Koresh, the group's spiritual leader, is false. But as with war,
military invasions, and other acts of state-_as J.S. Griffey of the
University of Houston argued in an outstanding article in the Southern
Partisan_-the first impression is the one that lasts.

For example, most people probably believe that the government attacked the
Waco Christians because they were "stockpiling" weapons. Were they? Texans
own 60 million firearms, about 3.5 per person. At Mt. Carmel there were
two firearms per person, most of them locked away. The rest of their
protection consisted of hay bales and plywood.

The stockpiling accusation was an act of projection, for the real
stockpiler was the government. In the attack on Waco, agents used M113
personnel carriers, M2AO Bradley fighting vehicles, Sikorsky Blackhawks,
Apache and UH-1 Bell helicopters, Abrams MI tanks, 7.62nim machine guns,
FBI SWAT snipers, two varieties of hand grenades, and the FBI's
psychological warfare experts. The government even fired canisters of CS
gas, banned in warfare by international treaty, through windows and walls.

The BATF got their helicopters from the Texas National Guard. Under the
law, the military cannot be involved in domestic law enforcement. But a
special provision of the U.S. Code allows the government to use military
equipment in drug cases. So the BATF told Texas Governor Ann Richards that
they suspected Mount Carmel had a drug lab. This canard was not in the
BATF's search warrants and it hasn't been mentioned since.

Did Koresh want a confrontation with law enforcement agents? Most evidence
indicates he desired good relations with the law. In 1992, Koresh had
actually invited the BATF into the compound so agents could see for
themselves. But the government refused. "Why do you all have to be so big
all the time?" Koresh asked the FBI during the month-long standoff. "Why
didn't you just talk to me?"

Did the community have a death wish? Twenty minutes before the fire began,
the community hung out a sign reading: `We want our phones fixed." (The
government had cut them off, along with the electricity.) That's not a
message sent by people hungering for the Apocalypse. None of the survivors
report discussion of suicide plans.

There is still no evidence that the religious people set the fire that
destroyed their building. The place was a firetrap, entirely made of wood
and
sealed shut. Since the government had cut off their electricity, lanterns
were their only light. The government shot out the windows, so sheets were
their only protection from the weather. The tanks that battered the
building
probably set the fire, either accidentally or deliberately.

The initial raid on February 28, 1993, took place on Sunday, when the
women and children were downstairs for worship service. This was designed
to humiliate Koresh in front of his followers. Several people say the
government shot through the roof from a helicopter, but we cannot know for
sure. The physical evidence is reduced to ashes, and the government plowed
the land over a week after the home went up in flames. As the standoff
continued, the women and children were upstairs because they were afraid
of the government. The tanks destroyed the stairways that would have
allowed them to escape the fire. The underground shelter was destroyed as
well.

After the fire, the FBI made three claims it later retracted. First, the
Bureau said that two agents saw community members lighting a fire. Second,
the Bureau said one agent saw someone dressed in black "cupping his
hands," as if to light a fire. Third, the Bureau said some members trying
to flee the fire were shot by others. All assertions were false and were
subsequently dropped.

The Justice Department contributed its share of lies. Spokesmen said an
"independent arson investigator" concluded that members of the community
started the fire. But the "independent investigator" turned out to be Paul
Gray, an agent for the BATF from 1982 to 1990 whose wife stills works for
the agency as secretary to the man who planned the raid. They apparently
could
not be sure a genuinely independent investigator would come to the
preordained conclusion.

The stated purpose of the raid was to save children from abuse. Yet Janet
Reno lied about that too. The information she used was already
discredited, and she later admitted it. The real child abuse was committed
by the government to harass community members: the FBI turned on massive
floodlights at night and played recordings of Buddhist chants, dental
drills, and screaming, slaughtered rabbits. Reno herself ordered the house
to be saturated with CS gas, knowing that the community's gas masks
couldn't fit the children.

In ways that have become typical, the media and government worked together
in this disaster. One day before the raid, the Waco Tribune-Herald started a
series on "The Sinful Messiah." On the morning of February 28, 1993,
before BATF arrived at Mt. Carmel, at least 11 reporters were on the scene
already.
After the religious community was torched, the entire media participated
in the beatification of Janet Reno for her actions in Waco.

The consequences for the victims were public humiliation and death. There
were zero consequences for the perpetrators, unless we consider the three
agents who were suspended with pay and perks, which is no punishment at
all.

The methods and strategies of the government's assault against Waco had
been used for years by the military, but against foreign governments and
their leaders, not against the domestic citizenry. The most familiar case
of foreign intrigue was the government's attack on Manuel Noriega, in
which it used similar tactics (blaring music, planting evidence, spreading
disinformation), and therein lies the connection between foreign policy
and domestic. Anything a government allows itself to do to foreign
countries will eventually be done at home. That's one reason George
Washington warned us against foreign entanglements.

We may never know the full truth about Waco or the extent of
government perfidy, but we can draw lessons from the experience. This
particular event was a fiasco, but it also tells something about what our
government has become: "the organizer-in-chief of society," as Bertrand de
Jouvenel said, which is "making its monopoly of this role ever more
complete." It is a parasite and a monster that acts to protect its own
interests at the expense of other people's property and even lives.

Mises was right: government's nature is coercive. It is "beating, killing,
hanging." Coercion is necessary in society to protect the rights of
property holders against those who do not respect property. But when
government itself become the source of arbitrary violence, we have
tyranny. That's why unchecked power should never be invested in a
centralized government, even one with a democratic mandate. This power
will invariably be exercised at the expense of peaceful social relations.

In its dealings with the community of believers at Mount Carmel, the
central government abandoned the moral promise of a free society, and, as
all tyrannies eventually do, ignored its own standards of law and ethics.
But it paid the price of losing some measure of public confidence, which
is already at historic lows. A government that governs by fear alone
eventually finds itself unable to govern at all."

* * * * *

Dr. Paul wrote this article in 1994. He is a member of the U.S. House of

Representatives from Texas.



-----------------------------------------------------

>Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 02:00:44 -0700
>From: Jack Alpan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Fwd: Ron Paul, Representative from Texas, on Waco, 1994

Friends,

The following is the ultimate expression of political governemt on its own
citizens. Throughout history political governments killed more of its
citizens than all the criminals on the entire planet since man has been on
this planet. Waco was a test to see how gullable American citizens really
are. The media convinced the majority of Americans that their "lies" about
the incident are the "truth."

Waco proves that the American political government is prepared to murder
citizens of the United States just as they murder citizens of other
countries on our planet.

Andrew J. Galambos, founder of the Free Enterprise Institute (FEI), taught
from 1960 to 1990 that every form of political government (by whatever
name it is called) is the CAUSE of all social problems. You can find
Galambos' web site by doing a search with his name. I believe you can now
purchase his book published this year. You may even be able to get audio
tapes of his classes, wherein, he proves that political governments CAUSE
all social problems.

Based on what I learned from him and many others over a 30 year period, I
wrote "18 Steps to Freedom" at galaxymall.com/books/18stf to teach
Americans what we can do to create a society without political governemt
that would result in FREEDOM.

If anyone wants to buy Volume One of "18 Steps to Freedom" for $28.00
including postage and handling, I would gladly sell them a copy. It is so
important for every parent in America to read this book to their children
and grandchildren so we can begin the process of creating a social
structure that will produce FREEDOM.

Please help save America by passing this email to everyone on the Net.

Best Wishes,
Jack Alpan, dds, nd
-----------------------------------------------------


 -- Jeff --    http://www.wellnow.com

---------------------------------------------------------
 Well Now Health Information Service
 Box 15524 Atlanta Georgia [30333]
---------------------------------------------------------
 "There's nothing left in the world to prove. All that's worth doing is
  to love one another, using any means available to that purpose."
---------------------------------------------------------

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to