-Caveat Lector-
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 17:48:43 GMT
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: FAIR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [FAIR-L] ABC Gives Up On Accuracy?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAIR-L
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Media analysis, critiques and news reports
ACTION ALERT: ABC NEWS GIVES UP ON ACCURACY?
September 28, 1999
On September 19, ABC broadcast a one-hour news special titled "Is America
# One?" by ABC News correspondent John Stossel. By comparing the economies
of Hong Kong, the United States and India, Stossel attempts to show that
laissez-faire economic policy is "what makes a country work well for its
people." The program was filled with so many factual inaccuracies,
Limbaughesque distortions and unsubstantiated claims that it calls into
question whether ABC News applied any sort of journalistic standards to
the broadcast.
The following is just a sampling of some of Stossel's erroneous claims:
-- One of Stossel's main sources on Hong Kong claims that Hong Kong is
"the only government in the world that makes a surplus, a big surplus."
As anyone who pays attention to Washington politics knows, the U.S.
government has been running a federal budget surplus for more than a year;
it amounted to $70 billion last year. Other countries with budget
surpluses last year included the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia,
Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden.
-- Another major Stossel source, Dinesh D'Souza of the American Enterprise
Institute, claims that compared to other countries, the United States is
"a very mobile society in which lots of people who start out at the bottom
can find a place at least in the middle, and some will rise to the top."
D'Souza is identified as an "author and research scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute." But viewers are not told that D'Souza is neither an
economist nor a writer who has ever specialized in economics.
In fact, a 1996 study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) compared earnings mobility in eight countries.
Measuring mobility by how often workers in the bottom fifth of earnings
ended up in the upper three-fifths, the United States came in last. The
country that came in first was Denmark, a nation with an elaborate social
welfare system.
-- Stossel says at one point that the alternative to a "free society" is
"stagnation, and often poverty. Consider China, now mired in Third world
poverty. They were once the leader of the world."
Actually, China's economy is anything but "stagnant." As the Treasury
Department's Lawrence Summers said in a speech last year, "China has been
the fastest growing economy in history since [economic] reform began in
1980." While China has adopted some aspects of market economics, a large
proportion of its business firms are still owned by the government.
-- In order to refute the only on-camera source who is given significant
time to disagree with his thesis--progressive talkshow host Jim
Hightower--Stossel claims that "the Federal Reserve's wage data that's
often cited doesn't count things like commissions salespeople make,
retirement contributions, medical insurance. When you include them,
average American compensation's risen 20 percent."
This statement contains multiple inaccuracies. First, the Federal Reserve
does not collect wage data. The "often cited" wage data Stossel apparently
has in mind--showing that wages for ordinary workers have fallen--come
from the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data Stossel
cites purporting to show that compensation has "risen 20 percent"--he does
not say since when--most likely come from the Commerce Department's
National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA).
The NIPA data measure the total amount of compensation--including payroll
taxes, health, pension, and other non-wage benefits--earned in the economy
as a whole. While that figure can be divided by the total number of
workers to obtain a statistical average, this cannot be used as a gauge of
ordinary worker's compensation, since the average is inflated by very high
salaries and benefits for a small number of top-paid workers.
Stossel is "confusing what happens to the typical worker and an overall
average," explains economist Dean Baker, senior research fellow at the
Preamble Center. "Suppose Bill Gates got his billions of dollars as wage
income. That would raise the average. But obviously that doesn't help the
typical worker."
A median value for hourly workers' compensation--the wages and benefits
received by workers at the 50th percentile--is a much more accurate gauge
of what "the average American" earns, and can be estimated by combining
data from the BLS and the NIPA. By this estimate, inflation-adjusted
median hourly compensation fell from $13.66 in 1989 to $13.08 in 1997, a
decline of 4.2 percent. This is actually a steeper decline than for wages
alone over the same period.
-- In one of the program's most dishonest moments, Stossel misrepresents
the views of University of Texas economist James Galbraith to bolster one
of his points.
Stossel reports that European economies are damaged by laws that guarantee
things like paid parental leaves and long vacations. "Many economists who
once argued that we could learn from Europe, like James Galbraith, have
now changed their minds," says Stossel.
This comment is followed by a soundbite from an interview with Professor
James Galbraith, a prominent liberal economist. In the soundbite,
Galbraith says: "There might be a moment for the Europeans to learn from
us, rather than for us to be studying them."
But Stossel took Galbraith's words out of context, making it appear as if
he agreed with Stossel's views. "My point is quite different from the one
Stossel makes in the lead-in," Galbraith told FAIR. He explained that he
had actually told Stossel that "Europe could, in short, benefit from
adopting some of the continent-wide transfer mechanisms, such as Social
Security, that we have long enjoyed in the United States."
In fact, Galbraith recently co-drafted an economists' statement opposing
plans by the German government to cut social spending. It declared:
"As American economists and social scientists, we oppose the plans
recently announced by the German government to restructure and deregulate
the German economy along lines alleged to be 'the American model.'...
Germany is today in the grip of an ideology of free markets, deregulation
and privatization that originated here. But as that ideology was the
source of American failures in the 1980s, and not of our recent successes,
many Americans have abandoned it."
Far from espousing Stossel's view that European countries would benefit
from adopting American-style free-market policies, Professor Galbraith has
long been publicly outspoken in opposing it--yet ABC viewers would have no
way of knowing that.
-- Stossel claims that poor Americans enjoy the same access to medical
care as the wealthy:
"Our system does sometimes fail poor people, but the truth is that when
someone is denied care, it makes headlines because it's so unusual. Most
of the time, even the poorest person going to the emergency room gets the
same high-tech, cutting edge treatment that lures foreign leaders like
Jordan's King Hussein to American hospitals."
"It's simply not true that people can get access to care," counters
Steffie Woolhandler, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical
School, and co-founder Physicians for a National Health Program.
"According to a federal survey, there were 945,000 people in a single year
who needed and couldn't get emergency care in this country." The same
survey, conducted in 1987 by the Department of Health and Human Services,
found that almost two-thirds of those giving a reason for not obtaining
medical care cited "high costs or lack of insurance" (American Journal of
Public Health, 3/1995).
Given that 43 million Americans are uninsured, Woolhandler told FAIR, we
shouldn't be surprised at these numbers. "We have a system that denies
healthcare to millions and millions of people every year. These stories
don't make the headlines."
-- In one of the most startling scenes in the broadcast, Stossel travels
to a food pantry in the South Bronx run by a local nun. He interrogates
the people lined up to receive food about whether they own VCRs or
microwaves. Stossel asserts:
"No one says some Americans aren't suffering, but poverty in America is
nothing compared to the misery and hunger you see in India, and most of
the world. These people in the South Bronx aren't here because they've
been going without food. They come because the food is free."
In fact, the Census Bureau's 1995 Food Security survey classified 13.8
percent of Americans as either hungry or "food insecure." Food insecurity
is defined as having a "limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally
adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire
acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways." (For example, 81 percent of
respondents in households classified as "food insecure" said that
sometimes in the past 12 months the food they bought "just didn't last"
and they "didn't have money to get more.") __________
Stossel has long been a passionate believer in free-market economics; in
1994, he told the Oregonian newspaper (10/26/94): "Markets are magical and
the best protectors of the consumer. It is my job to explain the beauties
of the free market." "Is America #One?" makes it clear that Stossel does
indeed think it's his job to promote an ideology, and that he is willing
to sacrifice factual accuracy, misrepresent sources and abandon other
journalistic standards to achieve that goal.
ABC News, apparently, is willing to make that same sacrifice.
ACTION: Contact ABC News and ask them if Stossel's reports are subject to
a different standard than the rest of the network's news broadcasts. Point
out the factual errors in this most recent report, many of which are
listed above.
Contact:
ABC News
47 W. 66th Street
New York, NY 10023
Phone: 212-456-7777 (ABC News general number)
212-456-7301 (John Stossel)
Fax: 212-456-4297
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ABC News)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Stossel)
----------
Feel free to respond to FAIR ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). We can't reply to
everything, but we will look at each message. We especially appreciate
documented example of media bias or censorship. All messages to the
'FAIR-L' list will be forwarded to the editor of the list.
Also, please send copies of email correspondence, including any
responses, to us at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Feel free to spread this message around. Put it on conferences
where it is appropriate. We depend on word of mouth to get our message
out, so please let others know about FAIR and this mailing list.
Don't miss a single e-mail from FAIR-L.
You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site:
http://www.fair.org/emaillist.html
Or, you can send a "subscribe FAIR-L enter your full name"
command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The subscriber list is kept confidential, so no need to worry about
spammers.
You may leave the list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF FAIR-L"
command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please support FAIR by becoming a member.
You will receive FAIR's magazine, EXTRA! and its newsletter, EXTRA!
Update. You can become a member by calling 1-800-847-3993 from 9 to
5 Eastern Time (be sure to tell them you got the information
on-line) or by sending $19 with your name and address to:
FAIR/EXTRA! Subscription Service
P.O. Box 170
Congers, NY 10920-9930
FAIR
(212) 633-6700
http://www.fair.org/
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list administrators: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
