-Caveat Lector-

This is very interesting about UN. Communism just make things fairer
altogether ?


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, 16 July 1999 6:55
Subject: SNET: New York Post: UN Reviving Communism



->  SNETNEWS  Mailing List

Source:  New York Post


http://www.nypost.com/editorial/10902.htm">http://www.nypost.com/editorial/1
0902.htm


Editorial

IS THE UNITED NATIONS TRYING TO REVIVE COMMUNISM?

The United Nations, a corrupt and corrupting institution that grew out
of the
crackpot notion of an enlightened world government, doesn�t like the
direction in which the global economy is going. Its predictable
solution:
world government, with the U.N. in charge.

Ummm, no thanks.

The great economic problem in the world, according to a new report by
the
United Nations Development Programme, is that markets are just working
too
well.

Yes, you read that right: The U.N. thinks that the explosion of
worldwide
freedom that has followed the end of communism is no fair. This
explosion
goes by the name of "globalization," and it�s the purpose of the U.N.
report
to turn the word "globalization" into an epithet.

Competitive markets may guarantee efficiency, the U.N. report says, but
they
do not guarantee equality. In other words, eight years after Boris
Yeltsin
jumped on a tank and sealed the doom of the Soviet Union, some people
and
some countries are far richer than others - and that�s no fair!

"By the late 1990s," write the report�s authors, "the fifth of the
world�s
people living in the highest income countries had 86 percent of world
GDP and
the bottom fifth had just 1 percent."

No fair!

Though technology is providing the world with previously unimaginable
benefits, it�s not being used in the right way, according to the U.N.
Rather, it should be used for "eradicating poverty." Alas, that goal is
supposedly not on the agenda: "Cosmetic drugs and slow-ripening
tomatoes come
higher on the priority list than drought-resistant crops or a vaccine
against
malaria."

No fair!

You might think that amazing advances have already been made in the
world of
medicine in the United States when it comes to vaccines and drugs and
that
sort of thing, but the U.N. doesn�t dwell on those. When it condemns
the
refusal of "technology" to find "drought-resistant crops" it
conveniently
ignores the unbelievable bounty offered to the world by U.S.  scientist
Norman Borlaug and his "green revolution."

These technological improvements have all taken place because the U.S.
has a
free-market economy that offers spectacular rewards to those who figure
out
new ways and new techniques to improve the lives of those around them.
If
any country in the world is to develop a vaccine against malaria, it
will be
the United States - because the drug company that finds the vaccine
will
profit from it as a result.

But the backward-looking pseudo-intelligences behind the U.N. report
refuse
to see this. What they see is that technology is out of reach for the
poor,
and the laws governing patents do not pay enough attention to the
"knowledge
of indigenous people."

All these troubles, it seems, could be solved by the reinvention of
national
and global governance so that "human development and equity" is
foremost.

Because the current "institutions of international governance are
inadequate
for the challenges of the 21st century," the report suggests some new
ideas.
Topping the list, naturally, is a "stronger and more coherent United
Nations," followed by institutions like a world environmental agency
and a
world investment trust with redistributive functions.

A world ruled by people like those who wrote this report is a world
this
planet has known all too well, to its infinite sorrow. It�s a world of
bureaucrats who believe not in equality, but in egalitarianism, and
will
stifle everybody who disagrees. The centralization of power in the
hands of
these bureaucrats in the name of the "poor" leads inevitably to a
dictatorship in their name.

In other words, it�s communism all over again. Globalization is just
the new
word these neo-Communists are going to use now that capitalism sounds
good.

The good news is that ideas like these have had their day. The bad news
is
that the bureaucrats of the United Nations are still sitting on their
duffs
in that monstrosity on the East River, trying to figure out ways to
enhance
their roles in the world.

There�s a lot of talk about how the United States owes a lot to the
United
Nations in the form of "arrears" for its "dues" - money the U.N. needs
to
support efforts like this noxious report. The very fact that this
report
exists should be reason enough for Republicans in the House and Senate
to see
to it that this ideological cesspool of an organization receives not
even so
much as a Lincoln penny.

-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->  Posted by: "Mark A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to