-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nypostonline.com/editorial/14952.htm

                     MAYBE THEY SHOULDN'T  SLEEP AT ALL

               No wonder conservatives refer to the federal
               government as "the nanny state."

               The Consumer Product Safety Commission
               stepped in this week to issue a warning about
               children under the age of two sleeping in their
               parents' beds.

               It did so based on one survey - one survey -
               that attributed 515 baby deaths over a
               seven-year period to sleeping in their parents'
               bed.

               The first question this raises is: Why is the
               Consumer Product Safety Commission of all
               agencies conducting this study? Last we
               checked, neither parents nor babies fall under
               anyone's definition of "product."

               There is no indication that a faulty bed or
               pillow caused any of these cases of early death.
               Instead, it is unquantifiable actions such as
               "overlying" or an adult occasionally suffocating
               an infant.

               The survey attributes 64 baby deaths a year to
               sharing the parental bed - out of3.9 million
               American babies born each year. And it still
               issued its front-page warning despite the fact
               that this number is statistically insignificant
               from the number of babies in cribs - 50 a year
               -who die because they get their heads caught
               between the slats.

               Now compare these numbers with the hundreds
               upon hundreds of millions of babies born for
               millennia who have slept close to their parents.

               Child safety is vitally important. But it is
               nothing short of irresponsible for the federal
               government to be terrifying parents based on
               the flimsiest of evidence. And it's nothing short
               of shocking for the Consumer Product Safety
               Commission to be butting in.

               Here's something of a radical notion - how
               about letting parents decide how best to care for
               their babies? Uncle Sam, consider yourself
               relieved of this particular baby-sitting duty.

--
-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to