-Caveat Lector- We don't need a 3rd Party; we need a 2nd Party! -----Original Message----- From: Cliff Hume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 10, 1999 3:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freedomfight] Re: femme takeover fulfills Satan's promise toEve Bard We don't need a 3rd Party; we need a 2nd Party! Right on, Bard. A third party or any other number of parties is essential for dividing the votes up so that the CFR controllers always get their man in office. Building a second party requires identifying and throwing from office those representatives who do not abide by the terms of the Constitution. Building that second party can take place by electing statesmen to either of the two parties. Don't be misled by labels Voting along party lines and not for people is very dangerous to the Republic; Dr, Larry McDonald, the Congressman from Georgia, was shot down on flight 007 over Soviet waters. Though a Democrat, Congressman McDonald's voting record was 100 percent conservative. The powers that be spent millions of dollars in his riding trying to get rid of him. Judge Clarence Thomas, an Afro-American conservative, had millions spent on a smear campaign to keep him out of the Supreme Court. Clinton, a Democrat, has done everything against the Republic and the Constitution and women, and the whole left wing in the controlled media and elsewhere, including the women's movements suffering from his abuse, have rallied and spent multi millions of dollars to keep him in office. Ronald Regan was a Republican Governor of California. He was elected on a platform stating that he was going to cut the debt and straighten out all kinds of wrongs in government. When he left office, the controlled media covered his tracks by hiding the fact that he had actually increased the debt by leaps and bounds. While in office, he pardoned thirteen murderers; these same murderers went out free and killed twenty-six more people. When Roosevelt said if anything happens in government, you can bet that it was planned that way", a person has to begin to wonder exactly who it was that these people killed. Were they people who could have explained why things have been done contrary to the rhetoric? Would a socialist lie? On pages 70 to 77 of Professor Carroll Quigley's, Tragedy and Hope - The (1348 page) History of the World in Our Time, Quigley explains how the Republic was changed into a ONE PARTY SYSTEM. Almost anyone today can tell you that it makes from little to no difference who you vote for, the exact same kind of legislation is forthcoming - all of which belongs in the Socialist-Marxist Camp. It takes a lot of money to run a campaign to be elected to political office these days and if socialism and communism are movements of 'the downtrodden masses' while most of these masses are sitting on their asses in the pubs drinking beer, where are they getting all of the funds from to elect these people who are destroying the Republic and the freedoms that the Republic was supposed to grant them? Follow the elephantine tracks of the money crowd, the Armand Hammers and such, for the answer. Armand Hammer's father was one of the founding members of the Communist Party, USA. Jimmy Carter, a member of the subversive Council on Foreign Relations, was one of the founding members of the subversive Trilateral Commission, with CFR members David Rockefeller, and Zbigniew Brzezinski - author of Between Two Ages, 334 pages of praise for Marxism. As Zbig puts it on page 72: "That is why Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief: it stresses man's capacity to shape his material destiny - finite and defined as man's only reality - and postulates the absolute capacity of man to truly understand his reality as a point of departure for his active endeavors to shape it. To a greater extent than any previous mode of political thinking, Marxism puts a premium on the systematic and rigorous examination of material reality and on guides to action derived from that examination." The Marxist have a very effective tactic for their program of world domination under the New World Order. The tactic or technique is to take two steps forward and if the peasants begin to get upset or disturbed, or suspicious, by what appears to be happening to their country, they will place someone in office who is capable of being used to make it appear that they are stopping or even reversing a trend. The controlled media easily accomplishes this goal in that they know that over 75 percent of the voting public receive almost 100 percent of their information from television. Since Woodrow Wilson's term in office, only two Presidents, Linden Johnson and Ronald Reagan, were not members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Johnson, like Reagan, was a tax and spend liberal, but it was Ronald Reagan who put more members of the CFR in government positions than any president before him. It was also Reagan who increased the debt higher than all presidents in history combined. Someone wrote and told me not to knock the peoples idols. I am aware of the fact that truth is stranger than fiction and also that "the truth hurts", but as a very wise author pointed out to me many years ago, many of the sayings taught to us were meant to deliberately mislead. Take for example: "What you don't know can't hurt you." In actual fact, it is those things that you do not know that often hurt the most. This is the kind of thought which brings people to kill or discredit the messenger bearing bad news, all of which comes from twisted logic. How many people have been sold the bill of goods which states that a favorable balance of trade is very good for the country. If you put that to the test of logic, the very best and most favorable balance of trade would be to turn all of our productivity over to the communists and marxist. The US tax-payers, unbeknownst to the majority, have supported every marxist-communist dictatorship that has stated on numerous occasions that they are going to bury us. From one administration to the next, year in, year out, from Woodrow Wilson to William Jefferson Clinton, the con goes on. At 11:57 AM 10/10/99 -0700, you wrote: >Man severs his relationship with God > >Man was given privileges that no other creation had been given before. God >gave man dominion over all creatures of the earth. Man was given the right >of self-determination and thus could do whatever he desired. He alone was in >control of his destiny. Angels, on the other hand, are created to serve God >and man. Rebelling against God means instant removal from heaven. There are >no second chances. Angels can not repent after rebelling against God. > >In the beginning, God created this beautiful garden in a place called Eden. >He created numerous plants and trees for humans as well as animals to eat. >He also created the tree of life, and the tree of the knowledge of good and >evil. Adam and Eve had no shame among them. God told them to eat the fruit >of the trees that He had made. He requested nothing from them and gave them >only one rule, "Do not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil." >Unfortunately for us, they broke that one rule. He told them that if they >ate the fruit from this tree, they would surely die. No where in scripture >does it indicate the fruit was an apple! > >Satan, being his own devious self, saw an opportunity to make Adam sin >against God. He knew he himself could not persuade Adam to eat from the >tree. He therefore possessed the body of a serpent and attempted to persuade >Eve. Eve would not eat the fruit initially. However, Satan told Eve she >would become like God. Eve took and ate the fruit, but nothing appeared to >have happened. She then brought the fruit to Adam and asked him to eat it. >He remembered what God had told him regarding the fruit from this tree, but >Eve seemed perfectly fine. Adam unwisely ate the fruit and their eyes were >immediately opened. They knew that they were naked and attempted to cover >themselves with fig leaves. Adam was the head of the family. He should have >taken control of the situation. Note again that Eve was not aware of what >she had done until Adam ate the fruit. > >God, as He normally did in the afternoon, came down in the garden to speak >with Adam and Eve. They heard Him walking toward them and hid themselves. He >called out to Adam, "Adam where are you?" Adam replied, "We're naked and >were hiding from You." God said, "Who told you that you are naked? Did you >eat from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?" Adam replied, "This >woman that you gave me made me do it." > >Because of their disobedience to God's commandment, they were punished for >their actions. God said to Eve, "I will greatly multiply your sorrow and >your conception; In pain you shall bring forth children; Your desire shall >be for your husband, and he shall rule over you"(1). The punishment on Eve >and hence other women was two-fold. Any woman who has given birth will >acknowledge that it is a painful experience. The expressions I saw on my >wife's face during labor led me to thank God that it was her having our >child instead of me. Eve was created to be equal to Adam and he treated her >as such. Her sin destroyed this equality and established the husband as the >head of the family--a fact that has been ignored in recent history. > >Because Adam heeded the voice of his wife and ate the forbidden fruit, God >cursed the ground. Adam would now have to work to produce his own food. God >then said, "Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and >evil." He then killed an animal and gave them the skin as clothing. The >killing of the animal was probably a traumatic event in their lives. They >had never seen death before(2). Without the shedding of blood, there can be >no remission from sin(3). > >Because the tree of life was also in the garden, God drove Adam and Eve out >of Eden so that they could not eat of its fruit ever again. He then placed >angels at the east end of Eden with a flaming sword so they could not >re-enter the garden. The authority they had over the planet earth was taken >away and Satan became the god of this world. >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- - >---- >Footnotes >(1) Genesis 3:16. Return to text. >(2) NKJV; Genesis 1:26 & 27 indicates that vegetation was given to both >humans and animals for food. There are no indications that Adam and Eve ate >animals prior to their sin against God. Man in his present form cannot >survive without certain nutrients from animals. We can obtain the needed >protein from plant life, but essential vitamins, such as vitamin B-12, are >only available through animal sources. It would have taken a great deal of >effort to determine the correct combinations of foods for a balanced diet. >Unlike today, they did not have the convenience of going to the local store >and purchasing needed vitamins and minerals. However, located in the garden >of Eden was the Tree of Life. The fruit from this tree probably provided >everything needed to sustain life. Initially, they may have eaten meat. I >assumed from verse 1:27 that animals did not initially eat one another. > >(3) Hebrews 9:20. >http://www.ghgcorp.com/hollaway/mansever.html > >Bard > >We don't need a 3rd Party; we need a 2nd Party! > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/freedomfight >http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/freedomfight http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
