-Caveat Lector-
-Subject: The Population Control Agenda 2/2
A Personal UPDATE Article
http://www.khouse.org/articles/update/popcontrol2.html
Beyond Birth Control:
The Population Control Agenda (Part 2)
by Dr. Stan Monteith, M.D.
[Ed. Note: Last month we began a two-part series on the New World agenda
behind many "social programs" whose goal is to reduce the population of the
world. We continue this month with a look at some specific examples.]
The Infamous Tuskegee Study
The influence of population control advocates can be seen in the Tuskegee
Study, a scientific research program in which 400 syphilis-infected black
men were recruited by the U.S. Public Health Service in 1932. The
participants were told that they would be treated for their infections but
instead had all effective medicine withheld. The black men were actively
prevented from obtaining treatment elsewhere as their bodies, and the bodies
of their wives and children, were systematically ravaged by disease.
The men who conceived this Nazi-style study justified their atrocity by
saying that scientists needed to learn how untreated syphilis progressed in
the human body. For forty years-from 1932 until 1972-the genocidal Tuske-gee
Study continued. It was not until 1972, after one newspaper finally broke
the story, that the study was finally terminated. By that time, only 125 of
the original 400 men survived. According to Margaret Sanger's1 sense of
morality, experiments on "human weeds" were fully justified in the name of
"science."
To this day, 25 years after the end of that grotesque human experiment, none
of the perpetrators of that atrocity has ever been accused or indicted of a
crime. Do you honestly believe for one moment that such an experiment would
have been tolerated here in America had the participants been white men?2
DDT Saved Lives
Another more effective method of reducing world population was devised in
the early 1960s by environmentalists and population-control adherents:
blocking the use of DDT for mosquito and malaria control, which had been
found to be extremely effective in saving human lives.
In 1970 the National Academy of Sciences, in their book Life Sciences,
stated that, "In little more than two decades DDT has prevented 500 million
deaths due to malaria."
To population control advocates, this preservation of human life was
intolerable, so they set out to outlaw further use of the pesticide. Up
until 1970 all reliable scientific data had consistently demonstrated that
DDT was safe for both humans and animals. Indeed, DDT was the safest
pesticide ever known to mankind. Furthermore, it was inexpensive and could
be widely used in third-world countries to control the spread of
insect-borne diseases.
Accordingly, population control adherents set out to have DDT banned in the
name of saving the environment. You probably remember the contrived stories
declaring that DDT caused softening of eggshells, interfered with the
balance of nature, and endangered humanity by entering the food chain. In
truth, all of those stories were fabricated and part of a carefully
coordinated program to block further use of the lifesaving pesticide.
William Ruckelshaus was a longtime member of the Environmental Defense Fund
and Director of the EPA. He outlawed further use of DDT in 1972 despite the
recommendation of the EPA Chairman Investigating Committee, which had heard
six months of testimony on use of the pesticide, and had determined that DDT
was completely safe. When Ruckelshaus outlawed further use of DDT, he signed
the death warrant for hundreds of millions of helpless human beings living
in third-world countries.
In Remembering Silent Spring and Its Consequences, 3 Professor J. Gordon
Edwards quoted from a speech by Victor Yanconne, founder of the
Environmental Defense Fund. In that talk, Mr. Yanconne related a story told
to him by a reporter who had asked Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major
opponents of DDT, whether a ban on DDT wouldn't actually result in far
greater use of more toxic pesticides. Dr. Wurster is reported to have
replied, "So what? People are the cause of all the problems. We have too
many of them. We need to get rid of some of them and this is as good a way
as any."
When asked by the same reporter, "Doctor, how do you square the killing of
people with the mere loss of some birds?" Dr. Wurster is reported to have
replied, "It doesn't really make a lot of difference, because
organophosphate acts locally and only kills farm workers and most of them
are Mexicans and Negroes."4
If the National Academy of Sciences was correct in its 1970 assessment, we
have probably lost over 600 million human lives during the past twenty-five
years since advocates of population control succeeded in outlawing DDT.5
Abortion, Breast Cancer and Population Control
Many physicians are concerned about dramatic increases in breast carcinoma
in women. Despite the fact that 18 scientific studies in domestic and
foreign medical journals have demonstrated the direct relationship between
first-trimester abortions and breast cancer, all efforts to disseminate that
information here in the United States have been consistently blocked by
those favoring abortion and population control.
In the fall of 1996 a new scientific paper consisting of a meta-analysis of
23 scientific studies on the relationship between first trimester abortions
and breast cancer was published in a British medical journal. It
demonstrated a higher incidence of breast cancer in women who had
first-trimester abortions.
In response to that publication, the American Medical Association (AMA), the
American Cancer Society (ACS), and pro-abortion/population control advocates
joined together to attack the conclusions of the authors, and to block all
efforts to disseminate that information to American physicians. The AMA, the
ACS, and the pro-death lobby continue to insist that women must not be
advised of the risk they incur when they destroy the life of their unborn
child.
Current abortion policies in America are absolutely necessary to reduce our
population. That is why a minor child can be taken from school to an
abortion clinic without parental notification. Yet that same child cannot be
given an aspirin without parental consent. It all has to do with population
control.6
The Massacres in Africa
What really happened to Christians in Rwanda between April and July of 1994
is a shocking story. After the Christian Tutsis were disarmed by
governmental decree in the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to
systematically massacre the defenseless Christians beginning in April 1994
and continuing until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets, the Hutu
forces created a state of terror within the helpless Christian population as
they systematically butchered thousands.
The United Nations immediately convened hearings on Rwanda, but Madeline
Albright, American Ambassador to the United Nations, argued strenuously that
neighboring African nations should not be allowed to intervene until the
"civil war had come to an end." In reality, there was no civil war, since
those being slaughtered had no weapons with which to defend themselves; it
was simply a matter of mass murder.
In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Madeline
Albright also insisted that the word "genocide" not be used, and that United
Nations forces stationed in Rwanda were not to be allowed to intervene. In
the three months that followed, between one-half and three-quarters of a
million Christians were systematically dismembered, hacked to death, and
slaughtered in the bloody carnage that ensued. Tens of thousands of
Christians were murdered in churches; tens of thousands more were murdered
in hospitals and schools. On several occasions, United Nations soldiers
stationed in Rwanda actually handed helpless Christians over to members of
the Hutu militia. They then stood by as their screaming charges were
unceremoniously hacked to pieces.
At the end of the carnage in late July 1994, the American government
rewarded the Hutu murderers with millions of dollars in foreign aid. The
American press has been silent about the fact that almost all people
slaughtered were Christians, and that it was our government's policy that
was primarily responsible for blocking efforts by neighboring African
countries to intervene.7
There are dozens of other examples of population control programs which have
been implemented throughout our world by modern-day "Malthusians" in their
effort to ensure that the world population is dramatically curtailed. To
date it is estimated that far more than one billion human lives have been
terminated as a result of the worldwide abortion programs financed by the
United States. In addition, we are beginning to see the devastating effects
of the AIDS epidemic as this plague begins to depopulate large areas of Asia
and Africa. Rational efforts to address the HIV epidemic throughout the
world continue to be blocked. Rather than utilizing proven public health
methods, advocates of population control continue to promote both hedonistic
sex education and condom distribution, which will only assure the disease
will continue to spread.
Notes:
1. Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood, and in The Pivot of
Civilization she called for "the elimination of human weeds," and the
"cessation of charity" because it prolonged the lives of the unfit. See
Personal UPDATE, 9/97 p. 2-5 for more information on her writings.
2. AIDS and the Doctors of Death, Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, pp.
168-170.
3. Remembering Silent Spring and Its Consequences, J. Gordon Edwards, a
monograph, p. 7, available from Radio Liberty or from Dr. Edwards at San
Jose State University.
4. Reported by Chairman John Rarick: House Hearings on the Federal Pesticide
Control Act of 1971, pp. 266-267, in Serial No 92-A, quoted in a treatise by
Dr. J. Gordon Edwards. A taped interview with Dr. Edwards is available from
Radio Liberty, as is his treatise: see also Environmental Overkill, Dixy Lee
Ray, Regnery, p. 77.
5. Environmental Overkill, op cited: pp. 76-77 and 192, see also my 2-hour
interview with Dr. Dixy Lee Ray: see also Dr. Edwards' treatise on DDT,
available from Radio Liberty.
6. "Strong Abortion-Breast Cancer Link Revealed," Washington Times, October
12, 1996, A1.
7. An audio-taped interview with Peter Hammond of Front Line Ministries is
available from Radio Liberty: also see Holocaust in Rwanda, Peter Hammond,
available from In Touch Mission Int'l (ITMI), P.O. Box 28240, Tempe AZ,
85285.
Additional Resources
Strategic Trends Update 1999 Audio Book
Stan Monteith's web site: http://www.industries.net/radio-liberty
Stan Monteith's radio program "Radio Liberty" can be heard at:
http://www.audiocentral.com/rshows/rliberty
This article was first published in the October 1997 edition of Personal
Update.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
