-Caveat Lector-

Government Finalizes Rules Protecting Kids Online

October 20, 1999

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The government said today that for the next two years it
will allow businesses on the Internet to send e-mail to parents for
permission to ask personal questions of their children but only if that
information is not shared with other companies.

That compromise was among the most contentious provisions within the Federal
Trade Commission's ruling on how it will enforce a new law aimed at
protecting the privacy of children under 13 on the Internet.

The FTC's ruling, approved 4-0 by commissioners, is expected to have a
dramatic impact on hundreds of popular Internet sites aimed at children,
which typically offer online games and entertainment in exchange for
personal information that is valuable to marketers.

The FTC decided that Web sites that share personal information disclosed by
children with other companies must obtain a parent's permission through
mailed or faxed paperwork, calls to a toll-free number, a credit-card number
or e-mail that uses cutting-edge digital signature technology.

The agency will begin enforcing the new rules in April.

"There's a real problem out there," FTC Chairman Robert Pitofsky said today.
"We're going to give the industry six months to get its act together to make
changes. After that, we'll monitor these Web sites and we'll take
enforcement action."

The new law, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, requires
operators of commercial Web sites to obtain consent from parents before
asking children under 13 for their names, addresses, telephone numbers or
other identifying information.

"The FTC did a good, balanced job," said Ron Plesser, an attorney who worked
with the Direct Marketing Association and other groups. "Everything's a
compromise -- it's not all great for industry, but it resolves some major
concerns."

Jason Catlett of Junkbusters Corp., who has harshly criticized the FTC on
privacy issues, praised the agency for a "remarkably good job, particularly
considering the complexity of the technologies and given the intensity of
the industry's lobbying for loopholes."

"The intent of Congress and the common sense expectations of parents seemed
to have survived intact," Catlett said.

The problems facing regulators involve the faceless nature of the Internet,
where children often know more about the technology than their parents and
can easily impersonate an adult with a few mouse clicks.

Pitofsky said that in two years the FTC will reconsider whether e-mail can
be more widely used to seek a parent's permission, as techniques improve for
ensuring the identity of e-mail authors. It's currently simple to
impersonate another person -- or a parent _ using e-mail.

"We wanted to leave elbow room to account for emerging technologies,"
Pitofsky said.

The industry, which generally supported the privacy law, warned regulators
that imposing barriers that are too onerous between a child and his favorite
Web site might discourage kids from spending time online.

But Pitofsky said rules requiring a parent to mail or fax their permission
-- a process that could take days -- will be in effect "only if the company
has in mind collecting the information, sorting it out and renting it. That
is a sensitive enough area that the more rigorous approaches are justified."


The FTC also will prohibit a company from using online games or prizes to
entice children into disclosing "more personal information than is
reasonably necessary." And it requires companies to allow parents to review
and delete their child's information, and to refuse to allow further
collection or use of those types of details.

The new law does not require companies to obtain a parent's permission to
collect children's e-mail address to send them information on a one-time
basis, such as a digital coupon for a video game.

The FTC also decided not to require companies that have already collected
information online to ask parents to continue using their children's names
and e-mail addresses.

The privacy law, enacted in October 1998, was prompted by an FTC study last
year of 1,400 Web sites, including one where children were asked to give
their names, addresses, e-mail addresses and ages and say whether they ever
received gifts of stocks, cash, savings bonds or certificates of deposit.

Copyright 1999 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.




=======================
Robert F. Tatman
Computer Help Desk
Desktop & LAN Services
Systems Department
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
215.854.2729
215.854.2788
The contents of this message represent the opinion only of the writer, and
may not be construed to indicate the endorsement of Knight-Ridder, Inc.;
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.; The Philadelphia Inquirer; or the
Philadelphia Daily News.
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to