-Caveat Lector- Re: [CTRL] Convergence: Cycles of Civilization In a message dated 10/23/1999 2:20:26 PM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Also, if you read "Hamlet's Mill," the bottom line is that our constellations and zodiac --a projection of archetypal motifs onto the stars, a kind of "written" record used to teach posterity-- the celestial blueprint was first created at an astronomically remarkable moment about 6000 BC, when the GALACTIC plane intersected the path of the sun and planets at the equinoctial point.">> This theory appears to unnaturally reverse "as above, is below"-- denying the fundamental relationship of the microcosm to the macrocosm. As an example.... We know that the Earth (and it's occupants) are continually effected by the heat, light, and electromagnetic fields (both polar and equatorial) of the Sun. Each person, while having the same basic components, are still unique to their own matter through both their individual predisposition of DNA, and their natal position (date/time stamp) within the Universe. We recognize the effect of these "powers" on the whole of mankind's indivi- duality as natal and conceptual astrology... Each planet, individually unique to it's own matter, is not only guided along it's path by the Sun's magnetic "leash," but also "soaks in" or "reflects" said solar benefactors back toward the Earth itself. We recognize the effects of these "powers" on the whole of the Earth (as Earth Stars), which are but one of the factors for recognizing the planetary grid... This is of course, probably why the Giza pyramids line up to Orion and the Chinese pyramids line up to Draco... AS BELOW, IS ABOVE? The Bible forbids "fortune telling," which at least acknowledges the reality of the possibility; and, we know that charting a daily horoscope through the use of natal astrology can give some form of advance insight or perspective toward the daily events of a person's life. Individuals here on Earth may THINK that they know where they are going on a daily basis (the trajectory of their daily life, if you will), but the changing components of daily life, and their very POSITION on the earth alter those plans.... Accidents happen. Conversely, the trajectories of the heavenlies seem to continue along their seemingly beaten path... >From this beaten path, it is their continually moving orbital presence and magnetic reflection that are recognized as having an effect on mankind, and NOT vice-versa. We do acknowledge the paradox of this situation-- But surely, the "bottom line" of "Hamlet's Mill" must be INcorrect in stating that the projection of archetypal motifs onto the stars was MERELY a kind of "written" record used to teach posterity, as this would ULTIMATELY mean that the actions of mankind would indicate the POSITION of the heavenlies, rather than vice-versa. Whether or not this next quote is taken from "Hamlet's Mill" or from DASgoat, I am unsure, but in either case, this second half of the above statement proves to be more of the same: In a message dated 10/23/1999 2:20:26 PM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "...the celestial blueprint was first created at an astronomically remarkable moment about 6000 BC, when the GALACTIC plane intersected the path of the sun and planets at the equinoctial point." This is like saying that Americans are afforded individual and humane rights because they are RECOGNIZED in the Bill of Rights. DASgoat, please correct me if I am reading these statements in the wrong light, but these remarks seem to infer that it was finite man who made up the schematics from scratch, and imposed them on the Universe which existed prior to his (flesh) creation. It would appear far more likely, that this is the moment in time where "stone age man" came to these REALIZATIONS. Realization is not creation. Discovery is not invention. By whom, however, and whenever this celestial connection was made, speaks only toward the realization and discovery of that which had previously existed. Some might say, that as he began to search for his microcosmic place in the macrocosmic Universe, mankind was Divinely guided toward learning the meaning of stars and constellations for the purpose of revealing far greater truths (GEN 1:14; PS 19:1-5); helping us to further understand the possibility of expanding our just and finite place therein. But, mankind's self adulating pulp fiction prefers to exaggerate his presence and achievement-- sometimes, even to that of Godhood. Giving the already existing celestial mechanics and magnetic framework of the Universe a name does not call it into existence. Unless of course, the namegiver is God Himself; and in my book, mankind is not God. Tsadowq DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
