Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com
http://www.konformist.com/1999/mumia.htm
http://www.konformist.com/1999/mumia-waco.htm


Murder of Mumia Scheduled
Thursday, October 14, 1999
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge just signed the death  warrant for 
African-American activist and journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal. The state-sponsored 
murder of Mumia is scheduled for December 2, 1999. If you can, please  
protest on his behalf (http://mumia.org/story1.html).

The key witness whose testimony doomed Mumia admitted  that her testimony was 
coerced by police. When she  informed the court of this criminal outrage 
during an appeal for a new trial, the presiding judge had her ARRESTED ON THE 
SPOT on an old bad-check charge!! In so doing the judge was a willing party 
to an on-going  effort to intimidate that witness in an effort to have Mumia 
killed in a state-sponsored ritual murder.

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/19991013/ts/crime_mumia_1.html

Below is my report on the witness intimidation. Also be sure to read Richard 
Poe's NewsMax article on MOVE, "The Waco Before Waco," where the FBI helped 
police bomb the MOVE group and then blame it on MOVE:

http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/9/22/85323 


       http://users.erols.com/igoddard/no-recan.htm 

     (free 2 copy (*)-----------------(free 2 forward)

              J U D G E   B A R S   T R U T H
           I N   A B U - J A M A L   A P P E A L 

      By Ian Williams Goddard  (11/02/96)

      A key witness, Veronica Jones, whose testimony 
      previously doomed MOVE activist Mumia Abu-Jamal 
      to a death sentence for the Dec. 9, 1981 death 
      of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner, 
      recently recanted her testimony, stating that 
      her story was the result of police coercion.[1] 
      However,  the judge ruled yesterday that her 
      testimony must be barred from being a factor
      of consideration in the ongoing appeal for 
      a new trail in Philadelphia. [2]

      Ms. Jones stated during appeals for a new trail 
      that right after Faulkner was shot, she told pol-
      ice that she saw two men running from the crime
      scene. Abu-Jamal, a founding member of the Black
      Panther party, could not possibly run because he,
      caught in the cross-fire of the shoot out, was
      shot and seriously wounded. What is more, the 
      officer was shot with a .44 caliber gun while 
      Abu-Jamal carried a .38 caliber gun. [3]

      Soon after her report to police, Ms. Jones found 
      herself in prison charged with armed robbery. Ms. 
      Jones says that two officers visited her in her 
      prison cell and said that the 10-year prison 
      charge would be dropped IF she would falsify her 
      testimony to say that she saw nobody running from 
      the crime scene, thereby effectively framing po-
      litical activist Abu-Jamal. To ensure her free-
      dom, she agreed to falsify her story.  But 14 
      years later, she came clean with the truth.

      Yet now Judge Albert Sabo,  who presided over 
      Abu-Jamal's original legal railroading, has just 
      ruled that her new testimony must be barred as a 
      factor of consideration in the appeal for a new 
      trial. The judge said that this time the testimony 
      of Veronica has suddenly become ``worthy of little 
      or no belief,'' i.e., it's become unreliable. [2] 

      This is an attempt of the judge to scrub reality
      out of existence; an attempt to prohibit all that 
      threatens to liberate this man from chains and 
      from the hangman's noose. 

      Clearly, this part of a continuing conspiracy to 
      kill a man, an outspoken critic of police brutality, 
      that evidence strongly suggests is innocent. As if 
      all this was not enough to prove that Abu-Jamal is 
      continuing to be railroaded, consider this:

      As Veronica was recanting her previously coerced 
      testimony during appeal hearings, before she could 
      even walk off the witness stand, she was ARRESTED 
      on the spot on an old bad-check charge. Judge Sabo 
      had courtroom deputies arrest her, handcuff her, 
      and take her into custody right off the stand!! [4]

      If we needed evidence that her previous testimony 
      had been coerced,  we surely got it right in the 
      courtroom, with the hanging judge orchestrating the 
      coercion this time.  Abu-Jamal's attorney, Leonard 
      Weinglass, blasted this gross act of intimidation,  
      stating: ``It's brutal, it's coercive, it's shock-
      ing. It shouldn't happen...in this country.'' [4]
      ________________________________________________
      [1] "Witness Recanting Testimony Against Abu-Jamal 
      Appears in Court," Associated Press (09/18/96).
      [2] "Judge Bars Recantation of Witness Who Helped 
      Convict Abu-Jamal," Associated Press (11/01/96).
      [3] "The Case for Mumia Abu-Jamal," Rick Finley, 
      Collegiate Times (4/17/96), see first URL below. 
      [4] "Witness Arrested After Recanting Statement 
      Against Abu-Jamal," Associated Press (10/01/96).

      http://www.mumia.org 
      http://mojo.calyx.net/~refuse/mumia/index.html 
      http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/mumia002.htm 
      http://www.mdle.com/WrittenWord/rfinley/finley21.htm 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
GODDARD'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm


Mumia's Situation Following the new Death Warrant and new Filing in the
Federal Court

by C. Clark Kissinger
10.14.99

What follows is a short summary of Mumia's current legal situation for
activists and speakers working for Mumia. It explains why there must be
a major focus at this time on demanding that the federal district court
in Philadelphia grant a hearing on Mumia�s new petition.

Is Mumia going to be executed on December 2?

No, but his life is in great danger. With the filing on October 15 of a
petition in the federal district court for a new trial for Mumia, the
federal judge is expected to soon grant a stay of execution. A stay, of
course, is only a postponement to allow the federal judge to consider
the new petition. Mumia remains under order of death, and the stay will
be lifted after the federal district court finishes considering the
case.

Governor Ridge signed this death warrant knowing full well that Mumia
would be filing for a new trial in a matter of days, and the death
warrant would be stayed. This is the same thing he did in 1995 when he
signed a death warrant just before Mumia filed a petition for a new
trial in the state courts. It is a political step designed to mislead
people and pressure the courts.

What is the significance of Mumia's new petition?

This is a most critical moment in the whole appeals process. A federal
district judge in Philadelphia is being asked to hold a hearing on
Mumia's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

A motion for habeas corpus (Latin for "let's have the body") comes from
English common law, where it was an appeal to a court to review whether
the King's detention of somebody was legal. In granting the motion, the
court told the King's sheriff to "bring the body" into court and justify
why you are holding him. This practice developed into a procedure in the
U.S. by which federal courts are asked to review criminal convictions by
state courts. What it means in practice is that state governments do not
have an absolute right to take away a person's freedom or life.

So why would a hearing be so important?

Up to this point, all hearings have been in the Pennsylvania state court
system and presided over by Judge Sabo. Sabo routinely denied motions
for discovery and denied subpoenas for key witnesses sought by the
defense. Sabo's actions were then approved by the Pennsylvania Supreme,
most of whose justices are endorsed by the Fraternal Order of Police.

Thus a hearing in federal district court be Mumia FIRST real opportunity
to have the evidence heard and reviewed. It will also be Mumia's LAST
opportunity to present the evidence and witnesses denied by the
Pennsylvania court system. After the federal district court, all higher
federal appeals courts will only review transcripts -- they will not
hear any new evidence.

What is the effect of the new federal laws on death penalty appeals?

The danger is this: the federal district judge who gets this case is not
required to grant Mumia a hearing. He could simply read the Pennsylvania
trial transcripts and issue a ruling. In fact, the 1996 Effective Death
Penalty Act (EDPA) is specifically designed to discourage federal courts
from reviewing and overturning death sentences handed down in the state
courts. This is why public action for Mumia is so important. The
government has to hear a loud popular demand for a hearing, so the
evidence can be heard that would justify a new trial for Mumia.

What the Effective Death Penalty Act attempts to do is to repeal the
federal right of habeas corpus. Under the signboard of "federalism",
both this new law and recent rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court are
attempting to make decisions by state courts final, and far less subject
to federal review. "Federalism" is just a new name for the old doctrine
of "states rights" that attempted to prevent any federal review of white
supremacist courts in the South. Such federal review was a major gain of
the Civil Rights Movement, which the government is now seeking to
reverse. This has to be called out and exposed.

What is the effect of the Supreme Court turning down Mumia's appeal on
October 4?

Earlier this year, Mumia's legal team also petitioned the U.S. Supreme
Court for a "writ of certiorari." This is a request to the Supreme Court
to look at the case before it works its way up through the normal habeas
corpus process. Sometimes the Supreme Court will do this, when an
important legal question is presented. In Mumia's case, the Supreme
Court was asked to consider whether it was constitutional to deny him
the right to act as his own attorney and to bar him from the court room
when he protested this denial. In denying this petition, the Supreme
Court was saying that it would not consider these issues now -- the case
will have to go through the federal district court and the circuit court
of appeals first. The U.S. Supreme Court did NOT rule against Mumia on
merit of the issues he raised.

What happens if the federal district judge denies Mumia a new trial
(denies habeas corpus)?

If the judge at the federal district court level rules against him,
Mumia will then appeal to the federal 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. But
if the judge rules in favor of Mumia, the state of Pennsylvania is sure
to appeal to the 3rd Circuit Court. So there will be two rounds of
federal court action in Philadelphia over the next year (the district
court and the circuit court of appeals).

In general, action in the federal courts will go much faster than it did
in the state courts. Thus we are now entering the final phase of the
battle to save Mumia's life. This is why we must proceed with a greater
sense of urgency and determination.
-----------------------
re-sent by Prison Radio
-----------------------
Prison Radio challenges mass incarceration and racism by airing the voices
of men and women in prison. Our educational materials serve
as a catalyst for public activism.

To subscribe to the Prison Radio Zap-email list,
send a blank email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe, send a blank email
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In order to be on the mailing list,
send us a contribution of $25 or more.

Prison Radio
P.O. Box 411074
San Francisco, CA 94141
www.prisonradio.org


MUMIA ON WACO:
=================================================
WACO, ... AGAIN
Mumia Abu-Jamal
September 9, 1999

"Every government is run by liars and nothing they say should be believed."  
-- Journalist I.F. Stone (1907-1989)

With the recent revelation that FBI agents fired several "incendiary devices" 
into the flimsy, 
wooden home, headquarters and church of the Branch Davidian religious commune 
near Waco, Texas, began renewed charges that the agencies and operatives of 
the U.S. Government sparked the deadly conflagration that left 80 men, women 
and children incinerated.

For over 6 years the U.S. Justice Department said no such flammable canisters 
were used at any time on April 19, 1993.  For over six years government 
officials lied, insisting that the Branch Davidians killed themselves by 
setting the fire in any orgy of suicidal violence.

Now, who can really say?  The "incendiary devices" story was broken, not by a 
major U.S. newspaper, or network, but by an independent filmmaker and 
journalist.  The national media is just following somebody else's play.

When the state attacked MOVE headquarters on May 13th, 1985, they also blamed 
MOVE people, saying they set their own home and headquarters aflame, 
incinerating themselves!

To date, almost 15 years after the police mass murder of MOVE men, women, and 
children (11 people), the *only* person to serve even an hour of jail was 
MOVE survivor Ramona Africa, "guilty" only of surviving.

Similarly, the WACO survivors have been socked into prison for exorbitant 
periods of time, based, at least in part, on FBI and government lies at trial.

According to at least one source, there was U.S. Army Delta Force members 
active at WACO.  The magazine "Soldier of Fortune", as early as its August 
1996 issue, reports Delta wasn't some background, observing outfit.  "SOF" 
cites sources which claim Delta actually talked U.S. Attorney General Janet 
Reno into the chemical and armored assault on Mount Carmel.  The magazine 
quotes a Department of Defense attorney saying the Delta unitmembers were 
"forward deployed" on the inner perimeter surrounding Mt. Carmel, adding that 
Delta's role in the assault was "much more advisory than observatory; active, 
not passive."

And now, the same government promises to, once again, "investigate" Waco.  We 
are witnessing the birth of but another, "new and improved," whitewash.

@1999 Mumia Abu-Jamal


If you are interested in a free subscription to The Konformist Newswire, 
please visit http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist/ and sign up. Or, e-mail 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!" 
(Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool catch phrase.)

Visit the Klub Konformist at Yahoo!: 
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/klubkonformist

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Java or juggling?.  Everybody learns something at Learn2.com.  Where
you'll find thousands of free 2torials, affordable online courses, and
useful tips for everyday life.  http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/964


eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/konformist
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications






Reply via email to