> [This is too long to forward, but the audience and topic are too rich
> to pass over. The full text is at
> <http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/19
> 99/11/5/3.text.1>.]
>
>                              THE WHITE HOUSE
>
>                       Office of the Press Secretary
>                          (Hartford, Connecticut)
> ________________________________________________________________________
> For Immediate Release                                   November 4, 1999
>
>                          As Prepared for Delivery
>
>                              SAMUEL R. BERGER
>                         NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR
>                REMARKS TO THE BILDERBERG STEERING COMMITTEE
>
>                              November 4, 1999
>
>                    Strengthening the Bipartisan Center:
>                   An Internationalist Agenda for America
>
> Two weeks ago, I gave a speech in New York at the Council on Foreign
> Relations about the unique and paradoxical position in which America
> finds itself today.  Some of you may have read a few articles about it
> in the op-ed pages.  Come to think of it, some of you may have written a
> few of those articles!
>
> In the speech, I pointed out that we are at the height of our power and
> prosperity.  We face no single, overriding threat to our existence.  The
> ideals of democracy and free markets which we embrace are ascendant
> through much of the world.   After 50 years of building alliances for
> collective defense, common prosperity, and wider freedom, we now have an
> unparalleled opportunity to shape, with others, a better, safer, more
> democratic world.
>
> Most Americans are ready to seize that opportunity, though we sometimes
> differ about how.  Yet there are also some who question whether we need
> to seize it at all.  They believe America can and should go it alone --
> either by withdrawing from the world and relying primarily on our
> military strength to protect us from its dangers . . . or by imposing
> our will on the world, even if it means alienating our closest allies.
> There are elements of isolationism in that view; for whatever its
> intent, its effect is to isolate America from its friends and to define
> America's interests in the narrowest of terms.  There are clearly
> elements of unilateralism in it as well.
>
> I made these arguments in my speech to stimulate a discussion about
> America's appropriate role in the world.  It appears that I've
> succeeded.  This is a discussion Americans need to be having -- before
> decisions are made that do real harm to our capacity to lead.  And I'm
> pleased to have the opportunity to move that dialogue forward this
> evening with you.

Reply via email to